Wow what a shit score I got ... must be that OEM PSU murdering my score ... *hopes*
Hey don't you guys understand that this test does NOT support crossfire/SLi. I'm getting same results as with single HD 3870.bf2gammer wrote:
i guess your higher cpu clock wouldnt have anything to do with that? but still, your gts still pretty much beat his 3870x2Overdose wrote:
http://img444.imageshack.us/img444/4760 … arkmq4.jpg
lol @ panzer. i still beat your score. 3870x2 = epic fail, 8800 GTS 512 = epic win
-panz...
edit: but the test still does its job. Stress it to the max. even in 1 minute load my GPU temps go to 85c max. Anyone up for 1h stress test with this beast?
edit: and that cheat didn't actually work very well... I tried running it at 1440x900 and this is what I got...
Last edited by GC_PaNzerFIN (2008-04-03 01:02:40)
3930K | H100i | RIVF | 16GB DDR3 | GTX 480 | AX750 | 800D | 512GB SSD | 3TB HDD | Xonar DX | W8
I like the "and has recovered" bit though
Lol, no. You have a HD3870 lying around. Try it with just that.GC_PaNzerFIN wrote:
Hey don't you guys understand that this test does NOT support crossfire/SLi. I'm getting same results as with single HD 3870.bf2gammer wrote:
i guess your higher cpu clock wouldnt have anything to do with that? but still, your gts still pretty much beat his 3870x2Overdose wrote:
http://img444.imageshack.us/img444/4760 … arkmq4.jpg
lol @ panzer. i still beat your score. 3870x2 = epic fail, 8800 GTS 512 = epic win
-panz...
edit: but the test still does its job. Stress it to the max. even in 1 minute load my GPU temps go to 85c max. Anyone up for 1h stress test with this beast?
edit: and that cheat didn't actually work very well... I tried running it at 1440x900 and this is what I got...
http://img150.imageshack.us/img150/5083 … ll1ru4.jpg
I don't have one around atm.nukchebi0 wrote:
Lol, no. You have a HD3870 lying around. Try it with just that.GC_PaNzerFIN wrote:
Hey don't you guys understand that this test does NOT support crossfire/SLi. I'm getting same results as with single HD 3870.bf2gammer wrote:
i guess your higher cpu clock wouldnt have anything to do with that? but still, your gts still pretty much beat his 3870x2
-panz...
edit: but the test still does its job. Stress it to the max. even in 1 minute load my GPU temps go to 85c max. Anyone up for 1h stress test with this beast?
edit: and that cheat didn't actually work very well... I tried running it at 1440x900 and this is what I got...
http://img150.imageshack.us/img150/5083 … ll1ru4.jpg
but here is from ozone benchforum...
"Originally posted by: bryanW1995
running at native res of 14x9, stock e6750 and stock 3870 I got 3717. let's see:
1024x768 = 4732 min 1 max 109 avg 80
1280x1024 = 2962 min 42 max 64 avg 49
1440x900 = 3717 min 52, max 81 avg 62
1600x1200= 2641 min 1 max 62 avg 44
1680x1050= 2820 min 1 max 59 avg 49
1920x1200= 2710 min 1 max 62 avg 46 "
http://forums.anandtech.com/messageview … id=2087990
Last edited by GC_PaNzerFIN (2008-04-03 02:12:04)
3930K | H100i | RIVF | 16GB DDR3 | GTX 480 | AX750 | 800D | 512GB SSD | 3TB HDD | Xonar DX | W8
That is fail, or the benchmark is heavily biased towards AMD.
(The fact I am scoring 133% of a GTX indicates something is wrong with it.)
(The fact I am scoring 133% of a GTX indicates something is wrong with it.)
Last edited by nukchebi0 (2008-04-03 12:46:35)
this is more of a stress test. It is very buggy when it comes to performance scoring. this is the toughest stresstest none the less it doesn't show correct scores.nukchebi0 wrote:
That is fail, or the benchmark is heavily biased towards AMD.
(The fact I am scoring 133% of a GTX indicates something is wrong with it.)
3930K | H100i | RIVF | 16GB DDR3 | GTX 480 | AX750 | 800D | 512GB SSD | 3TB HDD | Xonar DX | W8
Oh, okay.
It has showed the stock cooler on the 8800GTS is really good, especially considering the 15% overclock I had on it.
It has showed the stock cooler on the 8800GTS is really good, especially considering the 15% overclock I had on it.
yep. it is pretty good compared to GT and the older coolers.nukchebi0 wrote:
Oh, okay.
It has showed the stock cooler on the 8800GTS is really good, especially considering the 15% overclock I had on it.
3930K | H100i | RIVF | 16GB DDR3 | GTX 480 | AX750 | 800D | 512GB SSD | 3TB HDD | Xonar DX | W8
Especially the GTX and Ultra cards, my GTX goes to 80°C under loadGC_PaNzerFIN wrote:
yep. it is pretty good compared to GT and the older coolers.nukchebi0 wrote:
Oh, okay.
It has showed the stock cooler on the 8800GTS is really good, especially considering the 15% overclock I had on it.
Getting a Thermalright HR-03 Plus this summer, so I should have some better temps and some overclocking then
I am so NOT gonna be trying this on my AthlonXP3200+ and AGP X800XT PE.
My 8600GTS only goes up to 61C on it.
"people in ny have a general idea of how to drive. one of the pedals goes forward the other one prevents you from dying"
Only have OpenGL 1.
main battle tank karthus medikopter 117 megamegapowershot gg
got 1600 pts.
The G80 influences this as well.PBAsydney wrote:
Especially the GTX and Ultra cards, my GTX goes to 80°C under loadGC_PaNzerFIN wrote:
yep. it is pretty good compared to GT and the older coolers.nukchebi0 wrote:
Oh, okay.
It has showed the stock cooler on the 8800GTS is really good, especially considering the 15% overclock I had on it.
Getting a Thermalright HR-03 Plus this summer, so I should have some better temps and some overclocking then
This is more CPU based then GPU based guys.
Look at the score, higher clocked quad with 8800GT > same clockspeed dual with 8800GTX
Wonder what my mates skulltrail quad sli would do to this :p
Look at the score, higher clocked quad with 8800GT > same clockspeed dual with 8800GTX
Wonder what my mates skulltrail quad sli would do to this :p
did it on the wrong MSAA and resolution, on same as OP i got 1140
my cpu will oc to 3.2ghz but i hit my memory strap so pointless.
Allow me to try it for you (close but not exactly the same hardware)Scorpion0x17 wrote:
I am so NOT gonna be trying this on my AthlonXP3200+ and AGP X800XT PE.
How on earth can an X800 score 1/3 lower than a 7600GS?!jsnipy wrote:
Allow me to try it for you (close but not exactly the same hardware)Scorpion0x17 wrote:
I am so NOT gonna be trying this on my AthlonXP3200+ and AGP X800XT PE.
http://img390.imageshack.us/img390/3982/98025164mz5.png
The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP
AGP card running on a 5 yo board with a socket A 3200+?Freezer7Pro wrote:
How on earth can an X800 score 1/3 lower than a 7600GS?!jsnipy wrote:
Allow me to try it for you (close but not exactly the same hardware)Scorpion0x17 wrote:
I am so NOT gonna be trying this on my AthlonXP3200+ and AGP X800XT PE.
http://img390.imageshack.us/img390/3982/98025164mz5.png
My system isn't a lot betterjsnipy wrote:
AGP card running on a 5 yo board with a socket A 3200+?Freezer7Pro wrote:
How on earth can an X800 score 1/3 lower than a 7600GS?!jsnipy wrote:
Allow me to try it for you (close but not exactly the same hardware)
http://img390.imageshack.us/img390/3982/98025164mz5.png
Also,
The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP
I dont get it, urs says "9" the one i posted says "399"Freezer7Pro wrote:
My system isn't a lot betterjsnipy wrote:
AGP card running on a 5 yo board with a socket A 3200+?Freezer7Pro wrote:
How on earth can an X800 score 1/3 lower than a 7600GS?!
Also,
http://i205.photobucket.com/albums/bb8/ … ro/9-1.png
edit: ok i see the aa ... not sure ... its just a pc hooked up as an extra, nothing special done to it. I know it was one of the very first x800s. Its a bit on the warm side also.
Last edited by jsnipy (2008-04-05 10:53:58)
Nonono, the pic was completely unrelated. Just a run I did on my fuck around with-computer. My 7600 scores a little over 600.jsnipy wrote:
I dont get it, urs says "9" the one i posted says "399"Freezer7Pro wrote:
My system isn't a lot betterjsnipy wrote:
AGP card running on a 5 yo board with a socket A 3200+?
Also,
http://i205.photobucket.com/albums/bb8/ … ro/9-1.png
edit: ok i see the aa ... not sure ... its just a pc hooked up as an extra, nothing special done to it.
The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP
I think that x800 is probably a lot different that the alter ones. When I bought that I don't think there was even a 7 series.Freezer7Pro wrote:
Nonono, the pic was completely unrelated. Just a run I did on my fuck around with-computer. My 7600 scores a little over 600.jsnipy wrote:
I dont get it, urs says "9" the one i posted says "399"Freezer7Pro wrote:
My system isn't a lot better
Also,
http://i205.photobucket.com/albums/bb8/ … ro/9-1.png
edit: ok i see the aa ... not sure ... its just a pc hooked up as an extra, nothing special done to it.
The 7 series existed when the X800 did. Same generation even.jsnipy wrote:
I think that x800 is probably a lot different that the alter ones. When I bought that I don't think there was even a 7 series.Freezer7Pro wrote:
Nonono, the pic was completely unrelated. Just a run I did on my fuck around with-computer. My 7600 scores a little over 600.jsnipy wrote:
I dont get it, urs says "9" the one i posted says "399"
edit: ok i see the aa ... not sure ... its just a pc hooked up as an extra, nothing special done to it.
The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP