Oh so you mean like 95% of Serges threads?m3thod wrote:
look i could go around an creating a few hundred threads with the title Good Job USA! And then post a whole load of crap how you fucked up in Iraq, how your economy is getting going down and around the bend, how the dollar is being buttfucked and why your gun laws suck balls...simply to piss you lot off.
This thread of nothing more than flame baiting form the resident OLT.
Read CP post old man.deeznutz1245 wrote:
Oh so you mean like 95% of Serges threads?m3thod wrote:
look i could go around an creating a few hundred threads with the title Good Job USA! And then post a whole load of crap how you fucked up in Iraq, how your economy is getting going down and around the bend, how the dollar is being buttfucked and why your gun laws suck balls...simply to piss you lot off.
This thread of nothing more than flame baiting form the resident OLT.
I read it. Why don't you go into your skivvy drawer and change into a pair of non-bunching panties junior. Kthx.m3thod wrote:
Read CP post old man.deeznutz1245 wrote:
Oh so you mean like 95% of Serges threads?m3thod wrote:
look i could go around an creating a few hundred threads with the title Good Job USA! And then post a whole load of crap how you fucked up in Iraq, how your economy is getting going down and around the bend, how the dollar is being buttfucked and why your gun laws suck balls...simply to piss you lot off.
This thread of nothing more than flame baiting form the resident OLT.
Yeah, those hotheaded southerners, on the top of my head i can only think of one other nation that just as easily or even more easily wreck havoc and starts shooting other people when things go just a little against themHurricaИe wrote:
don't forget the other argentine on this forumGunSlinger OIF II wrote:
serge is going to start freaking out
Yeah I don't get why Argentines have a tendency to just cause chaos when shit goes wrong
Pretty bad, specially since I'm in the travel industry and this strike cost me a few thousand dollars, but thanks for your concern about the behavior of the passengers from around the World. And the passengers are right, you can't wait for two days coz an Airline and the employees have issues to solve.usmarine2005 wrote:
Well this is one way to show your anger....hurt people.
------
"Passengers at Argentina's main airport have damaged ticket counters and thrown objects at staff after an airline cancelled flights for a second day."
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7185615.stm
Thanks dude, but there's no problem since this sucked big time, although I don't get the GJ Arg thing. Aerolineas Argentinas is an airline not a country. Maybe marine doesn't know about it.m3thod wrote:
Your thread title sucks and is little more than your usual e-hissy fit posted for the sole reason of flamebaiting at a respected forum member.
Rule 2: Respect the site, staff, and members.
Since I had a lot of passengers flying this weekend, I would have done that without any problem, lol.DesertFox- wrote:
What do you mean "start"? He's probably the one who broke the counters and whatnot.GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
serge is going to start freaking out
UK did a great job with hooligans in football. They fixed that problem a while ago. And now we should do the same here, lol. Oh, yes we also have violence in our football.konfusion wrote:
I'm Brazilian... I'm supposed to laugh at this.
You have idiots everywhere: the USA, the Middle-East and even Argentina... In the UK you don't have that (thank god, otherwise Heathrow would be so screwed) - instead you have god-damned soccer hooligans.
-konfusion
I have no problem with the content of the thread even though it's boring as shit. It's the retarded inflammatory title that's the issue.sergeriver wrote:
Thanks dude, but there's no problem since this sucked big time, although I don't get the GJ Arg thing. Aerolineas Argentinas is an airline not a country. Maybe marine doesn't know about it.m3thod wrote:
Your thread title sucks and is little more than your usual e-hissy fit posted for the sole reason of flamebaiting at a respected forum member.
Rule 2: Respect the site, staff, and members.
Last edited by m3thod (2008-01-15 02:47:28)
I can tolerate that you say I don't deserve respect, but I won't let you tell a lie about my threads, show me where I did the same, except a few ones in retaliation to marine. I never posted something as GG US. Never. And you know it.deeznutz1245 wrote:
Oh so you mean like 95% of Serges threads?m3thod wrote:
look i could go around an creating a few hundred threads with the title Good Job USA! And then post a whole load of crap how you fucked up in Iraq, how your economy is getting going down and around the bend, how the dollar is being buttfucked and why your gun laws suck balls...simply to piss you lot off.
This thread of nothing more than flame baiting form the resident OLT.
Obviously should have gone to specsavers. You're in luck they give geriatrics a discount.deeznutz1245 wrote:
I read it. Why don't you go into your skivvy drawer and change into a pair of non-bunching panties junior. Kthx.m3thod wrote:
Read CP post old man.deeznutz1245 wrote:
Oh so you mean like 95% of Serges threads?
Again, it was marine. We know how he is. Let him be...and thanks again mate.m3thod wrote:
I have no problem with the content of the thread. It's the retarded inflammatory title that's the issue.sergeriver wrote:
Thanks dude, but there's no problem since this sucked big time, although I don't get the GJ Arg thing. Aerolineas Argentinas is an airline not a country. Maybe marine doesn't know about it.m3thod wrote:
Your thread title sucks and is little more than your usual e-hissy fit posted for the sole reason of flamebaiting at a respected forum member.
Rule 2: Respect the site, staff, and members.
Rofl.m3thod wrote:
Obviously should have gone to specsavers. You're in luck they give geriatrics a discount.deeznutz1245 wrote:
I read it. Why don't you go into your skivvy drawer and change into a pair of non-bunching panties junior. Kthx.m3thod wrote:
Read CP post old man.
Something that marine doesn't know, amongst other things, is the fact that a lot of those poeple were from other countries. All people, Argentinian and not, were very angry, and they were in their right to be angry. Nobody from the company gave them an explanation or even called them to tell them about this. It's all the company's fault. And besides, I don't care about marine, I care about the feww thousand I lost coz of it.CameronPoe wrote:
I'm sure Serge will be able to see through this rather flimsy attack on the entire nation of Argentina based on the acts of a few of its citizens. If all nations were judged on the actions of a minority of vandals then all nations would be regarded as terrible and flawed. It's fair enough to post the story but the thread title is ridiculous. It's like saying 'Good Job USA' and then posting this story:
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,322548,00.html
As for the story itself - what is there to debate? The perpetrators should operate within the law and not destroy the property of the state or of anyone else. I think 99.9% would concur.
Last edited by sergeriver (2008-01-15 02:53:38)
Luxemburg?Varegg wrote:
Yeah, those hotheaded southerners, on the top of my head i can only think of one other nation that just as easily or even more easily wreck havoc and starts shooting other people when things go just a little against themHurricaИe wrote:
don't forget the other argentine on this forumGunSlinger OIF II wrote:
serge is going to start freaking out
Yeah I don't get why Argentines have a tendency to just cause chaos when shit goes wrong
alright, enough of that personal shit now. We know were everyone stands on this. Just let go, and discuss the topic. that goes for all of youm3thod wrote:
Obviously should have gone to specsavers. You're in luck they give geriatrics a discount.deeznutz1245 wrote:
I read it. Why don't you go into your skivvy drawer and change into a pair of non-bunching panties junior. Kthx.m3thod wrote:
Read CP post old man.
The title is a bit misleading but this happened, so it's an issue that I'm sure marine is concerned about.B.Schuss wrote:
alright, enough of that personal shit now. We know were everyone stands on this. Just let go, and discuss the topic. that goes for all of youm3thod wrote:
Obviously should have gone to specsavers. You're in luck they give geriatrics a discount.deeznutz1245 wrote:
I read it. Why don't you go into your skivvy drawer and change into a pair of non-bunching panties junior. Kthx.
And if no one wants to do that, I might just as well close this down.
any attempt to get personal here, will be deleted, and the offender dealt with accordingly.
No Cam did not put it well. You fucking muppets even realize it is a state run airline? Do you? Then you would see it is controlled by Argentina. Then you would understand the state brought this upon themselves. Hence good job Argentina.B.Schuss wrote:
I sense some tension in D&ST.
oh well, I guess Cam put it well. The thread title is a little bit misleading. Maybe, for the sake of forum peace, usmarine would consider editing it to more appropriately fit the topic.
I'll keep the banhammer ready, in case this ends up in a flame war...
Perhaps you need to write more clearly and less ambiguously because the distinct impression you gave was that Argentina 'failed' because of the behaviour of the irate citizens:usmarine2005 wrote:
No Cam did not put it well. You fucking muppets even realize it is a state run airline? Do you? Then you would see it is controlled by Argentina. Then you would understand the state brought this upon themselves. Hence good job Argentina.B.Schuss wrote:
I sense some tension in D&ST.
oh well, I guess Cam put it well. The thread title is a little bit misleading. Maybe, for the sake of forum peace, usmarine would consider editing it to more appropriately fit the topic.
I'll keep the banhammer ready, in case this ends up in a flame war...
So maybe you should use the banhammer and knock it upside your own head. or use it to all the derailers. But oh no, let them continue their bullshit and imply that I am wrong.
Last edited by CameronPoe (2008-01-15 09:26:27)
Yet another thread where you fail to talk about the OP.CameronPoe wrote:
You could have taken the extra 12 seconds to type a sentence outlining that it was in fact the airline you were criticising and not the people, but you didn't...
Even bigger than the blind pilot?Mek-Izzle wrote:
fuck airports. the single biggest disaster to hit the avation industry
You didn't really make it clear what it was that upset you about the article so people were left guessing. Anyone can post a fucking link to a story - are we supposed to read your mind to ascertain what your position on the matter is? The only clue you gave to what you were driving at was a dig at the irate vandals. I addressed what I thought you were getting at in my post. The fact that you can't construct an OP where you clearly and concisely state a position around which a debate can take place is failure on your part, not mine.usmarine2005 wrote:
Yet another thread where you fail to talk about the OP.CameronPoe wrote:
You could have taken the extra 12 seconds to type a sentence outlining that it was in fact the airline you were criticising and not the people, but you didn't...
Or maybe I thought people actually knew about this story and understood it was a state run airline.
Last edited by CameronPoe (2008-01-15 09:34:11)
Oh so sorry it is not in the format that the princess agrees with. So sorry princess. I forgot this was the Harvard debate club.CameronPoe wrote:
failure on your part, not mine.