Buuuuuuuuut, can Blu-ray players let you dl games and demos, play music, watch DVD's AND blu-rays, AAAAAAAAAND hook you up to the full internet for free?NooBesT wrote:
By then blu-ray players will be cheaper than PS3. A lot.teek22 wrote:
K. Well eventually you will. People said that about DVD and VHS (I know its a bad comparison because DVD is so much better but I don't care).jord wrote:
No, I don't need to get a blue ray player. I'm happy with my normal DVD player thanks.
Well one day DVD players and films will have the smallest section in a shop and it will all be blu-ray. May be a while but it WILL happen.
Then are you still saying you will not buy a blu-ray player? And when this does happen I can assure you Blu-ray will fall in price a lot...and hence the PS3 will most likely follow suit. Will you still buy a blu-ray player when you can pay little bit more for a blu-ray player+console?
Buuuuuuuuut, can Blu-ray players let you dl games and demos, play music, watch DVD's AND blu-rays, AAAAAAAAAND hook you up to the full internet for free?NooBesT wrote:
By then blu-ray players will be cheaper than PS3. A lot.teek22 wrote:
K. Well eventually you will. People said that about DVD and VHS (I know its a bad comparison because DVD is so much better but I don't care).jord wrote:
No, I don't need to get a blue ray player. I'm happy with my normal DVD player thanks.
Well one day DVD players and films will have the smallest section in a shop and it will all be blu-ray. May be a while but it WILL happen.
Then are you still saying you will not buy a blu-ray player? And when this does happen I can assure you Blu-ray will fall in price a lot...and hence the PS3 will most likely follow suit. Will you still buy a blu-ray player when you can pay little bit more for a blu-ray player+console?
I'm not a fan boy or anything.
It's funny, all you PS3 fanboys say that, and yet you start this thread. ELITE-UK, SamTheMan and so many others of the PS3 fanboys feel the need to express their opinions in every thread about the Xbox.Gooners wrote:
Just GTFO, 'cuz we don't want another XBox is better, No Ps3 is better, NO BITCHES Wii Pwooons j0000kptk92 wrote:
Snooooooooooooooooooooooooore
You say you don't want a 360 vs PS3 vs Wii fight, yet you all instigate it all the time.
My test thread backs this up.Poseidon wrote:
It's funny, all you PS3 fanboys say that, and yet you start this thread. ELITE-UK, SamTheMan and so many others of the PS3 fanboys feel the need to express their opinions in every thread about the Xbox.Gooners wrote:
Just GTFO, 'cuz we don't want another XBox is better, No Ps3 is better, NO BITCHES Wii Pwooons j0000kptk92 wrote:
Snooooooooooooooooooooooooore
You say you don't want a 360 vs PS3 vs Wii fight, yet you all instigate it all the time.
Im not actually a PS3 fanboy, i just know for a fact its a better console with more to offer. (I had a 360 so im speaking from experience)jord wrote:
My test thread backs this up.Poseidon wrote:
It's funny, all you PS3 fanboys say that, and yet you start this thread. ELITE-UK, SamTheMan and so many others of the PS3 fanboys feel the need to express their opinions in every thread about the Xbox.Gooners wrote:
Just GTFO, 'cuz we don't want another XBox is better, No Ps3 is better, NO BITCHES Wii Pwooons j0000
You say you don't want a 360 vs PS3 vs Wii fight, yet you all instigate it all the time.
Yes i have a PS3 but i also have a kickass PC which just fucking owns.
Im actually a PC fanboy
I was in PCWorld a while back and they have really reduced their prices. I'd get it over an XBOX 360 any day now (especially Blu-ray!) Although I have a Wii which I am very happy with
No, it's not. That's YOUR OPINION. I could say the fucking Dreamcast is better, and you couldn't prove me wrong either. It's YOUR OPINION and it doesn't make it right.ELITE-UK wrote:
Im not actually a PS3 fanboy, i just know for a fact its a better console with more to offer. (I had a 360 so im speaking from experience)jord wrote:
My test thread backs this up.Poseidon wrote:
It's funny, all you PS3 fanboys say that, and yet you start this thread. ELITE-UK, SamTheMan and so many others of the PS3 fanboys feel the need to express their opinions in every thread about the Xbox.
You say you don't want a 360 vs PS3 vs Wii fight, yet you all instigate it all the time.
Yes i have a PS3 but i also have a kickass PC which just fucking owns.
Im actually a PC fanboy
Im also using what i know...and i KNOW that the PS3 can do more.Poseidon wrote:
No, it's not. That's YOUR OPINION. I could say the fucking Dreamcast is better, and you couldn't prove me wrong either. It's YOUR OPINION and it doesn't make it right.ELITE-UK wrote:
Im not actually a PS3 fanboy, i just know for a fact its a better console with more to offer. (I had a 360 so im speaking from experience)jord wrote:
My test thread backs this up.
Yes i have a PS3 but i also have a kickass PC which just fucking owns.
Im actually a PC fanboy :P
you guys reckon this 360 price cut is cos off these figures?
http://www.computerandvideogames.com/ar … ?id=184281
http://www.computerandvideogames.com/ar … ?id=184281
By that time they just mightBf2-GeneralArnott wrote:
Buuuuuuuuut, can Blu-ray players let you dl games and demos, play music, watch DVD's AND blu-rays, AAAAAAAAAND hook you up to the full internet for free?NooBesT wrote:
By then blu-ray players will be cheaper than PS3. A lot.teek22 wrote:
K. Well eventually you will. People said that about DVD and VHS (I know its a bad comparison because DVD is so much better but I don't care).
Well one day DVD players and films will have the smallest section in a shop and it will all be blu-ray. May be a while but it WILL happen.
Then are you still saying you will not buy a blu-ray player? And when this does happen I can assure you Blu-ray will fall in price a lot...and hence the PS3 will most likely follow suit. Will you still buy a blu-ray player when you can pay little bit more for a blu-ray player+console?
second I get ahold of my HMV discount, one of them is mine for £200, whup.
So what? Who gives a flying fuck. I know I don't. The Xbox 360 is fun no matter what the specs are, and you consistently feel the need to downtrot it just because it doesn't fit your opinion.ELITE-UK wrote:
Im also using what i know...and i KNOW that the PS3 can do more.Poseidon wrote:
No, it's not. That's YOUR OPINION. I could say the fucking Dreamcast is better, and you couldn't prove me wrong either. It's YOUR OPINION and it doesn't make it right.ELITE-UK wrote:
Im not actually a PS3 fanboy, i just know for a fact its a better console with more to offer. (I had a 360 so im speaking from experience)
Yes i have a PS3 but i also have a kickass PC which just fucking owns.
Im actually a PC fanboy
More to offer? Says YOU. The Xbox 360 offers way more to myself seeing as most of my friends have one and it's a good way to connect with people.
XBox 360 offers more games.
It also offers better Online system (XBL)
It also offers better Online system (XBL)
Basically the reason I got a PS3:
- Blu Ray player
- Free online services
- All the good games are on both platforms anyway
- WiFi already installed (Xbox doesn't come with a WiFi detector I think, the adaptor costs a bomb too)
- More people I know have a PS3
- I need my Gran Turismo
- I refuse to use anything other than the Playstation Dualshock controller/layout which I've been using since 1998!
The reason the Xbox 360 is cheaper is because it has less features, the price is the same when you include everything you need for a proper setup.
Also the PS3 has things like the EyeToy (or PS Eye as they call it now) and has the Sixaxis motion sensing which is fun and is a refreshing change when required to use it in games like Ratchet and Clank etc.. so that motion sensing has potential for alot of things.
- Blu Ray player
- Free online services
- All the good games are on both platforms anyway
- WiFi already installed (Xbox doesn't come with a WiFi detector I think, the adaptor costs a bomb too)
- More people I know have a PS3
- I need my Gran Turismo
- I refuse to use anything other than the Playstation Dualshock controller/layout which I've been using since 1998!
The reason the Xbox 360 is cheaper is because it has less features, the price is the same when you include everything you need for a proper setup.
Also the PS3 has things like the EyeToy (or PS Eye as they call it now) and has the Sixaxis motion sensing which is fun and is a refreshing change when required to use it in games like Ratchet and Clank etc.. so that motion sensing has potential for alot of things.
Yet to have alot of the features of the PS3 u have to buy additional equipment for the 360. Like, all be it a mute argument, a HD player, wireless and watever esle.Poseidon wrote:
So what? Who gives a flying fuck. I know I don't. The Xbox 360 is fun no matter what the specs are, and you consistently feel the need to downtrot it just because it doesn't fit your opinion.ELITE-UK wrote:
Im also using what i know...and i KNOW that the PS3 can do more.Poseidon wrote:
No, it's not. That's YOUR OPINION. I could say the fucking Dreamcast is better, and you couldn't prove me wrong either. It's YOUR OPINION and it doesn't make it right.
More to offer? Says YOU. The Xbox 360 offers way more to myself seeing as most of my friends have one and it's a good way to connect with people.
This year PS3 seems to have the better catalogue, MGS4 and GT5 just kills whatever microsoft can come up with.
Martyn
It might have something to do with the 360 dropping prices in Europe? It's something they can do since they are no longer losing money on each sale. That's one of the benefits of entering the next generation market a year ahead of the competition. The Xbox 360 Successor is already in the works (I've heard as early as 2010). I'm sure the Blu-Ray surge helped the PS3 sales though.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
Here are the most retarded reasons, that 360 fanboys make up:
PS3 costs $700,
PS3 has no games,
PS3 online is shit and laggy,
Metal Gear Sold 4 is going to be multiplatform,
Home is going to suck,
Blu Ray is useless,
Bla Blalalalal
PS3 costs $700,
PS3 has no games,
PS3 online is shit and laggy,
Metal Gear Sold 4 is going to be multiplatform,
Home is going to suck,
Blu Ray is useless,
Bla Blalalalal
Last edited by r'Eeee (2008-03-13 12:37:48)
Kmarion wrote:
It might have something to do with the 360 dropping prices in Europe? It's something they can do since they are no longer losing money on each sale. That's one of the benefits of entering the next generation market a year ahead of the competition. The Xbox 360 Successor is already in the works (I've heard as early as 2010). I'm sure the Blu-Ray surge helped the PS3 sales though.
Already pointed out the priice fallbennisboy wrote:
you guys reckon this 360 price cut is cos off these figures?
http://www.computerandvideogames.com/ar … ?id=184281
Does anybody know when there's going to be another PS3 price drop in the UK? And whether they're going to release a 60/80GB PS3 MGS4 edition similar to wot they're doing over in the US?
It sucks that they took out the backwards compatibility on the 40GB PS3 and discontinued the 60GB while the lucky peeps in the USA still have the 80GB version available to them
It sucks that they took out the backwards compatibility on the 40GB PS3 and discontinued the 60GB while the lucky peeps in the USA still have the 80GB version available to them
You know what...im not going to continue with this arguement with you because you obviously dont want to take your dick out of your 360's ass.Poseidon wrote:
So what? Who gives a flying fuck. I know I don't. The Xbox 360 is fun no matter what the specs are, and you consistently feel the need to downtrot it just because it doesn't fit your opinion.ELITE-UK wrote:
Im also using what i know...and i KNOW that the PS3 can do more.Poseidon wrote:
No, it's not. That's YOUR OPINION. I could say the fucking Dreamcast is better, and you couldn't prove me wrong either. It's YOUR OPINION and it doesn't make it right.
More to offer? Says YOU. The Xbox 360 offers way more to myself seeing as most of my friends have one and it's a good way to connect with people.