rammunition
Fully Loaded
+143|6128
now i have a 500GB hard drive with Vista on it, i only have 150GB left and want to add 2 hard drives.

now here is what i want.

500GB- has vista installed and will install software on it only
*1TB - now i want a 1TB hard drive and want to put all my music, videos, work, ISO's and back up on that.
*40GB- now on this hard drive i want to install Ubuntu and want to dual boot.

Also i want to be able to access my music/videos etc from the 1TB when i use both Vista and Ubuntu.


what sort of setup is needed and how do you do it?????

here is a link to my motherboard

http://www.gigabyte.com.tw/Products/Mot … uctID=2741

what im asking is, is it a case of just plugging them or do you need some sort of raid set up???

Last edited by rammunition (2008-11-04 03:40:18)

Bertster7
Confused Pothead
+1,101|6848|SE London

Get hard drive. Plug in power lead. Plug in data lead. Initialise in Windows.

Job done.

Why on earth would you need a RAID set?

Accessing a normal NTFS partition from Ubuntu will be fine. It should have read only access to the drive.
rammunition
Fully Loaded
+143|6128

Bertster7 wrote:

Get hard drive. Plug in power lead. Plug in data lead. Initialise in Windows.

Job done.

Why on earth would you need a RAID set?

Accessing a normal NTFS partition from Ubuntu will be fine. It should have read only access to the drive.
i have no idea, i have never had more than one hard drive in a computer and am confused a bit on adding more
max
Vela Incident
+1,652|6834|NYC / Hamburg

Bertster7 wrote:

Get hard drive. Plug in power lead. Plug in data lead. Initialise in Windows.

Job done.

Why on earth would you need a RAID set?

Accessing a normal NTFS partition from Ubuntu will be fine. It should have read only access to the drive.
that & afaik 8.10 can now finally reliably write to ntfs
once upon a midnight dreary, while i pron surfed, weak and weary, over many a strange and spurious site of ' hot  xxx galore'. While i clicked my fav'rite bookmark, suddenly there came a warning, and my heart was filled with mourning, mourning for my dear amour, " 'Tis not possible!", i muttered, " give me back my free hardcore!"..... quoth the server, 404.
rammunition
Fully Loaded
+143|6128

max wrote:

Bertster7 wrote:

Get hard drive. Plug in power lead. Plug in data lead. Initialise in Windows.

Job done.

Why on earth would you need a RAID set?

Accessing a normal NTFS partition from Ubuntu will be fine. It should have read only access to the drive.
that & afaik 8.10 can now finally reliably write to ntfs
8.10 seems cool, i haven't tried it yet want to
max
Vela Incident
+1,652|6834|NYC / Hamburg

I'm staying with 8.04 for the moment. On second thought I might update my q6600-P5Q rig. The onboard network doesn't work atm. I'm sure there's a fix, but I cba. I just use a PCI card. 8.10 should fix that problem though.
once upon a midnight dreary, while i pron surfed, weak and weary, over many a strange and spurious site of ' hot  xxx galore'. While i clicked my fav'rite bookmark, suddenly there came a warning, and my heart was filled with mourning, mourning for my dear amour, " 'Tis not possible!", i muttered, " give me back my free hardcore!"..... quoth the server, 404.
Microwave
_
+515|6921|Loughborough Uni / Leeds, UK
I've got 8.10 on my system at the moment. I can access my other 2 hard drives from in Ubuntu.


I have a bootloader menu with vista, xp and ubuntu on now. I can talk you through setting it up like that if you want.
rammunition
Fully Loaded
+143|6128

james@alienware wrote:

I've got 8.10 on my system at the moment. I can access my other 2 hard drives from in Ubuntu.


I have a bootloader menu with vista, xp and ubuntu on now. I can talk you through setting it up like that if you want.
sounds cool, please do explain
FatherTed
xD
+3,936|6766|so randum
cable for power + cable for data.

done.
Small hourglass island
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella
Microwave
_
+515|6921|Loughborough Uni / Leeds, UK
Which bit do you want help with?


Lets do this one step at a time!
rammunition
Fully Loaded
+143|6128

james@alienware wrote:

Which bit do you want help with?


Lets do this one step at a time!
my main concern was that when i boot into ubuntu/vista which will be on separate drives, in which the 1TB will be used by both, so i would have thought their would have been a set up but it seems not to be the case
Microwave
_
+515|6921|Loughborough Uni / Leeds, UK
If you want ubuntu and vista installed on the same drive you'll need to partition it, which is simple.
rammunition
Fully Loaded
+143|6128

james@alienware wrote:

If you want ubuntu and vista installed on the same drive you'll need to partition it, which is simple.
No, i want 3 HDD in total

500GB- has vista installed and will install software on it only
*1TB - now i want a 1TB hard drive and want to put all my music, videos, work, ISO's and back up on that.
*40GB- now on this hard drive i want to install Ubuntu and want to dual boot.


as mentioned, my main concern was if both OS's on separate drives would be able to access the 1TB
Microwave
_
+515|6921|Loughborough Uni / Leeds, UK

rammunition wrote:

james@alienware wrote:

If you want ubuntu and vista installed on the same drive you'll need to partition it, which is simple.
No, i want 3 HDD in total

500GB- has vista installed and will install software on it only
*1TB - now i want a 1TB hard drive and want to put all my music, videos, work, ISO's and back up on that.
*40GB- now on this hard drive i want to install Ubuntu and want to dual boot.


as mentioned, my main concern was if both OS's on separate drives would be able to access the 1TB
OK..... well the only drive of concern to you is the 40GB one. Assuming it's already connected to your pc you need to format it.

Then download the version of ubuntu you want (32/64bit).

Then you need to install it on the drive which is the 'hardest' bit.
CrazeD
Member
+368|6939|Maine

jamiet757 wrote:

No offense, but if you don't even know how to add another hard drive to your computer, why the hell would you think of trying to mess around with linux?
Brasso
member
+1,549|6896

i see no benefits from dual booting with linux on another drive.  the only reason i use linux is because i wanted to make the most of my old laptop's resources (xp was being a bit of a hog).  you're not going to be able to do very much on linux and installing apps/sudo is a PITA and confusing, at least to me.  i only use my linuxtop for browsing the web and some light openoffice use.
"people in ny have a general idea of how to drive. one of the pedals goes forward the other one prevents you from dying"
Freezer7Pro
I don't come here a lot anymore.
+1,447|6463|Winland

haffeysucks wrote:

i see no benefits from dual booting with linux on another drive.  the only reason i use linux is because i wanted to make the most of my old laptop's resources (xp was being a bit of a hog).  you're not going to be able to do very much on linux and installing apps/sudo is a PITA and confusing, at least to me.  i only use my linuxtop for browsing the web and some light openoffice use.
I'd rather run Ubuntu on a small extra drive than on a part of my main drive. More practical, and no need to repartition if you wanna get rid of it.
The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP
Brasso
member
+1,549|6896

Freezer7Pro wrote:

haffeysucks wrote:

i see no benefits from dual booting with linux on another drive.  the only reason i use linux is because i wanted to make the most of my old laptop's resources (xp was being a bit of a hog).  you're not going to be able to do very much on linux and installing apps/sudo is a PITA and confusing, at least to me.  i only use my linuxtop for browsing the web and some light openoffice use.
I'd rather run Ubuntu on a small extra drive than on a part of my main drive. More practical, and no need to repartition if you wanna get rid of it.
oh of course.  that's not what i meant.  i meant why would you want to run ubuntu when you have XP/vista already?
"people in ny have a general idea of how to drive. one of the pedals goes forward the other one prevents you from dying"
TopHat01
Limitless
+117|6171|CA

haffeysucks wrote:

Freezer7Pro wrote:

haffeysucks wrote:

i see no benefits from dual booting with linux on another drive.  the only reason i use linux is because i wanted to make the most of my old laptop's resources (xp was being a bit of a hog).  you're not going to be able to do very much on linux and installing apps/sudo is a PITA and confusing, at least to me.  i only use my linuxtop for browsing the web and some light openoffice use.
I'd rather run Ubuntu on a small extra drive than on a part of my main drive. More practical, and no need to repartition if you wanna get rid of it.
oh of course.  that's not what i meant.  i meant why would you want to run ubuntu when you have XP/vista already?
tbh

Most people I know install Linux, bitch about how a certain part doesn't work/they cba to learn it, and go back to XP/Vista.  If I were the OP here, I'd buy a 1TB, move everything from my 500GB to my 1TB, and maybe do a 50/50 split of XP and Vista, or a 90/10 of Vista/Linux if you're really that inclined to get Linux.  I'd probably convert the 500GB to an external, or backup drive.

Just my opinion.
GodFather
Blademaster's bottom bitch
+387|6486|Phoenix, AZ
HDD's are like the easiest thing to set up



And I was looking at >999GB drives and a lot of them had bad reviews saying mainly something along the lines of "Failed after 2 months" "Failed after 3 weeks"

Anyone have thoughts on the above? I was looking into a cheap TB drive in the future for all my.... files *cough*..... but I was turned off by the amount of people saying how it failed on them

If im right about the failure rate, buy a few 640GB drives for 70 bucks a pop
Freezer7Pro
I don't come here a lot anymore.
+1,447|6463|Winland

TopHat01 wrote:

haffeysucks wrote:

Freezer7Pro wrote:


I'd rather run Ubuntu on a small extra drive than on a part of my main drive. More practical, and no need to repartition if you wanna get rid of it.
oh of course.  that's not what i meant.  i meant why would you want to run ubuntu when you have XP/vista already?
tbh

Most people I know install Linux, bitch about how a certain part doesn't work/they cba to learn it, and go back to XP/Vista.  If I were the OP here, I'd buy a 1TB, move everything from my 500GB to my 1TB, and maybe do a 50/50 split of XP and Vista, or a 90/10 of Vista/Linux if you're really that inclined to get Linux.  I'd probably convert the 500GB to an external, or backup drive.

Just my opinion.
If you wanna try Linux, and have a cheap, old 40GB drive lying around, why not install it on that one? It saves a lot of hassle.
The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP
max
Vela Incident
+1,652|6834|NYC / Hamburg

GodFather wrote:

HDD's are like the easiest thing to set up



And I was looking at >999GB drives and a lot of them had bad reviews saying mainly something along the lines of "Failed after 2 months" "Failed after 3 weeks"

Anyone have thoughts on the above? I was looking into a cheap TB drive in the future for all my.... files *cough*..... but I was turned off by the amount of people saying how it failed on them

If im right about the failure rate, buy a few 640GB drives for 70 bucks a pop
1 out of 8 of my 1TB drives died after a couple of hours. First natural HDD death I've had since '99
once upon a midnight dreary, while i pron surfed, weak and weary, over many a strange and spurious site of ' hot  xxx galore'. While i clicked my fav'rite bookmark, suddenly there came a warning, and my heart was filled with mourning, mourning for my dear amour, " 'Tis not possible!", i muttered, " give me back my free hardcore!"..... quoth the server, 404.
prototype
Member
+52|6577
MAX, if you dont mind saying, how old was the TB drive that died and what name brand/model was it?

Last edited by prototype (2008-11-05 08:24:26)

max
Vela Incident
+1,652|6834|NYC / Hamburg

Samsung Spinpoint F1, died after about a day. All my 7 other F1s work perfectly fine. IMO just a random fluke. I was long overdue for a HDD dieing on me
once upon a midnight dreary, while i pron surfed, weak and weary, over many a strange and spurious site of ' hot  xxx galore'. While i clicked my fav'rite bookmark, suddenly there came a warning, and my heart was filled with mourning, mourning for my dear amour, " 'Tis not possible!", i muttered, " give me back my free hardcore!"..... quoth the server, 404.
rammunition
Fully Loaded
+143|6128

max wrote:

Samsung Spinpoint F1, died after about a day. All my 7 other F1s work perfectly fine. IMO just a random fluke. I was long overdue for a HDD dieing on me
i have never had a problem with samsung drives, might be something else killing your drives tbh



ok, so i got a 250GB drive for £25 with P&P, doing to partition that and have 40GB for ubuntu and 200GB for back ups til i get more money for the 1TB

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard