Graphics + Framerates.

2007-01-17 07:55:12

#1

B00MH3ADSH0T: Fresh NoobCaeks Here; +118|6849|Penrith,Nsw, Aus

Just wondering about what framerates, and AA and AF i would get with high settings (light and shadows on medium) Using a res of 1280x1024

Specs:

Intel E6300 C2D

2gb g.skill ram @ 800mhz with timings of 4-4-4-12

Gigabyte 7600gt 265mb

Gigabyte P965-DS3 Mobo

Last edited by B00MH3ADSH0T (2007-01-17 07:55:48)

2007-01-17 08:02:31

#2

RDMC: Enemy Wheelbarrow Spotted..!!; +736|7023|Area 51

Computer Geeks Help this guy out..

2007-01-17 08:03:09

#3

B00MH3ADSH0T: Fresh NoobCaeks Here; +118|6849|Penrith,Nsw, Aus

:p Im gonna go to sleep its getting late here thanks again for them pics rdmc

Last edited by B00MH3ADSH0T (2007-01-17 08:07:42)

2007-01-17 08:03:10

#4

daffytag: cheese-it!; +104|7034

Why dont you just run the game on those settings and see, unless its a system you intend to build. If thats the case, then I dont know.

2007-01-17 08:03:25

#5

kn0ckahh: Member; +98|7197|netherlands, sweet lake city

I have settings at max with a framerate of 100,

C2D: E6400
asus P5B deluxe
saphire radeon 1950 xtx
2 gigs of ram, dont remember the Hz

Last edited by kn0ckahh (2007-01-17 08:04:13)

2007-01-17 08:04:22

#6

B00MH3ADSH0T: Fresh NoobCaeks Here; +118|6849|Penrith,Nsw, Aus

I Dont have all the parts yet so thats why im asking otherwise i would test it myself.

2007-01-17 08:06:16

#7

B00MH3ADSH0T: Fresh NoobCaeks Here; +118|6849|Penrith,Nsw, Aus

kn0ckahh wrote:
I have settings at max with a framerate of 100,

C2D: E6400
asus P5B deluxe
saphire radeon 1950 xtx
2 gigs of ram, dont remember the Hz

Cpu is basicly the same but i dont know shit all about ati cards since i have never used one.

2007-01-17 08:07:53

#8

Cybargs: Moderated; +2,285|7174

I heard from another person with around the same setup that you can hit all high.

https://cache.www.gametracker.com/server_info/203.46.105.23:21300/b_350_20_692108_381007_FFFFFF_000000.png

2007-01-17 08:09:21

#9

max: Vela Incident; +1,652|7026|NYC / Hamburg

B00MH3ADSH0T wrote:
kn0ckahh wrote:
I have settings at max with a framerate of 100,

C2D: E6400
asus P5B deluxe
saphire radeon 1950 xtx
2 gigs of ram, dont remember the Hz
Cpu is basicly the same but i dont know shit all about ati cards since i have never used one.

this ati card is a brazillion times better than a 7600.

back to business: i would say you will be somewhere around 30-40 fps with the rig you posted on most high

Last edited by max (2007-01-17 08:11:56)

_{once upon a midnight dreary, while i pron surfed, weak and weary, over many a strange and spurious site of ' hot xxx galore'. While i clicked my fav'rite bookmark, suddenly there came a warning, and my heart was filled with mourning, mourning for my dear amour, " 'Tis not possible!", i muttered, " give me back my free hardcore!"..... quoth the server, 404.}

2007-01-17 08:09:22

#10

B00MH3ADSH0T: Fresh NoobCaeks Here; +118|6849|Penrith,Nsw, Aus

cyborg_ninja-117 wrote:
I heard from another person with around the same setup that you can hit all high.

Got any idea about AA, AF? he had set.

2007-01-17 08:10:59

#11

Bell: Frosties > Cornflakes; +362|7007|UK

AA and AF abliterate frame rates, this is the justification for the really expensive cards ont he market, you can argue my 7600 runs as high as your 7950, but his 7950 can handle the AA and AF. To be honest, the improvements are not as much as say, going from low to medium, medium to high in graphics setting. I've seen full AA and AF on 2142 and it does look awsome, but on a sub $200 card, I say leave them off to retain your smooth steady play. Otherwise you will have all be it good looking pictures to watch, saw a 7600GT with 4x AA managing about 30FPS on a good day.

Martyn

2007-01-17 08:17:26

#12

B00MH3ADSH0T: Fresh NoobCaeks Here; +118|6849|Penrith,Nsw, Aus

The site im buying parts off doesnt have any 7900gt's but they have a 7900gs for $100 aus$ more then the 7600gt what kind of differnce am i looking at between the two?

2007-01-17 08:29:55

#13

Cybargs: Moderated; +2,285|7174

B00MH3ADSH0T wrote:
cyborg_ninja-117 wrote:
I heard from another person with around the same setup that you can hit all high.
Got any idea about AA, AF? he had set.

I suggest 4X AA and 8X AF.

2007-01-17 08:31:27

#14

Stormscythe: Aiming for the head; +88|7007|EUtopia | Austria

B00MH3ADSH0T wrote:
The site im buying parts off doesnt have any 7900gt's but they have a 7900gs for $100 aus$ more then the 7600gt what kind of differnce am i looking at between the two?

8 pixel pipes more and doubled bus interface, but slower core clock and mem clock on the 7900GS. And 40-50% better performance.
Sad, however, you didn't wait for the 8600 Ultra to be released...

2007-01-17 08:36:17

#15

Drykill: I Like Waffles.; +47|7150|England

I have a 7600GT and I can play Bf2 all maxed out no problem.
Atm I'm running on:
3500+ AMD 939 CPU
2gb pc3200
XFX 7600GT XT
K8N Neo4-F mobo
2 TFT monitors at 1280x1024 75Hz

All Bf2 settings on high with 4xAA and AF left at default and I rarely go below 40FPS (8XAF is playable but 16x kills it - like 20-45 FPS) and thats running at 1280x1024 75Hz.

2142 is another story, I found 2142 really laggy and sometimes unplayable in the titans so I gave up playing 2142. I think it might be the shite CPU though as changing the graphics settings had little effect on the FPS.

A 7600GT can run Bf2 maxed out with very few problems(arty and loads of smoke) but will struggle with newer games like 2142, Vegas etc.

2007-01-17 09:25:54

#16

shtihl: Member; +0|6775|Here

B00MH3ADSH0T wrote:
The site im buying parts off doesnt have any 7900gt's but they have a 7900gs for $100 aus$ more then the 7600gt what kind of differnce am i looking at between the two?

there is a major diff between the 2. do not go with the gs version. they dont tend to play well

2007-01-17 09:30:32

#17

RDMC: Enemy Wheelbarrow Spotted..!!; +736|7023|Area 51

Drykill wrote:
I have a 7600GT and I can play Bf2 all maxed out no problem.
Atm I'm running on:
3500+ AMD 939 CPU
2gb pc3200
XFX 7600GT XT
K8N Neo4-F mobo
2 TFT monitors at 1280x1024 75Hz

All Bf2 settings on high with 4xAA and AF left at default and I rarely go below 40FPS (8XAF is playable but 16x kills it - like 20-45 FPS) and thats running at 1280x1024 75Hz.

2142 is another story, I found 2142 really laggy and sometimes unplayable in the titans so I gave up playing 2142. I think it might be the shite CPU though as changing the graphics settings had little effect on the FPS.

A 7600GT can run Bf2 maxed out with very few problems(arty and loads of smoke) but will struggle with newer games like 2142, Vegas etc.

Well...I have a K9N Mobo..7600 GT..1 gig pc6400 and 3800+ at 2.6 ghz..how come I can't play it all out on high..is it because of my 1 gig...?

2007-01-17 09:44:28

#18

Stormscythe: Aiming for the head; +88|7007|EUtopia | Austria

shtihl wrote:
B00MH3ADSH0T wrote:
The site im buying parts off doesnt have any 7900gt's but they have a 7900gs for $100 aus$ more then the 7600gt what kind of differnce am i looking at between the two?
there is a major diff between the 2. do not go with the gs version. they dont tend to play well

They do better than 7600GTs after all...
And 4 pixel pipes for about 80€ more (dunno what this'd be in aus$) is worse than 8 more for 100aus$ for sure.
Especially since overclocked versions of the 7900GS (Gainward BLISS, for example) are higher than stock 7900GT speeds.

PS: 7900 is the 'biggest bang for buck' in the gaming-friendly category of GFX cards...

2007-01-17 09:47:50

#19

Drykill: I Like Waffles.; +47|7150|England

RDMC(2) wrote:
Well...I have a K9N Mobo..7600 GT..1 gig pc6400 and 3800+ at 2.6 ghz..how come I can't play it all out on high..is it because of my 1 gig...?

The 1Gb and probably the manufacturer of your card.

2007-01-17 17:20:11

#20

B00MH3ADSH0T: Fresh NoobCaeks Here; +118|6849|Penrith,Nsw, Aus

Drykill wrote:
RDMC(2) wrote:
Well...I have a K9N Mobo..7600 GT..1 gig pc6400 and 3800+ at 2.6 ghz..how come I can't play it all out on high..is it because of my 1 gig...?
The 1Gb and probably the manufacturer of your card.

I thought the biggest differnce between manufacturers was the heatsink?

2007-01-17 17:37:44

#21

-cologne-fab: Der Kölner; +3|7161|CGN - GER

I got erveything on "high" @1600x1200 px
...and AA off!!!

...runs great with ping <20ms (DSL2000, ISH.de = Cologne-Cable-Connection-best ever!!!)

my system:
CPU: Athlon 3700+
Board: Asus A8N SLI-Deluxe
RAM: 2048MB Corsair DDR400 XMS2
Graphic: Sparkle 7800GTX 256MB
Monitor: 2x Samsung SyncMaster 1100p plus
120GB Werstern Digital SATA-I
Logitech G15 + G5

2007-01-17 23:26:00

#22

claor: Member; +39|6873|Australia

should be able to do all high at that res with 2xaa with a average of 60 fps..
good luck.

BF2S Forums Graphics + Framerates.

kn0ckahh wrote:

B00MH3ADSH0T wrote:

kn0ckahh wrote:

cyborg_ninja-117 wrote:

B00MH3ADSH0T wrote:

cyborg_ninja-117 wrote:

B00MH3ADSH0T wrote:

B00MH3ADSH0T wrote:

Drykill wrote:

shtihl wrote:

B00MH3ADSH0T wrote:

RDMC(2) wrote:

Drykill wrote:

RDMC(2) wrote:

Board footer