How to make BF2 awsm

2009-04-22 16:08:54

#1

1.5 sucks: Banned; +11|5742|locked in myke's basement

Things that do not need nerfing:
J10, Attack Helis,

Things that do not need to be made more powerful:
AA, Essex, F35,

Things that definitely need fixing:
Hitreg,

Things that could possibly be nerfed:
Nades:
2 nades per kit + 1 nade PER AMMO PACK

Clays:
Smaller Radius, Destructible

Things that need improvement:
Movement:
Make similar to 1.12, i.e. the full range of movement, but without jumping + shooting.

Bugs/fixes from 1.50:
Operation Blue Pearl:
Change the boundaries like this:

^ map (C) 2009 TehMyke
Kinda similar to Leviathan.
Also: 2 cars for USMC in uncap and maybe a car or two @ harbor/construction for PLA
Allow commanders to drop vehicles.

Disable Falcon by defaut and fix the overwriting of secondary controls with Falcon controls every time a game is joined (eg when aircraft controls are bound to mouse + joystick, Falcon overwrites the joystick).
Require a checkbox on the controls page to enable Falcon - so that the 99% of users who don't use Falcon don't have Falcon binds present by default.

Discuss.

Last edited by 1.5 sucks (2009-04-22 16:19:05)

2009-04-22 16:16:05

#2

TehMyke: 8======D; +343|6967

1.5 sucks wrote:
Clays:
Smaller Radius,

and destroyable like they once where

kthx

» You guys are all old and wrinkly now, GG... | Steam | teHmyke.com | YouTube

2009-04-22 16:18:28

#3

N00bkilla55404: Voices are calling...; +136|6189|Somewhere out in Space

NO NO NO NO NO DONT FUCKING NERF NADES THE ONLY TIME PEOPLE SPAM THEM IS IO KARKAND SO PLAY SOMETHING ELSE YOU FUCKING LAMERS!

srs

2009-04-22 16:28:25

#4

I'm Jamesey: Do a Research Noob; +506|6390|Scotland!

N00bkilla55404 wrote:
NO NO NO NO NO DONT FUCKING NERF NADES THE ONLY TIME PEOPLE SPAM THEM IS IO KARKAND SO PLAY SOMETHING ELSE YOU FUCKING LAMERS!

srs

shut up you're dumb

2009-04-22 16:28:49

#5

1.5 sucks: Banned; +11|5742|locked in myke's basement

I'm Jamesey wrote:
N00bkilla55404 wrote:
NO NO NO NO NO DONT FUCKING NERF NADES THE ONLY TIME PEOPLE SPAM THEM IS IO KARKAND SO PLAY SOMETHING ELSE YOU FUCKING LAMERS!

srs
shut up you're dumb

i demand suggestions

2009-04-22 16:34:32

#6

DefCon-17: Maple Syrup Faggot; +362|6414|Vancouver | Canada

Don't nerf the J10 but nerf nades?

lolgtfo

2009-04-22 16:38:14

#7

Aries_37: arrivederci frog; +368|6833|London

N00bkilla55404 wrote:
NO NO NO NO NO DONT FUCKING NERF NADES THE ONLY TIME PEOPLE SPAM THEM IS IO KARKAND SO PLAY SOMETHING ELSE YOU FUCKING LAMERS!

srs

the guy who said that on the forum has a good point. nades do ruin IO, but on conquest maps everyone is either in a vehicle or are playing AT. If you want to play medic and be useful to your team then you will need the nades.

2009-04-22 16:42:11

#8

KEN-JENNINGS: I am all that is MOD!; +2,979|6889|949

It's really not that bad of a game. The only glaring problem is hitreg. They don't need to nerf anything or revert back to earlier versions. Just fix the hitreg (if possible) and give us the new map.

I don't see why people are freaking out over a patch that's still in beta...

2009-04-22 16:43:33

#9

steelie34: pub hero!; +603|6639|the land of bourbon

hit reg, better pearl

https://bf3s.com/sigs/36e1d9e36ae924048a933db90fb05bb247fe315e.png

2009-04-22 16:48:16

#10

TehMyke: 8======D; +343|6967

KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
I don't see why people are freaking out over a patch that's still in beta...

well considering its been "in the works" for close to a year now... i would of expected something slightly more polished not worse tbh

Last edited by TehMyke (2009-04-22 16:49:04)

» You guys are all old and wrinkly now, GG... | Steam | teHmyke.com | YouTube

2009-04-22 16:49:51

#11

13/f/taiwan: Member; +940|5956

TehMyke wrote:
KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
I don't see why people are freaking out over a patch that's still in beta...
well considering its been "in the works" for close to a year now... i would of expected something slightly more polished not worse tbh

qft

2009-04-22 17:20:35

#12

N00bkilla55404: Voices are calling...; +136|6189|Somewhere out in Space

Aries_37 wrote:
N00bkilla55404 wrote:
NO NO NO NO NO DONT FUCKING NERF NADES THE ONLY TIME PEOPLE SPAM THEM IS IO KARKAND SO PLAY SOMETHING ELSE YOU FUCKING LAMERS!

srs
the guy who said that on the forum has a good point. nades do ruin IO, but on conquest maps everyone is either in a vehicle or are playing AT. If you want to play medic and be useful to your team then you will need the nades.

Even then, you only see spam on IO karkand. Is there nade spam on IO sharqi, mashturr? NO!

2009-04-22 17:28:35

#13

Aries_37: arrivederci frog; +368|6833|London

N00bkilla55404 wrote:
Aries_37 wrote:
N00bkilla55404 wrote:
NO NO NO NO NO DONT FUCKING NERF NADES THE ONLY TIME PEOPLE SPAM THEM IS IO KARKAND SO PLAY SOMETHING ELSE YOU FUCKING LAMERS!

srs
the guy who said that on the forum has a good point. nades do ruin IO, but on conquest maps everyone is either in a vehicle or are playing AT. If you want to play medic and be useful to your team then you will need the nades.
Even then, you only see spam on IO karkand. Is there nade spam on IO sharqi, mashturr? NO!

well actually there is. IO in general is horrendous for nades. small team sizes + all medic + lots of nades = spam on any map.

But I honestly don't see DICE putting in so much effort as to go and nerf nades in IO but not in conquest. And the heart of bf2 is conquest so if they can't be selective I'd rather they just keep nades as they are.

2009-04-22 17:53:09

#14

blademaster: I'm moving to Brazil; +2,075|6903

nerf the blackhawk so its mini gun is Godly like it once was!!!

2009-04-22 17:58:55

#15

KEN-JENNINGS: I am all that is MOD!; +2,979|6889|949

12/f/taiwan wrote:
TehMyke wrote:
KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
I don't see why people are freaking out over a patch that's still in beta...
well considering its been "in the works" for close to a year now... i would of expected something slightly more polished not worse tbh
qft

It's EA/DICE. You are probably setting your standards too high. I expected it (the patch) to be shitty and buggy, but I didn't expect the community to go crazy over it. Still, it's absurd to say that a beta patch sucks (it is by definition incomplete). Yes, reverting controls to aN add-on 99% of the community don't have is stupid - but that's why they release beta patches - so those errors can be found and fixed.

2009-04-22 18:03:34

#16

jsnipy: ...; +3,277|6780|...

definitely agree with making blue pearl bigger

2009-04-22 18:18:25

#17

Banksey: Banksey Says: Chew, don't choke :); +12|5743|Ireland

blademaster wrote:
nerf the blackhawk so its mini gun is Godly like it once was!!!

Cleary you don't understand the concept behind nerfing

2009-04-22 21:26:05

#18

-MetaL*: Sup guies; +157|5891|Southern California

1.5 sucks wrote:
Nades:
2 nades per kit + 1 nade PER AMMO PACK

Oh gee I wonder who came up with this idea.

2009-04-22 21:50:58

#19

Longbow: Member; +163|6904|Odessa, Ukraine

Nerf G36E?

2009-04-22 21:52:35

#20

.:i7|Batman: Banned; +27|5758| - | - | - | - | - |

Longbow wrote:
Nerf G36E?

No it needs more power, things a lil girls toy.

2009-04-22 22:05:57

#21

TunaMan: Mouse-Pilot; +29|6041|Israel

1.5 sucks wrote:
Things that do not need to be made more powerful:
F35

Things that could possibly be nerfed:
Nades:
2 nades per kit + 1 nade PER AMMO PACK

Discuss.

I agree with all you've said apart from those two what's quoted up here. Why?
- The F35 can do with a little improvement for the turns and afterburner. Not to mention allow it to actually dodge missiles.
- The nades are fine. No need to whine about them.
- The blackhawks can definitely be improved a little like they were on the earlier patches .

Last edited by RegMan (2009-04-22 22:09:38)

2009-04-22 22:07:29

#22

Wallpaper: ☺; +303|6251|The pool

nickb64 wrote:
[sarcasm]Things That could be added(if possible):
Nuclear Bombing by Commander[/sarcasm]

Some people seriously suggested that.

My flickr

2009-04-22 22:20:36

#23

-CARNIFEX-[LOC]: Da Blooze; +111|6911

My biggest problems with BF2 are hitreg, grenades, and claymores.

So:
Fix hitreg, at least to some degree.

Keep the same number of starting nades, but I like the idea of only getting 1 extra per ammo pack.

Instead of having 2 claymores, snipers have 1 claymore, and 1 single medkit, or maybe just 1 claymore...and claymores should be destructable and have a smaller area to set them off. I'm sick of seeing claymores through doorways, purposely avoiding going through, and still having it blow up and kill me if I walk by 5 feet out from the door that it's INSIDE.

Plus, since C4 has been nerfed to hell, I think Spec Forces could use 1 single claymore.

In BF2's current state, I think a chimpanzee trained only to run around and drop claymores could probably average a 2.0 KDR on Karkand IO...

https://static.bf2s.com/files/user/12516/Bitch%20Hunter%20Sig.jpg

2009-04-22 22:47:56

#24

TunaMan: Mouse-Pilot; +29|6041|Israel

-CARNIFEX-[LOC] wrote:
In BF2's current state, I think a chimpanzee trained only to run around and drop claymores could probably average a 2.0 KDR on Karkand IO...

I lol'd

2009-04-22 23:31:45

#25

Janis_Petke: \m/(><)\m/; +49|6951|Brunei Darussalam

Bring back the old miniguns for blackhawk! Well, not as powerfull as they were, but some...

BF2S Forums How to make BF2 awsm

1.5 sucks wrote:

N00bkilla55404 wrote:

I'm Jamesey wrote:

N00bkilla55404 wrote:

N00bkilla55404 wrote:

KEN-JENNINGS wrote:

TehMyke wrote:

KEN-JENNINGS wrote:

Aries_37 wrote:

N00bkilla55404 wrote:

N00bkilla55404 wrote:

Aries_37 wrote:

N00bkilla55404 wrote:

12/f/taiwan wrote:

TehMyke wrote:

KEN-JENNINGS wrote:

blademaster wrote:

1.5 sucks wrote:

Longbow wrote:

1.5 sucks wrote:

nickb64 wrote:

-CARNIFEX-[LOC] wrote:

Board footer