don't oversimplify to make your point right, it's lame i dont even know if you're talking about bhopping or ddivingSgtMurphy wrote:
exploit ?? hahahaha... get real dude. Just because a few retards cant shoot a jumping man...
if it's bhopping w/e, if it's ddving they aren't shooting at a jumping man, they're shooting at a jumping head, big difference
they didn't change to "entire player movement" they added a small time delay from prone to standing/crouching, which is more consistent with reality, who the hell can jump up in the air from a prone position with two hands on a rifle even once, let alone constantlySgtMurphy wrote:
is no reason to change the entire player movement 6 months after game release.
and also, they made it impossible to shoot while in transition from once stance to another, which has nothing do with movement at all
meybe you should take your own advice and...
SgtMurphy wrote:
get your head checked.
puts you in a very risky position and is idiotic, besides if yer gunner stays in the chopper you only get a cap rate of 1 player, if he jumps out, 2 man cap rate but the chopper is practically defenseless unless he flies away, leaving his gunner at risk on the ground, but at any rate it is legitimate since capping flags works on player proximity to the flag, that like saying capping a flag with a tank is illegitimate because you shouldn't be able to cap from inside a vehicle, and besides that, the transport choppers were practically made for flag capping, fly in with a full load, drop all but yer gunners on the flag and defend with those sweet ass miniguns, that's just smart teamplay, not a glitch, you were meant to be able to do that. whether you should be capable of capping from the air is up for debate'illegitimate strategy' ???
I guess choppers capping flags from the air is legitimate ??
even if they made it impossible to cap from a vehicle all you'd have to do is land and get out, which imo is a waste of a good attack chopper either way
they nerfed that too, remember? yer using this point as if it's still valid, but it's nothahahahaha... or dropping cars on enemies ??
anyone who defends a glitcher is welcoming hackers and people that tk for vehicles, and punish for accidental tk's are the idiots, yer gonna bring down the game altogether if left uncheckedahahaha.. DICE are idiots. Anyone who tries to defend DICE's way of thinking needs their heads
checked.
u realise, of course, that it was a bunch of free thinker swedes who are responsible for your having online games at all right? i mean, they only INVENTED THE BLOODY INTERNET YOU TOOL, and don't give me that bullsh*t arrogant "no, the USA invented the internet" which people everywhere seem to thinkA bunch of swedes writing a modern war combat game was the first indicator.
http://public.web.cern.ch/Public/Conten … WW-en.html
plz, click, CERN is located where? Sweden? really? wow
EA is in france? gee i thought they were in the UKGood thing the French team at EA didnt write it, each kit would have had a white flag in it.. my point is, if you think your argument is legit just because DICE does something, you need to get your head checked.
as you can see, noobs oversimplify, exaggerate and state issues that have been fixed as if they still exist in a vain attempt to validate their side of their argument
sounds a lot like bureaucracy, COULD BUREAUCRATS BE THE NOOBS OF MODERN SOCIETY!?!?! noooooooooooooooooooo.......... <sarcasm>
Last edited by IntrebuloN (2006-09-18 15:36:08)