ig wrote:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/701/3.html
shit looks pretty confusing
yeah...
TSI wrote:
kk. subnetting is basically creating semi-autonomous, subsidiary networks within a larger network, to permit a) easier data flow, usually within the subsidiary network "node" without said data having to go through the entire network and b) to manage data flow levels--i.e. making them lower, to increase performance.
reply with anything else you need to know
well, i know what it is, i need to know how to do it. for instance:
A company is using a Class B IP addressing scheme and expects to need as many as 100 networks. What is the correct subnet mask to use with the network configuration?
255.255.0.0
255.255.240.0
255.255.254.0
255.255.255.0
255.255.255.128
255.255.255.192
A company is planning to subnet its network for a maximum of 27 hosts. Which subnet mask would provide the needed hosts and leave the fewest unused addresses in each subnet?
255.255.255.0
255.255.255.192
255.255.255.224
255.255.255.240
255.255.255.248

Refer to the exhibit. A technician is planning an addressing scheme for a branch office as shown in the exhibit. What is the status of the intended network?
The configuration will work as planned.
The subnetwork mask of host A is incorrect.
The default gateway of host A is a network address.
The addresses on the router LAN interfaces are on the same subnetwork.
The IP address of host A is on a different subnetwork than the subnetwork that the Ethernet router interface is on.
TSI wrote:
killer21 wrote:
Do you know your default subnet masks?
The way I learned it is to use the 2n-2 formula. Hard to explain. I'll point you to this website. Maybe it will help you out.
aye, this is a good one!
i'll look at that, thanks...
Last edited by haffeysucks (2008-01-17 17:21:48)
"people in ny have a general idea of how to drive. one of the pedals goes forward the other one prevents you from dying"