War Man
Australians are hermaphrodites.
+564|6971|Purplicious Wisconsin
HOLY FUCKING SHIT!!! THIS GAME LOOKS GREAT, *calms down*. Alright; it seems the medic will be the shotgun class, the smg's are probably going to the recon class so you have a choice between smg or sniper, and the machine guns will go to engineer.

_Dominiko_PL wrote:

Did he just destroy a tank with blackhawk minigun?

http://img15.imageshack.us/img15/4867/facepalmq.jpg
With enough bullets it is possible to destroy a tank... but it takes ALOT of bullets.
The irony of guns, is that they can save lives.
Longbow
Member
+163|6904|Odessa, Ukraine

killaer wrote:

What are people expecting from BF3 that this won't bring? I mean from the videos alone...Seems like more vehicles, better graphics, more destruction, etc...
From what I see in this trailer, it looks exactly like a shitty console port that I try to avoid. I just hope that BF3 will be pure BF2's child, not that crappy bastard BF:BC's
-MetaL*
Sup guies
+157|5891|Southern California

nickb64 wrote:

Minigun could never take out a tank. A 30mm Vulcan Cannon (A10 Gun) could, but I don't think that's what that was.
GAU-8 Avenger is on an A10.
Longbow
Member
+163|6904|Odessa, Ukraine

-MetaL* wrote:

GAU-8 Avenger is on an A10.
And afaik it already cant take out modern tanks, like Leclerc, Leopard 2, Challenger 2, Merkava MkIII, M1A2 and others. Only cold war era tanks.
War Man
Australians are hermaphrodites.
+564|6971|Purplicious Wisconsin

Longbow wrote:

killaer wrote:

What are people expecting from BF3 that this won't bring? I mean from the videos alone...Seems like more vehicles, better graphics, more destruction, etc...
From what I see in this trailer, it looks exactly like a shitty console port that I try to avoid. I just hope that BF3 will be pure BF2's child, not that crappy bastard BF:BC's
I want to burn bf3.
The irony of guns, is that they can save lives.
Longbow
Member
+163|6904|Odessa, Ukraine

War Man wrote:

I want to burn bf3.
PC games > console ports
War Man
Australians are hermaphrodites.
+564|6971|Purplicious Wisconsin

Longbow wrote:

War Man wrote:

I want to burn bf3.
PC games > console ports
Not always, some console games I like better than pc games
The irony of guns, is that they can save lives.
DrunkFace
Germans did 911
+427|6938|Disaster Free Zone

killaer wrote:

lol...bf2 fans really can't enjoy anything can they
I liked 1942, I liked Vietnam and I liked 2.

The fact this game looks SHIT, has nothing to do with my ability to like something different.
DrunkFace
Germans did 911
+427|6938|Disaster Free Zone

War Man wrote:

Longbow wrote:

War Man wrote:

I want to burn bf3.
PC games > console ports
Not always, some console games I like better than pc games
About the only games that fall into that category are GTA, but then they're also Released on PC and are usually better. Ohh and Zelda Ocarina of Time.
killaer
Member
+41|6975

Longbow wrote:

killaer wrote:

What are people expecting from BF3 that this won't bring? I mean from the videos alone...Seems like more vehicles, better graphics, more destruction, etc...
From what I see in this trailer, it looks exactly like a shitty console port that I try to avoid. I just hope that BF3 will be pure BF2's child, not that crappy bastard BF:BC's
Why does it look like a shitty console port?
Noobpatty
ʎʇʇɐdqoou
+194|6611|West NY
I hope they changed the deviation at least a little. And that weird thing where firing an Abram's mounted machine gun was more effective firing one shot at a time
Longbow
Member
+163|6904|Odessa, Ukraine

killaer wrote:

Why does it look like a shitty console port?
Graphics, animations, crosshair, recoil, movement - they are all way too consolish. And those bright explosions are just meh..
War Man
Australians are hermaphrodites.
+564|6971|Purplicious Wisconsin

Longbow wrote:

killaer wrote:

Why does it look like a shitty console port?
Graphics, animations, crosshair, recoil, movement - they are all way too consolish. And those bright explosions are just meh..
The PC version may end up a bit different. Lets just wait and see.

Last edited by War Man (2009-06-13 11:20:54)

The irony of guns, is that they can save lives.
M.O.A.B
'Light 'em up!'
+1,220|6480|Escea

Longbow wrote:

killaer wrote:

Why does it look like a shitty console port?
Graphics, animations, crosshair, recoil, movement - they are all way too consolish. And those bright explosions are just meh..
The graphics and animations for BFBC2 are better than those of BF2. If the same game was made on a PC that looked exactly the same you wouldn't bitch about it. The whole 'consolish' thing is a load of shit, the only differences between console games and PC versions is that in place of 'Press F' it'll have a button. Analog sticks don't take rocket science to use and consoles have a great ability to produce games with better GFX and mechanics on new games without actually upgrading the console.

Its just a case of complaining for complaining's sake because it started out as a console exclusive title.
Longbow
Member
+163|6904|Odessa, Ukraine

M.O.A.B wrote:

Analog sticks don't take rocket science to use and consoles have a great ability to produce games with better GFX and mechanics on new games without actually upgrading the console.
Mouse + keyboard > joystick, anyday. I will never ever buy a console before they introduce full scale support for KB/mouse in MP games.
M.O.A.B
'Light 'em up!'
+1,220|6480|Escea

Longbow wrote:

M.O.A.B wrote:

Analog sticks don't take rocket science to use and consoles have a great ability to produce games with better GFX and mechanics on new games without actually upgrading the console.
Mouse + keyboard > joystick, anyday. I will never ever buy a console before they introduce full scale support for KB/mouse in MP games.
Well that's your option, but don't brand every aspect of a console game as a pile of shite just because it doesn't have keyboard or mouse support. Consoles as standard are likely to be more powerful than the vast majority of gaming PC's people have and their games are no different.
H3RB4L ABU53
+45|6125|123 | 456 | 789 | Δ
I used to be a console only gamer playing mostly on Xbox 360 when I played FPS on the 360 like BF2, R6 Vegas, I thought it was fine with the Xbox pad until I started playing properly on the PC with K+M, obviously the K+M is much more accurate and you can aim as fast as you like with a mouse and it takes a lot more learning to aim competitively with mouse than an analogue stick, so I prefer using mouse.
The good thing about consoles is that everyones got the same hardware, I know BF2 on the 360 is nothing at all compared to the PC version, smaller maps, less vehicles, less weapons, no teamwork etc etc etc but the good thing about it is that everyone has to use the pad, so you can be comfortable using it without feeling like you're at a disadvantage, and it's nice just having a pad to control everything with and nothing else- it's easy- that's why a lot of people say console FPS's are for noobs, everyone can get good at them quick- if you could plug a K+M into the 360 and play against everyone using pads obviously you would own them too hard
I think console games are good for casual gaming if you're a hardcore gamer and want to relax a bit, like I said it's good on BF2 on the 360 when I used to play it years ago being able to control infantry and fly choppers, drive tanks etc all using the pad like everyone else, but the PC has so much more control and detail and options that you can't really turn back to console games because consoles just don't meet your expectations after gaming on PC, which is why I was a bit disappointed when Bad Company 1 didn't come out on the PC cos I didn't want to play a FPS on my 360 ever
I hope BC2 for the PC doesn't end up like a console port like someone said, because console ports are complete shit- look at the Halo games on PC, if they were 100% native PC they would prob be some of the most popular games on PC
RoaringJet[FIN]
Member
+16|5713

M.O.A.B wrote:

Longbow wrote:

M.O.A.B wrote:

Analog sticks don't take rocket science to use and consoles have a great ability to produce games with better GFX and mechanics on new games without actually upgrading the console.
Mouse + keyboard > joystick, anyday. I will never ever buy a console before they introduce full scale support for KB/mouse in MP games.
Well that's your option, but don't brand every aspect of a console game as a pile of shite just because it doesn't have keyboard or mouse support. Consoles as standard are likely to be more powerful than the vast majority of gaming PC's people have and their games are no different.
Playing FPS on consoles is like trying to stick ur dick trough a cheerio while handling micro devices and wearing boxing gloves. The stick is fucking clumsy and worthless for aiming, its designed for look-around and for racing games if your not blessed with a wheel etc.

And were you high when you wrote that consoles "are to be" more powerful than the gaming rigs. If you look inside PS3 you find stuff almost identical to what's inside of a PC, the thing is, that that stuff inside the console is already starting to be out of date compared to PC hardware. Youre getting nowhere by comparing PCs with consoles on performance standards
_Dominiko_PL
TITS or gtfo.
+97|6778|Polish state of EU
I think BFBC2 for PCs will be a shitty console port game, arcade and boring after some time, and Dice will not care about it at all. Why? Because BF3 will be in progress
Trotskygrad
бля
+354|6256|Vortex Ring State

M.O.A.B wrote:

Longbow wrote:

killaer wrote:

Why does it look like a shitty console port?
Graphics, animations, crosshair, recoil, movement - they are all way too consolish. And those bright explosions are just meh..
The graphics and animations for BFBC2 are better than those of BF2. If the same game was made on a PC that looked exactly the same you wouldn't bitch about it. The whole 'consolish' thing is a load of shit, the only differences between console games and PC versions is that in place of 'Press F' it'll have a button. Analog sticks don't take rocket science to use and consoles have a great ability to produce games with better GFX and mechanics on new games without actually upgrading the console.

Its just a case of complaining for complaining's sake because it started out as a console exclusive title.
CoD4 (and CoD5) were developed both for PC and console. And nobody bitched about that. Why can we accept BF:BC2 as a cross-developed game? Valve does it all the time with HL.

"Oh, console ports are shitty, but PC ports to console are just fucking amazing" Seriously?
M.O.A.B
'Light 'em up!'
+1,220|6480|Escea

RoaringJet[FIN] wrote:

M.O.A.B wrote:

Longbow wrote:


Mouse + keyboard > joystick, anyday. I will never ever buy a console before they introduce full scale support for KB/mouse in MP games.
Well that's your option, but don't brand every aspect of a console game as a pile of shite just because it doesn't have keyboard or mouse support. Consoles as standard are likely to be more powerful than the vast majority of gaming PC's people have and their games are no different.
Playing FPS on consoles is like trying to stick ur dick trough a cheerio while handling micro devices and wearing boxing gloves. The stick is fucking clumsy and worthless for aiming, its designed for look-around and for racing games if your not blessed with a wheel etc.

And were you high when you wrote that consoles "are to be" more powerful than the gaming rigs. If you look inside PS3 you find stuff almost identical to what's inside of a PC, the thing is, that that stuff inside the console is already starting to be out of date compared to PC hardware. Youre getting nowhere by comparing PCs with consoles on performance standards
I see. I hear the new Crysis (you know sequel to the most graphically demanding game that exists) will be on PS3, but the PS3 is outdated an all.

And I always find it amusing when someone utterly despises a piece of equipment because they can't use it effectively. By the way, a mouse is designed to look around as well, if you couldn't look around you couldn't shoot anything.

In terms of performance to price, a console will beat a PC and you don't have to stick a new part in it every three years to play the newest game. Funny too considering console games like I said, improve in their graphical ability as time goes on, without the need to upgrade the console.

The whole "PC Master Race" can be summarised as a case of 'they are playing with toys that should rightfully be mine, wah!'
Trotskygrad
бля
+354|6256|Vortex Ring State

M.O.A.B wrote:

RoaringJet[FIN] wrote:

M.O.A.B wrote:


Well that's your option, but don't brand every aspect of a console game as a pile of shite just because it doesn't have keyboard or mouse support. Consoles as standard are likely to be more powerful than the vast majority of gaming PC's people have and their games are no different.
Playing FPS on consoles is like trying to stick ur dick trough a cheerio while handling micro devices and wearing boxing gloves. The stick is fucking clumsy and worthless for aiming, its designed for look-around and for racing games if your not blessed with a wheel etc.

And were you high when you wrote that consoles "are to be" more powerful than the gaming rigs. If you look inside PS3 you find stuff almost identical to what's inside of a PC, the thing is, that that stuff inside the console is already starting to be out of date compared to PC hardware. Youre getting nowhere by comparing PCs with consoles on performance standards
I see. I hear the new Crysis (you know sequel to the most graphically demanding game that exists) will be on PS3, but the PS3 is outdated an all.

And I always find it amusing when someone utterly despises a piece of equipment because they can't use it effectively. By the way, a mouse is designed to look around as well, if you couldn't look around you couldn't shoot anything.

In terms of performance to price, a console will beat a PC and you don't have to stick a new part in it every three years to play the newest game. Funny too considering console games like I said, improve in their graphical ability as time goes on, without the need to upgrade the console.

The whole "PC Master Race" can be summarised as a case of 'they are playing with toys that should rightfully be mine, wah!'
Lol, yeah, some of that is true. I can't play FPS for shit on a PS3.

But, I <3 my PC for gaming because the games are more customizable (try getting a console on your PS3), and I can mod my games to fit my needs. Try doing that on a PS3.

And that is why I hate consoles. I love modding my games, and consoles don't support that.
M.O.A.B
'Light 'em up!'
+1,220|6480|Escea

fermatx wrote:

M.O.A.B wrote:

RoaringJet[FIN] wrote:


Playing FPS on consoles is like trying to stick ur dick trough a cheerio while handling micro devices and wearing boxing gloves. The stick is fucking clumsy and worthless for aiming, its designed for look-around and for racing games if your not blessed with a wheel etc.

And were you high when you wrote that consoles "are to be" more powerful than the gaming rigs. If you look inside PS3 you find stuff almost identical to what's inside of a PC, the thing is, that that stuff inside the console is already starting to be out of date compared to PC hardware. Youre getting nowhere by comparing PCs with consoles on performance standards
I see. I hear the new Crysis (you know sequel to the most graphically demanding game that exists) will be on PS3, but the PS3 is outdated an all.

And I always find it amusing when someone utterly despises a piece of equipment because they can't use it effectively. By the way, a mouse is designed to look around as well, if you couldn't look around you couldn't shoot anything.

In terms of performance to price, a console will beat a PC and you don't have to stick a new part in it every three years to play the newest game. Funny too considering console games like I said, improve in their graphical ability as time goes on, without the need to upgrade the console.

The whole "PC Master Race" can be summarised as a case of 'they are playing with toys that should rightfully be mine, wah!'
Lol, yeah, some of that is true. I can't play FPS for shit on a PS3.

But, I <3 my PC for gaming because the games are more customizable (try getting a console on your PS3), and I can mod my games to fit my needs. Try doing that on a PS3.

And that is why I hate consoles. I love modding my games, and consoles don't support that.
I like PC's as much as my console and I probably use my PC more than my PS3. But having that PS3 opens me up to games that don't come out on the PC and also allows me to play games at max settings and smoothness without having to fork out a load of money and time for upgrades.

I have no problem with PCs, I just really don't understand the mentatlity that leads to the absolute hatred of consoles by PC-only gamers.
Trotskygrad
бля
+354|6256|Vortex Ring State

M.O.A.B wrote:

fermatx wrote:

M.O.A.B wrote:


I see. I hear the new Crysis (you know sequel to the most graphically demanding game that exists) will be on PS3, but the PS3 is outdated an all.

And I always find it amusing when someone utterly despises a piece of equipment because they can't use it effectively. By the way, a mouse is designed to look around as well, if you couldn't look around you couldn't shoot anything.

In terms of performance to price, a console will beat a PC and you don't have to stick a new part in it every three years to play the newest game. Funny too considering console games like I said, improve in their graphical ability as time goes on, without the need to upgrade the console.

The whole "PC Master Race" can be summarised as a case of 'they are playing with toys that should rightfully be mine, wah!'
Lol, yeah, some of that is true. I can't play FPS for shit on a PS3.

But, I <3 my PC for gaming because the games are more customizable (try getting a console on your PS3), and I can mod my games to fit my needs. Try doing that on a PS3.

And that is why I hate consoles. I love modding my games, and consoles don't support that.
I like PC's as much as my console and I probably use my PC more than my PS3. But having that PS3 opens me up to games that don't come out on the PC and also allows me to play games at max settings and smoothness without having to fork out a load of money and time for upgrades.

I have no problem with PCs, I just really don't understand the mentatlity that leads to the absolute hatred of consoles by PC-only gamers.
Well, yeah, PC gamers get pissed when they can't spawn ministriders on HL2 on the Xbox. Yeah.

If it isn't that, then it's their 1:5 KDR on MP FPSs
DUnlimited
got any popo lolo intersting?
+1,160|6721|cuntshitlake

The thing is, games that have top priority for consoles and are ported to PC just about always fail miserably.

War Man wrote:

With enough bullets it is possible to destroy a tank... but it takes ALOT of bullets.
lol

Last edited by DeathUnlimited (2009-06-14 08:01:42)

main battle tank karthus medikopter 117 megamegapowershot gg

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard