DAST Chat

2011-06-23 08:43:53

#2551

War Man: Australians are hermaphrodites.; +564|7080|Purplicious Wisconsin

Poseidon wrote:
inbreeding causes hatred

just see game of thrones

You mind explaining to me how you are angering me in any way? I am perfectly calm and so bored I'll deal with any troll or asshole for the hell of it.

Edit: Also, what is with this inbreeding thing? I don't recall being inbred.

Last edited by War Man (2011-06-23 08:44:17)

The irony of guns, is that they can save lives.

2011-06-23 08:48:20

#2552

eleven bravo: Member; +1,399|5625|foggy bottom

youve got a bad memory

Tu Stultus Es

2011-06-23 08:54:49

#2553

Jaekus: I'm the matchstick that you'll never lose; +957|5545|Sydney

War Man wrote:
I don't recall being inbred.

lulz

2011-06-23 08:57:38

#2554

Macbeth: Banned; +2,444|5952

fascinating guys.

2011-06-23 09:33:18

#2555

11 Bravo: Banned; +965|5603|Cleveland, Ohio

fuck sake. bunch of assholes.

Last edited by 11 Bravo (2011-06-23 09:35:26)

2011-06-23 09:34:30

#2556

Poseidon: Fudgepack DeQueef; +3,253|6904|Long Island, New York

buch

2011-06-23 09:35:42

#2557

11 Bravo: Banned; +965|5603|Cleveland, Ohio

Poseidon wrote:
buch

wow good job

2011-06-23 10:18:09

#2558

jord: Member; +2,382|7044|The North, beyond the wall.

War Man wrote:
Poseidon wrote:
mouthbreather
I usually use my nose, I thought you did considering how big it is.

How long did it take you to come up with that, lol...

2011-06-23 13:33:26

#2559

Hurricane2k9: Pendulous Sweaty Balls; +1,538|6068|College Park, MD

Uzique wrote:
can a carrier deploy within range in the same time it takes to give an order to your satellite-base, though?

tbh, I think if it gets to the point where we're launching missiles at countries that can detect them (and even do shit about it), we're in World War 3

Question to Paul supporters (I like him for the most part): Ron Paul says he supports the Defense of Marriage Act because it prevents the federal government from imposing its will on individual states. Doesn't the fourteenth amendment do just that?

https://static.bf2s.com/files/user/36793/marylandsig.jpg

2011-06-23 13:42:02

#2560

Shocking: sorry you feel that way; +333|6366|...

13rin wrote:
Uzique wrote:
Hurricane2k9 wrote:
IIRC it takes what, 30 minutes for a nuclear weapon launched from the US to reach Russia? Yes, we can definitely hit targets more quickly and without foreign bases.
i always thought part of the point of international satellite bases was for intervention-technology, legal loopholes (in the case of the middle-east/certain shitholes), and a harder chance of having a launch detected.
Yea... I saw them a hubs in-case the US needed to ramp up a military presence or for logistical support. However, we've got carriers that are more than capable platforms.

Yeah but you don't always have a carrier lying around. Satellite bases have their advantages, moreover they're absolutely necessary if you're eyeing a deployment in another country. Clinton for example intended to go into Afghanistan after the USS Cole, but he couldn't get basing rights in Uzbekistan. You got them after 9/11.

Anyway you can leave the majority of your bases. There is absolutely little reason if any to have as many military bases within the EU as you do. Keeping those you have in the ME around however wouldn't be a bad idea.

edit; wops Iraq, Afghanistan ofc

Last edited by Shocking (2011-06-23 13:42:29)

inane little opines

2011-06-23 15:35:08

#2561

Uzique: dasein.; +2,865|6837

http://www.economist.com/blogs/dailycha … costofcoke

https://media.economist.com/sites/default/files/imagecache/original-size/20110702_WOC093.gif

sucks to be norwegian

_{libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual}. _{http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/}

2011-06-23 15:37:58

#2562

Shocking: sorry you feel that way; +333|6366|...

I really don't understand why usage % of drugs in one country is so much higher than the other. Culturally and socially western states really don't differ all that much anymore, are some countries' people just more likely to use than others?

inane little opines

2011-06-23 15:41:04

#2563

Uzique: dasein.; +2,865|6837

you're very wrong and very misinformed when it comes to how countries like to get loose. huge cultural divisions. mostly depending on religious belief and previous class/social structures and their attendant norms and mores. i can understand perfectly why the % use will differ. also you have to think of practical things such as importation, local law enforcement and general business viability. most of the reason why coke is so cheap in the uk, portugal and spain is because that's where it's sent to from south america.

_{libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual}. _{http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/}

2011-06-23 15:43:01

#2564

11 Bravo: Banned; +965|5603|Cleveland, Ohio

War Man wrote:
Poseidon wrote:
11 Bravo wrote:

LOL

go to an obama rally you media sheep
i just think it's hilarious that you of all people would be criticizing someone on their contribution when your own "contributions" are worth about as much as a stripped down car
Your contribution is as much as a dog's shit.

2011-06-23 15:43:04

#2565

Uzique: dasein.; +2,865|6837

though i've got to say that the higher relative demand in certain countries also drives down the quality, because of cutting.

so swings and roundabouts... swings and roundabouts...

_{libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual}. _{http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/}

2011-06-23 15:47:29

#2566

Shocking: sorry you feel that way; +333|6366|...

Well considering lots of drugs that end up in Europe come through this place first, and considering the very liberal approach to drugs in contrast to all the other nations I figured we would score quite high in consumption. Not at all the case. I'm talking overall drug use here rather than solely coke though, I remember statistics that mapped those which had similar results for all countries in relation to eachother.

Can't find those stats so I'm just basing this off of memory, could be wrong.

inane little opines

2011-06-24 05:18:34

#2567

Kmar: Truth is my Bitch; +5,695|6967|132 and Bush

"France's Sarkozy says hundreds of French soldiers will be withdrawn from Afghanistan in 2011, 2012"
Don't we all just assume after the POTUS the other night? It's a NATO draw down in general.

Xbone Stormsurgezz

2011-06-24 06:39:49

#2568

Jay: Bork! Bork! Bork!; +2,006|5724|London, England

https://reason.com/assets/mc/jtaylor/paynecar.jpg

"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat

2011-06-24 06:46:36

#2569

Cheeky_Ninja06: Member; +52|7099|Cambridge, England

Kmar wrote:
"France's Sarkozy says hundreds of French soldiers will be withdrawn from Afghanistan in 2011, 2012"
Don't we all just assume after the POTUS the other night? It's a NATO draw down in general.

USA is Nato. Europe cant function otherwise

2011-06-24 08:05:43

#2570

13rin: Member; +977|6845

Cheeky_Ninja06 wrote:
Kmar wrote:
"France's Sarkozy says hundreds of French soldiers will be withdrawn from Afghanistan in 2011, 2012"
Don't we all just assume after the POTUS the other night? It's a NATO draw down in general.
USA is Nato. Europe cant function otherwise

So does this mean we lost?
http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/us- … -increased

What an ass.
http://blogs.cbn.com/WhiteHouseWrap/arc … istan.aspx

I stood in line for four hours. They better give me a Wal-Mart gift card, or something. - Rodney Booker, Job Fair attendee.

2011-06-24 12:13:56

#2571

Hurricane2k9: Pendulous Sweaty Balls; +1,538|6068|College Park, MD

Congress is all talk and no walk. "Hurr durr Obummer is violatin the war powers act " followed by not voting to cut funding

http://www.cnn.com/2011/POLITICS/06/24/ … ?hpt=hp_t1

2011-06-24 13:24:39

#2572

13rin: Member; +977|6845

Hurricane2k9 wrote:
Congress is all talk and no walk. "Hurr durr Obummer is violatin the war powers act " followed by not voting to cut funding

http://www.cnn.com/2011/POLITICS/06/24/ … ?hpt=hp_t1

Er... He is. Imagine if Bush did that. Guess they didn't have the votes?

I stood in line for four hours. They better give me a Wal-Mart gift card, or something. - Rodney Booker, Job Fair attendee.

2011-06-24 13:34:20

#2573

Macbeth: Banned; +2,444|5952

War powers act

2011-06-24 13:43:24

#2574

Hurricane2k9: Pendulous Sweaty Balls; +1,538|6068|College Park, MD

Macbeth wrote:
War powers act

ah you think the president shouldn't be required to follow the law?

Last edited by Hurricane2k9 (2011-06-24 13:43:32)

2011-06-24 13:53:00

#2575

Macbeth: Banned; +2,444|5952

Whether the wars powers act is constitutional or not is a subject that hasn't been resolved yet. But aside from that, every president has ignored that piece of 70's Nixon era shit. As they should since the bill blows. The compliants coming from the right about the war powers act is just more stupid ass grandstanding.

BF2S Forums DAST Chat

Poseidon wrote:

War Man wrote:

Poseidon wrote:

War Man wrote:

Poseidon wrote:

Uzique wrote:

13rin wrote:

Uzique wrote:

Hurricane2k9 wrote:

War Man wrote:

Poseidon wrote:

11 Bravo wrote:

Kmar wrote:

Cheeky_Ninja06 wrote:

Kmar wrote:

Hurricane2k9 wrote:

Macbeth wrote:

Board footer