usmarine
Banned
+2,785|7190

Shem wrote:

usmarine wrote:

Shem wrote:

Not all muslims are extremsists, alot of you seem to forget that.
oh boy.  Three pages of this again.  WE KNOW.  THANK YOU.
If people stopped acting like it
Show me where somebody said "all muslims."  Please.
usmarine
Banned
+2,785|7190

Must be extremist kids marching in there as well.  But oh well, I thought they were too poor to protest.  But then wait, I was also told that being poor made them extremists.  I dunno.

https://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/images/cartoon_muhammad_ny_protest_21706.jpg
IRONCHEF
Member
+385|6920|Northern California
Hey, if the most sacred elements of my temple worship can be freely flaunted by anti-mormons all over the web and if I'm ok with it, then muslims should be fine with a completely honest, objective, and even complimentary rendition of their sacred prophet.

In the back of my mind, the devil in me is just chomping at the bit to run naked through northwest Pakistan and the eastern tribal areas of Afghanistan with a big poster of Muhammed sucking on some woman's toes while jacking off on his gay lover....but I can't afford the air fare and i'd be too cold, so I will refrain...oh, and it's not very Christian!


rdx-fx wrote:

No, not all muslims are extremists.

However..

The silence from the moderate muslims when their extremist brothers commit atrocities is deafening.
(Don't see any of the muslim nations exactly rushing to capture and punish Osama Ben Laden for committing atrocities in their religion's name.. but they are Johnny-on-the-spot the instant a Danish newspaper publishes a cartoon).

If a Muslim terrorist blows up a bunch of infidels,
there are a few moderate muslims condemning it on the one end,
a few more extremists on the other end inspired to do the same on the other end,
and a deafening silence from the rest of the muslim population.

Meanwhile, if an infidel posts a picture on Wikipedia.. there's petitions and complaints flying around.
Yet.. it would never occur to them to censure their brothers who are burning American flags, burning George Bush mannequins, and holding "death to America" posters.

Yes, double standards.
Ok, ok... enough with this line of BS.  First, you probably dont' watch Al Jazeera (I do, and I watch other ME news on Mosaic) so you don't know what you're talking about (like usmarine).  They're as pissed about their precious, peaceful religion being trampled by the extremists...EQUALLY as much as Christians are about their extremists.

Do you attack white supremists' web sites with DOS attacks to stem their pretended Christian hate?  No.   Have you picketed in front of Westboro Baptist church demanding they act like real Christians?  probably not.  Did you mail the parents of the kids who went to Jesus Camp declaring it an extremist Christian brainwashing abuse on their children?  Likely no.

So don't go and say the good muslims are not doing anything about their extremist comrads.  They live in just as much fear and complacency as we do with our extremists.

Last edited by IRONCHEF (2008-02-06 11:13:45)

usmarine
Banned
+2,785|7190

IRONCHEF wrote:

First, you probably dont' watch Al Jazeera (I do, and I watch other ME news on Mosaic) so you don't know what you're talking about (like usmarine).
lol...well by god you are the expert.  You saw it on TV.  lulz.
IRONCHEF
Member
+385|6920|Northern California

usmarine wrote:

IRONCHEF wrote:

First, you probably dont' watch Al Jazeera (I do, and I watch other ME news on Mosaic) so you don't know what you're talking about (like usmarine).
lol...well by god you are the expert.  You saw it on TV.  lulz.
Insults instead of comments?  Can mean only one thing.

and yes, if there are protests on the streets being aired, should I not believe it?  Do you EVER give credibility to ANY news channel?
Locoloki
I got Mug 222 at Gritty's!!!!
+216|7069|Your moms bedroom
https://i197.photobucket.com/albums/aa284/Coryfales/Untitled23.jpg

k, and also, muhammed ringtones? wtf ads
usmarine
Banned
+2,785|7190

IRONCHEF wrote:

usmarine wrote:

IRONCHEF wrote:

First, you probably dont' watch Al Jazeera (I do, and I watch other ME news on Mosaic) so you don't know what you're talking about (like usmarine).
lol...well by god you are the expert.  You saw it on TV.  lulz.
Insults instead of comments?  Can mean only one thing.

and yes, if there are protests on the streets being aired, should I not believe it?  Do you EVER give credibility to ANY news channel?
You started with the insult babe.

I visit AJ (english edition) everyday.
David.P
Banned
+649|6703

FatherTed wrote:

Wiki wont fold.
Not so sure about that.

FatherTed wrote:

And the muslims arent going to kill you in your sleep.
They prefer it when you're awake for more pain.

FatherTed wrote:

So chill on the muslim threads.
No!
IRONCHEF
Member
+385|6920|Northern California
usmarine, you're a coward sob... you simply have no ability to discuss things like an adult.  Your "out of context" insult to me is getting old and dried up..like McCain.

You couldn't even answer my questions after calling your cowardly bluff.  Insults are NOT saying you don't know what you're talking about, insults are calling someone a profanity, or using otherwise rude remarks.  I'm actually correct in my assumption that you don't know what you're talking about.  You got your ass handed to you in that other thread..now you're pulling the same shit here...pretending not to include their whole religion when you are.

You are seriously a miserable piece of shit.  You get to win this because it's boring responding to you...you don't dignify my response anymore.
usmarine
Banned
+2,785|7190

IRONCHEF wrote:

usmarine, you're a coward sob... you simply have no ability to discuss things like an adult.  Your "out of context" insult to me is getting old and dried up..like McCain.

You couldn't even answer my questions after calling your cowardly bluff.  Insults are NOT saying you don't know what you're talking about, insults are calling someone a profanity, or using otherwise rude remarks.  I'm actually correct in my assumption that you don't know what you're talking about.  You got your ass handed to you in that other thread..now you're pulling the same shit here...pretending not to include their whole religion when you are.

You are seriously a miserable piece of shit.  You get to win this because it's boring responding to you...you don't dignify my response anymore.
You say I do not know anything.  And just because a swear word is not present, does not mean it is not an insult.  What kind of fucked up logic is that?

Go watch TV so you know more than us.

Last edited by usmarine (2008-02-06 11:27:28)

Roger Lesboules
Ah ben tabarnak!
+316|7006|Abitibi-Temiscamingue. Québec!

Shem wrote:

I actually agree that it should be removed to be honest.

Hey, Im pretty sure a lot of christians would get pissy if we put certain images up there.

Muslims don't like pictures of Mohammed.. respect it imo.
What about non-muslism people who WANT to see a picture of it on a pretty good site like Wikipedia? We would lose our right to their right? Hun hun! No fair!

/me goes to wiki to save muhamad pic and post it a little bit everywhere i get chance to.

Last edited by Roger Lesboules (2008-02-06 11:29:15)

geNius
..!.,
+144|6871|SoCal
I think we should put a cap on victims.  Not everyone can be one.
https://srejects.com/genius/srejects.png
SEREMAKER
BABYMAKIN EXPERT √
+2,187|6997|Mountains of NC

look at some of these repiles :
Dec 4, 2007, Anonymous, Libyan Arab Jamahiriya
That is not allowed in our religious, we want it to be removed. we respect yours ,,you respect ours.

Dec 4, 2007, Sajid Qureshi, India
please do not test our patience.


my fav :
Dec 4, 2007, Syed jalal Akbar, India
tell the infedels and kafirs not to publish,host or carry images of our prophets...if so be prepared to face the wrath of god...and cosequences




hmmmmmmmmm "be prepared" ...................... what a loving bunch of people
https://static.bf2s.com/files/user/17445/carhartt.jpg
M.O.A.B
'Light 'em up!'
+1,220|6652|Escea

SEREMAKER wrote:

look at some of these repiles :
Dec 4, 2007, Anonymous, Libyan Arab Jamahiriya
That is not allowed in our religious, we want it to be removed. we respect yours ,,you respect ours.

Dec 4, 2007, Sajid Qureshi, India
please do not test our patience.


my fav :
Dec 4, 2007, Syed jalal Akbar, India
tell the infedels and kafirs not to publish,host or carry images of our prophets...if so be prepared to face the wrath of god...and cosequences




hmmmmmmmmm "be prepared" ...................... what a loving bunch of people
the last two are priming their C4 with det cord.
SEREMAKER
BABYMAKIN EXPERT √
+2,187|6997|Mountains of NC

M.O.A.B wrote:

SEREMAKER wrote:

look at some of these repiles :
Dec 4, 2007, Anonymous, Libyan Arab Jamahiriya
That is not allowed in our religious, we want it to be removed. we respect yours ,,you respect ours.

Dec 4, 2007, Sajid Qureshi, India
please do not test our patience.


my fav :
Dec 4, 2007, Syed jalal Akbar, India
tell the infedels and kafirs not to publish,host or carry images of our prophets...if so be prepared to face the wrath of god...and cosequences




hmmmmmmmmm "be prepared" ...................... what a loving bunch of people
the last two are priming their C4 with det cord.
probably .................. I'm loading my 700, lets see who gets who first
https://static.bf2s.com/files/user/17445/carhartt.jpg
M.O.A.B
'Light 'em up!'
+1,220|6652|Escea

SEREMAKER wrote:

M.O.A.B wrote:

SEREMAKER wrote:

look at some of these repiles :
Dec 4, 2007, Anonymous, Libyan Arab Jamahiriya
That is not allowed in our religious, we want it to be removed. we respect yours ,,you respect ours.

Dec 4, 2007, Sajid Qureshi, India
please do not test our patience.


my fav :
Dec 4, 2007, Syed jalal Akbar, India
tell the infedels and kafirs not to publish,host or carry images of our prophets...if so be prepared to face the wrath of god...and cosequences




hmmmmmmmmm "be prepared" ...................... what a loving bunch of people
the last two are priming their C4 with det cord.
probably .................. I'm loading my 700, lets see who gets who first
hehe, give me a SAW and I've got your back (after a quick run through how to use it)
SenorToenails
Veritas et Scientia
+444|6559|North Tonawanda, NY

Shem wrote:

Not all muslims are extremsists, alot of you seem to forget that.

Most of us, including myself do not belong to this faith and as such we have no right to say whether or not they should think it acceptable.

If the faith as a whole wants it removed, just remove it, keeping it up there in spite is just a way to spawn a few more extremists.
Uh oh.  We better remove those pictures or else they will get mad!  Please.  Wikipedia is not a muslim publication.  Read Cam's post again:

CameronPoe wrote:

Wikipedia will not buckle. These petition signers are wasting their time. They should go out and have a fucking beer instead of wasting their ink. If I wanna stick a link on Wikipedia to ancient art depicting Jesus fisting Buddha while Moses watches then I'd like my freedom of speech respected (of course the link would have to be of some historical or artistic merit, otherwise it would just be tasteless...).
David.P
Banned
+649|6703

SEREMAKER wrote:

M.O.A.B wrote:

SEREMAKER wrote:

look at some of these repiles :
Dec 4, 2007, Anonymous, Libyan Arab Jamahiriya
That is not allowed in our religious, we want it to be removed. we respect yours ,,you respect ours.

Dec 4, 2007, Sajid Qureshi, India
please do not test our patience.


my fav :
Dec 4, 2007, Syed jalal Akbar, India
tell the infedels and kafirs not to publish,host or carry images of our prophets...if so be prepared to face the wrath of god...and cosequences




hmmmmmmmmm "be prepared" ...................... what a loving bunch of people
the last two are priming their C4 with det cord.
probably .................. I'm loading my 700, lets see who gets who first
Switchblade or Boxcutter? I like the box cutter better because it wont accidentally go off, And i can control the length of the blade. But switch blade is faster and it's perfect for surprise stabbings(Shooting up version not folding)
Skorpy-chan
Member
+127|6774|Twyford, UK
Wikipedia needs censorship, but not THIS kind. They need the pictures of erect cocks removing from random articles on the front page, not removing stuff like that.
Laika
Member
+75|6372
Last I checked, nobody is forcing any muslims to view the pictures.
SenorToenails
Veritas et Scientia
+444|6559|North Tonawanda, NY

Skorpy-chan wrote:

Wikipedia needs censorship, but not THIS kind. They need the pictures of erect cocks removing from random articles on the front page, not removing stuff like that.
I'm not sure that fixing vandalism is the same as censorship.
Zukabazuka
Member
+23|7114

Locoloki wrote:

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/c … i_151b.jpg

not muhammed ;) this is the picture in question
They are complaining about that one? He does look a bit pale :)
konfusion
mostly afk
+480|6979|CH/BR - in UK

Disagree with this entirely. Fuck PC! There are certain pictures/paintings of Jesus, so why shouldn't there be any of Mohammed?

I respect religions, but this is too fucking pc for me.

-konfusion
Pug
UR father's brother's nephew's former roommate
+652|6971|Texas - Bigger than France
Perhaps we can just create a muslim edition of wiki?  Or wait...is there one already?
David.P
Banned
+649|6703
Lol al jazeera. I've seen that one show where they were comparing Israeli's treatment of the palestinians worse then the holocaust! And whats even more fucked up? The program before that one denied the holocaust ever happened!

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard