I don't know...Pug wrote:
Perhaps we can just create a muslim edition of wiki? Or wait...is there one already?
What about http://www.conservapedia.com/Main_Page
- Index »
- Community »
- Debate and Serious Talk »
- Trying to Censor Wikipedia? (asked to remove Mohammed photos)
What about http://www.conservapedia.com/Main_Page
Not the same thing.KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
I don't know...Pug wrote:
Perhaps we can just create a muslim edition of wiki? Or wait...is there one already?
What about http://www.conservapedia.com/Main_Page
I hope these people realize that their bitching only encourages people like myself to post things like this....David.P wrote:
http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/02/05/technology/wiki.php
Seriously What the Fuck? I'm glad wikipedia is not bending to pressure, But for how long?
Like i said in the earlier thread Double Mother Fucken Standards...
No, I was serious.KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
I don't know...Pug wrote:
Perhaps we can just create a muslim edition of wiki? Or wait...is there one already?
What about http://www.conservapedia.com/Main_Page
Hmm, I thought the Qur'an itself was actually; or already; thought of (to Muslims of course) as a sort Islamapedia of Science, Math, History...?Pug wrote:
No, I was serious.KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
I don't know...Pug wrote:
Perhaps we can just create a muslim edition of wiki? Or wait...is there one already?
What about http://www.conservapedia.com/Main_Page
http://www.miraclesofthequran.com/
http://www.sultan.org/articles/QScience.html
http://www.answering-christianity.com/ac20.htm#links
http://www.islamicity.com/Science/iqs/
http://www.themodernreligion.com/verses_sci.htm
I've seen (visited) a great number of these ridiculous sites over the years; & you've got give em credit for how far they attempt to stretch credulity.
Last edited by topal63 (2008-02-06 19:32:02)
Maybe this?Pug wrote:
No, I was serious.KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
I don't know...Pug wrote:
Perhaps we can just create a muslim edition of wiki? Or wait...is there one already?
What about http://www.conservapedia.com/Main_Page
It all depends on your viewpoint. Is graffiti art, vandalism, or racial slurs?SenorToenails wrote:
I'm not sure that fixing vandalism is the same as censorship.Skorpy-chan wrote:
Wikipedia needs censorship, but not THIS kind. They need the pictures of erect cocks removing from random articles on the front page, not removing stuff like that.
This is vandalism.Skorpy-chan wrote:
It all depends on your viewpoint. Is graffiti art, vandalism, or racial slurs?SenorToenails wrote:
I'm not sure that fixing vandalism is the same as censorship.Skorpy-chan wrote:
Wikipedia needs censorship, but not THIS kind. They need the pictures of erect cocks removing from random articles on the front page, not removing stuff like that.
Destroying an article and replacing it with unrelated junk is pretty clearly vandalism.
Last edited by SenorToenails (2008-02-06 19:44:51)
I don't know how many times I have to say it or how many things will reinforce my belief: Wipe out everyone who believes that shit, and destroy all record that it ever existed. Kill them all down to the toddlers and move on with the rest of us.
Steady on dude!Dersmikner wrote:
I don't know how many times I have to say it or how many things will reinforce my belief: Wipe out everyone who believes that shit, and destroy all record that it ever existed. Kill them all down to the toddlers and move on with the rest of us.
You're Genghis Khan's kinda guy.Dersmikner wrote:
I don't know how many times I have to say it or how many things will reinforce my belief: Wipe out everyone who believes that shit, and destroy all record that it ever existed. Kill them all down to the toddlers and move on with the rest of us.
- Index »
- Community »
- Debate and Serious Talk »
- Trying to Censor Wikipedia? (asked to remove Mohammed photos)