PluggedValve wrote:
Sonata, you bring a very fresh perspective for us westerners. I have a couple questions though. You seem to contradict yourself a bit. First you said that Islam is proven then you say that you have to "believe". If its proven, then there is no need for "faith".
This is maybe a language problem,, but I'm not sure ,, anyway, when I said "proven" I meant that you can judge that Islam is true by using your pure mind ,, and I didnt used this word "believed" an opposite to "proven".
PluggedValve wrote:
It seems a bit narrow for you to say that Shiites are not Muslim because they only pray 3 times a day (because of the 12th Imam, i think). They believ in 99% of the same things as you, so it seems like you believe 99% the same as a non muslim. Is that not hippocritical.
To decide if someone is Muslim or not,, you don't count the quantity of his beliefs,, you just see what does he believe in ??
Praying five times a day is a common teaching and very obvious,, so if someone believe that they shouldn't pray five times ,, he is not a Muslim.
The logical reason for this is:
Muhammad says: you have to pray five times.
A person says: we don't have to pray five times.
Well that means this person doesn't believe Muhammad so he is not a Muslim.
PluggedValve wrote:
I am unclear on Mohammed's mission or purpose. I understand he was put there by Allah to spread Islam. If he is spreading Islam using violence(last ditch effort as i understand it) is that actually spreading Islam or is it spreading fear?? If they had to scare people into believing in Islam, then the people they spread it to dont truely believe in Islam. They believe in not being killed for Islam.
Muhammad didn't use violence against any Non-Muslim ,, he fought in particular situations against some particular people.
And generally he don't say: either you follow me or you get killed.
there was three choices:
1- Be a Muslim
2- Live free and respected , but under some conditions,, One obvious condition is "You don't prevent us from spreading Islam and don't fight us for that"
3- Refuse those conditions. and fight.
And note that it is forbidden to kill any woman , child , old man,or anyone who isn't able to fight, even if they are Non-Muslims and refuse following Muhammad.
Generally: killing or just hurting one of those people is considered "sinful" . but there are some exceptions.
So in short: Muhammad don't fight every Non-Muslim Man. He fought in special situations.
There were a lot of Non-Muslims who lived in peace with Muhammad,
and it wasn't allowed to hurt 'em, one was his neighbor , he was a Jew,, and Muhammad didn't hurt him at all,, when this Jew was sick,, Muhammad visited him.
PluggedValve wrote:
If muslim's see non-muslims as "infidels" then how come they can do business with the non muslim?? Seem's a bit silly to trade goods with someone you see as an enemy or lesser being. If Islam's teachings were all true, would God's people (ie. muslims in this case) be living in worse conditions than the infidels?? If so, how does that make an average muslim feel "more holy" than anyone else. Does it not raise questions at least.
Muslims aren't like that.
Let me tell you a story of a real Muslim "AliBinAbyTaleb" to help you understand how a real Muslim thinks :
That great Muslim was at war,, and fighting a Non-muslim warrior,, the Muslim just won the fight and was very closed to kill him,, in that time : the Non-muslim warrior knew that he is dead then he just fired a spittle at the Muslims face ( I dunno what do you call this action in English ) anyway this Muslim left him and didn't kill him. why??
because he is afraid of being killing that guy not totally for God but also for himself (sense he was angry because of that fired spittle),, he wants to kill him only for God ,, and it is wrong to do it for yourself.
Last edited by Sonata (2008-02-06 01:39:46)