Snorkelfarsan
Soup Boy
+32|7041|Stockholm, Sweden
I read a good post on a Swedish "military" forum the other day. (Since I'm from Sweden, obviously) It was a very well written worst case scenario where Sweden is eventually invaded by Russia (a few years from now). Now I don't wanna go in to all the details because the post was several pages long, but pretty much what happened was that Chechnian terrorists attacked the subway in Moscow, Russia. And somehow these terrorists  and/or people who had something to do with them where in Sweden as refugees, so Swedish law prohibits them from being handed over to the Russians. Now I don't remember the whole story, but as I said it was very well written and I just want to give you an overall idea of what happened in the "story". So besides these terrorists being given "asylum" in Sweden, there where a lot of other things going on like Russian border intrusion in to Swedish waters, Swedish coast guard killing Russian sailors, oil drama, u name it. Even though it might sound ridiculous me explaining this, if you read the story and new a bit about Sweden and Russia you would understand. (They have been "enemies" for centuries.) Anyway, just IMAGINE, that for some reason Russia has now invaded Sweden. Not much force was needed since the Swedish armed forces is pretty small now a days (was one of Europes biggest 20 years ago, and there is a big debate in Sweden now on whether we should continue to take money from the armed forces or not - hence this scenario was created). Maybe small skirmishes were fought but the Russians pretty much just rolled in, took out key TV/Radio broadcasting stations, Air Force bases etc. (Again, this is probably not how things would happen, but imagine!)
So within a matter of days most of Sweden is occupied but Russia. Even though there is not any major hostility against the people there is of course tension. After a few weeks a system is set up where Russian guards are patrolling the streets of Stockholm with Swedish police officers and the Russians claim that when the Swedish government have agreed to certain terms than they will pull out. But it seems as there is some kind of a hidden agenda, perhaps the Russians are aiming to stay in Sweden, for more than just a couple of months....

Sweden is not officially a part of NATO, although we work a lot with them. But still I believe that America sees Sweden as their "ally" more than anything else. Not only that, Norway - being a NATO country, is just beside Sweden. So with Sweden occupied by Russia, NATO would surely see that as a threat. Would Finland come to our aid? Perhaps a guerrilla war would start against the occupiers? With Finnish soldiers fighting along side their Swedish comrades just like in WWII (except it was the other way around back then of course).
I'm not sure what the EU would do, but I'm guessing they wouldn't wanna interfere too much because of all the bureaucracy within the EU.

But to my question, do you think that the USA would do anything about the situation, either with or without armed force? Would the US come to our aid?

EDIT: Magpie did us all a huge favor and translated a summarized version of the story:

International Maritime Organization (IMO) Did in 2004 declare the Baltic sea as a protected sea or something, and declared that no oil tankers could enter if the did not have double hulls?
all of the countries surrounding the Baltic except Russia signed the agreement


January 2007
The Swedish coastguard (KBV) boarded two Russian oil tankers to try and send them back to Basra where they came from. Since they did not have a double hull. They did not want to cooperate so the coast guard took control over the ships and escorted them out of kattegat and there the crew were handed back the ship

The oil the ships where carrying was supposed to go to a power plant in kallingrad, but during that time it was the coldest winter months with temps down to -34 and there was hardly any fuel reserves left, they had limited electricity

The Russians said that over 330 ppl die, but there was a public outcry when it came out that 22 of the dead had died in the same old ppl home and they where ww2 war veterans

Russia calls back its ambassador . the ships are sent through again but with a heavy Russian navy escort, the Swedish coastguard orders are ignored . and the transport goes through



May 2007
Russia declares that they are going to raise their fishing quotas with over 40% , even though Swe and Finland protest they go through with it and start to fish outside of gotland (Swedish island) some of the ships are on Swedish territorial waters and when the coastguard try and board a ship a Russian fisher shoots and kills a Coastguard.

After this the coastguard uses Swedish military spec ops to do the boardings , the Russians gets P.O and the Russian fishing fleet is escorted by Navy  ships. Sometimes the ships are in Swedish waters and after a confrontation between them a Swedish Corvette is damaged badly, since a Russian navy ship rammed it. A Russian sailor dies

September 2007
A well planned terror attack occurs during rush hour in the Moscow's underground 2 of the 8 rucksacks have a nervgas in them within 15 min 860 ppl have died due to the nervgas. After a massive manhunt Chechnian separatists are arrested  6 of them are Swedish citizens, they were granted it a few years ago. The money that was used to plan the assault was funded by a  government run relief agency, who thought they where funding a center for raped women outside of Grozny

February 2008
A outbreak of smallpox occurs and is found to have originated from St peterburgs water plant. After two weeks the over 2000 ppl have died and several hundred more have been shoot by Russian troops since they tried to escape from the quarantine area.

as responsible for that act the Russians point the finger at a "Sergej" who lives in Sweden. The Swedish security police question him but release him due to the lack of evidence. Russia demands that he will be sent over but Sweden refuses on the grounds that he has already been questioned by the security police and that Russia does not belong to the EU and that he also risks to get the death penalty if sent over.
There is no way he could be sent to Russia according to the law


Russia threatens Sweden and declares that sergej is outlawed and that they will deal with him some other way. after 2 attempts on sergejs life and
after a media storm  he is given police protection. When a third attempt is made on his life his attacker is killed by a Security police bodyguard.
The attacker is identified as a active officer in the Russian domestic troops
Sweden calls home its ambassador from Russia.

Russia also calls home their ambassador and declare in the UN security council that they no longer accept that Sweden has become a safe haven for Russian enemies


.

March 2008
Rumours of a imminent nuclear terror attack spreads widespread panic in Moscow ,  roads are blocked and looting occurs during several days in the city. The rumour was posted on 10 of Russia's most visited sites. The well written message says that 3 suitcase nukes will be detonated in three named locations in Moscow. This as revenge towards Russia's oppression of the tjetjen ppl.
Nobody is harmed during the days of civil unrest but the economy is hurt, and it is a huge crisis for the Russian industry since nobody is ordering.
Allot of ppl lose their jobs

The messages author is never found but Russian gossip newspapers state that the message probably has its origin in the it country Sweden

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

After that it goes on to tell how Russia managed to invade Sweden ,

Sorry if there are any errors in the text if there is then stfu
Here is a link to the topic on the swedish forum. It was posted back in '04.
I doubt any of you can read it, but if you happen to be swedish, or know someone who can translate it then take your time.

Last edited by Snorkelfarsan (2008-01-08 19:53:12)

ATG
Banned
+5,233|6964|Global Command
I don't think so, unless you have some of our megarich peoples money in your banks.

btw, China is quietly invading Russia right now as we speak, so I seriously don't think you have to worry.

http://www.infoshop.org/inews/article.p … 5180623912
SenorToenails
Veritas et Scientia
+444|6565|North Tonawanda, NY
I would imagine the US would, as would much of western Europe.  (If nothing else, diplomatic aid, etc...)

Sweden has a recognized policy for neutrality, and it is not seen by NATO as a sign of distrust.  Sweden has participated in many NATO actions, like Bosnia and Afghanistan, so I imagine there is a great likelihood that NATO would come to its aid.

Last edited by SenorToenails (2008-01-07 20:18:00)

Major.League.Infidel
Make Love and War
+303|6913|Communist Republic of CA, USA
I'd be willing to bet we'd at least send a CVBG and/or a MEF to the region and exchange words with Russia, demanding they pull out.  Whether it would escalate to a shooting war is up to the gods.
ATG
Banned
+5,233|6964|Global Command

Major.League.Infidel wrote:

I'd be willing to bet we'd at least send a CVBG and/or a MEF to the region and exchange words with Russia, demanding they pull out.  Whether it would escalate to a shooting war is up to the gods.
We did squat for Chechnya. They have oil. Lots of oil. It's why Hitler invaded Russia.
What does Sweden have besides hot blonds?
Major.League.Infidel
Make Love and War
+303|6913|Communist Republic of CA, USA

ATG wrote:

Major.League.Infidel wrote:

I'd be willing to bet we'd at least send a CVBG and/or a MEF to the region and exchange words with Russia, demanding they pull out.  Whether it would escalate to a shooting war is up to the gods.
We did squat for Chechnya. They have oil. Lots of oil. It's why Hitler invaded Russia.
What does Sweden have besides hot blonds?
I'd go to war for Hot Blondes...


You're right though.  I suppose we'd probably do nothing, leave it up to the EU to deal with it.
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6840|North Carolina
I think America would jump at the opportunity to mount a multilateral attack on Russia, so yes.
lowing
Banned
+1,662|7086|USA

Snorkelfarsan wrote:

I read a good post on a Swedish "military" forum the other day. (Since I'm from Sweden, obviously) It was a very well written worst case scenario where Sweden is eventually invaded by Russia (a few years from now). Now I don't wanna go in to all the details because the post was several pages long, but pretty much what happened was that Chechnian terrorists attacked the subway in Moscow, Russia. And somehow these terrorists  and/or people who had something to do with them where in Sweden as refugees, so Swedish law prohibits them from being handed over to the Russians. Now I don't remember the whole story, but as I said it was very well written and I just want to give you an overall idea of what happened in the "story". So besides these terrorists being given "asylum" in Sweden, there where a lot of other things going on like Russian border intrusion in to Swedish waters, Swedish coast guard killing Russian sailors, oil drama, u name it. Even though it might sound ridiculous me explaining this, if you read the story and new a bit about Sweden and Russia you would understand. (They have been "enemies" for centuries.) Anyway, just IMAGINE, that for some reason Russia has now invaded Sweden. Not much force was needed since the Swedish armed forces is pretty small now a days (was one of Europes biggest 20 years ago, and there is a big debate in Sweden now on whether we should continue to take money from the armed forces or not - hence this scenario was created). Maybe small skirmishes were fought but the Russians pretty much just rolled in, took out key TV/Radio broadcasting stations, Air Force bases etc. (Again, this is probably not how things would happen, but imagine!)
So within a matter of days most of Sweden is occupied but Russia. Even though there is not any major hostility against the people there is of course tension. After a few weeks a system is set up where Russian guards are patrolling the streets of Stockholm with Swedish police officers and the Russians claim that when the Swedish government have agreed to certain terms than they will pull out. But it seems as there is some kind of a hidden agenda, perhaps the Russians are aiming to stay in Sweden, for more than just a couple of months....

Sweden is not officially a part of NATO, although we work a lot with them. But still I believe that America sees Sweden as their "ally" more than anything else. Not only that, Norway - being a NATO country, is just beside Sweden. So with Sweden occupied by Russia, NATO would surely see that as a threat. Would Finland come to our aid? Perhaps a guerrilla war would start against the occupiers? With Finnish soldiers fighting along side their Swedish comrades just like in WWII (except it was the other way around back then of course).
I'm not sure what the EU would do, but I'm guessing they wouldn't wanna interfere too much because of all the bureaucracy within the EU.

But to my question, do you think that the USA would do anything about the situation, either with or without armed force? Would the US come to our aid?


Here is a link to the topic on the swedish forum. It was posted back in '04.
I doubt any of you can read it, but if you happen to be swedish, or know someone who can translate it then take your time.
Let me get this straight, you, as a neutral country  who stayed out of WW2 ( except for the collaboration of Sweden to the Nazis) expects that the US would or should come running to your aid if and when you get invaded??!!

Tell ya what, we will promise as much "AID" or assistance as you offered the allies to rid your continent of the Nazi tyranny. Deal?

The nerve it would take for a country like Sweden to ASK or EXPECT help is mind blowing

Last edited by lowing (2008-01-07 21:59:40)

Catbox
forgiveness
+505|7151
everyone outside the US rags on the US and anything the country does or says... until they need help...
Love is the answer
pj666
Member
+16|6800|Sydney, Australia
Let me get this straight, you, as a neutral country  who stayed out of WW2 ( except for the collaboration of Sweden to the Nazis) expects that the US would or should come running to your aid if and when you get invaded??!!

Tell ya what, we will promise as much "AID" or assistance as you offered the allies to rid your continent of the Nazi tyranny. Deal?

The nerve it would take for a country like Sweden to ASK or EXPECT help is mind blowing
Conveniently ignoring the US's neutrality for most of WW2. Which you did in WW1 as well.

I think they invented the term "Came late to the party ..." for the US getting involved in those wars.
pj666
Member
+16|6800|Sydney, Australia

ATG wrote:

Major.League.Infidel wrote:

I'd be willing to bet we'd at least send a CVBG and/or a MEF to the region and exchange words with Russia, demanding they pull out.  Whether it would escalate to a shooting war is up to the gods.
We did squat for Chechnya. They have oil. Lots of oil. It's why Hitler invaded Russia.
What does Sweden have besides hot blonds?
Chechnya is a part of the old Soviet Union, and well within their sphere of influence. The US going into support them would be like Russia supporting Mexican gangs fighting the ATF on the Rio Grande (ignoring the issue that Chechnya kicked off when there was a sane president in the White House who didn't invade countries at the drop of a hat).

The US and Europe would both fire up the tanks and jets if Russia invaded Sweden. There is no way they would let them get away with it. Next thing the Russians would be knocking off Norway, the Baltics, etc if they didn't stop it.

By the same token the Russians know that, so they would be VERY unlikely to invade.
BruceLeet
Member
+4|6639
I dont see a reason why the US would help, Sweden is not a member of NATO
lowing
Banned
+1,662|7086|USA

pj666 wrote:

Let me get this straight, you, as a neutral country  who stayed out of WW2 ( except for the collaboration of Sweden to the Nazis) expects that the US would or should come running to your aid if and when you get invaded??!!

Tell ya what, we will promise as much "AID" or assistance as you offered the allies to rid your continent of the Nazi tyranny. Deal?

The nerve it would take for a country like Sweden to ASK or EXPECT help is mind blowing
Conveniently ignoring the US's neutrality for most of WW2. Which you did in WW1 as well.

I think they invented the term "Came late to the party ..." for the US getting involved in those wars.
WW1  was not our war until the Germans pulled us in by sinking our luxury liner.

WW2 again was not our war but we did help finance the damn thing long before we entered militarily.

YOUR continent was being over ran, and YOU let Germany do so through your borders, so not only DIDN'T you do anything to fight it, you ACTUALLY made it more convenient for them to do so. Sorry no comparison buddy.
SenorToenails
Veritas et Scientia
+444|6565|North Tonawanda, NY

lowing wrote:

pj666 wrote:

Let me get this straight, you, as a neutral country  who stayed out of WW2 ( except for the collaboration of Sweden to the Nazis) expects that the US would or should come running to your aid if and when you get invaded??!!

Tell ya what, we will promise as much "AID" or assistance as you offered the allies to rid your continent of the Nazi tyranny. Deal?

The nerve it would take for a country like Sweden to ASK or EXPECT help is mind blowing
Conveniently ignoring the US's neutrality for most of WW2. Which you did in WW1 as well.

I think they invented the term "Came late to the party ..." for the US getting involved in those wars.
WW1  was not our war until the Germans pulled us in by sinking our luxury liner.

WW2 again was not our war but we did help finance the damn thing long before we entered militarily.

YOUR continent was being over ran, and YOU let Germany do so through your borders, so not only DIDN'T you do anything to fight it, you ACTUALLY made it more convenient for them to do so. Sorry no comparison buddy.
Lowing is right-- WWI was not the USA's war.  It was Germany's unrestricted submarine warfare (sinking the Lusitania included) and the Zimmerman Telegraph that did it. 


As for World War 2 (European Theatre) --

It started with the German/Russian invasion of Poland, right?  That was September 1, 1939.  The US didn't join in officially until early/mid December 1941.  So thats about 2 years of the US not being directly involved.  Then, the war did not end until mid 1945 in Europe.  So if we do the math, the US was in the war for 1942,1943,1944, and half of 1945.  That's hardly "late to the party".  Needless to say, if the US had only 1 front to deal with, it probably would have ended a lot sooner.

I don't think anyone can say that the US stayed out of "most" of World War 2.  In fact, that is just plain incorrect.
nukchebi0
Пушкин, наше всё
+387|6759|New Haven, CT
Especially considering the minuscule amount of conflict between October 1939 and May 1940.
legionair
back to i-life
+336|7058|EU

You aren't in NATO and you like your neutrality. After WWII your government passed our legionnaires to Soviets which after sent them to GULAG. So why wouldn't you pass Chechen terrorists? I think this scenario is ridiculous because if there would be any threat for your independence you will do anything to avoid it, just like every other state. And Russia would be a fool if they just stop in Sweden.
FEOS
Bellicose Yankee Air Pirate
+1,182|6846|'Murka

Turquoise wrote:

I think America would jump at the opportunity to mount a multilateral attack on Russia, so yes.
That's absurd.

However, if NATO decided to act in some way, the US would do its part.
“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein

Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
zeidmaan
Member
+234|6850|Vienna

I think the NATO would implement an arms embargo on Sweden to stop them from getting any weapons to fight. Than they would send some smurfs in to do some drinking and whoring around.
Magpie
international welder....Douchebag Dude, <3 ur mom
+257|6961|Milkystania, yurop
Scary, well I would join the resistance without a doubt if there were none, then form one. if Mr Russian thinks Iraqi resistance looked hard they will be in for a huge  surprise.

And I would expect that European forces would intervene not sure about that the US would come to our aid
RavyGravy
Son.
+617|6840|NSW, Australia

lowing wrote:

pj666 wrote:

Let me get this straight, you, as a neutral country  who stayed out of WW2 ( except for the collaboration of Sweden to the Nazis) expects that the US would or should come running to your aid if and when you get invaded??!!

Tell ya what, we will promise as much "AID" or assistance as you offered the allies to rid your continent of the Nazi tyranny. Deal?

The nerve it would take for a country like Sweden to ASK or EXPECT help is mind blowing
Conveniently ignoring the US's neutrality for most of WW2. Which you did in WW1 as well.

I think they invented the term "Came late to the party ..." for the US getting involved in those wars.
WW1  was not our war until the Germans pulled us in by sinking our luxury liner.

WW2 again was not our war but we did help finance the damn thing long before we entered militarily.

YOUR continent was being over ran, and YOU let Germany do so through your borders, so not only DIDN'T you do anything to fight it, you ACTUALLY made it more convenient for them to do so. Sorry no comparison buddy.
might wana take a second look at where hes from before you go on your little rants there.
lowing
Banned
+1,662|7086|USA

XxRavenxX wrote:

lowing wrote:

pj666 wrote:


Conveniently ignoring the US's neutrality for most of WW2. Which you did in WW1 as well.

I think they invented the term "Came late to the party ..." for the US getting involved in those wars.
WW1  was not our war until the Germans pulled us in by sinking our luxury liner.

WW2 again was not our war but we did help finance the damn thing long before we entered militarily.

YOUR continent was being over ran, and YOU let Germany do so through your borders, so not only DIDN'T you do anything to fight it, you ACTUALLY made it more convenient for them to do so. Sorry no comparison buddy.
might wana take a second look at where hes from before you go on your little rants there.
I thought it was abundantly clear that I was speaking to the post and not the person, but hey, if I have to come out and say that I was not accusing the poster of personally collaborating with Germany or personally allowing Germany to march through Sweden or personally remaining neutral during WW2 or personally owning the continent of Europe, then let this be that acknowledgement.
Snorkelfarsan
Soup Boy
+32|7041|Stockholm, Sweden

SenorToenails wrote:

lowing wrote:

pj666 wrote:


Conveniently ignoring the US's neutrality for most of WW2. Which you did in WW1 as well.

I think they invented the term "Came late to the party ..." for the US getting involved in those wars.
WW1  was not our war until the Germans pulled us in by sinking our luxury liner.

WW2 again was not our war but we did help finance the damn thing long before we entered militarily.

YOUR continent was being over ran, and YOU let Germany do so through your borders, so not only DIDN'T you do anything to fight it, you ACTUALLY made it more convenient for them to do so. Sorry no comparison buddy.
Lowing is right-- WWI was not the USA's war.  It was Germany's unrestricted submarine warfare (sinking the Lusitania included) and the Zimmerman Telegraph that did it. 


As for World War 2 (European Theatre) --

It started with the German/Russian invasion of Poland, right?  That was September 1, 1939.  The US didn't join in officially until early/mid December 1941.  So thats about 2 years of the US not being directly involved.  Then, the war did not end until mid 1945 in Europe.  So if we do the math, the US was in the war for 1942,1943,1944, and half of 1945.  That's hardly "late to the party".  Needless to say, if the US had only 1 front to deal with, it probably would have ended a lot sooner.

I don't think anyone can say that the US stayed out of "most" of World War 2.  In fact, that is just plain incorrect.
Regarding Swedens "neutrality" during WWII. Yes our government were cowards and didnt want to stand up against the nazis so we let them march in to Norway. But on the other, at that time our military was not at all something to brag about, and if we would have tried to stop Hitler we would have ended up as Poland. On the other hand, the a lot of swedes went over to fight with the Finnish during the Finnish Winter war against the Russians.
And another thing, even though the US did have a big part of "saving" Europe during WWII, the efforts only count for a maximum of 30%. It was infact the Russians who did most of the job of silencing the germans. But Brittain and the US take a lot more credit for it. Now dont Im glad you helped out, because otherwise, big parts of Europe would have been a part of the Soviet Union.
Vilham
Say wat!?
+580|7201|UK

ATG wrote:

Major.League.Infidel wrote:

I'd be willing to bet we'd at least send a CVBG and/or a MEF to the region and exchange words with Russia, demanding they pull out.  Whether it would escalate to a shooting war is up to the gods.
We did squat for Chechnya. They have oil. Lots of oil. It's why Hitler invaded Russia.
What does Sweden have besides hot blonds?
Is Chechnya the Causican oil fields? I never have know where Chechnya is other than on the western side of Russia.
Snorkelfarsan
Soup Boy
+32|7041|Stockholm, Sweden

legionair wrote:

You aren't in NATO and you like your neutrality. After WWII your government passed our legionnaires to Soviets which after sent them to GULAG. So why wouldn't you pass Chechen terrorists? I think this scenario is ridiculous because if there would be any threat for your independence you will do anything to avoid it, just like every other state. And Russia would be a fool if they just stop in Sweden.
well as I said, IMAGINE! I dont now what sweden would do with the terrorists. But they would definatley dislike handing them over if they would risk death penalty.
And regarding Sweden during the cold war. Sweden gathered a lot of intelligence for the US, and even though we declared being neutral in the Cold war Sweden cooperated with the US a lot "off the record".
M.O.A.B
'Light 'em up!'
+1,220|6658|Escea

Not sure really maybe if they were asked to help, or they may help immediately, I don't really know. But I do know that the Swedish military would given the Russians some headaches, they've got some neat equipment and weapons etc.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard