I have 2 SATA Seagate Barracuda 7,200rpm 112GB HDs. They WERE running RAID0 but long story short, I got a sasser worm and it fucked everything up.
I'm ready to reformat but i'm wondering what would work better for me and maybe you guys could chime in.
I like to play BF2 and not really much else...that's all i got the computer for really and my wife edits videos and her stuff takes up a lot of space.
Would i be better off:
Option 1: Put windows XP back on it and run it the way it was (RAID0). 224GB total
Option2: Put windows on 1 of the HDs and run the other HD as storage (for my wife). 112GB each (X2), but only have BF2/FRAPS on one HD and have all my wife's stuff on D: so when she's using it she can just pull her stuff up that way.
Basically, would that run faster than having everything on RAID0 (virtually 1 HD)?
I tried to make that understandable, sorry if it's confusing.
I'm ready to reformat but i'm wondering what would work better for me and maybe you guys could chime in.
I like to play BF2 and not really much else...that's all i got the computer for really and my wife edits videos and her stuff takes up a lot of space.
Would i be better off:
Option 1: Put windows XP back on it and run it the way it was (RAID0). 224GB total
Option2: Put windows on 1 of the HDs and run the other HD as storage (for my wife). 112GB each (X2), but only have BF2/FRAPS on one HD and have all my wife's stuff on D: so when she's using it she can just pull her stuff up that way.
Basically, would that run faster than having everything on RAID0 (virtually 1 HD)?
I tried to make that understandable, sorry if it's confusing.
Last edited by PigPopTart (2008-03-09 09:52:43)