Last edited by K3rt6699 (2008-04-12 13:20:40)
Success? You understand the LOSE millions each year because of the console...FatherTed wrote:
Like Microsoft will really care that much? The Xbox 360 has clearly been a success, and they don't exactly need more money.
Last edited by Fenix14 (2008-04-12 18:44:28)
unnamednewbie13 wrote:
I bet a lot of the people who are going to get this game will already have a console. Minor inconvenience for Microsoft.
This crap's been going on since SNES vs Sega Genesis and beyond. A truly 'leet' consoler is going to have both, so what's the argument about...r'Eeee wrote:
K3rt6699 wrote:
Why are people always fighting...what started the crap between the two consoles?Way to contradict yourself...K3rt6699 wrote:
And people saying the DLC for GTA4 wont matter much...you wont be saying that when they drop.
Last edited by unnamednewbie13 (2008-04-12 20:20:03)
*cough* Austrialian monies >.>VicktorVauhn wrote:
did that article say that the game will cost more then $100
Umm?
gah, foreign devils.Goven wrote:
*cough* Austrialian monies >.>VicktorVauhn wrote:
did that article say that the game will cost more then $100
Umm?
Source?sinnik wrote:
Hmm
I'll believe when I see it actually happen - Rockstar signed a deal with both that stated that there would be no favouratism and neither would be included as a bundle. If that wsn't the case the the Microsoft would have been laughing cos the 360 version was completed and ready for the release months before the PS3 version was ready to go (major coding problems with the PS3 version)
You realise that just shows that its more than likely this deal has been in the bag for a LONG time, otherwise the Xbox360 version would have been released first. As that isnt the case it shows that RS know they can make a lot of money from sony in a particular way, eg this deal.sinnik wrote:
Hmm
I'll believe when I see it actually happen - Rockstar signed a deal with both that stated that there would be no favouratism and neither would be included as a bundle. If that wsn't the case the the Microsoft would have been laughing cos the 360 version was completed and ready for the release months before the PS3 version was ready to go (major coding problems with the PS3 version)
It really is crazy. Doesn't the Aussie dollar trade pretty much evenly with the US dollar? It should be $60 like it is here.Megalomatthew wrote:
"You can buy the arcade console for $399, and the game at $119."
Games cost $120in Australia?! That's crazy talk! Madness I tell you!
That's what I'm thinking. They were just smart enough to announce it mere weeks before release.Vilham wrote:
You realise that just shows that its more than likely this deal has been in the bag for a LONG time, otherwise the Xbox360 version would have been released first. As that isnt the case it shows that RS know they can make a lot of money from sony in a particular way, eg this deal.sinnik wrote:
Hmm
I'll believe when I see it actually happen - Rockstar signed a deal with both that stated that there would be no favouratism and neither would be included as a bundle. If that wsn't the case the the Microsoft would have been laughing cos the 360 version was completed and ready for the release months before the PS3 version was ready to go (major coding problems with the PS3 version)