Poll

Do you agree with gay couples adopting kids from poor countries?

Yes61%61% - 57
No38%38% - 36
Total: 93
sergeriver
Cowboy from Hell
+1,928|7181|Argentina
Think of African countries where AIDS and civil war are things kids are forced to live with.  So, what is better for them?  To grow up in poverty with no future or to be adopted by foreign people getting the chance to live a better life in a better country?
AussieReaper
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
+5,761|6576|what

I wouldn't have a problem with it, however: the gay couples would still have to be as stable as any other couple and would have to go through just as much red tape and background checks, etc.

I don't think they should get special consideration either discriminatory or by quicker access through the adoption process.

And of course, I'd want there to be checkups from whichever adoption agency is running the program to ensure the child's safety and well being. Mental as well as physical.
https://i.imgur.com/maVpUMN.png
The#1Spot
Member
+105|6963|byah
We dont need gays to influence the young children's minds.
Pug
UR father's brother's nephew's former roommate
+652|6966|Texas - Bigger than France
Semantics  4 me
do i "agree with"? =  I'd say no.
"will it cause problems"? = I'd say the kids will be fine
.Sup
be nice
+2,646|6877|The Twilight Zone
Yes. They are gay not child abusers.
https://www.shrani.si/f/3H/7h/45GTw71U/untitled-1.png
jsnipy
...
+3,277|6946|...

Sure why not, better than children growing up alone or shit conditions. It worked in La Cage aux Folles!
sergeriver
Cowboy from Hell
+1,928|7181|Argentina

jsnipy wrote:

Sure why not, better than children growing up alone or shit conditions. It worked in La Cage aux Folles!
That's different.  One of them was the biological father of the kid.
jsnipy
...
+3,277|6946|...

sergeriver wrote:

jsnipy wrote:

Sure why not, better than children growing up alone or shit conditions. It worked in La Cage aux Folles!
That's different.  One of them was the biological father of the kid.
Well. I still say yes.
FEOS
Bellicose Yankee Air Pirate
+1,182|6835|'Murka

TheAussieReaper wrote:

I wouldn't have a problem with it, however: the gay couples would still have to be as stable as any other couple and would have to go through just as much red tape and background checks, etc.

I don't think they should get special consideration either discriminatory or by quicker access through the adoption process.

And of course, I'd want there to be checkups from whichever adoption agency is running the program to ensure the child's safety and well being. Mental as well as physical.
QFT.

Having just been through the adoption process, I feel that there shouldn't be any discrimination or preferential treatment for gay couples. The key there is "couples"...they must meet the same criteria as straight couples. Many countries will not allow adoption by single parents. If the home studies show the gay couple is stable, financially able to care for their child(ren), and love them unconditionally. The kids need a loving, stable home--whoever provides it.
“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein

Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
FallenMorgan
Member
+53|6338|Glendale, CA

The#1Spot wrote:

We dont need gays to influence the young children's minds.
There is no link between child abuse and gay couples, it's mostly lies.  A child growing up with two dads or two moms will not grow up to be gay, always, but even if so, there's nothing wrong with it.
S.Lythberg
Mastermind
+429|6870|Chicago, IL

FallenMorgan wrote:

The#1Spot wrote:

We dont need gays to influence the young children's minds.
There is no link between child abuse and gay couples, it's mostly lies.  A child growing up with two dads or two moms will not grow up to be gay, always, but even if so, there's nothing wrong with it.
We need more gays, not less, it will slow down the population boom
argo4
Stand and Deliver
+86|6357|United States
i'd say no just cause a boy adopted and raised by gays will pretty much be screwed up for life, i.e. he won't know what real family life is like  and he will be ostracized for being weird/effeminate/acting gay. For girls, gay parents are probably alright
FallenMorgan
Member
+53|6338|Glendale, CA

argo4 wrote:

i'd say no just cause a boy adopted and raised by gays will pretty much be screwed up for life, i.e. he won't know what real family life is like  and he will be ostracized for being weird/effeminate/acting gay. For girls, gay parents are probably alright
Um...so fucking what?

The only reason people want kids to know what "real family life" is like is so they grow up to get married and have a bunch of kids in a suburban house with a white picket fence and all that other bullshit.
S.Lythberg
Mastermind
+429|6870|Chicago, IL

FallenMorgan wrote:

argo4 wrote:

i'd say no just cause a boy adopted and raised by gays will pretty much be screwed up for life, i.e. he won't know what real family life is like  and he will be ostracized for being weird/effeminate/acting gay. For girls, gay parents are probably alright
Um...so fucking what?

The only reason people want kids to know what "real family life" is like is so they grow up to get married and have a bunch of kids in a suburban house with a white picket fence and all that other bullshit.
not the point, kids will find out that they have gay adoptive parents, and they'll get hell for it.

and FYI, your anti-society bias is showing.
FallenMorgan
Member
+53|6338|Glendale, CA

S.Lythberg wrote:

FallenMorgan wrote:

argo4 wrote:

i'd say no just cause a boy adopted and raised by gays will pretty much be screwed up for life, i.e. he won't know what real family life is like  and he will be ostracized for being weird/effeminate/acting gay. For girls, gay parents are probably alright
Um...so fucking what?

The only reason people want kids to know what "real family life" is like is so they grow up to get married and have a bunch of kids in a suburban house with a white picket fence and all that other bullshit.
not the point, kids will find out that they have gay adoptive parents, and they'll get hell for it.

and FYI, your anti-society bias is showing.
They'll be stronger, because it's likely the kid's parents will tell the kid to not listen to them, because they're biggoted and whatnot.

Yes I'm anti-mainstream society, and proud of it.
S.Lythberg
Mastermind
+429|6870|Chicago, IL

FallenMorgan wrote:

S.Lythberg wrote:

FallenMorgan wrote:


Um...so fucking what?

The only reason people want kids to know what "real family life" is like is so they grow up to get married and have a bunch of kids in a suburban house with a white picket fence and all that other bullshit.
not the point, kids will find out that they have gay adoptive parents, and they'll get hell for it.

and FYI, your anti-society bias is showing.
They'll be stronger, because it's likely the kid's parents will tell the kid to not listen to them, because they're biggoted and whatnot.

Yes I'm anti-mainstream society, and proud of it.
fucked up =/= stronger

kids who are constantly ridiculed tend to shoot up the place, not mature into better people.
FallenMorgan
Member
+53|6338|Glendale, CA

S.Lythberg wrote:

FallenMorgan wrote:

S.Lythberg wrote:


not the point, kids will find out that they have gay adoptive parents, and they'll get hell for it.

and FYI, your anti-society bias is showing.
They'll be stronger, because it's likely the kid's parents will tell the kid to not listen to them, because they're biggoted and whatnot.

Yes I'm anti-mainstream society, and proud of it.
fucked up =/= stronger

kids who are constantly ridiculed tend to shoot up the place, not mature into better people.
I was ridiculed through elementary school, and I never shot anyone.  In general all the kids who make fun of them for having gay parents will likely end up working at McDonalds.
CoronadoSEAL
pics or it didn't happen
+207|6942|USA
(:21) - i don't mean to derail, but the lulz...the lulz...

Last edited by CoronadoSEAL (2008-05-06 16:16:29)

KEN-JENNINGS
I am all that is MOD!
+2,991|7056|949

No I think only transgender blood type O- polygamists should.
madmurre
I suspect something is amiss
+117|7134|Sweden
Yes IF the biological parents approve you have to respect their cultural view even if you don´t agree on it in allot of development countries gay couples are denied adoptions.
eaglecorps
shotguns
+23|6667|TEXAS
I say nay gay marriage is wrong I don't care where they get their kids from.
FallenMorgan
Member
+53|6338|Glendale, CA

eaglecorps wrote:

I say nay gay marriage is wrong I don't care where they get their kids from.
Um...and is there a logical reason behind it being wrong that does not involve the bible?

madmurre wrote:

Yes IF the biological parents approve you have to respect their cultural view even if you don´t agree on it in allot of development countries gay couples are denied adoptions.
If a black couple adopts a white baby they don't need the permission of the biological parents.  Usually if parents put their kid up for adoption, they wouldn't care if the adoptive parents are gay.  What if the couple is really caring and whatnot, they get refused, and the next couple that comes around is abusive, but it's a man and a woman?
Pug
UR father's brother's nephew's former roommate
+652|6966|Texas - Bigger than France
Does this mean that Elen Degeneres can't adopt a cool asian kid like the rest of Hollywood?

Tragic.
madmurre
I suspect something is amiss
+117|7134|Sweden

FallenMorgan wrote:

madmurre wrote:

Yes IF the biological parents approve you have to respect their cultural view even if you don´t agree on it in allot of development countries gay couples are denied adoptions.
If a black couple adopts a white baby they don't need the permission of the biological parents.  Usually if parents put their kid up for adoption, they wouldn't care if the adoptive parents are gay.  What if the couple is really caring and whatnot, they get refused, and the next couple that comes around is abusive, but it's a man and a woman?
Look from their perspective basicly hey we are the sons from satan and gonna take "care" of your child you would´nt want your kids to be raised by demons from hell would you?

the example is a tad bit bisarre but i think you see my point and the scenario your using could be used the other way around.
Drakef
Cheeseburger Logicist
+117|6786|Vancouver

S.Lythberg wrote:

FallenMorgan wrote:

argo4 wrote:

i'd say no just cause a boy adopted and raised by gays will pretty much be screwed up for life, i.e. he won't know what real family life is like  and he will be ostracized for being weird/effeminate/acting gay. For girls, gay parents are probably alright
Um...so fucking what?

The only reason people want kids to know what "real family life" is like is so they grow up to get married and have a bunch of kids in a suburban house with a white picket fence and all that other bullshit.
not the point, kids will find out that they have gay adoptive parents, and they'll get hell for it.

and FYI, your anti-society bias is showing.
Kids will always be bullied and harassed. If they wear a yellow shirt, if they are brown, if they are left handed. if they eat a different lunch- Kids will always find a reason to pick on certain other kids. Unless you wish to legislate complete conformity, I don't believe that one different aspect will be radically different.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard