HurricaИe
Banned
+877|6396|Washington DC

colonelioan wrote:

usmarine2005 wrote:

colonelioan wrote:

, ITS NOT MADE TO GO IN A MAN S' ANUS.
So is there a biological difference between a dudes anus and a chick's anus?  I think not.  So no sir, your argument fails.
Does fucking A man s'anus will create a baby? WILL IT? TELL ME.  Mr.Intelligent marine...if that ever exists.
Neither does fucking a girl's anus.

Epic fail is epic.

edit - And who the fuck cares if they make babies or not? Last I heard one of the big worries is overpopulation.

Last edited by HurricaИe (2008-01-16 19:08:30)

Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6840|North Carolina

colonelioan wrote:

usmarine2005 wrote:

colonelioan wrote:

, ITS NOT MADE TO GO IN A MAN S' ANUS.
So is there a biological difference between a dudes anus and a chick's anus?  I think not.  So no sir, your argument fails.
Does fucking A man s'anus will create a baby? WILL IT? TELL ME.  Mr.Intelligent marine...if that ever exists.
Um...  missed a few sex ed classes, eh?...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9V2Fz_yjK50

Last edited by Turquoise (2008-01-16 19:11:42)

colonelioan
Member
+14|6891|Kanada

HurricaИe wrote:

colonelioan wrote:

usmarine2005 wrote:


So is there a biological difference between a dudes anus and a chick's anus?  I think not.  So no sir, your argument fails.
Does fucking A man s'anus will create a baby? WILL IT? TELL ME.  Mr.Intelligent marine...if that ever exists.
Neither does fucking a girl's anus.

Epic fail is epic.

edit - And who the fuck cares if they make babies or not? Last I heard one of the big worries is overpopulation.
A girl has a vagina to get fucked, the man has only the anus, thus he can only fuck the anus of the guy, fucking the girl in the anus isn't homosexual why because....its....a girl wow epic eh?

Are you guys gay or what? Seriously.
usmarine
Banned
+2,785|7197

colonelioan wrote:

Are you guys gay or what? Seriously.
Ya you wanna fuck?
HurricaИe
Banned
+877|6396|Washington DC

colonelioan wrote:

HurricaИe wrote:

colonelioan wrote:

Does fucking A man s'anus will create a baby? WILL IT? TELL ME.  Mr.Intelligent marine...if that ever exists.
Neither does fucking a girl's anus.

Epic fail is epic.

edit - And who the fuck cares if they make babies or not? Last I heard one of the big worries is overpopulation.
A girl has a vagina to get fucked, the man has only the anus, thus he can only fuck the anus of the guy, fucking the girl in the anus isn't homosexual why because....its....a girl wow epic eh?

Are you guys gay or what? Seriously.
Obvious homophobe is obvious

And why don't you answer USM's point about infertile women? They can't have babies either.

Seriously, it's not like homosexuals invade on your rights or liberties or anything. They're people like you, except they have an attraction towards the male gender of their species. Such things have been found in other species in nature as well. The evidence supports the theory that homosexuality is natural.

edit: Your logic sounds not unlike that of Southern slave holders in the 1800s. "They are black, that's not normal to me, therefore they are below me."

Last edited by HurricaИe (2008-01-16 19:14:44)

konfusion
mostly afk
+480|6985|CH/BR - in UK

HurricaИe wrote:

And who the fuck cares if they make babies or not? Last I heard one of the big worries is overpopulation.
Funny thing is, the population in the developed world is going down drastically. Not long before it comes to a recession. In Italy, Switzerland and the UK, I believe, the population growth is tiny - in fact, in Italy it might be negative.

Overpopulation is more of a problem in less developed countries - should we advocate homosexuality there?

-konfusion
HurricaИe
Banned
+877|6396|Washington DC

konfusion wrote:

HurricaИe wrote:

And who the fuck cares if they make babies or not? Last I heard one of the big worries is overpopulation.
Funny thing is, the population in the developed world is going down drastically. Not long before it comes to a recession. In Italy, Switzerland and the UK, I believe, the population growth is tiny - in fact, in Italy it might be negative.

Overpopulation is more of a problem in less developed countries - should we advocate homosexuality there?

-konfusion
Advocating contraceptives and incentives to not have so many children works.
pj666
Member
+16|6801|Sydney, Australia
Marriage is a religious ceremony.  Right or wrong, you can't force a religion to sanctify (that's a religious term) a union they don't allow or approve. It's like complaining Jews don't eat pork or Hari Krishnas don't eat meat or (devout) Muslims don't drink alcohol. That's the religion, you can't pick the bits you like.

I have no problem with a civil union or similar legal standing. This would allow same sex couples who declare themselves life partners or some other inspiring term to have legal standing with property, pensions, etc.

But don't expect religions, or people generally, to blindly support something a lot of those people don't approve of.

Those genitalia hanging from the front are for one reason (well two with pissing) and that's procreating. Biologically we are programmed that way. No procreation equals no more kids (gay or otherwise).

Theologically, marriage is a union of a man and a woman (traditionally with the intent of then having children in wedlock, but that's probably outdated now). 2 men or 2 women does not equal marriage. It's something different!!!! it's like a man complaining he can't get pregnant. If you don't get the fundamental problem inherent in that .....

How can homosexuals say "We are different to you, in that we love the same sex, but we want to be the same as you by calling our civil union marriage"? They spend decades protesting they are different and want to have that accepted, but the first thing they do when they get close to that is want to be the same as heterosexuals. The irony is overwhelming. It's like all the hippies become greedy polluting stock brokers and Washington lobbyists.

There's an old saying - I may not agree with you but I will fight to the death for your right to say it. I may not like the fact of their sexuality, but that doesn't mean I have to smile when I support those rights legally and politically, or call it something it ain't.

And don't even get me started on gay adoption.

This from someone who considerrs himself a liberal. I must be getting old ...
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6840|North Carolina

konfusion wrote:

HurricaИe wrote:

And who the fuck cares if they make babies or not? Last I heard one of the big worries is overpopulation.
Funny thing is, the population in the developed world is going down drastically. Not long before it comes to a recession. In Italy, Switzerland and the UK, I believe, the population growth is tiny - in fact, in Italy it might be negative.

Overpopulation is more of a problem in less developed countries - should we advocate homosexuality there?

-konfusion
*shrugs* Well, I was thinking more along the lines of opening up immigration more in Europe.  You guys really need young immigrants to keep your economies afloat.

America needs them too, but we get almost all that we need from Mexico.
Deadmonkiefart
Floccinaucinihilipilificator
+177|7141

adam1503 wrote:

Because "marriage" is defined as a union between a man and a woman.  Maybe gay people should be afforded rights similar to those of married couples, but that union shouldnt be called a "marriage" because it isnt.
Thank you.  I have been trying to tell people this for years.  Give gays equal benifiets with their civil unions, but don't call it marriage, because that is not what marriage is by definition.
colonelioan
Member
+14|6891|Kanada
Gosh, i guess idiots will remain idiots, gays will remain gays .Common sense doesn't seem to be this place s'forte.

And they you ask your self why is the world fucked up.


But be careful don't go in russia if you are gay, in that country, where people still have a head, if you are gay and wish to pride about it on the street.

The police will come and hold you by the back, while the citizens will punch you in the stomach. Then you will be arrested for disturbing the public place. To give you a fucking lesson.
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6840|North Carolina

Deadmonkiefart wrote:

adam1503 wrote:

Because "marriage" is defined as a union between a man and a woman.  Maybe gay people should be afforded rights similar to those of married couples, but that union shouldnt be called a "marriage" because it isnt.
Thank you.  I have been trying to tell people this for years.  Give gays equal benifiets with their civil unions, but don't call it marriage, because that is not what marriage is by definition.
That makes sense to me.  The problem is that, under the current system, a civil union and a marriage don't have all the same benefits.  If we changed this to be the case, this could be another solution to this issue.

It seems kind of silly that terminology can be so touchy in all this, but I think both sides would relent if we took this route.
usmarine
Banned
+2,785|7197

colonelioan wrote:

Gosh, i guess idiots will remain idiots, gays will remain gays .Common sense doesn't seem to be this place s'forte.

And they you ask your self why is the world fucked up.


But be careful don't go in russia if you are gay, in that country, where people still have a head, if you are gay and wish to pride about it on the street.

The police will come and hold you by the back, while the citizens will punch you in the stomach. Then you will be arrested for disturbing the public place. To give you a fucking lesson.
Bet you have a Hitler poster above your bed.
adam1503
Member
+85|6823|Manchester, UK

Turquoise wrote:

*shrugs* Well, I was thinking more along the lines of opening up immigration more in Europe.  You guys really need young immigrants to keep your economies afloat.
Europe has enough immigrants as it is.  But then thats a whole other discussion, and isnt related in any way at all to the question of gay marriages.
colonelioan
Member
+14|6891|Kanada

usmarine2005 wrote:

colonelioan wrote:

Gosh, i guess idiots will remain idiots, gays will remain gays .Common sense doesn't seem to be this place s'forte.

And they you ask your self why is the world fucked up.


But be careful don't go in russia if you are gay, in that country, where people still have a head, if you are gay and wish to pride about it on the street.

The police will come and hold you by the back, while the citizens will punch you in the stomach. Then you will be arrested for disturbing the public place. To give you a fucking lesson.
Bet you have a Hitler poster above your bed.
Nope sorry.
HurricaИe
Banned
+877|6396|Washington DC

colonelioan wrote:

Gosh, i guess idiots will remain idiots, gays will remain gays .Common sense doesn't seem to be this place s'forte.

And they you ask your self why is the world fucked up.


But be careful don't go in russia if you are gay, in that country, where people still have a head, if you are gay and wish to pride about it on the street.

The police will come and hold you by the back, while the citizens will punch you in the stomach. Then you will be arrested for disturbing the public place. To give you a fucking lesson.
Oh fuck off. Germany 1943 is that way ---->

I'm ashamed to hold citizenship with a stain like you

Last edited by HurricaИe (2008-01-16 19:27:09)

colonelioan
Member
+14|6891|Kanada

HurricaИe wrote:

colonelioan wrote:

Gosh, i guess idiots will remain idiots, gays will remain gays .Common sense doesn't seem to be this place s'forte.

And they you ask your self why is the world fucked up.


But be careful don't go in russia if you are gay, in that country, where people still have a head, if you are gay and wish to pride about it on the street.

The police will come and hold you by the back, while the citizens will punch you in the stomach. Then you will be arrested for disturbing the public place. To give you a fucking lesson.
Oh fuck off. Germany 1943 is that way ---->

I'm ashamed to hold citizenship with a stain like you
Rofl, Where did the idea of me being a Nazi came to you? Did i say something linking to the Nazi Germany?

Do you know your geography? Canada is not in the US you fucking moron.
HurricaИe
Banned
+877|6396|Washington DC

colonelioan wrote:

HurricaИe wrote:

colonelioan wrote:

Gosh, i guess idiots will remain idiots, gays will remain gays .Common sense doesn't seem to be this place s'forte.

And they you ask your self why is the world fucked up.


But be careful don't go in russia if you are gay, in that country, where people still have a head, if you are gay and wish to pride about it on the street.

The police will come and hold you by the back, while the citizens will punch you in the stomach. Then you will be arrested for disturbing the public place. To give you a fucking lesson.
Oh fuck off. Germany 1943 is that way ---->

I'm ashamed to hold citizenship with a stain like you
Rofl, Where did the idea of me being a Nazi came to you? Did i say something linking to the Nazi Germany?

Do you know your geography? Canada is not in the US you fucking moron.
Reading comprehension motherfucker, do you have it?

The Nazis held a similar anti-homosexual belief to you... that homosexuals (and Jews, amongst other people) were responsible for Germany's woes.

As for my "geography"... I'm a Canadian citizen you dipstick. I figure your mind is too small to wrap around that.
lavadisk
I am a cat ¦ 3
+369|7265|Denver colorado

colonelioan wrote:

HurricaИe wrote:

colonelioan wrote:

Gosh, i guess idiots will remain idiots, gays will remain gays .Common sense doesn't seem to be this place s'forte.

And they you ask your self why is the world fucked up.


But be careful don't go in russia if you are gay, in that country, where people still have a head, if you are gay and wish to pride about it on the street.

The police will come and hold you by the back, while the citizens will punch you in the stomach. Then you will be arrested for disturbing the public place. To give you a fucking lesson.
Oh fuck off. Germany 1943 is that way ---->

I'm ashamed to hold citizenship with a stain like you
Rofl, Where did the idea of me being a Nazi came to you? Did i say something linking to the Nazi Germany?

Do you know your geography? Canada is not in the US you fucking moron.
no. most of us Americans dont know where Canada is.
T.Pike
99 Problems . . .
+187|6718|Pennsyltucky

The thread is 6 hours old, haven't read anything bu the OP.

Heterosexuals produce offspring.

Offspring = more potential tax payers.

All we have to do is educate them with our tax money.

WTF are homosexuals contributing to the equation?

NOT that I'm saying that there's anything wrong with being homosexual, I'm  just talking about the repercussions of gov't endorsing a public union between two consulting adults.

Last edited by T.Pike (2008-01-16 19:36:57)

Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6840|North Carolina

T.Pike wrote:

The thread is 6 hours old, haven't read anything bu the OP.

Heterosexuals produce offspring.

Offspring = more potential tax payers.

All we have to do is educate them with our tax money.

WTF are homosexuals contributing to the equation?

NOT I'm saying that there's anything wrong with being homosexual, I'm  just talking about the repercussions of gov't endorsing a public union between two consulting adults.
There is such a thing as adoption....
adam1503
Member
+85|6823|Manchester, UK
It looks like this debate is quickly descending into a bitching tournament, so in an effort to rescue it, Im going to suggest this article about a lesbian couple denied recognition of marriage and why it was denied

http://www.guardian.co.uk/gayrights/sto … 3,00.html#

In his ruling, the judge said: "It is apparent that the majority of people, or at least of governments, not only in England but Europe-wide, regard marriage as an age-old institution, valued and valuable, respectable and respected, as a means not only of encouraging monogamy but also the procreation of children and their development and nurture in a family unit in which both maternal and paternal influences are available in respect of their nurture and upbringing.

"The belief that this form of relationship is the one which best encourages stability in a well-regulated society is not a disreputable or outmoded notion based upon ideas of exclusivity, marginalisation, disapproval or discrimination against homosexuals or any other persons who by reason of their sexual orientation or for other reasons prefer to form a same-sex union."

He added that marriage was, by "longstanding definition and acceptance", a formal relationship between a man and a woman primarily designed for producing and rearing children.
I think it highlights all the reasons why gay partnerships are not equal to a marriage.
T.Pike
99 Problems . . .
+187|6718|Pennsyltucky

So you thin a gay couple would be a better potential adoptee than a hetero couple?

Come on, I'm all for people being themselves & stuff but don't you think a mommy & daad would be better than a mommy & mommy or daddy & daddy?
adam1503
Member
+85|6823|Manchester, UK

T.Pike wrote:

So you thin a gay couple would be a better potential adoptee than a hetero couple?

Come on, I'm all for people being themselves & stuff but don't you think a mommy & daad would be better than a mommy & mommy or daddy & daddy?
I think the only way to start a family is with a man and a woman: whether they adopt ar procreate is up to them.  But starting a family with two men or two women is wrong.  And when you start to talk about children, the desires of the parents become less important; it is what the child needs that matters.  And a child has the right to having a mother and a father.  So when homosexual people say they want to have a child, I say that its not fair on the child to raise them in that way because they deserve a mother and father.

They should accept tha being gay means not being able to have children.

Last edited by adam1503 (2008-01-16 19:43:55)

Ajax_the_Great1
Dropped on request
+206|7082
Um... is there an ad for asian brides in this topic? I see pictures of asian women, their age, weight, where they're from, and what appears to be serial numbers.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard