Yaocelotl
:D
+221|7121|Keyboard
Scorpion0x17
can detect anyone's visible post count...
+691|7237|Cambridge (UK)

CommieChipmunk wrote:

hmm.. well, it would probably easier to go grab a 150 gb sata drive and just put XP on that and wait for SP1 for vista.  Could I have two HDDs both masters and choose which one I wanted to boot off of without unplugging and replugging sata cables every time I want to start the computer?
Yes, you could indeed run XP of a second HDD, and yes this will avoid a reinstall.

Again, you could also partition that drive - say to install both XP and Vista, or to create a separate data partition as I suggested.

AHA! I've just discovered, with Vista you don't even need to reinstall!

Microsoft wrote:

Can I repartition my hard disk?
   
Applies to all editions of Windows Vista.
Which edition of Windows Vista am I using?

You must be logged on as an administrator to perform these steps.

Yes. It's possible in this version of Windows to repartition your hard disk by using the Shrink feature in Disk Management. You can shrink an existing partition or volume to create unallocated disk space, from which you can create a new partition or volume. (Often, the terms partition and volume are used interchangeably.)
   
   
1.     Open Computer Management by clicking the Start button Picture of the Start button, clicking Control Panel, clicking System and Maintenance, clicking Administrative Tools, and then double-clicking Computer Management.‌ Administrator permission required If you are prompted for an administrator password or confirmation, type the password or provide confirmation.
2.     In the Navigation pane, under Storage, click Disk Management.
3.     Right-click the volume you want to shrink, and then click Shrink Volume.
4.     Follow the instructions on your screen.

For detailed information on how to shrink a volume, open Disk Management, click Help on the menu bar, click Help Topics, click the Contents tab, click Disk Management: Welcome, click Manage Basic Volumes, and then click Shrink a Basic Volume.
Notes

    * If you have multiple partitions on your hard disk, you can delete and create partitions from the resulting unallocated space. When you delete a partition, all data on the partition will be erased.
    * You can also repartition hard disks with a third-party partitioning program. Several third-party manufacturers offer programs that allow you to repartition your hard disk without erasing data.

(Source)
Then you need to create each other OS/data partition you want - I can't find instructions for exactly how to do this in Vista, but in XP, in the Disk Management tool, you just right click on the unallocated space and select 'New Partition'...

then, you can:

Microsoft wrote:

Install more than one operating system (multi-boot)
   
Applies to all editions of Windows Vista.
Which edition of Windows Vista am I using?

When you install the new version of Windows, you can keep an older version of Windows on your computer. This is often called a multiboot or dual-boot configuration.

Before you begin: Make sure that your hard disk has a separate partition for each operating system that you want to install, or that your computer has multiple hard disks. Otherwise, you will either have to reformat and repartition your hard disk or install the new operating system on a separate hard disk. Also, make sure that the partition or disk where you plan to install the new version of Windows is formatted with the NTFS file system. To create and format a partition, see Create and format a hard disk partition.
        Reformatting and repartitioning your hard disk deletes all information on that disk. If you are running a previous version of Windows and want to partition your hard disk without reformatting it, use disk partitioning software, which is available from various manufacturers. Some disk partitioning software allows you to keep your information. If you’re already running the most recent version of Windows and want to partition your hard disk, see Can I repartition my hard disk? Before installing Windows, be sure to disable all anti-virus software and back up your files to an external hard disk, a CD or DVD, a USB flash drive, or a network folder.   
   
   
1.     Turn on the computer running your current edition of Windows, and then insert the installation disc into the computer's CD or DVD drive.
2.     On the Install Windows menu, click Install now.
3.     On the Get important updates for installation page, we recommend getting the latest updates to help ensure a successful installation and to help protect your computer against security threats. You must be connected to the Internet to receive installation updates. This page might not appear if your computer is not connected to the Internet.
4.     On the Type your product key for activation page, we strongly recommend that you type your 25-character product key to help avoid problems during activation.
5.     On the Please read the license terms page, if you accept the license terms, click I accept the license terms.
6.     On the Which type of installation do you want? page, click Custom.
7.     On the Where do you want to install Windows page, select the partition or disk where you want to install the new Windows operating system.
8.     Click Next to begin the installation. You might see a compatibility report.
Notes

    * To set up a multi-boot configuration on a computer that does not yet have an operating system, partition the hard disk so each operating system you want to install has a partition, and begin by installing the oldest operating system first.
    * Any programs and drivers that you want to use must be installed on each operating system that you want to use them in.

(Source)
(That's all for Vista - installation to a different partition is similar in XP - during the blue dos-mode set-up screens you get the option to select the install partition).

Last edited by Scorpion0x17 (2007-06-26 20:37:22)

Scorpion0x17
can detect anyone's visible post count...
+691|7237|Cambridge (UK)

Yaocelotl wrote:

UbuntuFTW
UH? Just how, exactly does that solve his problem?
CommieChipmunk
Member
+488|7041|Portland, OR, USA

Scorpion0x17 wrote:

CommieChipmunk wrote:

hmm.. well, it would probably easier to go grab a 150 gb sata drive and just put XP on that and wait for SP1 for vista.  Could I have two HDDs both masters and choose which one I wanted to boot off of without unplugging and replugging sata cables every time I want to start the computer?
Yes, you could indeed run XP of a second HDD, and yes this will avoid a reinstall.

Again, you could also partition that drive - say to install both XP and Vista, or to create a separate data partition as I suggested.

AHA! I've just discovered, with Vista you don't even need to reinstall!

Microsoft wrote:

Can I repartition my hard disk?
   
Applies to all editions of Windows Vista.
Which edition of Windows Vista am I using?

You must be logged on as an administrator to perform these steps.

Yes. It's possible in this version of Windows to repartition your hard disk by using the Shrink feature in Disk Management. You can shrink an existing partition or volume to create unallocated disk space, from which you can create a new partition or volume. (Often, the terms partition and volume are used interchangeably.)
   
   
1.     Open Computer Management by clicking the Start button Picture of the Start button, clicking Control Panel, clicking System and Maintenance, clicking Administrative Tools, and then double-clicking Computer Management.‌ Administrator permission required If you are prompted for an administrator password or confirmation, type the password or provide confirmation.
2.     In the Navigation pane, under Storage, click Disk Management.
3.     Right-click the volume you want to shrink, and then click Shrink Volume.
4.     Follow the instructions on your screen.

For detailed information on how to shrink a volume, open Disk Management, click Help on the menu bar, click Help Topics, click the Contents tab, click Disk Management: Welcome, click Manage Basic Volumes, and then click Shrink a Basic Volume.
Notes

    * If you have multiple partitions on your hard disk, you can delete and create partitions from the resulting unallocated space. When you delete a partition, all data on the partition will be erased.
    * You can also repartition hard disks with a third-party partitioning program. Several third-party manufacturers offer programs that allow you to repartition your hard disk without erasing data.

(Source)
Then you need to create each other OS/data partition you want - I can't find instructions for exactly how to do this in Vista, but in XP, in the Disk Management tool, you just right click on the unallocated space and select 'New Partition'...

then, you can:

Microsoft wrote:

Install more than one operating system (multi-boot)
   
Applies to all editions of Windows Vista.
Which edition of Windows Vista am I using?

When you install the new version of Windows, you can keep an older version of Windows on your computer. This is often called a multiboot or dual-boot configuration.

Before you begin: Make sure that your hard disk has a separate partition for each operating system that you want to install, or that your computer has multiple hard disks. Otherwise, you will either have to reformat and repartition your hard disk or install the new operating system on a separate hard disk. Also, make sure that the partition or disk where you plan to install the new version of Windows is formatted with the NTFS file system. To create and format a partition, see Create and format a hard disk partition.
        Reformatting and repartitioning your hard disk deletes all information on that disk. If you are running a previous version of Windows and want to partition your hard disk without reformatting it, use disk partitioning software, which is available from various manufacturers. Some disk partitioning software allows you to keep your information. If you’re already running the most recent version of Windows and want to partition your hard disk, see Can I repartition my hard disk? Before installing Windows, be sure to disable all anti-virus software and back up your files to an external hard disk, a CD or DVD, a USB flash drive, or a network folder.   
   
   
1.     Turn on the computer running your current edition of Windows, and then insert the installation disc into the computer's CD or DVD drive.
2.     On the Install Windows menu, click Install now.
3.     On the Get important updates for installation page, we recommend getting the latest updates to help ensure a successful installation and to help protect your computer against security threats. You must be connected to the Internet to receive installation updates. This page might not appear if your computer is not connected to the Internet.
4.     On the Type your product key for activation page, we strongly recommend that you type your 25-character product key to help avoid problems during activation.
5.     On the Please read the license terms page, if you accept the license terms, click I accept the license terms.
6.     On the Which type of installation do you want? page, click Custom.
7.     On the Where do you want to install Windows page, select the partition or disk where you want to install the new Windows operating system.
8.     Click Next to begin the installation. You might see a compatibility report.
Notes

    * To set up a multi-boot configuration on a computer that does not yet have an operating system, partition the hard disk so each operating system you want to install has a partition, and begin by installing the oldest operating system first.
    * Any programs and drivers that you want to use must be installed on each operating system that you want to use them in.

(Source)
(That's all for Vista - installation to a different partition is similar in XP - during the blue dos-mode set-up screens you get the option to select the install partition).
kk.. so pretty much you get karma every time I see your name now..
Scorpion0x17
can detect anyone's visible post count...
+691|7237|Cambridge (UK)

CommieChipmunk wrote:

kk.. so pretty much you get karma every time I see your name now..
Here's your first opportunity...








































































SHIT! I bet I get banned for 'requesting karma' now...

Last edited by Scorpion0x17 (2007-06-26 21:18:49)

FredFLQ
S0tp R4p1nG u5!!1one
+47|7002|Donnacona, Quebec

Yaocelotl wrote:

UbuntuFTW
Ubuntu fucked my computer and I had to format...
CommieChipmunk
Member
+488|7041|Portland, OR, USA

Scorpion0x17 wrote:

CommieChipmunk wrote:

kk.. so pretty much you get karma every time I see your name now..
Here's your first opportunity...




































































SHIT! I bet I get banned for 'requesting karma' now...
You may not karma the same person in a 24 hour period.
lolz
CommieChipmunk
Member
+488|7041|Portland, OR, USA
https://img213.imageshack.us/img213/6810/untitledjd4.jpg




shit.. now should I install XP or Vista 32 bit... I'd have to take out a gig of ram regardless.. damn

Last edited by CommieChipmunk (2007-06-26 22:31:03)

Scorpion0x17
can detect anyone's visible post count...
+691|7237|Cambridge (UK)
Now you just need to create another partition - right click where it says 'Unallocated' and select 'New Partition'...

(and if you haven't got the hint already - if you value any of your data files, I'd recommend making two - one for XP/32bit Vista, one for data)

CommieChipmunk wrote:

shit.. now should I install XP or Vista 32 bit... I'd have to take out a gig of ram regardless.. damn
NO! <*sigh*> 32bit windows (whether it's Vista or XP) [big][huge][emphasis]DOES[/emphasis][/huge][/big] support 4GB of physical RAM.

It should work just fine.

(and if it doesn't it suggests there is something else wrong and it was never was 64bit Vista that was the problem in the first place)

Last edited by Scorpion0x17 (2007-06-27 01:09:30)

Bertster7
Confused Pothead
+1,101|7053|SE London

Scorpion0x17 wrote:

Now you just need to create another partition - right click where it says 'Unallocated' and select 'New Partition'...

(and if you haven't got the hint already - if you value any of your data files, I'd recommend making two - one for XP/32bit Vista, one for data)

CommieChipmunk wrote:

shit.. now should I install XP or Vista 32 bit... I'd have to take out a gig of ram regardless.. damn
NO! <*sigh*> 32bit windows (whether it's Vista or XP) [big][huge][emphasis]DOES[/emphasis][/huge][/big] support 4GB of physical RAM.
No it doesn't.

You can't access 4GB of physical memory within a 32-bit OS - simple as that. The CPU can't address it. It is limited to 4GB of logical memory space and you have to subtract IO addresses from that to get the total amount of physical memory supported. You can have 4GB in there, but you won't be able to access all of it.

It supports 4GB of logical RAM. Stop calling it physical RAM, that's just plain wrong. You can put 4GB of physical RAM in and it will use all of the DIMMs, but not all the space on all of them.

Last edited by Bertster7 (2007-06-27 05:20:06)

CommieChipmunk
Member
+488|7041|Portland, OR, USA
when I right click it says "new simple volume" is that what I'm looking for to create a new partition?
Bertster7
Confused Pothead
+1,101|7053|SE London

CommieChipmunk wrote:

when I right click it says "new simple volume" is that what I'm looking for to create a new partition?
On the unallocated space? If so, then yes.
Scorpion0x17
can detect anyone's visible post count...
+691|7237|Cambridge (UK)

Bertster7 wrote:

Scorpion0x17 wrote:

Now you just need to create another partition - right click where it says 'Unallocated' and select 'New Partition'...

(and if you haven't got the hint already - if you value any of your data files, I'd recommend making two - one for XP/32bit Vista, one for data)

CommieChipmunk wrote:

shit.. now should I install XP or Vista 32 bit... I'd have to take out a gig of ram regardless.. damn
NO! <*sigh*> 32bit windows (whether it's Vista or XP) [big][huge][emphasis]DOES[/emphasis][/huge][/big] support 4GB of physical RAM.
No it doesn't.

You can't access 4GB of physical memory within a 32-bit OS - simple as that. The CPU can't address it. It is limited to 4GB of logical memory space and you have to subtract IO addresses from that to get the total amount of physical memory supported. You can have 4GB in there, but you won't be able to access all of it.

It supports 4GB of logical RAM. Stop calling it physical RAM, that's just plain wrong. You can put 4GB of physical RAM in and it will use all of the DIMMs, but not all the space on all of them.
I'm sorry Bertster you are the one getting his terms mixed up.

The IO addressing is all handled between the OS and the BIOS - these do have access to the full 4GB of physical RAM.

Once the OS and BIOS have sorted out IO addressing, there will then be around 3GB (or so) left for Windows and apps to use.

Now, each application also gets a 4GB logical address space. Windows splits this between the remaining available physical RAM and the virtual RAM file on your HDD.
Scorpion0x17
can detect anyone's visible post count...
+691|7237|Cambridge (UK)

Bertster7 wrote:

CommieChipmunk wrote:

when I right click it says "new simple volume" is that what I'm looking for to create a new partition?
On the unallocated space? If so, then yes.
On this one, bertster, I think you are correct - sorry Chipmunk - they must have changed the wording on Vista and I couldn't find anything on the Microsoft website to tell me any different.
M.O.A.B
'Light 'em up!'
+1,220|6694|Escea

KILLSWITCH wrote:

Aaaaah yes the 'blue screen of death', doesn't your stomach just sink when you see it.
That one that says windows has shut down such and such to prevent damage to your comp? I hate that screen, It turns up every time I turn off ArmA.
Bertster7
Confused Pothead
+1,101|7053|SE London

Scorpion0x17 wrote:

Bertster7 wrote:

Scorpion0x17 wrote:

Now you just need to create another partition - right click where it says 'Unallocated' and select 'New Partition'...

(and if you haven't got the hint already - if you value any of your data files, I'd recommend making two - one for XP/32bit Vista, one for data)


NO! <*sigh*> 32bit windows (whether it's Vista or XP) [big][huge][emphasis]DOES[/emphasis][/huge][/big] support 4GB of physical RAM.
No it doesn't.

You can't access 4GB of physical memory within a 32-bit OS - simple as that. The CPU can't address it. It is limited to 4GB of logical memory space and you have to subtract IO addresses from that to get the total amount of physical memory supported. You can have 4GB in there, but you won't be able to access all of it.

It supports 4GB of logical RAM. Stop calling it physical RAM, that's just plain wrong. You can put 4GB of physical RAM in and it will use all of the DIMMs, but not all the space on all of them.
I'm sorry Bertster you are the one getting his terms mixed up.

The IO addressing is all handled between the OS and the BIOS - these do have access to the full 4GB of physical RAM.

Once the OS and BIOS have sorted out IO addressing, there will then be around 3GB (or so) left for Windows and apps to use.

Now, each application also gets a 4GB logical address space. Windows splits this between the remaining available physical RAM and the virtual RAM file on your HDD.
That's just not true.

The CPU must be able to identify each individual memory location, to do this each location must have a unique address. The fact that the OS and the BIOS have access to the full 4GB of physical RAM is completely irrelevant, since the CPU can't see it - only the available logical addresses, which includes the IO addressing (since the CPU needs to be able to access IO devices and memory). Therefore the total amount of memory available is 4GB of logical memory. Any virtual memory is simply handled through a page management system - with no pages exceeding the maximum addressable size by the CPU. The OS can't do anything without the CPU, so if the CPU can't see it - it isn't there.

You can put 4GB of physical RAM in a 32-bit system, it just won't all be used. Some of the physical RAM will be unavailable.
Bertster7
Confused Pothead
+1,101|7053|SE London

Scorpion0x17 wrote:

Bertster7 wrote:

CommieChipmunk wrote:

when I right click it says "new simple volume" is that what I'm looking for to create a new partition?
On the unallocated space? If so, then yes.
On this one, bertster, I think you are correct - sorry Chipmunk - they must have changed the wording on Vista and I couldn't find anything on the Microsoft website to tell me any different.
It's identical to doing it in XP.
Scorpion0x17
can detect anyone's visible post count...
+691|7237|Cambridge (UK)

Bertster7 wrote:

Scorpion0x17 wrote:

Bertster7 wrote:

No it doesn't.

You can't access 4GB of physical memory within a 32-bit OS - simple as that. The CPU can't address it. It is limited to 4GB of logical memory space and you have to subtract IO addresses from that to get the total amount of physical memory supported. You can have 4GB in there, but you won't be able to access all of it.

It supports 4GB of logical RAM. Stop calling it physical RAM, that's just plain wrong. You can put 4GB of physical RAM in and it will use all of the DIMMs, but not all the space on all of them.
I'm sorry Bertster you are the one getting his terms mixed up.

The IO addressing is all handled between the OS and the BIOS - these do have access to the full 4GB of physical RAM.

Once the OS and BIOS have sorted out IO addressing, there will then be around 3GB (or so) left for Windows and apps to use.

Now, each application also gets a 4GB logical address space. Windows splits this between the remaining available physical RAM and the virtual RAM file on your HDD.
That's just not true.

The CPU must be able to identify each individual memory location, to do this each location must have a unique address. The fact that the OS and the BIOS have access to the full 4GB of physical RAM is completely irrelevant, since the CPU can't see it - only the available logical addresses, which includes the IO addressing (since the CPU needs to be able to access IO devices and memory). Therefore the total amount of memory available is 4GB of logical memory. Any virtual memory is simply handled through a page management system - with no pages exceeding the maximum addressable size by the CPU. The OS can't do anything without the CPU, so if the CPU can't see it - it isn't there.

You can put 4GB of physical RAM in a 32-bit system, it just won't all be used. Some of the physical RAM will be unavailable.
Will you please haul your ass into the 21st century!

Intel wrote:

2.1.3 The Intel386™ Processor (1985)
The Intel386 processor was the first 32-bit processor in the IA-32 architecture family.
It introduced 32-bit registers for use both to hold operands and for addressing. The
lower half of each 32-bit Intel386 register retains the properties of the 16-bit registers
of earlier generations, permitting backward compatibility. The processor also
provides a virtual-8086 mode that allows for even greater efficiency when executing
programs created for 8086/8088 processors.
In addition, the Intel386 processor has support for:
• A 32-bit address bus that supports up to 4-GBytes of physical memory
• A segmented-memory model and a flat memory model
• Paging, with a fixed 4-KByte page size providing a method for virtual memory
management
• Support for parallel stages

(Source(page 34))
Intel386! 1985! "A 32-bit address bus"! "supports up to 4-GBytes of physical memory"!

I rest my case.

Last edited by Scorpion0x17 (2007-06-27 20:11:27)

Scorpion0x17
can detect anyone's visible post count...
+691|7237|Cambridge (UK)

Bertster7 wrote:

Scorpion0x17 wrote:

Bertster7 wrote:


On the unallocated space? If so, then yes.
On this one, bertster, I think you are correct - sorry Chipmunk - they must have changed the wording on Vista and I couldn't find anything on the Microsoft website to tell me any different.
It's identical to doing it in XP.
I think the wording of the options is slightly different in places. But, otherwise, from what I can tell, Bertster is right, the process is exactly the same.
Bertster7
Confused Pothead
+1,101|7053|SE London

Scorpion0x17 wrote:

Bertster7 wrote:

Scorpion0x17 wrote:


I'm sorry Bertster you are the one getting his terms mixed up.

The IO addressing is all handled between the OS and the BIOS - these do have access to the full 4GB of physical RAM.

Once the OS and BIOS have sorted out IO addressing, there will then be around 3GB (or so) left for Windows and apps to use.

Now, each application also gets a 4GB logical address space. Windows splits this between the remaining available physical RAM and the virtual RAM file on your HDD.
That's just not true.

The CPU must be able to identify each individual memory location, to do this each location must have a unique address. The fact that the OS and the BIOS have access to the full 4GB of physical RAM is completely irrelevant, since the CPU can't see it - only the available logical addresses, which includes the IO addressing (since the CPU needs to be able to access IO devices and memory). Therefore the total amount of memory available is 4GB of logical memory. Any virtual memory is simply handled through a page management system - with no pages exceeding the maximum addressable size by the CPU. The OS can't do anything without the CPU, so if the CPU can't see it - it isn't there.

You can put 4GB of physical RAM in a 32-bit system, it just won't all be used. Some of the physical RAM will be unavailable.
Will you please haul your ass into the 21st century!

Intel wrote:

2.1.3 The Intel386™ Processor (1985)
The Intel386 processor was the first 32-bit processor in the IA-32 architecture family.
It introduced 32-bit registers for use both to hold operands and for addressing. The
lower half of each 32-bit Intel386 register retains the properties of the 16-bit registers
of earlier generations, permitting backward compatibility. The processor also
provides a virtual-8086 mode that allows for even greater efficiency when executing
programs created for 8086/8088 processors.
In addition, the Intel386 processor has support for:
• A 32-bit address bus that supports up to 4-GBytes of physical memory
• A segmented-memory model and a flat memory model
• Paging, with a fixed 4-KByte page size providing a method for virtual memory
management
• Support for parallel stages

(Source(page 34))
Intel386! 1985! "A 32-bit address bus"! "supports up to 4-GBytes of physical memory"!

I rest my case.
Well that's pretty damned obvious. The CPU provides an offset which the paging unit uses to generate the address in physial memory - BUT the thing that makes me (and a lot of other people) refer to it as logical memory, is that some of that space in physical memory (after address allocation by the paging unit) is taken up by IO devices controlled by the BIOS. The BIOS reserves space in memory for PCI/AGP etc. - after address translation by the paging unit this space is the reason the OS won't report 4GB of memory present. This is why I'm refering to it as logical memory - because it includes IO address space, hence it is logical memory.

I know technically you CAN support more memory than that within 32-bit systems (using PAE and AWE and stuff - but it's a bit slow), but I don't think Vista does that - why bother when there's a 64-bit version?
Zimmer
Un Moderador
+1,688|7227|Scotland

Damn. I may have to go buy the 64-bit version.
Ryan
Member
+1,230|7314|Alberta, Canada

Filaure...?
My new favorite word. Thanks Microsoft!
=[AUT]-[phoenix]=
Member
+7|6627

Zimmer wrote:

Damn. I may have to go buy the 64-bit version.
just wait till the first service pack is out....at the moment most of the drivers suck....
CommieChipmunk
Member
+488|7041|Portland, OR, USA

=[AUT]-[phoenix]= wrote:

Zimmer wrote:

Damn. I may have to go buy the 64-bit version.
just wait till the first service pack is out....at the moment most of the drivers suck....
most? heh. try all of the drivers suck.

I can't play bf2 anymore, it's a fucking slideshow.
Bertster7
Confused Pothead
+1,101|7053|SE London

CommieChipmunk wrote:

=[AUT]-[phoenix]= wrote:

Zimmer wrote:

Damn. I may have to go buy the 64-bit version.
just wait till the first service pack is out....at the moment most of the drivers suck....
most? heh. try all of the drivers suck.

I can't play bf2 anymore, it's a fucking slideshow.
I don't currently have it installed, but I was running Ultimate 64-bit for a while, I had decent drivers for everything - you must just be unlucky.
BF2 ran perfectly, as did every other game I tried - which wasn't many.

It's the software incompatibilities that pissed me off.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard