I hope not
but adam and eve are completely plausibleMr_biggieballs wrote:
Well, I was thinking today about the whole evolution thing and this popped into my head. It seems unrealistic, but hey, I was bored.
According to this article.. if you have blue eyes.. you're related to each other.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22934464/wi … ?GT1=10815
People with blue eyes have a single, common ancestor, according to new research.
A team of scientists has tracked down a genetic mutation that leads to blue eyes. The mutation occurred between 6,000 and 10,000 years ago, so before then, there were no blue eyes.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22934464/wi … ?GT1=10815
People with blue eyes have a single, common ancestor, according to new research.
A team of scientists has tracked down a genetic mutation that leads to blue eyes. The mutation occurred between 6,000 and 10,000 years ago, so before then, there were no blue eyes.
What you consider a relative is relative.
Would you consider your great great half uncle's stepmom's son in law's twice removed cousin's niece a relative?
Would you consider your great great half uncle's stepmom's son in law's twice removed cousin's niece a relative?
mutos
My eyes have changed from brown, to green, to blue, to green, back to brown several times during the course of my life.S3v3N wrote:
According to this article.. if you have blue eyes.. you're related to each other.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22934464/wi … ?GT1=10815
People with blue eyes have a single, common ancestor, according to new research.
A team of scientists has tracked down a genetic mutation that leads to blue eyes. The mutation occurred between 6,000 and 10,000 years ago, so before then, there were no blue eyes.
Eww. I'm not going to date any more girls with blue eyes.S3v3N wrote:
According to this article.. if you have blue eyes.. you're related to each other.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22934464/wi … ?GT1=10815
Some theories propose that everyone is at least within being fiftieth cousins of one another.
the story of Adam and Eve is not fact.it is not to be taken literally as everyone seems to think.it and much of the Old Testament is full of symbolic and religious truth.no,God did not rip out a man's rib to make a women.it symbolizes the partnership between them.no the world was not created in 7 days.the story is simply trying to show that God creates.topal63 wrote:
Yes, we are all related.
1.) Adam & Eve, if you believe this = we're all related.
Oh, so you met the guy who wrote it. Coolio.aj0404 wrote:
the story of Adam and Eve is not fact.it is not to be taken literally as everyone seems to think.it and much of the Old Testament is full of symbolic and religious truth.no,God did not rip out a man's rib to make a women.it symbolizes the partnership between them.no the world was not created in 7 days.the story is simply trying to show that God creates.topal63 wrote:
Yes, we are all related.
1.) Adam & Eve, if you believe this = we're all related.
I wouldnt doubt it. How did one small population 1000's of years ago turn into 6 billion people today?Drakef wrote:
Some theories propose that everyone is at least within being fiftieth cousins of one another.
Ajax_the_Great1 wrote:
Oh, so you met the guy who wrote it. Coolio.
EE (hats
We call came from the Big Bang.
lolol double entendre
lolol double entendre
Last edited by HurricaИe (2008-01-31 19:09:57)
no.i'm simply giving you the beliefs of a group that has studied the Bible for hundreds of years.Ajax_the_Great1 wrote:
Oh, so you met the guy who wrote it. Coolio.aj0404 wrote:
the story of Adam and Eve is not fact.it is not to be taken literally as everyone seems to think.it and much of the Old Testament is full of symbolic and religious truth.no,God did not rip out a man's rib to make a women.it symbolizes the partnership between them.no the world was not created in 7 days.the story is simply trying to show that God creates.topal63 wrote:
Yes, we are all related.
1.) Adam & Eve, if you believe this = we're all related.
Through mitochondrial DNA they've traced all of humanity down to 3 African women. We're all related and all technically African.
I saw something yesterday on Discovery talking about DNA.
I'm afraid I'm not going to be able to articulate what they said, here goes.
There is very little difference in DNA from one human to another.
Looking at the animal kingdom Ape troops can have VERY different DNA even if the troops are only seperated by a few miles.
So yes, IMHO we are all related.
I'm afraid I'm not going to be able to articulate what they said, here goes.
There is very little difference in DNA from one human to another.
Looking at the animal kingdom Ape troops can have VERY different DNA even if the troops are only seperated by a few miles.
So yes, IMHO we are all related.
Can anyone here explain why we have aquatic skin? (As in our fat attaches to our skin like in sea mammals ie: whales, seals, etc..., and not like all other land mammals, where their skin attaches to their muscles ei: cats, dogs, chimps, etc...)
I've just always wondered that.
I've just always wondered that.
Sober enough to know what I'm doing, drunk enough to really enjoy doing it
slowly.GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
I wouldnt doubt it. How did one small population 1000's of years ago turn into 6 billion people today?Drakef wrote:
Some theories propose that everyone is at least within being fiftieth cousins of one another.
regarding south park...
are we all related to retarded fish frogs squirells too?
it does kinda explain it though lol, just not in depth
Last edited by Nappy (2008-01-31 23:58:18)
Holy shit, a non-Jew who understands the Old Testament.aj0404 wrote:
the story of Adam and Eve is not fact.it is not to be taken literally as everyone seems to think.it and much of the Old Testament is full of symbolic and religious truth.no,God did not rip out a man's rib to make a women.it symbolizes the partnership between them.no the world was not created in 7 days.the story is simply trying to show that God creates.topal63 wrote:
Yes, we are all related.
1.) Adam & Eve, if you believe this = we're all related.
+1 to you.
if everybody was spawned from "adam and eve" then we most certainly would be related...and mangled masses of inbred flesh wrought with genetic deficiencies.
so we basically saying that God lied.Shadowolf wrote:
Holy shit, a non-Jew who understands the Old Testament.aj0404 wrote:
the story of Adam and Eve is not fact.it is not to be taken literally as everyone seems to think.it and much of the Old Testament is full of symbolic and religious truth.no,God did not rip out a man's rib to make a women.it symbolizes the partnership between them.no the world was not created in 7 days.the story is simply trying to show that God creates.topal63 wrote:
Yes, we are all related.
1.) Adam & Eve, if you believe this = we're all related.
+1 to you.
No single sole can understand the old testament because we dont know what God meant with 6 yom-fact
and as a note the world was created in 6 days or yom. pffff
Last edited by stef10 (2008-02-01 10:50:20)
Haha are u nuts, do u realy belive that there where a male and a female in the begining. U must have read the bible to much, the scientists of to day all say that we came to this planet from another planet and i agree.
wtfUncleDan wrote:
Haha are u nuts, do u realy belive that there where a male and a female in the begining. U must have read the bible to much, the scientists of to day all say that we came to this planet from another planet and i agree.
joke? bad one indeed.
Yes, we are all inbreds.
but we are related by DNA