Peace talks, right?

2008-01-15 12:25:19

#51

CameronPoe: Member; +2,925|6990

sergeriver wrote:
usmarine2005 wrote:
sergeriver wrote:
Yeah, what a shame. Ah, FYI Aerolineas Argentinas belongs to Grupo Marsans from Spain, muack.
It is still the national airline. It is still operated(HQ) out of Buenos Aires. All you guys do is give the money to Iberia. Quite sad really when your national airline gives most of its money to a Spanish group.
Marsans not Iberia. Either way, it's not a state run airline. Your whole argument went down the toilet.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aerolineas … r-collapse

The Argentine government privatised the airline in 1989. American Airlines actually own 8.5% of it incidentally. Not state run - end of story, complete implosion of usmarine's argument.

2008-01-15 12:28:21

#52

sergeriver: Cowboy from Hell; +1,928|7192|Argentina

Maybe this helps you.

http://www.aerolineas.com.ar/ar/index_e … amp;tipo=A

In 2001 The Marsans Group takes charge of the company.

2008-01-15 12:31:18

#53

usmarine: Banned; +2,785|7196

CameronPoe wrote:
. Not state run - end of story, complete implosion of usmarine's argument.

Is it not the national airline?

2008-01-15 12:32:52

#54

sergeriver: Cowboy from Hell; +1,928|7192|Argentina

usmarine2005 wrote:
CameronPoe wrote:
. Not state run - end of story, complete implosion of usmarine's argument.
Is it not the national airline?

It doesn't belong to Iberia, it doens't belong to Argentina and you made look yourself like an ignorant prick, insulting everybody.

2008-01-15 12:33:28

#55

usmarine: Banned; +2,785|7196

sergeriver wrote:
usmarine2005 wrote:
CameronPoe wrote:
. Not state run - end of story, complete implosion of usmarine's argument.
Is it not the national airline?
It doesn't belong to Iberia, it doens't belong to Argentina and you made look yourself like an ignorant prick, insulting everybody.

Is it not the national airline?

2008-01-15 12:34:21

#56

sergeriver: Cowboy from Hell; +1,928|7192|Argentina

usmarine2005 wrote:
sergeriver wrote:
usmarine2005 wrote:
Is it not the national airline?
It doesn't belong to Iberia, it doens't belong to Argentina and you made look yourself like an ignorant prick, insulting everybody.
Is it not the national airline?

So? What has that to do with your thread title? Then I should have named this one GJ US. I didn't because the actions of GWB doesn't represent the whole America. That's a concept you don't manage.

Last edited by sergeriver (2008-01-15 12:36:19)

2008-01-15 12:36:20

#57

KEN-JENNINGS: I am all that is MOD!; +2,991|7067|949

Can you guys limit the bitching to PMs, or possibly to the thread being talked about?

2008-01-15 12:37:19

#58

sergeriver: Cowboy from Hell; +1,928|7192|Argentina

KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
Can you guys limit the bitching to PMs, or possibly to the thread being talked about?

It was closed because our drama queen marine asked for it.

Last edited by sergeriver (2008-01-15 12:44:20)

2008-01-15 12:37:21

#59

usmarine: Banned; +2,785|7196

sergeriver wrote:
So? What has that to do with your thread title? Then I should named this one GJ US.

No. It is ran by Argentinians. (sp?) A regional carrier may fly for United or Delta for example, but it is still controlled by that airline. If ASA fucks up, ASA fucked up, not Delta.

So, say ASA screwed up. I would not make a thread saying GJ Delta. It would be GJ ASA.

2008-01-15 12:37:23

#60

CameronPoe: Member; +2,925|6990

usmarine2005 wrote:
CameronPoe wrote:
. Not state run - end of story, complete implosion of usmarine's argument.
Is it not the national airline?

That is completely and utterly irrelevant. The term 'the national airline' means nothing - it could be renamed Shitair tomorrow because it's owned over 80% by non-Argentinians. It's not a state company - the state has no say in how the thing is run. The only thing it has to do with Argentina is that it's main hub of operations is in Buenos Aires basically. You're stupid fucking thread earlier tried extremely poorly to link Argentina - which one might assume to refer to the Argentine government - with the strife of a nominally Argentinian airline. The fact is it is run by Spaniards and Americans. Case closed - your crap poorly thought-through thread fails unbelievably. Next time think before typing.

Last edited by CameronPoe (2008-01-15 12:37:46)

2008-01-15 12:38:28

#61

CameronPoe: Member; +2,925|6990

usmarine2005 wrote:
sergeriver wrote:
So? What has that to do with your thread title? Then I should named this one GJ US.
No. It is ran by Argentinians. (sp?) A regional carrier may fly for United or Delta for example, but it is still controlled by that airline. If ASA fucks up, ASA fucked up, not Delta.

So, say ASA screwed up. I would not make a thread saying GJ Delta. It would be GJ ASA.

Small but important correction: run by Spaniards and Americans primarily. You said 'Good job Argentina', perhaps you should have said 'Good Job Aerolineas Argentina'.

Last edited by CameronPoe (2008-01-15 12:39:23)

2008-01-15 12:39:18

#62

usmarine: Banned; +2,785|7196

CameronPoe wrote:
Next time think before typing.

Oh shut up. So you did not like the title. Boo fucking who. get over it you little bitch.

2008-01-15 12:39:39

#63

sergeriver: Cowboy from Hell; +1,928|7192|Argentina

usmarine2005 wrote:
sergeriver wrote:
So? What has that to do with your thread title? Then I should named this one GJ US.
No. It is ran by Argentinians. (sp?) A regional carrier may fly for United or Delta for example, but it is still controlled by that airline. If ASA fucks up, ASA fucked up, not Delta.

So, say ASA screwed up. I would not make a thread saying GJ Delta. It would be GJ ASA.

You supported your thread title by saying it was a state run airline, hence GJ Argentina, .... more BS.

2008-01-15 12:39:46

#64

CameronPoe: Member; +2,925|6990

usmarine2005 wrote:
CameronPoe wrote:
Next time think before typing.
Oh shut up. So you did not like the title. Boo fucking who. get over it you little bitch.

I know you love me really. XXX

2008-01-15 12:39:58

#65

Mekstizzle: WALKER; +3,611|7056|London, England

Those damn Saudis

2008-01-15 12:41:12

#66

sergeriver: Cowboy from Hell; +1,928|7192|Argentina

usmarine2005 wrote:
CameronPoe wrote:
Next time think before typing.
Oh shut up. So you did not like the title. Boo fucking who. get over it you little bitch.

Dude, seriously stop the insults. You'll get banned. Discuss things like a grown up.

2008-01-15 12:41:21

#67

usmarine: Banned; +2,785|7196

sergeriver wrote:
usmarine2005 wrote:
sergeriver wrote:
So? What has that to do with your thread title? Then I should named this one GJ US.
No. It is ran by Argentinians. (sp?) A regional carrier may fly for United or Delta for example, but it is still controlled by that airline. If ASA fucks up, ASA fucked up, not Delta.

So, say ASA screwed up. I would not make a thread saying GJ Delta. It would be GJ ASA.
You supported your thread title by saying it was a state run airline, hence GJ Argentina, .... more BS.

"the government of Argentina (5%), and employees (3%)"

Last time I checked, the government IS the state.

Last edited by usmarine2005 (2008-01-15 12:41:47)

2008-01-15 12:42:41

#68

sergeriver: Cowboy from Hell; +1,928|7192|Argentina

usmarine2005 wrote:
sergeriver wrote:
usmarine2005 wrote:

No. It is ran by Argentinians. (sp?) A regional carrier may fly for United or Delta for example, but it is still controlled by that airline. If ASA fucks up, ASA fucked up, not Delta.

So, say ASA screwed up. I would not make a thread saying GJ Delta. It would be GJ ASA.
You supported your thread title by saying it was a state run airline, hence GJ Argentina, .... more BS.
"the government of Argentina (5%), and employees (3%)"

Last time I checked, the government IS the state.

Lol, you lost it. 5%, lol. They have the last say, lol.

2008-01-15 12:43:32

#69

CameronPoe: Member; +2,925|6990

usmarine2005 wrote:
sergeriver wrote:
usmarine2005 wrote:
No. It is ran by Argentinians. (sp?) A regional carrier may fly for United or Delta for example, but it is still controlled by that airline. If ASA fucks up, ASA fucked up, not Delta.

So, say ASA screwed up. I would not make a thread saying GJ Delta. It would be GJ ASA.
You supported your thread title by saying it was a state run airline, hence GJ Argentina, .... more BS.
"the government of Argentina (5%), and employees (3%)"

Last time I checked, the government IS the state.

5%

You are really clutching at straws here. Your thread was an attempt to say 'Argentina sucks' perhaps you should have entitled it 'The 5% of the company Aerolineas Argentina controls has contributed towards crap performance'. I wonder how much influence that 5% gets them in board decisions.......? Hmmmm.

American Airlines owns more of it than the fucking Argentinian state!

Last edited by CameronPoe (2008-01-15 12:44:12)

2008-01-15 12:45:34

#70

usmarine: Banned; +2,785|7196

CameronPoe wrote:
usmarine2005 wrote:
sergeriver wrote:
You supported your thread title by saying it was a state run airline, hence GJ Argentina, .... more BS.
"the government of Argentina (5%), and employees (3%)"

Last time I checked, the government IS the state.
5%

You are really clutching at straws here. Your thread was an attempt to say 'Argentina sucks' perhaps you should have entitled it 'The 5% of the company Aerolineas Argentina controls has contributed towards crap performance'. I wonder how much influence that 5% gets them in board decisions.......? Hmmmm.

American Airlines owns more of it than the fucking Argentinian state!

They still own it. It is HQ'd in BA. The hub is in Argentina. Most of its employees are Argentinian. GJ Argentina.

Last edited by usmarine2005 (2008-01-15 12:46:14)

2008-01-15 12:47:11

#71

sergeriver: Cowboy from Hell; +1,928|7192|Argentina

Look marine I don't give a shit for your opinions, but if you make a thread put the right info on it. The company belongs to Marsans, end of story. And you should know that, working at PrickAir.

2008-01-15 12:49:24

#72

usmarine: Banned; +2,785|7196

sergeriver wrote:
Look marine I don't give a shit for your opinions, but if you make a thread put the right info on it. The company belongs to Marsans, end of story. And you should know that, working at PrickAir.

sergeriver wrote:
Dude, seriously stop the insults. You'll get banned. Discuss things like a grown up.

Good. I will stop. Now go back to talking about Saudi and the US as if it is your business.

2008-01-15 12:51:15

#73

san4: The Mas; +311|7123|NYC, a place to live

sergeriver wrote:
san4 wrote:
How does this undermine the peace talks anyway?
I don't know, but selling weapons while you are supporting peace talks sounds a bit hypocrite.

In other words, it doesn't really undermine the peace talks. It just kind of sounds like it might if you don't think about it very much.

Oh, sorry. I didn't realize this thread had been totally, utterly, completely and irrevocably derailed.

2008-01-15 12:51:36

#74

sergeriver: Cowboy from Hell; +1,928|7192|Argentina

usmarine2005 wrote:
sergeriver wrote:
Look marine I don't give a shit for your opinions, but if you make a thread put the right info on it. The company belongs to Marsans, end of story. And you should know that, working at PrickAir.
sergeriver wrote:
Dude, seriously stop the insults. You'll get banned. Discuss things like a grown up.
Good. I will stop. Now go back to talking about Saudi and the US as if it is your business.

Did I insult you? Are you the company? And yes, what that assholes does is everyone's business. I have respect for America, so I don't make threads like GJ US, I say GJ GWB, who again is an asshole.

2008-01-15 12:52:47

#75

usmarine: Banned; +2,785|7196

sergeriver wrote:
Are you the company?

Ummm...actually yes. You do know what stock options are right?

BF2S Forums Peace talks, right?

sergeriver wrote:

usmarine2005 wrote:

sergeriver wrote:

CameronPoe wrote:

usmarine2005 wrote:

CameronPoe wrote:

sergeriver wrote:

usmarine2005 wrote:

CameronPoe wrote:

usmarine2005 wrote:

sergeriver wrote:

usmarine2005 wrote:

KEN-JENNINGS wrote:

sergeriver wrote:

usmarine2005 wrote:

CameronPoe wrote:

usmarine2005 wrote:

sergeriver wrote:

CameronPoe wrote:

usmarine2005 wrote:

sergeriver wrote:

usmarine2005 wrote:

CameronPoe wrote:

usmarine2005 wrote:

CameronPoe wrote:

sergeriver wrote:

usmarine2005 wrote:

sergeriver wrote:

usmarine2005 wrote:

sergeriver wrote:

usmarine2005 wrote:

usmarine2005 wrote:

sergeriver wrote:

usmarine2005 wrote:

CameronPoe wrote:

usmarine2005 wrote:

sergeriver wrote:

sergeriver wrote:

sergeriver wrote:

sergeriver wrote:

san4 wrote:

usmarine2005 wrote:

sergeriver wrote:

sergeriver wrote:

sergeriver wrote:

Board footer