i didnt vote cause there is no "I dont give a shit what you do" button
Poll
What should i do ?
| Play CS:S competitively | 20% | 20% - 8 | ||||
| Play BF2 competitively | 12% | 12% - 5 | ||||
| Play both for fun (have wars in CSS and pub BF2) | 66% | 66% - 26 | ||||
| Total: 39 | ||||||
Competitive gaming fails in my opinion. I used to be a competitive bf2 player, and before that a competitive CS player but i gave up on that shit. it was like having a 2nd job except i wasn't getting paid... i was getting abused by 12 yr old for apparently"hacking"
Just play for fun
Just play for fun
win.Little BaBy JESUS wrote:
Competitive gaming fails in my opinion. I used to be a competitive bf2 player, and before that a competitive CS player but i gave up on that shit. it was like having a 2nd job except i wasn't getting paid... i was getting abused by 12 yr old for apparently"hacking"
Just play for fun
everything i write is a ramble and should not be taken seriously.... seriously. ♥
CS:S is terrible playing it seriously is ridiculous.
That said so is BF2 but it is alot more fun.
That said so is BF2 but it is alot more fun.
bf2 4ever<3333
Do what I said on vent the other day (I'm Sii)
dont play neither. neither game is worth the time and effort as it was in the past.
^ You already said that
And lol at whoever left me the butthurt karma
And lol at whoever left me the butthurt karma
Playing pretty much anything competitively will make you rage and hate the game. A game is for enjoyment, not desk-breaking angerur a fag just like the specialist..GTFO BF2s
Last edited by Wallpaper (2009-04-25 20:52:17)
comp makes some people rage...as long as you choose not to be one of those people, its fuckin hilarious to watch them rage and especially hear them in ventWallpaper wrote:
^ You already said that
And lol at whoever left me the butthurt karmaPlaying pretty much anything competitively will make you rage and hate the game. A game is for enjoyment, not desk-breaking angerur a fag just like the specialist..GTFO BF2s
I personally can't play two games "seriously" without completely sucking ass at the other. This doesn't apply to different genres, though, so I could play like Simcity for days on end and then hop into a CSS match and play just fine.
BF2 has never struck me as a competitive game. Jets, tanks, helicopters? HORRIBLE hit detection. No control over net settings. No real match mode. The game feels too loose and pubby to me. Nothing is consistent, which adds a lot of randomness to the game. Yeah you can overcome the crap hit reg to a point, but you still get puffs of smoke and no damage very often, or you just completely shoot through a target. CSS certainly isn't a shining example for skill > randomness, but skill is handicapped way less in CS than BF2, and there are less random elements. CSS is built around competition and removing as many non-skill factors as possible. BF2 is very obviously a pub game. BF2 is a fuckload of fun to pub, but CSS is much more fun to play competitively.
BF2 has never struck me as a competitive game. Jets, tanks, helicopters? HORRIBLE hit detection. No control over net settings. No real match mode. The game feels too loose and pubby to me. Nothing is consistent, which adds a lot of randomness to the game. Yeah you can overcome the crap hit reg to a point, but you still get puffs of smoke and no damage very often, or you just completely shoot through a target. CSS certainly isn't a shining example for skill > randomness, but skill is handicapped way less in CS than BF2, and there are less random elements. CSS is built around competition and removing as many non-skill factors as possible. BF2 is very obviously a pub game. BF2 is a fuckload of fun to pub, but CSS is much more fun to play competitively.