lowing
Banned
+1,662|7087|USA
http://www.local6.com/news/14957504/detail.html


I can not stand this saggin' bullshit. I say pull up your fuckin pants and carry yourself with some respect. These are the same people that wonder why they no one will ever cut them a break.

Having said that, I am torn between my beliefs in personal freedom, (to be able to do what you want, as long as it does not infringe on another right to life liberty and pursuit of happiness) and this article.

Saggin' to me is obnoxious and disrespectful, but it does not infringe on anyone elses personal freedoms. I do not know if it was right to ban someone from the mall for it. I guess streaking does not infringe on the rights or freedoms of others either, but it is right to prohibit it.

Thoughts?
Adams_BJ
Russian warship, go fuck yourself
+2,055|7059|Little Bentcock
The police didn't do anything wrong, it was the kids fault and his family's.
CameronPoe
Member
+2,925|6992
Why on earth would someone get banned from a public place for a pretty inoffensive fashion trend?
Marlboroman82
Personal philosophy: Clothing optional.
+1,022|7059|Camp XRay

If you want your ass to hang out of your pants thats fine by me, just don't expect me to offer you a job or let you date my daughter.
https://i98.photobucket.com/albums/l250/marlboroman82/Untitled-8.png
lowing
Banned
+1,662|7087|USA

Adams_BJ wrote:

The police didn't do anything wrong, it was the kids fault and his family's.
The arrests yes, but I am thinking that this kid should have been left alone in the first place before it escalated
Varegg
Support fanatic :-)
+2,206|7246|NÃ¥rvei

Marlboroman82 wrote:

If you want your ass to hang out of your pants thats fine by me, just don't expect me to offer you a job or let you date my daughter.
You have a daughter ?
Wait behind the line ..............................................................
lowing
Banned
+1,662|7087|USA

CameronPoe wrote:

Why on earth would someone get banned from a public place for a pretty inoffensive fashion trend?
To wear your pants around your ankles  could be offensive and it is painfully, rediculously, stupid and shows a lack of repect to all around you. However, I believe there is no constitutional right NOT to be offended

Last edited by lowing (2008-01-02 06:11:47)

unnamednewbie13
Moderator
+2,072|7208|PNW

CameronPoe wrote:

Why on earth would someone get banned from a public place for a pretty inoffensive fashion trend?
Malls are privately owned and subject to rules set forth by their private owners.

People should consider the anti-sag thing to be an extension of 'no shirt, no shoes, no service.'

Last edited by unnamednewbie13 (2008-01-02 06:23:00)

Marlboroman82
Personal philosophy: Clothing optional.
+1,022|7059|Camp XRay

Varegg wrote:

Marlboroman82 wrote:

If you want your ass to hang out of your pants thats fine by me, just don't expect me to offer you a job or let you date my daughter.
You have a daughter ?
https://i98.photobucket.com/albums/l250/marlboroman82/Untitled-8.png
deeznutz1245
Connecticut: our chimps are stealin yo' faces.
+483|6929|Connecticut
I just look the other way. I stay clear of malls because they are infested with little punks but when I do have to go I keep to myself.
Malloy must go
lowing
Banned
+1,662|7087|USA

deeznutz1245 wrote:

I just look the other way. I stay clear of malls because they are infested with little punks but when I do have to go I keep to myself.
That is why I go to the malls armed, so when I am approached by one of these punks,  I can assume it is a robbery attempt and I can dispatch him with great predjudice and joy.

Most of us American gun owners feel like this. right deez?
unnamednewbie13
Moderator
+2,072|7208|PNW

lowing wrote:

deeznutz1245 wrote:

I just look the other way. I stay clear of malls because they are infested with little punks but when I do have to go I keep to myself.
That is why I go to the malls armed, so when I am approached by one of these punks,  I can assume it is a robbery attempt and I can dispatch him with great predjudice and joy.

Most of us American gun owners feel like this. right deez?
You forgot to mention the fact that you patrol the parking lot looking for people to shoot, in the hopes that it will start a massive 50-way firefight.
Ben0
The Last Gunslinger
+38|6811|Southampton
Dressing like a twat is no reason to arrest someone. So he was wearing saggy jeans so what? I bet other people go and shop wearing shockingly bad hawaiian (sp?) shirts, or socks + sandals but they dont get arrested. Fucking nazi government telling people what to wear now. Tsk.
deeznutz1245
Connecticut: our chimps are stealin yo' faces.
+483|6929|Connecticut

lowing wrote:

deeznutz1245 wrote:

I just look the other way. I stay clear of malls because they are infested with little punks but when I do have to go I keep to myself.
That is why I go to the malls armed, so when I am approached by one of these punks,  I can assume it is a robbery attempt and I can dispatch him with great predjudice and joy.

Most of us American gun owners feel like this. right deez?
lol.
Malloy must go
Marlboroman82
Personal philosophy: Clothing optional.
+1,022|7059|Camp XRay

Ben0 wrote:

Dressing like a twat is no reason to arrest someone. So he was wearing saggy jeans so what? I bet other people go and shop wearing shockingly bad hawaiian (sp?) shirts, or socks + sandals but they dont get arrested. Fucking nazi government telling people what to wear now. Tsk.
So it's ok for you to wear your pants to your ankles with your ass hanging out?
https://i98.photobucket.com/albums/l250/marlboroman82/Untitled-8.png
deeznutz1245
Connecticut: our chimps are stealin yo' faces.
+483|6929|Connecticut

Ben0 wrote:

Dressing like a twat is no reason to arrest someone. So he was wearing saggy jeans so what? I bet other people go and shop wearing shockingly bad hawaiian (sp?) shirts, or socks + sandals but they dont get arrested. Fucking nazi government telling people what to wear now. Tsk.
Like I said I look the other way on this issue, however, the gov has nothing to do with it. There is no law prohibiting that certain attire in that county so the police did not arrest the  man BECAUSE he was wearing baggy clothes. Remember, even though a mall is public domain it is still private property. That is key in this situation because the mall reserves the right to refuse service to anyone for any reason. The report stated that the gentleman had been trespassed. That means it is illegal for the man to even be on the property. We all know security guards are not to bright, maybe a kid paying his way through school is ok but a 40 year old security guard ain't to swift. That peaks my curiosity in the sense that they must remember him from something. Maybe he stands out amongst a thousand little baggy pant twats because his sag is a little excessive, or he caused trouble somewhere along the lines, I don't know, its speculation on my part. What I am saying is he must have done something for a dip shit mall cop to spot him accurately. Now we get to the arrest. Security guards are an authorized agent of the proprietor which in this case is the company that owns the mall. That company pays their taxes in the respective community in which they reside/ operate so it is the duty of the police to remove them from said property for trespassing. Also, if you are trespassed from somewhere that is public domain you must sign a trespass form stating you acknowledge it in order for the trespass to warrant arrest, that tells us that the man was fully aware of his wrongdoing by just being there. The cops would not arrest the man unless the fore mentioned document was presented with his signature on it. That being said the government has absolutely nothing to do with this. It was a civil matter between the man with the saggy pants and the mall, the man signed a conditional document stating he would not return and if he did he would be arrested, and then he returned forcing the issue to turn from civil to criminal.

In other words.................

.........baggy pants man did wrong.

Last edited by deeznutz1245 (2008-01-02 07:40:26)

Malloy must go
deeznutz1245
Connecticut: our chimps are stealin yo' faces.
+483|6929|Connecticut
I try not to make posts that make sense so I apologize in advance to anyone who has become offended by my rational thoughts in the previous post. I am sorry for any confusion and I will end with a "no u" to restore the balance that we all know as deeznutz. Thank you.
Malloy must go
SharkyMcshark
I'll take two
+132|7222|Perth, Western Australia

Marlboroman82 wrote:

Varegg wrote:

Marlboroman82 wrote:

If you want your ass to hang out of your pants thats fine by me, just don't expect me to offer you a job or let you date my daughter.
You have a daughter ?
LOL I showed THAT EXACT scene to my english class when I was critiquing Michael Bay's works. They all went and rented it after that.

PS My dad says he's going to be like that with my little sister. I LOL at the thought.
Mekstizzle
WALKER
+3,611|7057|London, England
I guess this goes in line with all the other fashion shit. Like Crosses/Headscarves/Veils. Honestly who gives a shit, some people need to find something better to do than get offended over pointless things. Just shrug it off and continue life cos it really doesn't affect anyone whatsoever. I hate people who go out of their own way to get offended by things.
m3thod
All kiiiiiiiiinds of gainz
+2,197|7107|UK
Where were the '"i'm gonna shoot your mac daddy black ass for wearing your jeans the wrong way which obviously mean you're going to try to bang my daughter you fag."

Kriss Kross own ass.
Blackbelts are just whitebelts who have never quit.
BlackKoala
Member
+215|6761

CameronPoe wrote:

Why on earth would someone get banned from a public place for a pretty inoffensive fashion trend?
Just an FYI, I go to the mall to buy clothes, not to see someone's ass hanging out of the back of their pants because they don't want to wear a belt.

The guy was banned for it before.  If you get banned from a private place, you are banned until the owner lifts it.  He apparently didn't, they had all rights to get on the guy for it.  I think it's funny they cite racism though,

link

article wrote:

"We feel like we've been prejudiced," Marthe said. "They treat us like a second-class citizen."
lol and buy a goddamn belt
Agent_Dung_Bomb
Member
+302|7172|Salt Lake City

Don't make them pull up their pants.  It's much easier for the cops to catch them after they commit a crime.
lowing
Banned
+1,662|7087|USA

unnamednewbie13 wrote:

lowing wrote:

deeznutz1245 wrote:

I just look the other way. I stay clear of malls because they are infested with little punks but when I do have to go I keep to myself.
That is why I go to the malls armed, so when I am approached by one of these punks,  I can assume it is a robbery attempt and I can dispatch him with great prejudice and joy.

Most of us American gun owners feel like this. right deez?
You forgot to mention the fact that you patrol the parking lot looking for people to shoot, in the hopes that it will start a massive 50-way firefight.
Nope I don't do that, I leave that up to the gangbangers and drug dealers to "self police" themselves. I just order up a tall margarita and cheer, at all of the taxpayer money we save witrh every shot.
Vilham
Say wat!?
+580|7202|UK
If it really bothers you it makes you as pathetic as them.
Mitch
16 more years
+877|6961|South Florida
You know what im going to say.
They were black, just think of how it went down.

The black family acting all black with there 'tough guy family gang' personality on, like they are above the law just cause they bitch about shit enough?
Wow you dont know how much i wanna use the N word here, but i dont wanna get another awm/ban.

Last edited by Mitch (2008-01-02 09:34:32)

15 more years! 15 more years!

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard