Casino Royale

2006-11-18 11:55:49

#51

Vilham: Say wat!?; +580|7194|UK

Cougar wrote:
Pierce Brosnan=best Bond ever.

Sean Connery was a great Bond but he was too cool. He could be sitting in a plane carrying a 40 megaton nuclear warhead that was on fire and plummeting and still be sipping a martini. I didn't really like that, it was too.......movieish.

Brosnan on the other hand could be just as cool handed as Connery in at the right time, but could absoulutly explode and kick ass like someone had lit a fire under his ass. Not to mention he looked serious and realistic in his moods, attitudes, responses and so on and so forth during the right times. When I look at Brosnan, I think that's what Bond should look like.

Daniel Craig=1 step above Tim Dalton on the failure totem pole.

/noob

Brosnan wasnt the coolest bond ever Sean Connery was.

I saw the film last night and it was an awesome film. However the only thing was that it wasnt very James Bondish. Not enough action and no evil bad guy trying to blow up the world. He only wants 150 million, thats all the film is about.

2006-11-18 18:00:05

#52

JoeFriday: Git 'Er Dun; +23|6868|Canada

you are dumb, critics gave it 4 out of 4! wtf are you taking about?????

2006-11-18 18:17:44

#53

Poseidon: Fudgepack DeQueef; +3,253|6965|Long Island, New York

According to a Yahoo! opinion poll, Casino Royale is the best bond ever. I'm definately seeing it.

2006-11-20 10:03:41

#54

TigerXtrm: Death by Indecency; +51|6796|Netherlands

Well if Yahoo says it then it must be true... Casino Royal MIGHT be a good movie (I havn't seen it yet) but it's certainly NOT the best ever. I'm a very big Bond fan and from what I have seen in the previews they killed the entire concept that made Bond Bond.
In any case, I have a full theater collectors card which I am going to use for a free ticket to this movie, because I doubt if it's worth my money TBH...

*TigerXtrm shall return... later after he has seen the movie to give you a final judgement.*

2006-11-20 10:06:15

#55

The Magic Mullet: Member; +240|6852

I gave it 17 thumbs up.

2006-11-20 10:07:31

#56

Kurazoo: Pheasant Plucker; +440|7112|West Yorkshire, U.K

personally i enjoyed this movie so stfu

2006-11-20 10:37:02

#57

grobmobularb: Banned; +3|6799

Casino Royal was good. A bit long. I had to pee at what I thought was the end, came back, and sat there for an additional 15-20 minutes. It had the Return of the King ending where there were like, 5+ different times it could've ended, but kept going.

Craig did an AMAZING job!! I never watched the old Bond flicks, as they just don't suit my taste, but this is my fav of them all. Brosnan was getting to gay and old for me. Getting Craig to play it was perfect.

I see many good films coming along from him now.

Also, someone please explain to me why each 007 is named James Bond? Is that the name that they adopt? Or do they just happen to birth a ton of James Bond's in England that become MI6 agents?

4.95 out of 5

Last edited by grobmobularb (2006-11-20 10:37:31)

2006-11-20 11:17:58

#58

TigerXtrm: Death by Indecency; +51|6796|Netherlands

grobmobularb wrote:
Also, someone please explain to me why each 007 is named James Bond? Is that the name that they adopt? Or do they just happen to birth a ton of James Bond's in England that become MI6 agents?

4.95 out of 5

James Bond is just a character without age. He's been around since the 1960's, hasn't aged a day and in that time 6 different actors played him. It's not so much that there's been 6 different James Bond's. The James Bond Craig plays is the same Bond that Sean Connery or Pierce Brosnan played.

2006-11-20 12:42:21

#59

Apoc-SAS: rebmeM; +39|6816|Scotland

According to a few sources i read its (one of) the best Bond films yet. So, i'll still be seeing it.

2006-11-20 12:42:55

#60

grobmobularb: Banned; +3|6799

TigerXtrm wrote:
grobmobularb wrote:
Also, someone please explain to me why each 007 is named James Bond? Is that the name that they adopt? Or do they just happen to birth a ton of James Bond's in England that become MI6 agents?

4.95 out of 5
James Bond is just a character without age. He's been around since the 1960's, hasn't aged a day and in that time 6 different actors played him. It's not so much that there's been 6 different James Bond's. The James Bond Craig plays is the same Bond that Sean Connery or Pierce Brosnan played.

So, he's basically a robot then. I figured it was a persona that the agent used/played, instead of really being named James Bond.

2006-11-20 13:47:11

#61

TigerXtrm: Death by Indecency; +51|6796|Netherlands

Well technically the guy should be over 85 years old. But we don't want to see an old man in a wheelchair kicking ass now do we?

2006-11-20 13:51:20

#62

J][gga: Member; +8|7081

I thought it was the worst bond film ever.... they should smack the people who picked him for bond..... british soap actor.... what a joke....

2006-11-20 14:26:39

#63

Masques: Black Panzer Party; +184|7150|Eastern PA

J][gga wrote:
I thought it was the worst bond film ever.... they should smack the people who picked him for bond..... british soap actor.... what a joke....

He also played the unhinged South African member of the hit squad in Munich.

I liked it. Up there with Thunderball and On Her Majesty's Secret Service. Connery is still the best Bond.

2006-11-20 14:27:34

#64

Ender2309: has joined the GOP; +470|6999|USA

my newspaper gave it a B, which is pretty impressive, as the reviewer guy is an asshole.

2006-11-20 14:30:10

#65

mafia996630: © 2009 Jeff Minard; +319|7191|d

ITs a good film.

2006-11-20 14:41:55

#66

silo1180: The Farewell Tour; +79|6850|San Antonio, TX

I saw the movie Wednesday (had a pass for the screenie, know a guy who's wife works for a paper) and I say it was one of the worst Bond movies. I had no problems with the new Bond, it's just a guy playing a role. But there's a card game in the last 1/4 of the movie and it goes on too long. They have to throw some things in to try to remind you that you're at an action movie. To me the sitting idle watching them play poker killed the rest of the movie.

2006-11-20 14:50:51

#67

TigerXtrm: Death by Indecency; +51|6796|Netherlands

Masques wrote:
I liked it. Up there with Thunderball and On Her Majesty's Secret Service. Connery is still the best Bond.

You do know that OHMSS is usually considered to be the worst movie in the existing collection? The guy playing Bond in that movie sucked even more then Craig... Seems to me you have bad taste :p (j/k)

And as for Thunderball, it had a good story but I liked the 'Never say Never again' remake a lot better.

Tiger

2006-11-20 15:14:44

#68

Masques: Black Panzer Party; +184|7150|Eastern PA

TigerXtrm wrote:
Masques wrote:
I liked it. Up there with Thunderball and On Her Majesty's Secret Service. Connery is still the best Bond.
You do know that OHMSS is usually considered to be the worst movie in the existing collection? The guy playing Bond in that movie sucked even more then Craig... Seems to me you have bad taste :p (j/k)

And as for Thunderball, it had a good story but I liked the 'Never say Never again' remake a lot better.

Tiger

I never liked the sort of happy-go-lucky type of Bond exemplified by Roger Moore and I think George Lazenby was certainly competent in the role.

Fleming wrote Bond as a kind of ruthless killer. Almost sociopathic.

As for your point on what is or is not considered good or bad, remember, Tom Cruise is considered a competent actor by many people. I consider him little more than a foppish git.

2006-11-20 15:36:23

#69

JaggedPanther: Member; +61|6901

Yeah Pierce was the best bond IMHO too, he also did his own stunts. No director yelled cut, while connery slipped off to the side and had a martini while his stunt double did the actual work.

Mind you I never liked bond movies; too cheesy. There is always a boat, car, pen gun, evil villian that has no gun, and sharks with lazers on their heads... whenever bond needed it. complete cheese for the masses.

Last edited by JaggedPanther (2006-11-20 15:37:00)

2006-11-20 19:17:47

#70

BornToKill67: It's a good day to die; +18|7088|Canada Eh?

JoeFriday wrote:
you are dumb, critics gave it 4 out of 4! wtf are you taking about?????

True, but most of the time cirtics alway give the complete opposite of what it deserves. They gave I Robot and most of my favorite movies 1 star... and gave most movies I hate 5/5 like Kill Bill vol.2 (the first one was good) ffs that movie was a P.O.S the first one is pacted with blood and gore and in vol. 2 they barely had enough blood to fill an IV pouch.

2006-11-21 02:59:42

#71

TigerXtrm: Death by Indecency; +51|6796|Netherlands

Just because critics like the movie doesn't mean they are right. If anything it's a matter of opinion and taste. It's my opinion that Craig was the worst choice for a new Bond EVER. And the whole 'going back in time to show how he got his 00 status' isn't my taste and is also not a cool thing to do with a movie series like Bond in general. There was probably a reason Casino Royale was never made into a movie in the early days, so why did they have to ignore the great minds that came up with Bond and give it their own twist?

Tiger

2006-11-21 08:45:24

#72

grobmobularb: Banned; +3|6799

JaggedPanther wrote:
Yeah Pierce was the best bond IMHO too, he also did his own stunts. No director yelled cut, while connery slipped off to the side and had a martini while his stunt double did the actual work.

Mind you I never liked bond movies; too cheesy. There is always a boat, car, pen gun, evil villian that has no gun, and sharks with lazers on their heads... whenever bond needed it. complete cheese for the masses.

Not in this one. There's none of that stupid shit gadgetry that is beyond fake in the real world. This is an extremely modern Bond film. No invisible cars, no rockets shooting out of the cars headlights, or lame stunts in boats.

It's just pure ASS kicking!!! Craig did a bad ass job, no matter what anyone says.

2006-11-21 08:47:16

#73

grobmobularb: Banned; +3|6799

BornToKill67 wrote:
JoeFriday wrote:
you are dumb, critics gave it 4 out of 4! wtf are you taking about?????
True, but most of the time cirtics alway give the complete opposite of what it deserves. They gave I Robot and most of my favorite movies 1 star... and gave most movies I hate 5/5 like Kill Bill vol.2 (the first one was good) ffs that movie was a P.O.S the first one is pacted with blood and gore and in vol. 2 they barely had enough blood to fill an IV pouch.

They got you on that, I, Robot is a stupid piece of fucking shit of a movie. Kill Bill 1 was good, 2 was like eating decomposing vomit (QT is a shitty director).

I'd like to know what your other favorite movies are.

2006-11-21 08:55:06

#74

chinesemaster006: Member; +3|7107

Too bad they have to switch actors so many times, I hope the series gets kicked back up again.

2006-11-21 08:56:26

#75

blademaster: I'm moving to Brazil; +2,075|7073

thx for the info nowq I know the movie sucks and will recomend it to otehrs not to see it.

BF2S Forums Casino Royale

Cougar wrote:

grobmobularb wrote:

TigerXtrm wrote:

grobmobularb wrote:

J][gga wrote:

Masques wrote:

TigerXtrm wrote:

Masques wrote:

JoeFriday wrote:

JaggedPanther wrote:

BornToKill67 wrote:

JoeFriday wrote:

Board footer