Low-end Oc'd to 3Ghz
High end @ stock 3Ghz
High end @ stock 3Ghz
Poll
Which consumes more power?
| E2200 Oc'd to 3.0Ghz | 55% | 55% - 5 | ||||
| E8400 @ stock 3 Ghz | 44% | 44% - 4 | ||||
| Total: 9 | ||||||
The 8400 uses less, the E2**0 series use about 80w at over 3GHz.
Last edited by Freezer7Pro (2008-04-23 09:47:57)
The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP
freezer is right. also lower end CPUs often need more vcore to be stable at same frequenzy as the higher end ones.
3930K | H100i | RIVF | 16GB DDR3 | GTX 480 | AX750 | 800D | 512GB SSD | 3TB HDD | Xonar DX | W8
GC_PaNzerFIN wrote:
freezer is right. also lower end CPUs often need more vcore to be stable at same frequenzy as the higher end ones.
also the e2200 is a 65nm part while the 8400 is a 45nm']['error wrote:
GC_PaNzerFIN wrote:
freezer is right. also lower end CPUs often need more vcore to be stable at same frequenzy as the higher end ones.
once upon a midnight dreary, while i pron surfed, weak and weary, over many a strange and spurious site of ' hot xxx galore'. While i clicked my fav'rite bookmark, suddenly there came a warning, and my heart was filled with mourning, mourning for my dear amour, " 'Tis not possible!", i muttered, " give me back my free hardcore!"..... quoth the server, 404.