GunSlinger OIF II
Banned.
+1,860|7072

.Sup wrote:

dayarath wrote:

.Sup wrote:

They haven't started mining yet. And only Albanians work there since the mines are located deep into Kosovo away from Serbia.
And kosovo is now independant meaning the mine is for the kosovar people. So, with permission to start a company (and most likely mine else they wouldn't be there) in kosovo, how does this equal stealing?
Who said they stole it?? I'm just saying independence of Kosovo is good for USA that's why they were the first to recognize it.
lets do things that are good for slovenia instead?  a country is in it for its own best interest.  every country.
.Sup
be nice
+2,646|6881|The Twilight Zone

GunSlinger OIF II wrote:

.Sup wrote:

dayarath wrote:


And kosovo is now independant meaning the mine is for the kosovar people. So, with permission to start a company (and most likely mine else they wouldn't be there) in kosovo, how does this equal stealing?
Who said they stole it?? I'm just saying independence of Kosovo is good for USA that's why they were the first to recognize it.
lets do things that are good for slovenia instead?  a country is in it for its own best interest.  every country.
Its good to do things in your interest but only if some other country doesn't suffer for it instead.
https://www.shrani.si/f/3H/7h/45GTw71U/untitled-1.png
GunSlinger OIF II
Banned.
+1,860|7072

.Sup wrote:

GunSlinger OIF II wrote:

.Sup wrote:


Who said they stole it?? I'm just saying independence of Kosovo is good for USA that's why they were the first to recognize it.
lets do things that are good for slovenia instead?  a country is in it for its own best interest.  every country.
Its good to do things in your interest but only if some other country doesn't suffer for it instead.
the world doesnt work that way.
Brasso
member
+1,549|7058

ghettoperson wrote:

haffeysucks wrote:

Why would the CIA want to kill Castro?  Maybe because that taking down the leader of a Communist country will yield actual results?

They're wrong anyhow, there's always going to be someone to replace him.
What results are you hoping to yield? And if they replace him, how will that yield results?
I'm saying the CIA is hoping that killing the leader of a Communist country will cause the country to abandon Communist idealism.  But that's entirely untrue and unrealistic.
"people in ny have a general idea of how to drive. one of the pedals goes forward the other one prevents you from dying"
CameronPoe
Member
+2,925|6983

David.P wrote:

This is why i love the CIA! and inb4leftisthate.
Because they can't assassinate someone?
SEREMAKER
BABYMAKIN EXPERT √
+2,187|6996|Mountains of NC

639

a bullet


CIA - " you know that might just work "
https://static.bf2s.com/files/user/17445/carhartt.jpg
David.P
Banned
+649|6702

CameronPoe wrote:

David.P wrote:

This is why i love the CIA! and inb4leftisthate.
Because they can't assassinate someone?
No because they'll never give up trying!
CameronPoe
Member
+2,925|6983

David.P wrote:

CameronPoe wrote:

David.P wrote:

This is why i love the CIA! and inb4leftisthate.
Because they can't assassinate someone?
No because they'll never give up trying!
It's no surprise their Iraq 'intelligence' was as shit as it was given how crap they are at assassinations.
David.P
Banned
+649|6702

CameronPoe wrote:

David.P wrote:

CameronPoe wrote:


Because they can't assassinate someone?
No because they'll never give up trying!
It's no surprise their Iraq 'intelligence' was as shit as it was given how crap they are at assassinations.
Okay you got me there.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard