BF2S Forums Are you satisfied with EA's Ranking System?

i just reached a thousand points today (hooray for me!) and to me 2500 till the next ranking seems an enormous stretch.......
i don't think of the top 10 as gods though,its just a game i'll get sick of in time.....
if anything i would rather think they've got too much time on their hands,lol.

They should lower everything by a factor of 2. Rank wise. That way more casual gamers can have unlocks more. Also they need to get rid of the 100+ hour reqs for everything. Its ridiculous. I should have to spend 100 hours with something to be "Veteran" good at it. Hell Im good enough at sniping to be an expert but no I could spend 100 hours. And they should add a Medal of Honor. Awarded to people with like insane number of Teamwork points. Around 100 thousand.

the good thing about the ranks before was that unlocks weren't so much unlocks anymore. I mean, you work hard for that gun and you get it and you like to show it off.

Now, however, everyone has it and so you're just another one of 'em.
But now it's also nice to see the difference in people's experience/rank. Before, on a typical 32 player server, there'd be around 24 lance corps, 4 privates, 2 private first class and 2 corporals, maybe even a sergeant.

I felt sooooo good to be a corporal, finally separating me from the rest of the lance corps. Since the gap was tremendous (1,000 to 10,500 points) You had a literally huge range of players, from newly lance to almost corp, making it hrad to distinguish how good (metaphorically) they were. Now with the new ranks you have a more accurate display of ranks.

Nope, needs to be based on SPM, KPM, KDR, DPM, W/L ratio and maybe a little Global Score. Also has to be based on 40% vehicle and 60% infantry.