Jesus guys, keep this on topic.
Small hourglass island
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella
tbh i had no idea what it was about lolFatherTed wrote:
Jesus guys, keep this on topic.
No.. If Sinn Fein were a terrorist party it would not be in government. So you are wrong again i'm afraid, It's the Loyalist's who vote for terrorist parties, they are the ones who haven't decommisioned & yet are allowed to be part of the process by the British state, however you don't hear us banging on about it..Vilham wrote:
Haha thanks for proving my point. People vote for a terrorist political party and yet you seem to think there will be no prejudice. /end argument, win.IG-Calibre wrote:
The UK Government put the Soldiers there you whab, of course they authorised their military to stand with their backs to the loyalists and open fire - bloody uppity Catholics demanding rights in their own country. Plus do you think that Bloody Sunday was the only event to happen here? Sinn Fein was a fairly small political party and certainly was not reflective of the majority of Catholic voters, the SDLP a non-violent political party born out of the civil rights movement was the majority Catholic party. Sinn Fien since renouncing violence and stopping the war has been much buoyed by Catholic Voters and are only now the Marjority Nationalist/Republican party because of the polarisation of the community by the conflict. That's how Democracy works mate, you can't complain when voters actually vote..Vilham wrote:
My point? The tragedy of Bloody Sunday was carried out by two moron low rank commanders and was not authorized by the UK government. The terrorist attacks carried out by the IRA were ordered by political party leaders your people vote in... and you try to claim theres no prejudice? So based on your opinion people like Osama Bin Laden can be just change their mind and drop any form of prejudice they hold? I guess Hitler could of just quit his party and claimed he was a totally changed man and didn't believe in any of the things he did... Are you really that naive? There is no such thing as FORMER terrorist.
sigh... i just feel sorry for you IG. Im gunna end it there. You clearly have an inability to understand that just because you say your not a terrorist anymore doesnt change your views on things.
I have asked you before Will, to stop calling me a terrorist it's ludicrous & offensive, it just shows your blinkered anti-Irish bigotry.. I think you should be banned tbh as you do not have any ability to discuss topics using substantive facts, please do not address me again. thank you..Vilham wrote:
sigh... i just feel sorry for you IG. Im gunna end it there. You clearly have an inability to understand that just because you say your not a terrorist anymore doesnt change your views on things.
Okay both of you, I want this to end here. We're having more and more problems with personal vendettas in DAST, and I don't want this carrying on so long we have to give either one, or both of you a ban. Drop it.
Not at all, David Irwin, Loyalist terrorist & man of great vision, spoke a lot of sense and the political dispensation which we now find ourselves in would never have happened without him..M.O.A.B wrote:
Really? You seem to throw insult after insult in the direction of Vilham who so far is pointing out points for debate. If there was a UK citizen who became a statesman who was a former terrorist you'd be singing a different tune.IG-Calibre wrote:
excuse me? calm down? mind your own business mate, I high lighted how I had answered the same question asked me again in the previous post by way of elucidation.. if you've nothing constructive and relevant to add, don't bother..M.O.A.B wrote:
Dude take some drowsy pills or something and calm the hell down, you'd think someone hit a nerve on a every post.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/commen … 290732.ece
Closed at OP request.