Harmor
Error_Name_Not_Found
+605|6993|San Diego, CA, USA
If we leave Iraq completely the Terrorists will not follow us home.

Granted the majority Shittes will kill the minority Sunni with help from the Iranians, but the blood baths that we saw in Cambodia after we left Vietnam will happen again here - that's ok because Vietnam today has normalized relations with the United States. 

The Iraqis will not allow al-Qaeda to form bases in their country or share oil revenues with them.

al-Qaeda will leave Iraq because the United States has left.

Iran will stop helping the Taliban in Afganistan and the Sunni terrorists in Iraq.

Iran will not use a nuke on Israel, to do so would draw the ire of the world community.

Iran will use its nuclear program in peace, for energy and not give any nuclear material or technology to Hezbolla.

Iran will not threaten Oman, Saudi Arabia, Jordon or Kuwait to limit oil production to the west.

The women who were burkas over their entire body do not deserve the rights that Western Women have earned - their culture dictacts otherwise - I mean why would they want the same rights as men?

The United States military is the agressor and is killing innocent civilians, not the terrorist with their car bombs or suicide vests.

According to Rosie O'Donnell the United States military killed 650,000 innocent Iraqis.

According to MSNBC the United States military are mercenaries.

--




Now if you believe any or all of the above I have a bridge to sell you.

https://img505.imageshack.us/img505/48/benicetoterroristspw1.jpg

Last edited by Harmor (2007-06-18 21:55:30)

Major.League.Infidel
Make Love and War
+303|6923|Communist Republic of CA, USA
You had me worried there for a second...
Harmor
Error_Name_Not_Found
+605|6993|San Diego, CA, USA

Major.League.Infidel wrote:

You had me worried there for a second...
Don't worry, I'm sure someone will read only the first few lines and tear me a new one.
SgtHeihn
Should have ducked
+394|6931|Ham Lake, MN (Fucking Cold)

Harmor wrote:

Major.League.Infidel wrote:

You had me worried there for a second...
Don't worry, I'm sure someone will read only the first few lines and tear me a new one.
I almost did.
sexecuti0ner
What kinda guy are you are?
+148|6676
Does it make me a bad person if I believe what you said about women in the middle east? 

Not really but good post, +1
geNius
..!.,
+144|6887|SoCal

Major.League.Infidel wrote:

You had me worried there for a second...
+1
https://srejects.com/genius/srejects.png
CaptainSpaulding71
Member
+119|6802|CA, USA
i understand the sarcasm of the original post.

however, to the actual topic.  Terrorists have one ultimate goal and that is to bring the entire world under the banner of islam.  Their immediate goals (as even bin Laden has stated) is to expel infidels and foreigners from the arab penninsula and return the region to a caliphate with sharia as the law of the land. 

Their next step of course is to extend this to the rest of the world.  In fact, this is already happening through breeding and non-integration with non-muslim population.  Look at Europe these days?  I hear Mohammad is second most popular name in London or something.  WTF?
CaptainSpaulding71
Member
+119|6802|CA, USA

Harmor wrote:

According to Rosie O'Donnell the United States military killed 650,000 innocent Iraqis.
According to Rosie O'Donnell, fire doesn't melt steel either.  hahaha
Harmor
Error_Name_Not_Found
+605|6993|San Diego, CA, USA

CaptainSpaulding71 wrote:

i understand the sarcasm of the original post.

however, to the actual topic.  Terrorists have one ultimate goal and that is to bring the entire world under the banner of islam.  Their immediate goals (as even bin Laden has stated) is to expel infidels and foreigners from the arab penninsula and return the region to a caliphate with sharia as the law of the land. 

Their next step of course is to extend this to the rest of the world.  In fact, this is already happening through breeding and non-integration with non-muslim population.  Look at Europe these days?  I hear Mohammad is second most popular name in London or something.  WTF?
In the middle ages it was "Convert or Die"...you only have to look at the history of Turkey and Spain to understand what I mean.

By opressing their women they keep them as baby-making machines and do, as you noted in the U.K., out breed your enemy.


The same logic goes for Pro-choice vs. Pro-life...eventually the Pro-lifers will out number the Pro-choice.



I guess instead of "Conquering by the Sword," its "Conquering by the Womb?"
Major.League.Infidel
Make Love and War
+303|6923|Communist Republic of CA, USA

Harmor wrote:

CaptainSpaulding71 wrote:

i understand the sarcasm of the original post.

however, to the actual topic.  Terrorists have one ultimate goal and that is to bring the entire world under the banner of islam.  Their immediate goals (as even bin Laden has stated) is to expel infidels and foreigners from the arab penninsula and return the region to a caliphate with sharia as the law of the land. 

Their next step of course is to extend this to the rest of the world.  In fact, this is already happening through breeding and non-integration with non-muslim population.  Look at Europe these days?  I hear Mohammad is second most popular name in London or something.  WTF?
In the middle ages it was "Convert or Die"...you only have to look at the history of Turkey and Spain to understand what I mean.

By opressing their women they keep them as baby-making machines and do, as you noted in the U.K., out breed your enemy.


The same logic goes for Pro-choice vs. Pro-life...eventually the Pro-lifers will out number the Pro-choice.



I guess instead of "Conquering by the Sword," its "Conquering by the Womb?"
Stop giving away Key secrets of the Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy
Spark
liquid fluoride thorium reactor
+874|7119|Canberra, AUS

CaptainSpaulding71 wrote:

i understand the sarcasm of the original post.

however, to the actual topic.  Terrorists have one ultimate goal and that is to bring the entire world under the banner of islam.  Their immediate goals (as even bin Laden has stated) is to expel infidels and foreigners from the arab penninsula and return the region to a caliphate with sharia as the law of the land. 

Their next step of course is to extend this to the rest of the world.  In fact, this is already happening through breeding and non-integration with non-muslim population.  Look at Europe these days?  I hear Mohammad is second most popular name in London or something.  WTF?
OH NOES THE DIRTY MUSLIMS ARE BREEDING WITH US! WE ARE BEING COMPROMISED BY THEM!

Seriously. If this goes on much further, my children will be studying two Holocausts, not one.
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
CaptainSpaulding71
Member
+119|6802|CA, USA
actually they are not breeding 'with' us.  if you read carefully, i made it a point to mention non-integration into the majority culture of their adopted land.  however, with > 5-10 kids per family and normal populace at much less than that, it's only a matter of time before the cultural climate will indeed change.  should we stop it?  i didn't say that, just saying it's something to think about. 

compounding this fact of breeding is the drain it will have on the country's resources unless these people are actually putting into the pot.
CameronPoe
Member
+2,925|7000

Harmor wrote:

If we leave Iraq completely the Terrorists will not follow us home.
Well perhaps some border security is in order then. Ever thought of that? It's amazing how many Vietnamese, Laotian and Cambodian terrorists 'followed you home' after the unjust and horrific Vietnam war....

Harmor wrote:

Granted the majority Shittes will kill the minority Sunni with help from the Iranians, but the blood baths that we saw in Cambodia after we left Vietnam will happen again here - that's ok because Vietnam today has normalized relations with the United States.
That's their business. It's none of our business. 

Harmor wrote:

The Iraqis will not allow al-Qaeda to form bases in their country or share oil revenues with them.
Well they certainly won't go down without a fight. I think the Mehdi Army will eventually win out.

Harmor wrote:

al-Qaeda will leave Iraq because the United States has left.
Frankly the United States gave Al Qaeda a red carpet welcome for the permanent existence of Al Qaeda in Iraq. Iraq will now NEVER be rid of Al Qaeda. GG.

Harmor wrote:

Iran will stop helping the Taliban in Afganistan and the Sunni terrorists in Iraq.
OK. SHIA Iran helping SUNNI Taliban and Iraqis. Riiiiiight. They're not as the stupid as the CIA you know.

Harmor wrote:

Iran will not use a nuke on Israel, to do so would draw the ire of the world community.
Nuclear deterrency and mutually assured destruction is what will prevent them from using nuclear weapons, which they don't have at the moment, on Israel.

Harmor wrote:

Iran will use its nuclear program in peace, for energy and not give any nuclear material or technology to Hezbolla.
It will use it for energy yes but what good is a nuclear wasteland in Israel, home of the third holiest shrine in Islam. My bets would be on poisoning the water supply rathering than nuclear attacks.

Harmor wrote:

Iran will not threaten Oman, Saudi Arabia, Jordon or Kuwait to limit oil production to the west.
Never have. The only nation they have ever threatened in their entire history of statehood has been Israel. Why would they start now? Not to mention the fact that Saudi Arabia houses Mecca and Medina, the two holiest cities in Islam. Hardly a target for the Islamic Republic of Iran. If it wanted to limit oil supply to the west it could simply shut its own taps off.

Harmor wrote:

The women who were burkas over their entire body do not deserve the rights that Western Women have earned - their culture dictacts otherwise - I mean why would they want the same rights as men?
Well Iranian women win seats in Parliament and attend university. Only the retard countries like Saudi Arabia, which the US supports whole-heartedly, deny women rights.

Harmor wrote:

The United States military is the agressor and is killing innocent civilians, not the terrorist with their car bombs or suicide vests.
The United States was the aggressor in Iraq and did kill scores of innocent civilians. You're correct there. Terrorists kill plenty of civilians too. What a coincidence.

Harmor wrote:

According to Rosie O'Donnell the United States military killed 650,000 innocent Iraqis.
She's full of shit.

Harmor wrote:

According to MSNBC the United States military are mercenaries.
Why?
Major.League.Infidel
Make Love and War
+303|6923|Communist Republic of CA, USA

CameronPoe wrote:

A retort to the OP
Wait, did you catch the foot note at the bottom?

Harmor wrote:

Now if you believe any or all of the above I have a bridge to sell you.

https://img505.imageshack.us/img505/48/benicetoterroristspw1.jpg
CameronPoe
Member
+2,925|7000

Major.League.Infidel wrote:

CameronPoe wrote:

A retort to the OP
Wait, did you catch the foot note at the bottom?

Harmor wrote:

Now if you believe any or all of the above I have a bridge to sell you.

http://img505.imageshack.us/img505/48/b … stspw1.jpg
Yes I caught it. It's the typical retarded mentality propagated by people devoid of intellect to endorse futile international intervention in lieu of proper domestic security and political pressure through sanctions and economic handicaps. The retarded binary mentality that assumes that by ceasing international intervention you must then be 'nice to terrorists' when there are many many alternatives to dealing with them. Nobody is being nice or wants to be nice to terrorists.

Last edited by CameronPoe (2007-06-19 00:53:31)

Major.League.Infidel
Make Love and War
+303|6923|Communist Republic of CA, USA

CameronPoe wrote:

Major.League.Infidel wrote:

CameronPoe wrote:

A retort to the OP
Wait, did you catch the foot note at the bottom?

Harmor wrote:

Now if you believe any or all of the above I have a bridge to sell you.

http://img505.imageshack.us/img505/48/b … stspw1.jpg
Yes I caught it. It's the typical retarded mentality propagated by people devoid of intellect to endorse futile international intervention in lieu of proper domestic security and political pressure through sanctions and economic handicaps. The retarded binary mentality that assumes that by ceasing international intervention you must then be 'nice to terrorists' when there are many many alternatives to dealing with them. Nobody is being nice or wants to be nice to terrorists.
While I agree with you to an extent, I do believe that it is too late to back out, and that we can't because then we'll be blamed for the massacre to follow.  I think that while our opinion in the world will likely continue to drop as long as we're in Iraq, if we can get it to a state of normality then we can go around doing the "Told you so thing" and possibly regain some face.  And the UN still wants us there, so it's not entirely our fault (Don't Eat me, I'm kinda nervous about debating against the almight CP)


Edit: So I did my quote post when his post ended at Economic Handicaps, yet after he edited it, it automatically edited my post to his expanded Resposne.  That's awesome.

Last edited by Major.League.Infidel (2007-06-19 00:58:30)

Parker
isteal
+1,452|6839|The Gem Saloon

CameronPoe wrote:

there are many many alternatives to dealing with them.
i agree.

https://i47.photobucket.com/albums/f180/parkercustoms/uzi021.jpg

JackerP
aka S.J.N.P.0717
+21|6722|Mo Val, Cali
If we leave Iraq completely the Terrorists will not follow us home.

They'll strike any chance they can get. Have you heard of anyone opposing going into Afghanistan? NO! We have killed terrorists but we have also created new ones with sole hatred to the U.S.


Granted the majority Shittes will kill the minority Sunni with help from the Iranians, but the blood baths that we saw in Cambodia after we left Vietnam will happen again here - that's ok because Vietnam today has normalized relations with the United States. 

This wouldn't have happened of Saddam was still in power.


The Iraqis will not allow al-Qaeda to form bases in their country or share oil revenues with them.

Oh they will let them form bases because our invasion. 70% something Iraqis say it's okay to shoot an American soldier. Do you have any idea why that might be? They won't them have any oil though but bases will be no problem.


al-Qaeda will leave Iraq because the United States has left.

No they won't. Since we got rid of Saddam more and more will go there.


Iran will stop helping the Taliban in Afganistan and the Sunni terrorists in Iraq.
Iran will not use a nuke on Israel, to do so would draw the ire of the world community.
Iran will use its nuclear program in peace, for energy and not give any nuclear material or technology to Hezbolla.
Iran will not threaten Oman, Saudi Arabia, Jordon or Kuwait to limit oil production to the west.


All this shit is unrelated to Iraq and nothing has been done about it or even argued. Unless you have a plan of action Idk wtf you're getting at.


The women who were burkas over their entire body do not deserve the rights that Western Women have earned - their culture dictacts otherwise - I mean why would they want the same rights as men?

There are women that don't want it but there are women that do want it. It's their culture and we have no right to go in there and change it into ours.


The United States military is the agressor and is killing innocent civilians, not the terrorist with their car bombs or suicide vests.

The U.S. is the aggressor in the Iraq war and that quote with Rosie is the truth. You think she's going to go on tv and just make up statistics. The terrorists are aggressors as well but not even 1/20th the U.S. is.


According to Rosie O'Donnell the United States military killed 650,000 innocent Iraqis.

Truth


According to MSNBC the United States military are mercenaries.

Not completely accurate not completely a lie.

--




Now if you believe any or all of the above I have a bridge to sell you.

How big is it and can you deliver?
Major.League.Infidel
Make Love and War
+303|6923|Communist Republic of CA, USA

Harmor wrote:

Major.League.Infidel wrote:

You had me worried there for a second...
Don't worry, I'm sure someone will read only the first few lines and tear me a new one.
Looks like he was right.
JackerP
aka S.J.N.P.0717
+21|6722|Mo Val, Cali
Haha, then you obviously didn't read my entire post. Say something about me not reading the entire post then you do it.
Smitty5613
Member
+46|6971|Middle of nowhere, California

CameronPoe wrote:

Nobody is being nice or wants to be nice to terrorists.
lol, do you know just how odd that sounds?? thats like saying "Lets be freinds with the Oklahoma City bomber."
Major.League.Infidel
Make Love and War
+303|6923|Communist Republic of CA, USA

S.J.N.P.0717 wrote:

Haha, then you obviously didn't read my entire post. Say something about me not reading the entire post then you do it.
He agreed with everything you said in the original post.
JackerP
aka S.J.N.P.0717
+21|6722|Mo Val, Cali

Smitty5613 wrote:

CameronPoe wrote:

Nobody is being nice or wants to be nice to terrorists.
lol, do you know just how odd that sounds?? thats like saying "Lets be freinds with the Oklahoma City bomber."
What's wrong with that? I mean just a regular guy.. oh yeah the bombing part...
JackerP
aka S.J.N.P.0717
+21|6722|Mo Val, Cali
He was being sarcastic.
Major.League.Infidel
Make Love and War
+303|6923|Communist Republic of CA, USA

S.J.N.P.0717 wrote:

He was being sarcastic.
He was being sarcastic with everything he said.  Why do you think all the violent republicans agreed with him?

Last edited by Major.League.Infidel (2007-06-19 01:31:21)

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard