Scorpion0x17
can detect anyone's visible post count...
+691|7032|Cambridge (UK)

twoblacklines wrote:

i want a gx2 for folding

i only run folding@gpu and dont bother with folding@cpu and im halfway up the bf2s leaderboard already
stats whore
Defiance
Member
+438|6937

DeathUnlimited wrote:

GPU's are advancing far faster than games need imo
That started a while back, when graphics took precedent over gameplay in some games.
AussieReaper
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
+5,761|6419|what

Defiance wrote:

DeathUnlimited wrote:

GPU's are advancing far faster than games need imo
That started a while back, when graphics took precedent over gameplay in some games.
Some games?

You mean Crysis.
https://i.imgur.com/maVpUMN.png
Defiance
Member
+438|6937

TheAussieReaper wrote:

Defiance wrote:

DeathUnlimited wrote:

GPU's are advancing far faster than games need imo
That started a while back, when graphics took precedent over gameplay in some games.
Some games?

You mean Crysis.
Nope, that is an extreme example to be sure though. To it's benefit, Crysis' gameplay is bland apart from the suit but I still found it fun if for that one thing.
Little BaBy JESUS
m8
+394|6415|'straya

Defiance wrote:

TheAussieReaper wrote:

Defiance wrote:


That started a while back, when graphics took precedent over gameplay in some games.
Some games?

You mean Crysis.
Nope, that is an extreme example to be sure though. To it's benefit, Crysis' gameplay is bland apart from the suit but I still found it fun if for that one thing.
imo Crysis is a good game... but boring after u get over how awesome it looks lol
Mekstizzle
WALKER
+3,611|6887|London, England
Doesn't seem to be much of an incentive to need to go and get a new video card though. PC Games Industry is slowing down too much and can't keep up, and the console games industry that ports titles to the PC won't exactly push PC's to their limits as those games are designed to run on console hardware, which isn't exactly cutting edge anymore
DUnlimited
got any popo lolo intersting?
+1,160|6729|cuntshitlake

Mek-Stizzle wrote:

Doesn't seem to be much of an incentive to need to go and get a new video card though. PC Games Industry is slowing down too much and can't keep up, and the console games industry that ports titles to the PC won't exactly push PC's to their limits as those games are designed to run on console hardware, which isn't exactly cutting edge anymore
Well the reason I am looking forwards to this is because older gpus get way cheaper. I have already seen a 8800GT for 75e and another equipped with Accelero S1 for 90e.

Good stuff dirt cheap.
main battle tank karthus medikopter 117 megamegapowershot gg
Freezer7Pro
I don't come here a lot anymore.
+1,447|6463|Winland

DeathUnlimited wrote:

Mek-Stizzle wrote:

Doesn't seem to be much of an incentive to need to go and get a new video card though. PC Games Industry is slowing down too much and can't keep up, and the console games industry that ports titles to the PC won't exactly push PC's to their limits as those games are designed to run on console hardware, which isn't exactly cutting edge anymore
Well the reason I am looking forwards to this is because older gpus get way cheaper. I have already seen a 8800GT for 75e and another equipped with Accelero S1 for 90e.

Good stuff dirt cheap.
Exactly. Being one gen behind is awesome.
The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP
heggs
Spamalamadingdong
+581|6654|New York

Freezer7Pro wrote:

DeathUnlimited wrote:

Mek-Stizzle wrote:

Doesn't seem to be much of an incentive to need to go and get a new video card though. PC Games Industry is slowing down too much and can't keep up, and the console games industry that ports titles to the PC won't exactly push PC's to their limits as those games are designed to run on console hardware, which isn't exactly cutting edge anymore
Well the reason I am looking forwards to this is because older gpus get way cheaper. I have already seen a 8800GT for 75e and another equipped with Accelero S1 for 90e.

Good stuff dirt cheap.
Exactly. Being one gen behind is awesome.
Yup, I rarely buy current gen stuff when you can get such solid performance from 'older' hardware.
Remember Me As A Time Of Day
max
Vela Incident
+1,652|6834|NYC / Hamburg

nubs
once upon a midnight dreary, while i pron surfed, weak and weary, over many a strange and spurious site of ' hot  xxx galore'. While i clicked my fav'rite bookmark, suddenly there came a warning, and my heart was filled with mourning, mourning for my dear amour, " 'Tis not possible!", i muttered, " give me back my free hardcore!"..... quoth the server, 404.
rammunition
Fully Loaded
+143|6128
direct x 11 already???

there are hardly any games that use direct x 10
prototype
Member
+52|6577
direct X 11 in the later Nvidia cards,

How far can graphics go?

I am waiting on affordable easy to use full body VR suits to play first person war games,
that will be frickin sweet
Freezer7Pro
I don't come here a lot anymore.
+1,447|6463|Winland

prototype wrote:

direct X 11 in the later Nvidia cards,

How far can graphics go?

I am waiting on affordable easy to use full body VR suits to play first person war games,
that will be frickin sweet
Those will be banned when gamers develop post-traumatic stress
The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP
The#1Spot
Member
+105|6806|byah
The 4850x2 is out on newegg. Its effing 430$. Who in the right mind would buy that? 2x 4870 can be nearly had for just a little more including rebate.

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.a … =HD%204850
CrazeD
Member
+368|6939|Maine

The#1Spot wrote:

The 4850x2 is out on newegg. Its effing 430$. Who in the right mind would buy that? 2x 4870 can be nearly had for just a little more including rebate.

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.a … =HD%204850
Wow, that's stupid. You can just crossfire two 4850's for less than $300.
GC_PaNzerFIN
Work and study @ Technical Uni
+528|6680|Finland

CrazeD wrote:

The#1Spot wrote:

The 4850x2 is out on newegg. Its effing 430$. Who in the right mind would buy that? 2x 4870 can be nearly had for just a little more including rebate.

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.a … =HD%204850
Wow, that's stupid. You can just crossfire two 4850's for less than $300.
yeah. new hardware is always overpriced at first. (looks at X58 mobos.... 300-400€)
3930K | H100i | RIVF | 16GB DDR3 | GTX 480 | AX750 | 800D | 512GB SSD | 3TB HDD | Xonar DX | W8
CrazeD
Member
+368|6939|Maine

GC_PaNzerFIN wrote:

CrazeD wrote:

The#1Spot wrote:

The 4850x2 is out on newegg. Its effing 430$. Who in the right mind would buy that? 2x 4870 can be nearly had for just a little more including rebate.

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.a … =HD%204850
Wow, that's stupid. You can just crossfire two 4850's for less than $300.
yeah. new hardware is always overpriced at first. (looks at X58 mobos.... 300-400€)
True, but usually AMD does better than that.

Come on AMD...what's wrong with you? >.<
Scorpion0x17
can detect anyone's visible post count...
+691|7032|Cambridge (UK)

prototype wrote:

direct X 11 in the later Nvidia cards,

How far can graphics go?
oh, quite some way yet...

I always chuckle when people say that CG can't get any better - look back at Crysis in 5 years time and you'll see it completely differently...
GC_PaNzerFIN
Work and study @ Technical Uni
+528|6680|Finland

Scorpion0x17 wrote:

prototype wrote:

direct X 11 in the later Nvidia cards,

How far can graphics go?
oh, quite some way yet...

I always chuckle when people say that CG can't get any better - look back at Crysis in 5 years time and you'll see it completely differently...
I will definately wait for dx11 before I upgrade. raytracing and tesselation will look awsome.
3930K | H100i | RIVF | 16GB DDR3 | GTX 480 | AX750 | 800D | 512GB SSD | 3TB HDD | Xonar DX | W8
Scorpion0x17
can detect anyone's visible post count...
+691|7032|Cambridge (UK)

GC_PaNzerFIN wrote:

Scorpion0x17 wrote:

prototype wrote:

direct X 11 in the later Nvidia cards,

How far can graphics go?
oh, quite some way yet...

I always chuckle when people say that CG can't get any better - look back at Crysis in 5 years time and you'll see it completely differently...
I will definately wait for dx11 before I upgrade. raytracing and tesselation will look awsome.
I doubt very much that DX11 will have raytracing. I'm just saying there's a long way to go before CG can stop going anywhere.
The#1Spot
Member
+105|6806|byah

Scorpion0x17 wrote:

prototype wrote:

direct X 11 in the later Nvidia cards,

How far can graphics go?
oh, quite some way yet...

I always chuckle when people say that CG can't get any better - look back at Crysis in 5 years time and you'll see it completely differently...
I occasionally look at old pc games >5 years on ign and its just amazing how far graphics have come.
Scorpion0x17
can detect anyone's visible post count...
+691|7032|Cambridge (UK)

The#1Spot wrote:

Scorpion0x17 wrote:

prototype wrote:

direct X 11 in the later Nvidia cards,

How far can graphics go?
oh, quite some way yet...

I always chuckle when people say that CG can't get any better - look back at Crysis in 5 years time and you'll see it completely differently...
I occasionally look at old pc games >5 years on ign and its just amazing how far graphics have come.
Exactamundo. The same will happen in another 5 years - todays games, as awesome as they look to us now, will look crap in 5 years time.

GC_PaNzerFIN wrote:

raytracing and tesselation will look awsome.
BTW, Panzer, what do you mean by "tessellation"? - you could be referring to a number of things and I'm just wondering which...
Freezer7Pro
I don't come here a lot anymore.
+1,447|6463|Winland

Scorpion0x17 wrote:

The#1Spot wrote:

Scorpion0x17 wrote:


oh, quite some way yet...

I always chuckle when people say that CG can't get any better - look back at Crysis in 5 years time and you'll see it completely differently...
I occasionally look at old pc games >5 years on ign and its just amazing how far graphics have come.
Exactamundo. The same will happen in another 5 years - todays games, as awesome as they look to us now, will look crap in 5 years time.

GC_PaNzerFIN wrote:

raytracing and tesselation will look awsome.
BTW, Panzer, what do you mean by "tessellation"? - you could be referring to a number of things and I'm just wondering which...
Out of
Tessellations and color, Tessellations with quadrilaterals, Regular and irregular tessellations, Self-dual Tessellations, Tessellations and computer graphics, Tessellations in nature, Number of sides of a polygon versus number of sides at a vertex and Tessellations of other spaces, which one do you think he means?

Spoiler (highlight to read):
Yes I copypasta'd those from Wikipedia.
The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP
Scorpion0x17
can detect anyone's visible post count...
+691|7032|Cambridge (UK)

Freezer7Pro wrote:

Scorpion0x17 wrote:

GC_PaNzerFIN wrote:

raytracing and tesselation will look awsome.
BTW, Panzer, what do you mean by "tessellation"? - you could be referring to a number of things and I'm just wondering which...
Out of
Tessellations and color, Tessellations with quadrilaterals, Regular and irregular tessellations, Self-dual Tessellations, Tessellations and computer graphics, Tessellations in nature, Number of sides of a polygon versus number of sides at a vertex and Tessellations of other spaces, which one do you think he means?

Spoiler (highlight to read):
Yes I copypasta'd those from Wikipedia.
Yeah, but that just means dividing a complex shape up into smaller, simpler,  joined-together shapes, so that they can be more efficiently rendered - i.e. like a triangle-mesh - nothing new in that.

I've a feeling Panzer was actually referring to volumetric rendering, but I could be wrong...

Last edited by Scorpion0x17 (2008-11-08 17:04:55)

Mekstizzle
WALKER
+3,611|6887|London, England
Still have a long way to go in terms of graphics, but an even longer journey in terms of physics

Wonder what shit will be like in 20 years time, crazy.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard