Don't start any more shit. Let it go.Mek-Izzle wrote:
usmarine and m3thod are a bunch of panzy faggot ...douchebags.
That should start something.
Ok honestly speaking. The only person I've never disagreed or thought "what a fuck post that was" with is gs
lol, it was done in jest. I've never been serious when flaming someonedeeznutz1245 wrote:
Don't start any more shit. Let it go.Mek-Izzle wrote:
usmarine and m3thod are a bunch of panzy faggot ...douchebags.
That should start something.
Ok honestly speaking. The only person I've never disagreed or thought "what a fuck post that was" with is gs
Last edited by Mek-Izzle (2008-01-16 06:18:31)
Last edited by m3thod (2008-01-16 06:29:02)
for god sake man use this! http://forums.bf2s.com/post.php?tid=902 … id=1816441ghettoperson wrote:
Not you, Mek.
If you just read the post after that, and then my reply. You wouldn't have had this big huge misunderstanding with m3thod that almost caused another jihad infatada within bf2sghettoperson wrote:
Not you, Mek.
Last edited by Mek-Izzle (2008-01-16 06:40:22)
although I felt insulted by his words, and what he implied, I did not ban him. I chose not to let my emotions get the best of me. It's called moderation. tbh, I was more disappointed with his words. I always considered him better than that.Mek-Izzle wrote:
lol, it was done in jest. I've never been serious when flaming someonedeeznutz1245 wrote:
Don't start any more shit. Let it go.Mek-Izzle wrote:
usmarine and m3thod are a bunch of panzy faggot ...douchebags.
That should start something.
Ok honestly speaking. The only person I've never disagreed or thought "what a fuck post that was" with is gs
I think usmarine got perm banned, look at the B.Schuss post at the end of the Argie thread he made
Don't worry Schussy, Liberals and terrorists still love you! <3B.Schuss wrote:
although I felt insulted by his words, and what he implied, I did not ban him. I chose not to let my emotions get the best of me. It's called moderation. tbh, I was more disappointed with his words. I always considered him better than that.Mek-Izzle wrote:
lol, it was done in jest. I've never been serious when flaming someonedeeznutz1245 wrote:
Don't start any more shit. Let it go.
I think usmarine got perm banned, look at the B.Schuss post at the end of the Argie thread he made
some would call it appeasement, though...
doesn't matter, he chose a different path anyway. You guys are smart, you figure it out yourselves..
as far as the OP is concerned, I like most of you, if that can be said of people I only know via the web. I try to avoid those who I know are unwilling to engage in a debate that could actually change their mind on the issue at hand.
apart from that, I neither hate nor love anyone here. I simply know most of you too little for that. However, some of you I hold in high regard.
He'll be back.B.Schuss wrote:
although I felt insulted by his words, and what he implied, I did not ban him. I chose not to let my emotions get the best of me. It's called moderation. tbh, I was more disappointed with his words. I always considered him better than that.Mek-Izzle wrote:
lol, it was done in jest. I've never been serious when flaming someonedeeznutz1245 wrote:
Don't start any more shit. Let it go.
I think usmarine got perm banned, look at the B.Schuss post at the end of the Argie thread he made
some would call it appeasement, though...
doesn't matter, he chose a different path anyway. You guys are smart, you figure it out yourselves..
as far as the OP is concerned, I like most of you, if that can be said of people I only know via the web. I try to avoid those who I know are unwilling to engage in a debate that could actually change their mind on the issue at hand.
apart from that, I neither hate nor love anyone here. I simply know most of you too little for that. However, some of you I hold in high regard.
Less of the "we" Albert.ATG wrote:
He'll be back.B.Schuss wrote:
although I felt insulted by his words, and what he implied, I did not ban him. I chose not to let my emotions get the best of me. It's called moderation. tbh, I was more disappointed with his words. I always considered him better than that.Mek-Izzle wrote:
lol, it was done in jest. I've never been serious when flaming someone
I think usmarine got perm banned, look at the B.Schuss post at the end of the Argie thread he made
some would call it appeasement, though...
doesn't matter, he chose a different path anyway. You guys are smart, you figure it out yourselves..
as far as the OP is concerned, I like most of you, if that can be said of people I only know via the web. I try to avoid those who I know are unwilling to engage in a debate that could actually change their mind on the issue at hand.
apart from that, I neither hate nor love anyone here. I simply know most of you too little for that. However, some of you I hold in high regard.
If that's what you mean.
We love marine and his tendency to goes berserk.
Are you kidding me? Nobody was debating the topic in that thread except for like one or two people. yet it was allowed to continue by the mods, along with the other thread. So ya, I get pissed when I get warnings from you guys, yet my threads are allowed to spiral out of control like that. Oh sure a mod can make a thread, kick people out of it, and clean it up. But we do not have that option. So before you jump down my throat, think for a second that there was no debate about the subject.B.Schuss wrote:
I try to avoid those who I know are unwilling to engage in a debate that could actually change their mind on the issue at hand.
I was debating, despite your lame attempt to bash me or your stupid title. And you even insulted everyone when you started a full of hatred topic out of nothing. GG Marine.usmarine2005 wrote:
Are you kidding me? Nobody was debating the topic in that thread except for like one or two people. yet it was allowed to continue by the mods, along with the other thread. So ya, I get pissed when I get warnings from you guys, yet my threads are allowed to spiral out of control like that. Oh sure a mod can make a thread, kick people out of it, and clean it up. But we do not have that option. So before you jump down my throat, think for a second that there was no debate about the subject.B.Schuss wrote:
I try to avoid those who I know are unwilling to engage in a debate that could actually change their mind on the issue at hand.
oh please. Look at your own first post. You didn't even formulate a decent opinion as a basis for debate.usmarine2005 wrote:
Are you kidding me? Nobody was debating the topic in that thread except for like one or two people. yet it was allowed to continue by the mods, along with the other thread. So ya, I get pissed when I get warnings from you guys, yet my threads are allowed to spiral out of control like that. Oh sure a mod can make a thread, kick people out of it, and clean it up. But we do not have that option. So before you jump down my throat, think for a second that there was no debate about the subject.B.Schuss wrote:
I try to avoid those who I know are unwilling to engage in a debate that could actually change their mind on the issue at hand.
followed by a link to the BBC article.usmarine2005 wrote:
Well this is one way to show your anger....hurt people.
Instead, you start throwing around profanities.B.Schuss wrote:
..The thread title is a little bit misleading. Maybe, for the sake of forum peace, usmarine would consider editing it to more appropriately fit the topic...
Define decent.B.Schuss wrote:
I don't get you, I really don't. You seem like a decent guy, why the outburst ?
Wishes are for dreamers and goals are for achieversjord wrote:
I wish I was a valued member of this fine establishment...
Right so if two of your threads had been both derailed, as always, are you telling me you would not be upset? No you may not swear, but that is the way I am. Point is, damn right you would be upset. I have seen the way mods deal with derailing in their threads.B.Schuss wrote:
I don't get you, I really don't. You seem like a decent guy, why the outburst ?
Last edited by usmarine2005 (2008-01-16 11:01:55)
You have derailed that thread from the beginning with the title. Don't play the innocent kid part, it doesn't fit you.usmarine2005 wrote:
Right so if two of your threads had been both derailed, as always, are you telling me you would not be upset? No you may not swear, but that is the way I am. Point is, damn right you would be upset. I have seen the way mods deal with derailing in their threads.B.Schuss wrote:
I don't get you, I really don't. You seem like a decent guy, why the outburst ?