Last edited by Gooners (2008-04-11 13:26:59)
^^GC_PaNzerFIN wrote:
ALL good <3
We tech team are always helping/giving rig advices. feel free to add me on xfire for help guys..Sup wrote:
Wow 1st rig posted here that is 100% fine. Good pick on everything.
I have, whole bags full. Especially Max, but thats another thing.Sup wrote:
That explains everything. Give them Scooby snacks. They deserved them.
I know... but its the only good board.Bull3t wrote:
I heard alot of people had problems with the Maximus.
Might want to do some research before you buy that motherboard.
There isn't much difference between the Q93 and the 945,a according to panzer only about a 5% difference.SpIk3y wrote:
Isn't that a bit expensive for a case? I know it's top of the line and I'm sure it owns, but... $250!? Get a $100-150 case and use the extra money to buy a better CPU, like the Q9450. You won't regret it... it's the components that make the real difference, after all.
that is correct. the 2mb difference in cache size isn't earth shaking big.Gooners wrote:
There isn't much difference between the Q93 and the 945,a according to panzer only about a 5% difference.SpIk3y wrote:
Isn't that a bit expensive for a case? I know it's top of the line and I'm sure it owns, but... $250!? Get a $100-150 case and use the extra money to buy a better CPU, like the Q9450. You won't regret it... it's the components that make the real difference, after all.
But what does Panzer knowGC_PaNzerFIN wrote:
that is correct. the 2mb difference in cache size isn't earth shaking big.Gooners wrote:
There isn't much difference between the Q93 and the 945,a according to panzer only about a 5% difference.SpIk3y wrote:
Isn't that a bit expensive for a case? I know it's top of the line and I'm sure it owns, but... $250!? Get a $100-150 case and use the extra money to buy a better CPU, like the Q9450. You won't regret it... it's the components that make the real difference, after all.
Last edited by SpIk3y (2008-04-09 17:19:10)
No, I understand 100% where you're coming from, but I had my mind set on this case, and if anything I will downgrade to the Cosmos (standard one)SpIk3y wrote:
OK well the CPU was just an example. My point still stands - you could always get another hard drive, a bigger monitor, fans/water cooling, optical drives, software, etc. with the extra money.
<3Gooners wrote:
I have, whole bags full. Especially Max, but thats another thing.Sup wrote:
That explains everything. Give them Scooby snacks. They deserved them.
Is that the new revision already? The first one had some faulty components that caused drive failures... (yes the guys know their stuff). Or was it the 1TB F1.... anyway if that is teh new rev it is nice HDD.Zimmer wrote:
Edit - Seeing as you have the cash to shell it.
Get this
http://www.overclockers.co.uk/showprodu … mp;subcat=
It's the fastest drive available and a whopping 32MB cache.
oh you and the spinpoints. You're right though, the spinpoints really are the best drives out there. WD isn't bad though. I really like their 1TB drive. Cool and power efficient, great for data serversZimmer wrote:
No. Not a WD. Seriously. No no no no no.
Either a Hitachi Deskstar ( beasts ) or Samsung SpinPoint ( awsm ).
The deskstar is currently the best HDD out there ( uses a new way of storing files, compresses/read/writes much faster as blocks are vertical and not horizontal ) or the SpinPoint, which is close on its heels.
WD fails compared to them. If you need proof, go over to tomshardware.com
Edit - Seeing as you have the cash to shell it.
Get this
http://www.overclockers.co.uk/showprodu … mp;subcat=
It's the fastest drive available and a whopping 32MB cache.