AMD Phenom™ FX processor

2008-08-28 21:12:47

#1

blademaster: I'm moving to Brazil; +2,075|6913

MD Phenom™ FX processor
The AMD Phenom™ FX processor is the most advanced PC processor in the galaxy.
AMD Phenom™ FX processors deliver the ultimate megatasking experience,
providing direct and rapid information flow between processor cores,
main memory, and
graphics and video accelerators.

There's said to be two chips in the pipeline, the FX-80 at 4Ghz and the FX-82 at 4.4GHz.

https://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m302/ABS_PC_1/fx2.jpg

https://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m302/ABS_PC_1/rev.jpg

https://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m302/ABS_PC_1/phenom-cpuz.jpg

http://reviewage.co.uk/content/view/33/1/

2008-08-28 21:13:38

#2

Catbox: forgiveness; +505|6984

I wonder if they will be as good as the intel procs?

Love is the answer

2008-08-29 03:30:48

#3

DUnlimited: got any popo lolo intersting?; +1,160|6731|cuntshitlake

Now this looks interesting

A quad core CPU stock clocked at 4.4GHz

main battle tank karthus medikopter 117 megamegapowershot gg

2008-08-29 03:37:00

#4

Varegg: Support fanatic :-); +2,206|7077|Nårvei

Will have to take a good look at these when i upgrade next year

Wait behind the line ..............................................................

2008-08-29 04:19:21

#5

Freezer7Pro: I don't come here a lot anymore.; +1,447|6465|Winland

I have a feeling that AMD are falling in the same trap as Intel did back with the Pentium 4, just going for pure clock speed. Hopefully, their L3 will be fast too, with lower latencies than the Nehalems, that ould make AMD the target for gaming systems.

The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP

2008-08-29 04:21:56

#6

mikeyb118: Evil Overlord; +76|6866|S.C.

AMD might be redefining stock cooling here.

Last edited by mikeyb118 (2008-08-29 04:22:19)

2008-08-29 05:46:06

#7

Freezer7Pro: I don't come here a lot anymore.; +1,447|6465|Winland

mikeyb118 wrote:
AMD might be redefining stock cooling here.

It's running at 1.15V. Most quads clocked to 4+ uses 1.5V+. A signifigant difference.

The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP

2008-08-29 06:07:36

#8

FFLink: There is.; +1,380|6958|Devon, England

Aren't they like £1000?

2008-08-29 06:11:37

#9

Freezer7Pro: I don't come here a lot anymore.; +1,447|6465|Winland

FFLink13 wrote:
Aren't they like £1000?

AMD aren't in a position to launch something in that price segment.

The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP

2008-08-29 06:38:09

#10

rammunition: Fully Loaded; +143|6129

FFLink13 wrote:
Aren't they like £1000?

AMD have made losses, i would predict this processor at a price of no more than £250, maybe £300. The current phenom is about £150

this is the most expensive AMD CPU on Ebuyer

http://www.ebuyer.com/product/143263

Last edited by rammunition (2008-08-29 06:55:58)

2008-08-29 06:52:16

#11

The#1Spot: Member; +105|6807|byah

Freezer7Pro wrote:
I have a feeling that AMD are falling in the same trap as Intel did back with the Pentium 4, just going for pure clock speed. Hopefully, their L3 will be fast too, with lower latencies than the Nehalems, that ould make AMD the target for gaming systems.

Unlike the P4 the the phenom fx has the cache to back up the clock speed.

2008-08-29 07:11:04

#12

Freezer7Pro: I don't come here a lot anymore.; +1,447|6465|Winland

The#1Spot wrote:
Freezer7Pro wrote:
I have a feeling that AMD are falling in the same trap as Intel did back with the Pentium 4, just going for pure clock speed. Hopefully, their L3 will be fast too, with lower latencies than the Nehalems, that ould make AMD the target for gaming systems.
Unlike the P4 the the phenom fx has the cache to back up the clock speed.

Prescotts had 2MB, which was huge fo the time. What killed the P4 was the 31-step pipeline. HT helped utilizing it a bit, but not enough.

The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP

2008-08-29 07:13:03

#13

FFLink: There is.; +1,380|6958|Devon, England

Sorry, was assuming it would be like these:

http://www.google.co.uk/products?hl=en& … p;ct=title

2008-08-29 07:14:40

#14

Jenspm: penis; +1,716|7000|St. Andrews / Oslo

4.4 Giga-WAT?!

I hope they're fucking awesome. gogogo AMD, do to Intel what you did to NVidia

https://static.bf2s.com/files/user/26774/flickricon.png

2008-08-29 07:17:15

#15

Freezer7Pro: I don't come here a lot anymore.; +1,447|6465|Winland

FFLink13 wrote:
Sorry, was assuming it would be like these:

http://www.google.co.uk/products?hl=en& … p;ct=title

Most of those are whole server,s you know...

The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP

2008-08-29 07:24:38

#16

GC_PaNzerFIN: Work and study @ Technical Uni; +528|6682|Finland

holy hell... if that is true, it will be THE bomb for gamers. I wonder how these OC too...

I REALLY want to see some benchies against Nehalem.

3930K | H100i | RIVF | 16GB DDR3 | GTX 480 | AX750 | 800D | 512GB SSD | 3TB HDD | Xonar DX | W8

2008-08-29 07:39:34

#17

Freezer7Pro: I don't come here a lot anymore.; +1,447|6465|Winland

GC_PaNzerFIN wrote:
holy hell... if that is true, it will be THE bomb for gamers. I wonder how these OC too...

I REALLY want to see some benchies against Nehalem.

I doubt something with that high of a stock frequency will overclock much. They're probably pretty much pushed to the limit at stock...

The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP

2008-08-29 07:41:24

#18

Gooners: Wiki Contributor; +2,700|6900

Freezer7Pro wrote:
GC_PaNzerFIN wrote:
holy hell... if that is true, it will be THE bomb for gamers. I wonder how these OC too...

I REALLY want to see some benchies against Nehalem.
I doubt something with that high of a stock frequency will overclock much. They're probably pretty much pushed to the limit at stock...

You never know

2008-08-29 08:03:41

#19

Agent_Dung_Bomb: Member; +302|7003|Salt Lake City

FFLink13 wrote:
Sorry, was assuming it would be like these:

http://www.google.co.uk/products?hl=en& … p;ct=title

Exactly. The increase in clock speeds was being negated by the reduced IPC in the deeper pipeline, not to mention the harsh penalty that resulted if a branch prediction was wrong. Having to flush and repopulate a pipeline that deep was costly to performance.

2008-08-29 16:40:36

#20

David.P: Banned; +649|6541

Remember the Pentium 3 and It's 10 stage Pipeline? Remember the P4 northwood with it's 20 stage? And remember the Prescott P4 with it's 30+ stage? Remember what happens when you add stages to a pipeline needlessly for clockspeed? Exactly more Speed and Heat for Less performance per clock.(P3 1.4ghz > P4 1.4 ghz)

2008-08-29 18:55:42

#21

blademaster: I'm moving to Brazil; +2,075|6913

yeah hopefully AMD makes a comeback so that way the market is stable and reliable as well as flexible allowing us to choose between the two

2008-08-30 00:58:39

#22

Freezer7Pro: I don't come here a lot anymore.; +1,447|6465|Winland

David.P wrote:
Remember the Pentium 3 and It's 10 stage Pipeline? Remember the P4 northwood with it's 20 stage? And remember the Prescott P4 with it's 30+ stage? Remember what happens when you add stages to a pipeline needlessly for clockspeed? Exactly more Speed and Heat for Less performance per clock.(P3 1.4ghz > P4 1.4 ghz)

Matter of fact, a Prescott at 1.4 > A P3 at 1.4, due to the new instructions supported, and some other optimizations and bla-di-bla-di-bla. A P3 at 1.4 totally shreds a Willamette at 2GHz, and is about equal to a Northie at 1.4.

The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP

BF2S Forums AMD Phenom™ FX processor

mikeyb118 wrote:

FFLink13 wrote:

FFLink13 wrote:

Freezer7Pro wrote:

The#1Spot wrote:

Freezer7Pro wrote:

FFLink13 wrote:

GC_PaNzerFIN wrote:

Freezer7Pro wrote:

GC_PaNzerFIN wrote:

FFLink13 wrote:

David.P wrote:

Board footer