Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6827|North Carolina

Kmarion wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

Masques wrote:


The negative externalities of drilling and production don't have an effect on Florida alone.
Good point...  but... if properly regulated, then more drilling isn't a bad thing.  It's all about oversight.
Economic implications would not be enough for overstepping states rights. If they cite national security as the core reason then it falls within the jurisdiction of the United States Constitution. Of course it doesn't really matter now. Floridians elected Crist and Crist has now agreed.
I just wish we had referendums on this sort of thing.  We need more referendums in general.
Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|7023|132 and Bush

Turquoise wrote:

Kmarion wrote:

Turquoise wrote:


Good point...  but... if properly regulated, then more drilling isn't a bad thing.  It's all about oversight.
Economic implications would not be enough for overstepping states rights. If they cite national security as the core reason then it falls within the jurisdiction of the United States Constitution. Of course it doesn't really matter now. Floridians elected Crist and Crist has now agreed.
I just wish we had referendums on this sort of thing.  We need more referendums in general.
Yes we do. The only other alternative is shorter terms.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
(T)eflon(S)hadow
R.I.P. Neda
+456|7251|Grapevine, TX
Developing... Ill try to find more info. tomorrow. from digg
House Democrats Call for Nationalization of Refineries !

foxnews.com — House Democrats responded to President's Bush's call for Congress to lift the moratorium on offshore drilling. Among other things, the Democrats called for the government to own refineries so it could better control the flow of the oil supply!! House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-MD) said the same.


Please tell me why they would want to run a refinery...  Dont drill or explore. But we'll run the refineries for you
Both go hand in hand and hey Im not bitching if they want to allow more refineries to be built, but there is no way in hell I would support our government controlling refinery operations.

They have also been sitting on at least 7 Nuclear plant license requests, to my knowledge... Congress that is.
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6827|North Carolina
I support socialized medicine....  but not socialized oil...  Saudi Aramco shows how bad that idea is.
Schittloaf
not fulla schit
+23|6325|MN

Turquoise wrote:

I would agree, Teflon.  One last caveat, however, is that we should maintain high environmental standards in this drilling.  If any Valdez type disasters occur, the company involved should get the shit sued out of them.
how many Valdez situations happen compared to daily transports of oil to this country from mid east?  thats like saying never fly an airplane because they fall out of the air !
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6827|North Carolina

Schittloaf wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

I would agree, Teflon.  One last caveat, however, is that we should maintain high environmental standards in this drilling.  If any Valdez type disasters occur, the company involved should get the shit sued out of them.
how many Valdez situations happen compared to daily transports of oil to this country from mid east?  thats like saying never fly an airplane because they fall out of the air !
You missed my point.  I was saying that companies should always be held accountable for their actions.  The reason I bring it up is because they often aren't held as accountable as they should be.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard