monitor...

The old non-Pebble Samsung BW screens did have a panelling issue- a lot of screens were manufactured with very poor quality pictures, color representation, viewing angles etc. However this is very much an old criticism of Samsung that still (sadly) overshadows them. All of their newer monitors have better build qualities, are of a consistently higher-standard, and offer a fantastic price:quality ratio.

Loyal owner and lover of 2x 22" WS Pebbles .

_{libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual}. _{http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/}

2008-01-13 09:07:06

#9

ig: This topic seems to have no actual posts; +1,199|7147

fuck all of you widescreen fanboys. 1600 x 1200/1400 x 1050 > *

2008-01-13 09:44:00

#10

02fxnmaurer: Member; +75|7107|Birmingham UK

after considerin the samsung panel lottery ..think im edging towards the LG

2008-01-13 09:50:17

#11

Ryan: Member; +1,230|7468|Alberta, Canada

LG sucks. I have an LG TV and every once and awhile a huge black box comes up and covers a quarter of the screen.

Samsung.

2008-01-13 10:02:28

#12

MetaL*: Banned; +188|6782|Anaheim, Mexifornia

Lg

Last edited by MetaL* (2008-01-13 10:02:39)

2008-01-13 15:38:19

#13

White-Fusion: Fuck; +616|7177|Scotland

Samsung!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1

2008-01-14 09:18:28

#14

02fxnmaurer: Member; +75|7107|Birmingham UK

http://www.overclockers.co.uk/showprodu … =MO-062-SA

saw this baby today...anyone own one ? have any such opinion on it ?

2008-01-14 09:42:42

#15

Zimmer: Un Moderador; +1,688|7381|Scotland

02fxnmaurer wrote:
http://www.overclockers.co.uk/showproduct.php?prodid=MO-062-SA

saw this baby today...anyone own one ? have any such opinion on it ?

Yes. I have the 20" and its fabulous. It looks okay in pictures, but in real life its very very nice.

Excellent screen. Would recommend to anyone.

Although... get the 20", not the 22" because the resolution is the same and the 22" is stretched. Better image on the 20".

2008-01-14 09:49:44

#16

02fxnmaurer: Member; +75|7107|Birmingham UK

bhuuurrr stretched sounds bad ....i hear the pebble has a tn panel so its no good for watchin at an angle....dont suppose anyone knows how to gt an s panel 22" bw .....i want one so baddd...i would buy a 20" if i hadnt set my mind on a 22"...for high res gaming.

2008-01-14 10:00:34

#17

Zimmer: Un Moderador; +1,688|7381|Scotland

High res gaming? Did you read my post mate?
22" has the SAME resolution as a 20". It's just a stretched screen. You will get no performance difference one 22" than on a 20". They are exactly the same.

2008-01-14 10:03:26

#18

Airwolf: Latter Alcoholic; +287|7345|Scotland

Zimmer wrote:
High res gaming? Did you read my post mate?
22" has the SAME resolution as a 20". It's just a stretched screen. You will get no performance difference one 22" than on a 20". They are exactly the same.

yeah..but I have a 22"

22" is great if the games support 16:10 aspect ratio and if you can afford it

2008-01-14 10:04:22

#19

BlackKoala: Member; +215|6950

Zimmer wrote:
High res gaming? Did you read my post mate?
22" has the SAME resolution as a 20". It's just a stretched screen. You will get no performance difference one 22" than on a 20". They are exactly the same.

Not stretched, just bigger pixels.

2008-01-14 10:05:32

#20

Zimmer: Un Moderador; +1,688|7381|Scotland

Airwolf wrote:
Zimmer wrote:
High res gaming? Did you read my post mate?
22" has the SAME resolution as a 20". It's just a stretched screen. You will get no performance difference one 22" than on a 20". They are exactly the same.
yeah..but I have a 22"

22" is great if the games support 16:10 aspect ratio and if you can afford it

....
22" = 20"

Look at the resolution. Aspect ratio is the same.

1680x1050 = 1680x1050

There is no advantage to a 22"

2008-01-14 10:08:31

#21

02fxnmaurer: Member; +75|7107|Birmingham UK

which one did u go for airwolf...i saw ur thread earlier ...an im basically im going on wat was said in tht one? does the screen looked stretched when using basic windows programs like media player etc as Zimmer has said (above)....and can u comment on watching it at different angles etc..because appaz it isnt so good?

im definitely thinkin the pebble, seen as there are no panel issues....saw the 22 pebble in currys today and it looked excellent but it wasnt turned on or hooked up to anythin ..

02

2008-01-14 10:09:48

#22

02fxnmaurer: Member; +75|7107|Birmingham UK

ahhh the temptation of 2 more inches......lmao......does it look sweet zimmer on bf with tht massive resolution ?

2008-01-14 10:12:24

#23

=DB4D=Slight: Member; +8|6810

drool!
Wish I had some spare cash at the moment. There are so many bits and peices I could get

2008-01-14 10:14:53

#24

Zimmer: Un Moderador; +1,688|7381|Scotland

02fxnmaurer wrote:
ahhh the temptation of 2 more inches......lmao......does it look sweet zimmer on bf with tht massive resolution ?

Two inches is absolutely nothing. For the extra expense its pointless.

2008-01-14 10:39:07

#25

02fxnmaurer: Member; +75|7107|Birmingham UK

hey zimmer or airwolf or anyone with a pebble dnt suppose u could boost a pic up of the monitor with bf2 or just the os running ...would be really helpful....ive definitely decided on a pebble just deliberatin on wat size?

would be much appreciated

02

BF2S Forums monitor...

TheAussieReaper wrote:

.Sup wrote:

02fxnmaurer wrote:

Zimmer wrote:

Zimmer wrote:

Airwolf wrote:

Zimmer wrote:

02fxnmaurer wrote:

Board footer