Mekstizzle
WALKER
+3,611|6885|London, England
Right, so what I want to do is set up a Media sharing network between my PS3, the laptop and my PC. What I've managed to do is enable the PS3 to access the media in my PC and laptop, aswell as have my laptop be able to access the media on my PC. But for some reason I can't get my PC to access the data on my laptop.

Pic to help you get what I mean:

https://i42.tinypic.com/29ks5f4.png

That's from the PC, as you can see, I can only share my media, I can't access anyone elses. The option isn't even there. Whereas when I go to the same settings for the laptop, there is a setting there which allows me to access other peoples media.

Maybe it's cos the laptop is Vista and I'm on XP? We're both using WMP 11 and the PS3 can access it all as it has its own media server scanning function, and the laptop is enabled otherwise the PS3 wouldn't be able to connect to it. So I'm not quite sure why I can't even "scan for devices" on my XP PC.

Any help?

Preferably using WMP 11, I know if I just downloaded Tversity I could do it, but tbh I don't think it performs as well as WMP 11 does when it comes to sharing/streaming over the network.
FatherTed
xD
+3,936|6764|so randum
iirc i had issues with my XP on network sharing and shit with my xbox
Small hourglass island
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella
Brasso
member
+1,549|6894

are the PC and laptop on the same workgroup?
"people in ny have a general idea of how to drive. one of the pedals goes forward the other one prevents you from dying"
steelie34
pub hero!
+603|6645|the land of bourbon
make sure file sharing is enabled in the firewall...
https://bf3s.com/sigs/36e1d9e36ae924048a933db90fb05bb247fe315e.png
Mekstizzle
WALKER
+3,611|6885|London, England
File sharing is enabled, otherwise I wouldn't be able to share files to the PS3. My PS3 can access the media on my PC and Laptop, and my Laptop can access the media on my PC. But I can't access the media from my PC to my Laptop (I can't even "find" the laptop on my PC), I have no idea how to "scan" for media centres so that my PC can access them, all I can find is ways to share to everyone else, but no ways to find and hog

I was doing some research on google etc.. and it seems that this problem is indeed real, and an XP problem at that. I think I'm stumped on this one.
FatherTed
xD
+3,936|6764|so randum

Mekstizzle wrote:

File sharing is enabled, otherwise I wouldn't be able to share files to the PS3. My PS3 can access the media on my PC and Laptop, and my Laptop can access the media on my PC. But I can't access the media from my PC to my Laptop (I can't even "find" the laptop on my PC), I have no idea how to "scan" for media centres so that my PC can access them, all I can find is ways to share to everyone else, but no ways to find and hog

I was doing some research on google etc.. and it seems that this problem is indeed real, and an XP problem at that. I think I'm stumped on this one.
yep you are i think

honestly, swear i tried to do the same thing between 2 pc's and my xbox, and it just isnt possible
Small hourglass island
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella
Cheez
Herman is a warmaphrodite
+1,027|6703|King Of The Islands

You can share files in Vista (Windows File and Print Sharing) as well as media sharing (Windows Media Player Networking Sharing).

Make sure the former is on under Network Center.

By default a computer is invisible in Windows Networking if it's not sharing anything. Share a folder (right click it) first to do so.
My state was founded by Batman. Your opinion is invalid.
steelie34
pub hero!
+603|6645|the land of bourbon

haffeysucks wrote:

are the PC and laptop on the same workgroup?
this is also important

i think windows gets a bad rap for file sharing.  it is sometimes very confusing, but it works if you know how to configure it correctly.  check out this link, there is some good info here -->

http://compnetworking.about.com/od/wind … haring.htm

Last edited by steelie34 (2009-02-01 05:08:11)

https://bf3s.com/sigs/36e1d9e36ae924048a933db90fb05bb247fe315e.png
Bertster7
Confused Pothead
+1,101|6845|SE London

steelie34 wrote:

haffeysucks wrote:

are the PC and laptop on the same workgroup?
this is also important

i think windows gets a bad rap for file sharing.  it is sometimes very confusing, but it works if you know how to configure it correctly.  check out this link, there is some good info here -->

http://compnetworking.about.com/od/wind … haring.htm
Not always.

Buggy as hell in XP. Yet another thing fixed by Vista.
steelie34
pub hero!
+603|6645|the land of bourbon

Bertster7 wrote:

steelie34 wrote:

haffeysucks wrote:

are the PC and laptop on the same workgroup?
this is also important

i think windows gets a bad rap for file sharing.  it is sometimes very confusing, but it works if you know how to configure it correctly.  check out this link, there is some good info here -->

http://compnetworking.about.com/od/wind … haring.htm
Not always.

Buggy as hell in XP. Yet another thing fixed by Vista.
what "bugs" are there in XP file sharing?  its just a protocol, and it works fine.  i have never had any issues getting vista and xp to work properly.  i think people are quick to say its broken and buggy when in reality they just haven't configured it properly...  for example, most people don't realize vista uses NTLMv2 authentication out-of-the-box compared to XP using only NTLM.  if the vista machine is set to reject all authentication attempts except ntlmv2, then you will have some problems connecting the two... this is not a "bug," but in fact a simple security setting that can be changed on both machines to make them work.
https://bf3s.com/sigs/36e1d9e36ae924048a933db90fb05bb247fe315e.png
Bertster7
Confused Pothead
+1,101|6845|SE London

steelie34 wrote:

Bertster7 wrote:

steelie34 wrote:


this is also important

i think windows gets a bad rap for file sharing.  it is sometimes very confusing, but it works if you know how to configure it correctly.  check out this link, there is some good info here -->

http://compnetworking.about.com/od/wind … haring.htm
Not always.

Buggy as hell in XP. Yet another thing fixed by Vista.
what "bugs" are there in XP file sharing?  its just a protocol, and it works fine.  i have never had any issues getting vista and xp to work properly.  i think people are quick to say its broken and buggy when in reality they just haven't configured it properly...  for example, most people don't realize vista uses NTLMv2 authentication out-of-the-box compared to XP using only NTLM.  if the vista machine is set to reject all authentication attempts except ntlmv2, then you will have some problems connecting the two... this is not a "bug," but in fact a simple security setting that can be changed on both machines to make them work.
Well you think wrong.

It breaks. It fails to recognise stuff after being configured correctly. You don't get this problem if you use AD, but XP filesharing is extremely buggy (not as buggy as doing anything with Samba on a Mac or with the piece of shit that is the Apple mail server).

I'm well aware of how NTLM works, I've also seen all sorts of horrible issues with filesharing across peer to peer networks with XP. I solve all these issues by just kerberising everything.
steelie34
pub hero!
+603|6645|the land of bourbon
hmm, we have different experiences then.  i have never had any problems with M$ file sharing on any windows versions, but i'm not going to say you haven't... if everything microsoft did worked perfectly, none of us would have jobs

btw, do you use the MIT version of kerberos or the M$ version?  i've had a lot of issues with the MIT version.
https://bf3s.com/sigs/36e1d9e36ae924048a933db90fb05bb247fe315e.png
Bertster7
Confused Pothead
+1,101|6845|SE London

steelie34 wrote:

hmm, we have different experiences then.  i have never had any problems with M$ file sharing on any windows versions, but i'm not going to say you haven't... if everything microsoft did worked perfectly, none of us would have jobs

btw, do you use the MIT version of kerberos or the M$ version?  i've had a lot of issues with the MIT version.
Typically the MIT version. Usually on UNIX systems (or dirty Macs - which are much the same). Never had any major issues with it.

Is all your NTP stuff sorted properly? That seems to be the most common cause of kerberos problems.
steelie34
pub hero!
+603|6645|the land of bourbon

Bertster7 wrote:

steelie34 wrote:

hmm, we have different experiences then.  i have never had any problems with M$ file sharing on any windows versions, but i'm not going to say you haven't... if everything microsoft did worked perfectly, none of us would have jobs

btw, do you use the MIT version of kerberos or the M$ version?  i've had a lot of issues with the MIT version.
Typically the MIT version. Usually on UNIX systems (or dirty Macs - which are much the same). Never had any major issues with it.

Is all your NTP stuff sorted properly? That seems to be the most common cause of kerberos problems.
well, there is a host of issues on our network here, and unfortunately i don't have to power to fix alot of the problems.  first off, our domain name for the active directory is not the same as the root DNS server, so that causes huge, huge, huge problems.  everything on the AD is supported with cname records, which causes a lot of latency and server not found errors... in fact, a lot of clients have issues finding the ntp servers, which probably causes the problems i'm having with the MIT realm.  for the time being, we are just kind of ignoring the kerb stuff and logging on right to AD, which isn't ideal, but the head network admin is retarded and doesn't understand wtf he's doing.  oh well, life goes on. /rant
https://bf3s.com/sigs/36e1d9e36ae924048a933db90fb05bb247fe315e.png
Bertster7
Confused Pothead
+1,101|6845|SE London

steelie34 wrote:

Bertster7 wrote:

steelie34 wrote:

hmm, we have different experiences then.  i have never had any problems with M$ file sharing on any windows versions, but i'm not going to say you haven't... if everything microsoft did worked perfectly, none of us would have jobs

btw, do you use the MIT version of kerberos or the M$ version?  i've had a lot of issues with the MIT version.
Typically the MIT version. Usually on UNIX systems (or dirty Macs - which are much the same). Never had any major issues with it.

Is all your NTP stuff sorted properly? That seems to be the most common cause of kerberos problems.
well, there is a host of issues on our network here, and unfortunately i don't have to power to fix alot of the problems.  first off, our domain name for the active directory is not the same as the root DNS server, so that causes huge, huge, huge problems.  everything on the AD is supported with cname records, which causes a lot of latency and server not found errors... in fact, a lot of clients have issues finding the ntp servers, which probably causes the problems i'm having with the MIT realm.  for the time being, we are just kind of ignoring the kerb stuff and logging on right to AD, which isn't ideal, but the head network admin is retarded and doesn't understand wtf he's doing.  oh well, life goes on. /rant
Yeah, sounds like DNS issues are causing NTP issues, which are screwing up your kerberos.

Bad DNS always leads to horrible knock on effects.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard