Example of laws that sound good but aren't

2010-02-01 12:46:24

#1

ATG: Banned; +5,233|6943|Global Command

Will post links later but you can see them now on drudge about how L.A. may require new and some retro building to require rainwater harvesting.

Sounds great for me, right? I am a small business person in rain water harvesting in Los Angeles. Bonanza.

No, actually, not at all.

Do the math: 1000 square feet of roof yields 550 gallons of water per inch of rain. That is ROOF area.
Imagine a developer contemplating a new shopping center. He must not only capture the 100000 square feet of roof area, but the 400000 feet of parking area, or pay $ 13.00 per gallon of water that goes into the storm drain.

An average of 14" of rain per year X 500000 square feet per year X $13.00 per gallon equals what?

Failure. What kind of fucking idiot would start a business here?

Fucking retards. - I wipe my ass with you.

2010-02-01 12:48:17

#2

Macbeth: Banned; +2,444|5999

Speed limits.

MOVE BITCH GET OUT THE WAY

2010-02-01 13:02:41

#3

Jay: Bork! Bork! Bork!; +2,006|5771|London, England

$91 million

"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat

2010-02-01 13:08:13

#4

Metal-Eater-GR: I can haz titanium paancakez?; +490|6686

lol. You sure there are no exceptions made for buildings with large roofs?

2010-02-01 13:19:57

#5

Pug: UR father's brother's nephew's former roommate; +652|6955|Texas - Bigger than France

ATG wrote:
Failure. What kind of fucking idiot would start a business here?

You just figured that out now?

2010-02-01 16:58:47

#6

Flaming_Maniac: prince of insufficient light; +2,490|7120|67.222.138.85

You are completely sure the law requires 1:1 collection?

2010-02-01 17:06:27

#7

Mitch: 16 more years; +877|6939|South Florida

Yeah.. I agree that its a bullshit law, and i also agree that theres LOTS of laws in effect that SOUNDED good but havent turned out good.

15 more years! 15 more years!

2010-02-01 17:10:04

#8

VicktorVauhn: Member; +319|6805|Southern California

Flaming_Maniac wrote:
You are completely sure the law requires 1:1 collection?

Exactly what I was gonna ask.

Just because you have to harvest rain water doesn't mean you have to harvest every last drop. I wouldn't be surprised if their was a maximum required amount here.

2010-02-01 17:13:24

#9

Jay: Bork! Bork! Bork!; +2,006|5771|London, England

Law of unintended consequences says enjoy the extra wildfires created by pulling humidity out of the air via rain collection.

"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat

2010-02-01 17:19:49

#10

N00bkilla55404: Voices are calling...; +136|6345|Somewhere out in Space

cool duplicate tread bro

You may post in 39 seconds

WHAT THE FUCK I POST IN A NONEXISTENT THREAD AND SPAM FILTER STILL APPLIES, FAIL.

2010-02-01 17:55:44

#11

Hurricane2k9: Pendulous Sweaty Balls; +1,538|6115|College Park, MD

JohnG@lt wrote:
Law of unintended consequences says enjoy the extra wildfires created by pulling humidity out of the air via rain collection.

Moar liek Failfornia

https://static.bf2s.com/files/user/36793/marylandsig.jpg

2010-02-01 17:58:23

#12

AussieReaper: ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°); +5,761|6566|what

Prohibition.

2010-02-01 17:59:14

#13

Bevo: Nah; +718|6934|Austin, Texas

Prohibition of marijuana.

inb4 dilbert

2010-02-01 18:19:00

#14

Dilbert_X: The X stands for; +1,822|6519|eXtreme to the maX

JohnG@lt wrote:
Law of unintended consequences says enjoy the extra wildfires created by pulling humidity out of the air via rain collection.

You really don't know anything about climate or weather do you?

Fuck Israel

2010-02-01 18:20:03

#15

Dilbert_X: The X stands for; +1,822|6519|eXtreme to the maX

Bevo wrote:
Prohibition of marijuana.

inb4 dilbert

Makes perfect sense, since its harmful especially to kids.
The majority of people agree with prohibition, so thats what happens.

Last edited by Dilbert_X (2010-02-01 18:21:15)

Fuck Israel

2010-02-01 18:20:45

#16

Bevo: Nah; +718|6934|Austin, Texas

Dilbert_X wrote:
Bevo wrote:
Prohibition of marijuana.

inb4 dilbert
Makes perfect sense, since its harmful especially to kids.

And alcohol isn't worse?

2010-02-01 18:22:17

#17

Dilbert_X: The X stands for; +1,822|6519|eXtreme to the maX

Don't think so no.

Fuck Israel

2010-02-01 18:23:30

#18

Bevo: Nah; +718|6934|Austin, Texas

Dilbert_X wrote:
Don't think so no.

ok

2010-02-01 18:25:13

#19

RAIMIUS: You with the face!; +244|7128|US

ATG wrote:
Do the math: 1000 square feet of roof yields 550 gallons of water per inch of rain. That is ROOF area.
Imagine a developer contemplating a new shopping center. He must not only capture the 100000 square feet of roof area, but the 400000 feet of parking area, or pay $ 13.00 per gallon of water that goes into the storm drain.

An average of 14" of rain per year X 500000 square feet per year X $13.00 per gallon equals what?

But 1000sq ft = 550gal. why are you multiplying by 500,000sq ft?
(It would still cost roughly $50mil if they didnt' collect any.)

2010-02-01 18:35:26

#20

N00bkilla55404: Voices are calling...; +136|6345|Somewhere out in Space

More like Dilderp dont you think?

2010-02-01 19:39:25

#21

ATG: Banned; +5,233|6943|Global Command

RAIMIUS wrote:
ATG wrote:
Do the math: 1000 square feet of roof yields 550 gallons of water per inch of rain. That is ROOF area.
Imagine a developer contemplating a new shopping center. He must not only capture the 100000 square feet of roof area, but the 400000 feet of parking area, or pay $ 13.00 per gallon of water that goes into the storm drain.

An average of 14" of rain per year X 500000 square feet per year X $13.00 per gallon equals what?
But 1000sq ft = 550gal. why are you multiplying by 500,000sq ft?
(It would still cost roughly $50mil if they didnt' collect any.)

Schroeder said that some building projects, such as those in downtown L.A. or areas where the soil is high in clay, would have difficulty with the 100% retention rule and that the $13-a-gallon mitigation fee is too high. A one-acre building on ground where runoff could not be managed on site, Schroeder said, could pay a fee as high as $238,000.

http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me … 4413.story

Assuming they figured the square footage of the property, including parking areas.

2010-02-01 20:16:48

#22

Jay: Bork! Bork! Bork!; +2,006|5771|London, England

Dilbert_X wrote:
JohnG@lt wrote:
Law of unintended consequences says enjoy the extra wildfires created by pulling humidity out of the air via rain collection.
You really don't know anything about climate or weather do you?

I do, thanks, they're interrupting the rain cycle by precluding evaporation. It won't necessarily be felt locally but that water IS being taken from elsewhere in the region.

"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat

2010-02-01 20:20:11

#23

Dilbert_X: The X stands for; +1,822|6519|eXtreme to the maX

You do know the vast bulk of evaporation leading to rainfall is from the sea?
Runoff collected from rainfall on roofs would be microscopically trivial in any case.

Last edited by Dilbert_X (2010-02-01 20:20:49)

Fuck Israel

2010-02-01 20:28:34

#24

Jay: Bork! Bork! Bork!; +2,006|5771|London, England

Dilbert_X wrote:
You do know the vast bulk of evaporation leading to rainfall is from the sea?
Runoff collected from rainfall on roofs would be microscopically trivial in any case.

Yes, I do understand that it's a small amount but it doesn't take a whole lot to turn southern California into an inferno.

"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat

2010-02-01 21:38:38

#25

Dilbert_X: The X stands for; +1,822|6519|eXtreme to the maX

With the Californian prevailing wind being from the west, ie from the sea, people collecting <1% of raindrops are not going to affect rainfall in California.

Fuck Israel

BF2S Forums Example of laws that sound good but aren't

ATG wrote:

Flaming_Maniac wrote:

JohnG@lt wrote:

JohnG@lt wrote:

Bevo wrote:

Dilbert_X wrote:

Bevo wrote:

Dilbert_X wrote:

ATG wrote:

RAIMIUS wrote:

ATG wrote:

Dilbert_X wrote:

JohnG@lt wrote:

Dilbert_X wrote:

Board footer