Holy crap, 480 stream processors compared to 128 on my GTX
DO WANT!
DO WANT!
Gddr5 baby.
I just don't have the heart to replace my 8800GTX, it cost me over $900 (Yes, hardware prices are teh sux0r in Iceland)
Sell a kidney then.
I have the money to do it, but it's such a waste, I bought my 8800GTX less than a year ago and it works fine for all games maxed out in 1680x1050 with 4xAA (Crysis doesn't count ) with good framerate..Sup wrote:
Sell a kidney then.
If you don't need a new card then don't buy it. But i need a new one with lots of memory for high resolutions.
wow. i will actually have to see reviews. this is very promising for that price point.
"people in ny have a general idea of how to drive. one of the pedals goes forward the other one prevents you from dying"
320 radeon SP equals to 64 nv ones. Radeons have a bit different architechture focusing in shader power vs nvidia focusing in textures.PBAsydney wrote:
Holy crap, 480 stream processors compared to 128 on my GTX
DO WANT!
3930K | H100i | RIVF | 16GB DDR3 | GTX 480 | AX750 | 800D | 512GB SSD | 3TB HDD | Xonar DX | W8
i was just about to add that same thought. now that i think about it, the 9600GT bested the 3850 (was it?) even with its 96 stream procs.GC_PaNzerFIN wrote:
320 radeon SP equals to 64 nv ones. Radeons have a bit different architechture focusing in shader power vs nvidia focusing in textures.PBAsydney wrote:
Holy crap, 480 stream processors compared to 128 on my GTX
DO WANT!
edit: im not sure about the details, basically a nvidia card with much less sps beat an AMD card.
hopefully though this will push down the 8 series card prices even further.
Last edited by haffeysucks (2008-04-23 03:19:10)
"people in ny have a general idea of how to drive. one of the pedals goes forward the other one prevents you from dying"
Since, I bought my 8800GT. About 10 new cards came out. Gotta love technology...
yes, you do. your card is still the best performer for the money.r'Eeee wrote:
Since, I bought my 8800GT. About 10 new cards came out. Gotta love technology...
"people in ny have a general idea of how to drive. one of the pedals goes forward the other one prevents you from dying"
In actual game performace, a 9600 card beat a 3870HD in this review.haffeysucks wrote:
i was just about to add that same thought. now that i think about it, the 9600GT bested the 3850 (was it?) even with its 96 stream procs.
edit: im not sure about the details, basically a nvidia card with much less sps beat an AMD card.
hopefully though this will push down the 8 series card prices even further.
Last edited by SenorToenails (2008-04-23 03:30:26)
highest overclocked and therefore more expensive 9600gt compared to stock HD3870 and I doubt they used teh 8.3 hotfix drivers.SenorToenails wrote:
In actual game performace, a 9600 card beat a 3870HD in this review.haffeysucks wrote:
i was just about to add that same thought. now that i think about it, the 9600GT bested the 3850 (was it?) even with its 96 stream procs.
edit: im not sure about the details, basically a nvidia card with much less sps beat an AMD card.
hopefully though this will push down the 8 series card prices even further.
3930K | H100i | RIVF | 16GB DDR3 | GTX 480 | AX750 | 800D | 512GB SSD | 3TB HDD | Xonar DX | W8
Point is, more stream processors do not make for an automatically better card.GC_PaNzerFIN wrote:
highest overclocked and therefore more expensive 9600gt compared to stock HD3870 and I doubt they used teh 8.3 hotfix drivers.
radeons have less real SPs than geforces.SenorToenails wrote:
Point is, more stream processors do not make for an automatically better card.GC_PaNzerFIN wrote:
highest overclocked and therefore more expensive 9600gt compared to stock HD3870 and I doubt they used teh 8.3 hotfix drivers.
3930K | H100i | RIVF | 16GB DDR3 | GTX 480 | AX750 | 800D | 512GB SSD | 3TB HDD | Xonar DX | W8
And they still own right?GC_PaNzerFIN wrote:
radeons have less real SPs than geforces.SenorToenails wrote:
Point is, more stream processors do not make for an automatically better card.GC_PaNzerFIN wrote:
highest overclocked and therefore more expensive 9600gt compared to stock HD3870 and I doubt they used teh 8.3 hotfix drivers.
you have seen the latest bencies. so yes.Sup wrote:
And they still own right?GC_PaNzerFIN wrote:
radeons have less real SPs than geforces.SenorToenails wrote:
Point is, more stream processors do not make for an automatically better card.
3930K | H100i | RIVF | 16GB DDR3 | GTX 480 | AX750 | 800D | 512GB SSD | 3TB HDD | Xonar DX | W8
LOL @ Mai
I just heard that the single GPU HD 4870 would be about 20% faster than 9800GTX. The X2 should then give GT200 run for its money.
3930K | H100i | RIVF | 16GB DDR3 | GTX 480 | AX750 | 800D | 512GB SSD | 3TB HDD | Xonar DX | W8
damn you, I don't want to upgrade yetGC_PaNzerFIN wrote:
I just heard that the single GPU HD 4870 would be about 20% faster than 9800GTX. The X2 should then give GT200 run for its money.
once upon a midnight dreary, while i pron surfed, weak and weary, over many a strange and spurious site of ' hot xxx galore'. While i clicked my fav'rite bookmark, suddenly there came a warning, and my heart was filled with mourning, mourning for my dear amour, " 'Tis not possible!", i muttered, " give me back my free hardcore!"..... quoth the server, 404.
too slow panzer!max wrote:
damn you, I don't want to upgrade yetGC_PaNzerFIN wrote:
I just heard that the single GPU HD 4870 would be about 20% faster than 9800GTX. The X2 should then give GT200 run for its money.
i thought that was common knowledge
i also heard the 4850 was going to be 10% faster than the 8800GT, and 10% slower than the 9800GTX.
"people in ny have a general idea of how to drive. one of the pedals goes forward the other one prevents you from dying"
but this is first somewhat trustable source from computex 2008 all before this were just rumorshaffeysucks wrote:
too slow panzer!max wrote:
damn you, I don't want to upgrade yetGC_PaNzerFIN wrote:
I just heard that the single GPU HD 4870 would be about 20% faster than 9800GTX. The X2 should then give GT200 run for its money.
i thought that was common knowledge
i also heard the 4850 was going to be 10% faster than the 8800GT, and 10% slower than the 9800GTX.
3930K | H100i | RIVF | 16GB DDR3 | GTX 480 | AX750 | 800D | 512GB SSD | 3TB HDD | Xonar DX | W8
link plz, i am really getting quite excited over these 4xxx cards...GC_PaNzerFIN wrote:
but this is first somewhat trustable source from computex 2008 all before this were just rumorshaffeysucks wrote:
too slow panzer!max wrote:
damn you, I don't want to upgrade yet
i thought that was common knowledge
i also heard the 4850 was going to be 10% faster than the 8800GT, and 10% slower than the 9800GTX.
"people in ny have a general idea of how to drive. one of the pedals goes forward the other one prevents you from dying"
http://my.ocworkbench.com/bbs/showthread.php?t=73691haffeysucks wrote:
link plz, i am really getting quite excited over these 4xxx cards...GC_PaNzerFIN wrote:
but this is first somewhat trustable source from computex 2008 all before this were just rumorshaffeysucks wrote:
too slow panzer!
i thought that was common knowledge
i also heard the 4850 was going to be 10% faster than the 8800GT, and 10% slower than the 9800GTX.
same here but I'm already waiting for 2x HD 5870 X2 Quad-fire
3930K | H100i | RIVF | 16GB DDR3 | GTX 480 | AX750 | 800D | 512GB SSD | 3TB HDD | Xonar DX | W8