Spark
liquid fluoride thorium reactor
+874|7120|Canberra, AUS

Stingray24 wrote:

Wow, where do these Christians who cannot sin live?  I want to be there when they turn water to wine.
I've known plenty unfortunately. Arrogance and religion do not mix well.
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5804|London, England

Dilbert_X wrote:

What I've noticed with many Christians is they do whatever they like, and rationalise it by saying 'I'm a Christian, Christians cannot sin, therefore whatever I choose to do is right', and I know Christians who have done some shocking things.
They can sin, but if they ask for forgiveness the sin goes away
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
Spark
liquid fluoride thorium reactor
+874|7120|Canberra, AUS

JohnG@lt wrote:

Dilbert_X wrote:

What I've noticed with many Christians is they do whatever they like, and rationalise it by saying 'I'm a Christian, Christians cannot sin, therefore whatever I choose to do is right', and I know Christians who have done some shocking things.
They can sin, but if they ask for forgiveness the sin goes away
A kind of cosmic get-out-of-jail-free card - except you can reuse this one.
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
KEN-JENNINGS
I am all that is MOD!
+2,993|7077|949

This is what passes as serious talk around here now, huh?  More like an atheist circle-jerk.

No, non-believers know more random facts about the bible/Judeo-Christian storylines than believers.  And Europeans can name more states than Americans.  Whatever.  'Knowing' about religion is a lot more than memorizing stupid factoids you learn in the first few years of sunday school.
Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,823|6551|eXtreme to the maX

JohnG@lt wrote:

Dilbert_X wrote:

What I've noticed with many Christians is they do whatever they like, and rationalise it by saying 'I'm a Christian, Christians cannot sin, therefore whatever I choose to do is right', and I know Christians who have done some shocking things.
They can sin, but if they ask for forgiveness the sin goes away
Thats only Catholics, who aren't really Christian.
Fuck Israel
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6851|North Carolina

KEN-JENNINGS wrote:

'Knowing' about religion is a lot more than memorizing stupid factoids you learn in the first few years of sunday school.
I would agree, but few people of any religious or nonreligious persuasion know much beyond that regarding religion.
jord
Member
+2,382|7124|The North, beyond the wall.
Shifty please stop it, alls this thread needs is that haibai troll to come in now and all is well. Ugh.
Hunter/Jumper
Member
+117|6800

-Sh1fty- wrote:

If you read the Bible, it's very logical. The Earth is 6000 to 10,000 years old, not 5000.

On a side note, dinosaurs might have still existed in somewhat large numbers up until about 100-300 years ago. Those surviving being quite small, and in areas with few humans, such as dense jungles. It's a theory but I see it being quite plausible.
Of course it's plausible. The  Jesus we know could even be the combined experiences of several men. Would it matter ? The message is what people want to spread not proof. that's why they use the word Faith.

When I read the bible or rather had it read to me as a tyke I didn't think

" wow Noah put every last worm chipmunk rat snake cheetah melnant neigh neigh mule cow deer and rhinoceros on a huge barge "

I figured he took the animals that were important to him, thought " thank god all the rats and cobras are toast ha ha ha !  Let the rain begin ! I hope this thing floats ? "

The bible stories are supposed to make you think and reflect and alter your out look and actions. Like the children's story

" The Rock in The road " were the liberals dig the hole deeper and set up the trap so everyone will have " Equality of Out Come ", Then the Conservative comes by and fixes the road to promote commerce.

I never really thought some one interviewed the good Samaritan and got it all down on paper just right. I got the messages they were sending even if I didn't buy that Jesus really Walked on water. Maybe  Jesus was the David Blaine of his time?

Last edited by Hunter/Jumper (2010-09-30 14:02:57)

jord
Member
+2,382|7124|The North, beyond the wall.

Hunter/Jumper wrote:

-Sh1fty- wrote:

If you read the Bible, it's very logical. The Earth is 6000 to 10,000 years old, not 5000.

On a side note, dinosaurs might have still existed in somewhat large numbers up until about 100-300 years ago. Those surviving being quite small, and in areas with few humans, such as dense jungles. It's a theory but I see it being quite plausible.
Of course it's plausible. The  Jesus we know could even be the combined experiences of several men. Would it matter ? The message is what people want to spread not proof. that's why they use the word Faith.

When I read the bible or rather had it read to me as a tyke I didn't think

" wow Noah put every last worm chipmunk rat snake cheetah melnant neigh neigh mule cow deer and rhinoceros on a huge barge "

I figured he took the animals that were important to him, thought " thank god all the rats and cobras are toast ha ha ha !  Let the rain begin ! I hope this thing floats ? "

The bible stories are supposed to make you think and reflect and alter your out look and actions. Like the children's story

" The Rock in The road " were the liberals dig the hole deeper and set up the trap so everyone will have " Equality of Out Come ", Then the Conservative comes by and fixes the road to promote commerce.

I never really thought some one interviewed the good Samaritan and got it all down on paper just right. I got the message even if I didn't buy the Walking on water part. May Jesus was the David Blaine of his time?
What part of the post you quoted is plausible exactly?
Hunter/Jumper
Member
+117|6800

Dilbert_X wrote:

JohnG@lt wrote:

Dilbert_X wrote:

What I've noticed with many Christians is they do whatever they like, and rationalise it by saying 'I'm a Christian, Christians cannot sin, therefore whatever I choose to do is right', and I know Christians who have done some shocking things.
They can sin, but if they ask for forgiveness the sin goes away
Thats only Catholics, who aren't really Christian.
I used to tell my ex wife that.
Man if I said something like that here there would be a riot ! Go Dilbert !
Hunter/Jumper
Member
+117|6800

jord wrote:

Hunter/Jumper wrote:

-Sh1fty- wrote:

If you read the Bible, it's very logical. The Earth is 6000 to 10,000 years old, not 5000.

On a side note, dinosaurs might have still existed in somewhat large numbers up until about 100-300 years ago. Those surviving being quite small, and in areas with few humans, such as dense jungles. It's a theory but I see it being quite plausible.
Of course it's plausible. The  Jesus we know could even be the combined experiences of several men. Would it matter ? The message is what people want to spread not proof. that's why they use the word Faith.

When I read the bible or rather had it read to me as a tyke I didn't think

" wow Noah put every last worm chipmunk rat snake cheetah melnant neigh neigh mule cow deer and rhinoceros on a huge barge "

I figured he took the animals that were important to him, thought " thank god all the rats and cobras are toast ha ha ha !  Let the rain begin ! I hope this thing floats ? "

The bible stories are supposed to make you think and reflect and alter your out look and actions. Like the children's story

" The Rock in The road " were the liberals dig the hole deeper and set up the trap so everyone will have " Equality of Out Come ", Then the Conservative comes by and fixes the road to promote commerce.

I never really thought some one interviewed the good Samaritan and got it all down on paper just right. I got the message even if I didn't buy the Walking on water part. May Jesus was the David Blaine of his time?
What part of the post you quoted is plausible exactly?
. . . that Dinosaurs existed . . .
SamTheMan
­
+341|5587|Stoke, England
jesus isnt real
Spark
liquid fluoride thorium reactor
+874|7120|Canberra, AUS

jord wrote:

Hunter/Jumper wrote:

-Sh1fty- wrote:

If you read the Bible, it's very logical. The Earth is 6000 to 10,000 years old, not 5000.

On a side note, dinosaurs might have still existed in somewhat large numbers up until about 100-300 years ago. Those surviving being quite small, and in areas with few humans, such as dense jungles. It's a theory but I see it being quite plausible.
Of course it's plausible. The  Jesus we know could even be the combined experiences of several men. Would it matter ? The message is what people want to spread not proof. that's why they use the word Faith.

When I read the bible or rather had it read to me as a tyke I didn't think

" wow Noah put every last worm chipmunk rat snake cheetah melnant neigh neigh mule cow deer and rhinoceros on a huge barge "

I figured he took the animals that were important to him, thought " thank god all the rats and cobras are toast ha ha ha !  Let the rain begin ! I hope this thing floats ? "

The bible stories are supposed to make you think and reflect and alter your out look and actions. Like the children's story

" The Rock in The road " were the liberals dig the hole deeper and set up the trap so everyone will have " Equality of Out Come ", Then the Conservative comes by and fixes the road to promote commerce.

I never really thought some one interviewed the good Samaritan and got it all down on paper just right. I got the message even if I didn't buy the Walking on water part. May Jesus was the David Blaine of his time?
What part of the post you quoted is plausible exactly?
Always difficult to tell but I think he was being somewhat sarcastic?

Can't make head or tail of the last two lines, so I won't even try.
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
jord
Member
+2,382|7124|The North, beyond the wall.

Hunter/Jumper wrote:

jord wrote:

Hunter/Jumper wrote:


Of course it's plausible. The  Jesus we know could even be the combined experiences of several men. Would it matter ? The message is what people want to spread not proof. that's why they use the word Faith.

When I read the bible or rather had it read to me as a tyke I didn't think

" wow Noah put every last worm chipmunk rat snake cheetah melnant neigh neigh mule cow deer and rhinoceros on a huge barge "

I figured he took the animals that were important to him, thought " thank god all the rats and cobras are toast ha ha ha !  Let the rain begin ! I hope this thing floats ? "

The bible stories are supposed to make you think and reflect and alter your out look and actions. Like the children's story

" The Rock in The road " were the liberals dig the hole deeper and set up the trap so everyone will have " Equality of Out Come ", Then the Conservative comes by and fixes the road to promote commerce.

I never really thought some one interviewed the good Samaritan and got it all down on paper just right. I got the message even if I didn't buy the Walking on water part. May Jesus was the David Blaine of his time?
What part of the post you quoted is plausible exactly?
. . . that Dinosaurs existed . . .
No he said the Earth is a few thousand years old and that somehow dinosaurs existed up until a few hundred years ago. So which do you agree with?
Hunter/Jumper
Member
+117|6800

KEN-JENNINGS wrote:

This is what passes as serious talk around here now, huh?  More like an atheist circle-jerk.

No, non-believers know more random facts about the bible/Judeo-Christian storylines than believers.  And Europeans can name more states than Americans.  Whatever.  'Knowing' about religion is a lot more than memorizing stupid factoids you learn in the first few years of sunday school.
Well spoken,
Don't take offense but...
Did you get more like me or am I becoming more like you * ? One more possibility is this whole place needs a double flush. When you look who are predominant poster is, it seems like the case.

For the record this isn't where I come for serious talk. But I like to hear unfiltered what other people think. Not what some one is telling me they think. Where else can you ask a Frenchmen if the protests we hear about are hype or fact ?

* My guess is you had another car stolen from you.
Hunter/Jumper
Member
+117|6800

jord wrote:

Hunter/Jumper wrote:

jord wrote:

What part of the post you quoted is plausible exactly?
. . . that Dinosaurs existed . . .
No he said the Earth is a few thousand years old and that somehow dinosaurs existed up until a few hundred years ago. So which do you agree with?
No one knows how old the Earth is or can even claim to but I guarantee its older than that. I am quite sure he means to say

" an inhabitable earth as we know it. " Not some orb of molten rock. I am not out to trip him up using " Geometric Logic " !

It is possible about dinosaurs - they may yet find one. I doubt it, but it could happen, Maybe you didn't consider that it could be a deep ocean dwelling spices ? Didn't some guy in South American have an un-Identifiable hide they thought to be from an extinct species from the jurasic period.

Last edited by Hunter/Jumper (2010-09-30 05:47:56)

Spark
liquid fluoride thorium reactor
+874|7120|Canberra, AUS
I am very sure in claiming that the earth has existed for four billion years at least. Plenty of evidence to back that one up as well. I'd hazard that humans would have found the earth habitable about half a billion years ago as well (Cambrian period, sounds about right wrt oxygen levels)
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6851|North Carolina

Hunter/Jumper wrote:

jord wrote:

Hunter/Jumper wrote:


. . . that Dinosaurs existed . . .
No he said the Earth is a few thousand years old and that somehow dinosaurs existed up until a few hundred years ago. So which do you agree with?
No one knows how old the Earth is or can even claim to but I guarantee its older than that. I am quite sure he means to say

" an inhabitable earth as we know it. " Not some orb of molten rock. I am not out to trip him up using " Geometric Logic " !

It is possible about dinosaurs - they may yet find one. I doubt it, but it could happen, Maybe you didn't consider that it could be a deep ocean dwelling spices ? Didn't some guy in South American have an un-Identifiable hide they thought to be from an extinct species from the jurasic period.
It's a matter of evidence.  Occam's Razor should continually be applied to all explanations.

If you have the evidence for a more complicated claim, then you can dismiss the simpler one.

For example...  Creationism may have sufficed before modern science, but now that we know far more than we did back then, it's only logical to move forward with the more complicated explanation that has mountains of evidence -- aka - evolution and the Big Bang.

By the same token, we have no evidence that dinosaurs existed as recently as a few hundred years ago, so that possibility must be dismissed.

The same goes for deities in general.  There is no evidence for a divine being.
eleven bravo
Member
+1,399|5705|foggy bottom
the earth is 5 billion years old
Tu Stultus Es
Ticia
Member
+73|5781

KEN-JENNINGS wrote:

This is what passes as serious talk around here now, huh?  More like an atheist circle-jerk.

No, non-believers know more random facts about the bible/Judeo-Christian storylines than believers.  And Europeans can name more states than Americans.  Whatever.  'Knowing' about religion is a lot more than memorizing stupid factoids you learn in the first few years of sunday school.
I think by knowing you mean have faith. If so then you're right, Atheists will never beat believers on that.
eleven bravo
Member
+1,399|5705|foggy bottom
I have faith in gravity
Tu Stultus Es
jord
Member
+2,382|7124|The North, beyond the wall.

eleven bravo wrote:

the earth is 5 billion years old
4.55 billion years old, give or take a bit.

The oldest rocks on earth are like 3.8 billion years old, which debunks any moronic creationism theories. Though I think shifty was trolling... perhaps
krazed
Admiral of the Bathtub
+619|7225|Great Brown North
that only works if you believe we can accurately date anything


creationists either don't believe we can, or the more hardcore of them believe the devil is trying to mislead us


i've heard both arguments
jord
Member
+2,382|7124|The North, beyond the wall.
Anyone who uses either argument should be told to stop wasting oxygen and avoided at allcosts lest there mental problems be contagious.
M.O.A.B
'Light 'em up!'
+1,220|6668|Escea

jord wrote:

eleven bravo wrote:

the earth is 5 billion years old
4.55 billion years old, give or take a bit.

The oldest rocks on earth are like 3.8 billion years old, which debunks any moronic creationism theories. Though I think shifty was trolling... perhaps
But Scientology claims Ming the Merciless brought us here in galatic DC-8's 35 billion years ago!

Spoiler (highlight to read):
Seriously, that's their actual backstory

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard