Is it just me or did the Q6700 get a huge price drop?
Might get this instead of the Q6600 now
Is it just me or did the Q6700 get a huge price drop?
Might get this instead of the Q6600 now
I say go for it.
tis a 45 nm 65nm proc
"people in ny have a general idea of how to drive. one of the pedals goes forward the other one prevents you from dying"
I no, I started building my computer back at the beginning of february, so my motherboard can't handle the Yorkfieldshaffeysucks wrote:
tis a 45 nm 65nm proc
(650i for anyone who cares)
Yeh, also note that 650i OC's Quads poorly. If you plan on overclocking anyways that is..Stimey wrote:
I no, I started building my computer back at the beginning of february, so my motherboard can't handle the Yorkfieldshaffeysucks wrote:
tis a 45 nm 65nm proc
(650i for anyone who cares)
main battle tank karthus medikopter 117 megamegapowershot gg
No real need, 2.66GHz is plenty for a quad.DeathUnlimited wrote:
Yeh, also note that 650i OC's Quads poorly. If you plan on overclocking anyways that is..Stimey wrote:
I no, I started building my computer back at the beginning of february, so my motherboard can't handle the Yorkfieldshaffeysucks wrote:
tis a 45 nm 65nm proc
(650i for anyone who cares)
The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP
I might go to 3Ghz at most.
Or I might get a new mobo because I got another job
In that case its the Q9300 for me.
Or I might get a new mobo because I got another job
In that case its the Q9300 for me.
Q9450 FTW!
Only 350 Dollars.
Only 350 Dollars.
Thats alright, but I can't support 45nm proc