Poll

Who Leaves a Better Legacy for his country?

Gwb30%30% - 17
Fidel Castro69%69% - 39
Total: 56
GunSlinger OIF II
Banned.
+1,860|7072

Spearhead wrote:

GunSlinger OIF II wrote:

Spearhead wrote:


Turqs a uniter.  He likes to agree with people.

Its actually kinda fun, agreeing with people, especially someone on the "other side" on these forums.  One thread I might hate lowings guts, and in another sometimes I'm the only person who agrees with him.  Its weird.
I dont have a problem agreeing with people.  I find it funny though, when he sees a counter point, he ditches his argument and agrees with that point.  Or, he'll agree with the point but continue to argue his point of view.   He just wants to be agreeable to the point where "whats the point of even debating anything with you", you dont seem to have any sincere platform.  One second, you cant stand ron paul, next second, thats the only man you would vote for. 


Just like John McCain, too wishy washy.
I think Turq just acknowledges the point someone else is making, but just doesn't have the time/effort to make a lengthy post to try and prove his point.  I bet thats it.
I remember posting something completely different to what his argument was.  He then agrees with my point, saying its right and ignores the rest of it while explaining his view.


To me, it seems like that is someone who goes with what the direction of the wave is taking him instead of sticking by your beliefs.
Spearhead
Gulf coast redneck hippy
+731|7118|Tampa Bay Florida
Ya, maybe

Although Turqs a skilled debator   I'm sure he'll have plenty to say next time he gets on.
GunSlinger OIF II
Banned.
+1,860|7072

Spearhead wrote:

Ya, maybe

Although Turqs a skilled debator   I'm sure he'll have plenty to say next time he gets on.
or he might just agree
sergeriver
Cowboy from Hell
+1,928|7185|Argentina

usmarine wrote:

sergeriver wrote:

usmarine wrote:

oh brother
Great contribution, as always.
Same could be said for this stupid ass thread.

Some of you truly have your heads straight up your asses if you try and compare the two.  You show me where an American floated on a refrigerator door or on a shity raft in order to cross an ocean to get to another country, then we can start to compare.
Mmmm, I never compared the two countries.  They aren't comparable.  Arghhhhhh, let me get the head out of my ass and I'll continue, just a second dude......ok, ready, what I want you to answer, if you can, is which guy is leaving his country in a better condition than before taking power.  If you thought I was comparing the US with the poor Cuba then you are the one that has his head straight up his ass.
DeathBecomesYu
Member
+171|6607

usmarine wrote:

sergeriver wrote:

usmarine wrote:

oh brother
Great contribution, as always.
Same could be said for this stupid ass thread.

Some of you truly have your heads straight up your asses if you try and compare the two.  You show me where an American floated on a refrigerator door or on a shity raft in order to cross an ocean to get to another country, then we can start to compare.
BINGO!!!!..This is a great point. I love how people here think that what Fidel has created a utopian society. Seriously, you just cant compare the two. Yes, Fidel did HELP create some good things but if you are a leader for 50 years, I sure hope you would be able to do a few good things.

Lets not forget all the people who were forced out of Cuba during the influx of Cubans during the late 70's, then lets not forget all the people who have been imprisoned for speaking their minds against Fidel. Lets not forget the political prisoners that Fidel has in jail even now and there are many who have been in jail for a long time and if anybody here thinks that people haven't been killed so Fidel could hold his power is a complete moron. Seriously, some of you just don't know history and just want to smell the flowers along the road.

I will agree that the situation that gave Fidel power was because of stupid U.S. politics and maneuvering but was the result a "positive" legacy. In a few ways yes, but I believe that there are thousands of Cubans who would slap your face if you applauded Fidel. There is a reason why so many Cubans want this guy dead. Consider what their families and friends may have gone through before you claim how cool Fidel is.

As far as Bush, as ATG said, he stood his ground from the beginning, some of you hate it, some of you don't. We will see how his leadership will be judged in the future. I will say that no President in our history had to deal with some of the biggest disasters we have had to go along with a war that we are in. 9/11, Hurricane Katrina that destroyed an area the size of Europe...imagine that for a moment. People criticize Bush for a disaster that was beyond comprehension. We go to war based on evidence that EVERYONE was screaming about. Now he is dealing with a credit and housing crunch that was created by greedy banks and credit ignorant society. Anyhow, our economy has help up for the most part and hopefully will get through this credit mess....who knows. Bottom line, I don't know what else any president could have done and we will see in time if a lot of these decisions were good or not.....time has not passed enough to truly know.

You cant compare these two men....A dictator who ruled at all costs and happened to do some good things over a 50 year reign....even the biggest asshole will get some things right over 50 years or an 8 year reign of a president that was presented with decisions that ANY man would have a hard time choosing. Could you have done better?? Would Gore have done better??? If you want to compare legacies of a country. Lets look at 50 years of American leadership to 50 years of Cuban leadership. That would be a no brainer.
sergeriver
Cowboy from Hell
+1,928|7185|Argentina

DeathBecomesYu wrote:

If you want to compare legacies of a country. Lets look at 50 years of American leadership to 50 years of Cuban leadership. That would be a no brainer.
I would pick Clinton before Fidel any day.  I was talking about two guys, not two countries.
usmarine
Banned
+2,785|7189

sergeriver wrote:

DeathBecomesYu wrote:

If you want to compare legacies of a country. Lets look at 50 years of American leadership to 50 years of Cuban leadership. That would be a no brainer.
I would pick Clinton before Fidel any day.  I was talking about two guys, not two countries.
Talking about the guys?  What?  Do you know both of them or something?  Do we?  No.  You have to compare countries.
sergeriver
Cowboy from Hell
+1,928|7185|Argentina

usmarine wrote:

sergeriver wrote:

DeathBecomesYu wrote:

If you want to compare legacies of a country. Lets look at 50 years of American leadership to 50 years of Cuban leadership. That would be a no brainer.
I would pick Clinton before Fidel any day.  I was talking about two guys, not two countries.
Talking about the guys?  What?  Do you know both of them or something?  Do we?  No.  You have to compare countries.
No, you must compare achievements.  I don't knwo any of them.  And not I'm not a Fidel fan, but I think he did a lot more than Bush with a lot less, but hey you are free to disagree.
GunSlinger OIF II
Banned.
+1,860|7072

sergeriver wrote:

usmarine wrote:

sergeriver wrote:


I would pick Clinton before Fidel any day.  I was talking about two guys, not two countries.
Talking about the guys?  What?  Do you know both of them or something?  Do we?  No.  You have to compare countries.
No, you must compare achievements.  I don't knwo any of them.  And not I'm not a Fidel fan, but I think he did a lot more than Bush with a lot less, but hey you are free to disagree.
bush=8 years


castro=49 years
sergeriver
Cowboy from Hell
+1,928|7185|Argentina

GunSlinger OIF II wrote:

sergeriver wrote:

usmarine wrote:


Talking about the guys?  What?  Do you know both of them or something?  Do we?  No.  You have to compare countries.
No, you must compare achievements.  I don't knwo any of them.  And not I'm not a Fidel fan, but I think he did a lot more than Bush with a lot less, but hey you are free to disagree.
bush=8 years


castro=49 years
Yup, I know.  And I hate to admit it, but this is the best argument against my poll.  Nevertheless, and forget about Fidel, what good things did GWB do for the US during this 8 years?  I think that was the point.  Fidel is a dictator, and there's no excuse for that.  But he achieved some good things, yes in 50 years.
usmarine
Banned
+2,785|7189

sergeriver wrote:

usmarine wrote:

sergeriver wrote:


I would pick Clinton before Fidel any day.  I was talking about two guys, not two countries.
Talking about the guys?  What?  Do you know both of them or something?  Do we?  No.  You have to compare countries.
No, you must compare achievements.  I don't knwo any of them.  And not I'm not a Fidel fan, but I think he did a lot more than Bush with a lot less, but hey you are free to disagree.
I don't disagree.  I don't understand what you are asking tbh.  Nor do I get how you can even compare the two.
sergeriver
Cowboy from Hell
+1,928|7185|Argentina

usmarine wrote:

sergeriver wrote:

usmarine wrote:


Talking about the guys?  What?  Do you know both of them or something?  Do we?  No.  You have to compare countries.
No, you must compare achievements.  I don't know any of them.  And not I'm not a Fidel fan, but I think he did a lot more than Bush with a lot less, but hey you are free to disagree.
I don't disagree.  I don't understand what you are asking tbh.  Nor do I get how you can even compare the two.
Read above.  I was trying to show how much could Bush have done with all the resources available and how little he did.  And I'm not being anti-American before someone says so.  If I had to pick between Castro and JFK or Castro and Clinton, I would pick JFK and Clinton.
GunSlinger OIF II
Banned.
+1,860|7072

sergeriver wrote:

GunSlinger OIF II wrote:

sergeriver wrote:


No, you must compare achievements.  I don't knwo any of them.  And not I'm not a Fidel fan, but I think he did a lot more than Bush with a lot less, but hey you are free to disagree.
bush=8 years


castro=49 years
Yup, I know.  And I hate to admit it, but this is the best argument against my poll.  Nevertheless, and forget about Fidel, what good things did GWB do for the US during this 8 years?  I think that was the point.  Fidel is a dictator, and there's no excuse for that.  But he achieved some good things, yes in 50 years.
fidels defiance against their neighbor by choosing the soviet has kept cuba stuck in 1959.  Im sure cam will tell you how many old chevies he saw there.  You think its a good legacy because he stuck his chin at the united states.  So a legacy of cuban dictatorship, foreign intervention, lack of due process and blind patriotism is good?  that goes against eveything you posted before.  I mean, you complain about venezuelans spreading propaganda in an international soccer game.  Yeah, the cuban regime has never used propaganda on their people to instill nationalism.  But, you dont like it when venezuela does it, but its ok when fidel does it.
Superslim
BF2s Frat Brother
+211|7120|Calgary
my pick GWB. Like I'll vote for a fucken commie. People run away from Cuba, they don't run away from living in the US. Enough said??.

The only good commie is a dead commie. END
usmarine
Banned
+2,785|7189

sergeriver wrote:

usmarine wrote:

sergeriver wrote:

No, you must compare achievements.  I don't know any of them.  And not I'm not a Fidel fan, but I think he did a lot more than Bush with a lot less, but hey you are free to disagree.
I don't disagree.  I don't understand what you are asking tbh.  Nor do I get how you can even compare the two.
Read above.  I was trying to show how much could Bush have done with all the resources available and how little he did.  And I'm not being anti-American before someone says so.  If I had to pick between Castro and JFK or Castro and Clinton, I would pick JFK and Clinton.
Dude JFK and his family started the whole mess with them anyway.

And dont bring clinton into this.  I see you trying to.  clinton can hug my nuts.  So lets just leave it at that.

Last edited by usmarine (2008-02-23 13:00:44)

sergeriver
Cowboy from Hell
+1,928|7185|Argentina

GunSlinger OIF II wrote:

sergeriver wrote:

GunSlinger OIF II wrote:

bush=8 years


castro=49 years
Yup, I know.  And I hate to admit it, but this is the best argument against my poll.  Nevertheless, and forget about Fidel, what good things did GWB do for the US during this 8 years?  I think that was the point.  Fidel is a dictator, and there's no excuse for that.  But he achieved some good things, yes in 50 years.
fidels defiance against their neighbor by choosing the soviet has kept cuba stuck in 1959.  Im sure cam will tell you how many old chevies he saw there.  You think its a good legacy because he stuck his chin at the united states.  So a legacy of cuban dictatorship, foreign intervention, lack of due process and blind patriotism is good?  that goes against eveything you posted before.  I mean, you complain about venezuelans spreading propaganda in an international soccer game.  Yeah, the cuban regime has never used propaganda on their people to instill nationalism.  But, you dont like it when venezuela does it, but its ok when fidel does it.
We are mixing things here a little.  I don't support any class of propaganda.  I hate it man.  But with all the wrong things Castro did, and they are a lot of things, he left Cuba in a better shape than before.  His main achievements are the good education and health systems IMO.  No more no less, and yes he was a dictator, agreed.  Maybe Fidel fucked up big time back in 1959.  And that's part of his legacy too.  But overall, he did a few good things for Cuba with nothing at hand.  That's all my point.

Last edited by sergeriver (2008-02-23 13:06:00)

sergeriver
Cowboy from Hell
+1,928|7185|Argentina

usmarine wrote:

sergeriver wrote:

usmarine wrote:


I don't disagree.  I don't understand what you are asking tbh.  Nor do I get how you can even compare the two.
Read above.  I was trying to show how much could Bush have done with all the resources available and how little he did.  And I'm not being anti-American before someone says so.  If I had to pick between Castro and JFK or Castro and Clinton, I would pick JFK and Clinton.
Dude JFK and his family started the whole mess with them anyway.

And dont bring clinton into this.  I see you trying to.  clinton can hug my nuts.  So lets just leave it at that.
I know you don't like Bush, but how can you hate Clinton that much?  I mean, he didn't get OBL, ok.  But give the man some credit ffs.
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6833|North Carolina

GunSlinger OIF II wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

Dilbert_X wrote:


They were mostly gangsters and fascists so I wouldn't worry about their opinion
Touche...  quite a few of the Cubans that come here are criminals.  I personally would prefer we ship the criminal ones to Puerto Rico.
whats with you agreeing with everybody?  Ive noticed this for a long time.  You say one thing, someone elses says a conflicting argument and you ditch your view and say something like "touche" or "good point"


almost everytime.
It's called being adaptable.  If someone presents a logical enough argument (even if it conflicts with my current view), I will support their view instead.  I try to be as flexible in my views as possible, because it prevents me from being too dogmatic.

Most people have an irrational habit of continuing to support whatever they believe in, even if it conflicts with rational sense.  I try to avoid doing that whenever possible, therefore, I generally submit to superior logic.
GunSlinger OIF II
Banned.
+1,860|7072

Turquoise wrote:

GunSlinger OIF II wrote:

Turquoise wrote:


Touche...  quite a few of the Cubans that come here are criminals.  I personally would prefer we ship the criminal ones to Puerto Rico.
whats with you agreeing with everybody?  Ive noticed this for a long time.  You say one thing, someone elses says a conflicting argument and you ditch your view and say something like "touche" or "good point"


almost everytime.
It's called being adaptable.
I disagree with that and with the way you seem to be describing it.  but, eh...
KEN-JENNINGS
I am all that is MOD!
+2,991|7060|949

GunSlinger OIF II wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

GunSlinger OIF II wrote:


whats with you agreeing with everybody?  Ive noticed this for a long time.  You say one thing, someone elses says a conflicting argument and you ditch your view and say something like "touche" or "good point"


almost everytime.
It's called being adaptable.
I disagree with that and with the way you seem to be describing it.  but, eh...
Why are you so disagreeable with everybody?
Spearhead
Gulf coast redneck hippy
+731|7118|Tampa Bay Florida

KEN-JENNINGS wrote:

GunSlinger OIF II wrote:

Turquoise wrote:


It's called being adaptable.
I disagree with that and with the way you seem to be describing it.  but, eh...
Why are you so disagreeable with everybody?
He's the anti-Turqoise.  Doesn't give a shit what you think, but still cool and says it the way it is, mostly I think.  Although that part is NOT anti-Turqoise.
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6833|North Carolina

GunSlinger OIF II wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

GunSlinger OIF II wrote:


whats with you agreeing with everybody?  Ive noticed this for a long time.  You say one thing, someone elses says a conflicting argument and you ditch your view and say something like "touche" or "good point"


almost everytime.
It's called being adaptable.
I disagree with that and with the way you seem to be describing it.  but, eh...
I know you and I sort of hit an impasse when I mentioned how I felt about loyalty to country and such, but think of it this way.  I hold logic as the highest virtue.

From what I can gather, you hold honor as that, but I'm not saying either one of us is better or worse for it.  I'm just saying we operate on very different principles.

I prefer to side with whatever makes the most sense to me at a given time, even if I might find the idea repulsive or scary in other respects.
GunSlinger OIF II
Banned.
+1,860|7072

KEN-JENNINGS wrote:

GunSlinger OIF II wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

It's called being adaptable.
I disagree with that and with the way you seem to be describing it.  but, eh...
Why are you so disagreeable with everybody?
because Im getting stop lossed and that has turned me angry and bitter at the world.


not really, but thats my story and Im sticking to it.

Last edited by GunSlinger OIF II (2008-02-23 14:36:06)

usmarine
Banned
+2,785|7189

sergeriver wrote:

usmarine wrote:

sergeriver wrote:


Read above.  I was trying to show how much could Bush have done with all the resources available and how little he did.  And I'm not being anti-American before someone says so.  If I had to pick between Castro and JFK or Castro and Clinton, I would pick JFK and Clinton.
Dude JFK and his family started the whole mess with them anyway.

And dont bring clinton into this.  I see you trying to.  clinton can hug my nuts.  So lets just leave it at that.
I know you don't like Bush, but how can you hate Clinton that much?  I mean, he didn't get OBL, ok.  But give the man some credit ffs.
Not going to start that again.

But how about you explain the JFK thing to me?
sergeriver
Cowboy from Hell
+1,928|7185|Argentina

usmarine wrote:

sergeriver wrote:

usmarine wrote:


Dude JFK and his family started the whole mess with them anyway.

And dont bring clinton into this.  I see you trying to.  clinton can hug my nuts.  So lets just leave it at that.
I know you don't like Bush, but how can you hate Clinton that much?  I mean, he didn't get OBL, ok.  But give the man some credit ffs.
Not going to start that again.

But how about you explain the JFK thing to me?
I think you better explain it to me, so I can explain it to you.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard