Poll

Human attraction

Looks, aaaaaw yeeeeah45%45% - 55
Personality, I like to be intrigued54%54% - 65
Total: 120
djphetal
Go Ducks.
+346|6772|Oregon
personality is (arguably) more important to sustaining a long-term relationship...
but initial attraction is driven by a biological need to reproduce, and what we see as "attractive" is just what we intrinsically know as "fertile."
Little BaBy JESUS
m8
+394|6585|'straya
*Agrees with multiple previous posts*

Sure a girl needs to have some looks to get me interested... but i cant stand skanks/sluts.

personality for me is definitely the deciding factor... im not gonna go out with a chick just cuz shes hot...

u know u like someone when u suddenly feel happier when u talk/be with them. not cuz they might have a tight ass
[pt] KEIOS
srs bsns
+231|7089|pimelteror.de

usmarine2005 wrote:

Looks pull you in, personality can push you away.
qft.
Skorpy-chan
Member
+127|6782|Twyford, UK
Short-term, looks are important, but this is long-term, so personality.

Although frankly, you need both. Being extremely nice and really smart is all well and good, but if you look like a trout, I ain't interested. Ditto for being stunningly hot but thick as two short planks.
CameronPoe
Member
+2,925|6992
Alcohol is the biggest factor of course...
Ajax_the_Great1
Dropped on request
+206|7083
Damn, everyone in here is so shallow. I'm sure you're all perfect 10's.

If you just want a quick bang then I guess just looks is ok. But if you want to be in a happy relationship its all about personality. I feel sorry for anyone who's never developed an attraction for another human being until after they got to know them.
IRONCHEF
Member
+385|6928|Northern California
Obviously a mixture is what most people go for, not one or the other. 

I'd like to add that it's more wise to go with the more personality friendly mate so you'll have more happiness.  Fun and happiness are two different things.  And what happens when your hot wife's face turns to leather because of all that sun she got nude sun bathing?  You gonna spend your life talking to a retard with a leather face?
.:ronin:.|Patton
Respekct dad i love u always
+946|7246|Marathon, Florida Keys
Personality
https://i54.photobucket.com/albums/g117/patton1337/stats.jpg
XanKrieger
iLurk
+60|7095|South West England

DonFck wrote:

You rarely see a girl and go "Even if she looks terribad, I'm sure she has a great personality. I'd better go chat with her."
You also rarely date a girl that's good looking and go "She's stupid, irritating and her opinions are either nonexistent or idiotic. But she looks great, I think I should marry her."

So both. One comes first, the other seals the deal.
Pretty much my idea on this subject as well
Brasso
member
+1,549|7067

Personality, as long as they're attractive.  Cute face, whatever.  Just not really fat or something.
"people in ny have a general idea of how to drive. one of the pedals goes forward the other one prevents you from dying"
sergeriver
Cowboy from Hell
+1,928|7194|Argentina
Ok, anyone saying personality is a liar.  Read the question ffs.  It says which is the bigger factor in "attraction"?  Attraction begins with the looks, then you get to know the girl and her personality.  But first attraction factor is without doubt the looks.
KylieTastic
Games, Girls, Guinness
+85|6889|Cambridge, UK

Looks = bigger 'attraction'

but after the initial attraction you've got to have both, but I guess personality more important as long as still got some looks.

as much as girls like to say looks don't count that's balls....
.... when a girl asks 'do you (still) fancy me' or just 'do I look good in this' try saying 'you look ok I guess, but Its your personality I love'
m3thod
All kiiiiiiiiinds of gainz
+2,197|7108|UK
I'm a shallow wanker.  Looks and fuck the personality.
Blackbelts are just whitebelts who have never quit.
blademaster
I'm moving to Brazil
+2,075|7082

tthf wrote:

its a mix of both, imho
personality looks get boring after a while but you still have to look good but personality is vital
sergeriver
Cowboy from Hell
+1,928|7194|Argentina

m3thod wrote:

I'm a shallow wanker.  Looks and fuck the personality.
If she has the looks fuck the girl not the personality.
Spearhead
Gulf coast redneck hippy
+731|7127|Tampa Bay Florida
Do we have to pick either one? 
Liberal-Sl@yer
Certified BF2S Asshole
+131|6893|The edge of sanity
Looks are great for a while but they change. Its a lot harder for a person to change their personality so I will go with the latter.

BTW: I'm an ass man as well
BVC
Member
+325|7132
Looks are more for initial attraction, personality for the long run.

Given the two options, I'd go for the woman with average looks and good personality if I was looking for something long term, and the one with good looks and average personality if i was just after a shag/fuckbuddy.
Afrika_18
Member
+26|6979
I don't know about this poll, but I know that for women, pecker-size is the most important thing to them.  I'll summarize the results of the study I read: if you have less than 14 inches, you aren't even classified as a man to the average woman.  They consider you a half-man/half-woman hybrid.  Anything less than 14 inches won't satisfy a woman, and if she's still with you and you have less than 14 inches, then she's a lesbian. 

Most of you will find this hard to believe, but the data is based on a study conducted by a famous Harvard Psychiatrist.  It was found that 14 inches produces the critical amount of pleasure/pain for the woman to 'submit'.  Anything below 14 inches produced only fake orgasms and thus, fake submission. 

It should also be noted that 95% of the women polled mentioned that the ideal pecker-size was 27 inches, and that the 14 inch critieria was just a minimum.
LaidBackNinja
Pony Slaystation
+343|7146|Charlie One Alpha

Mitch wrote:

Personality is better, BUT as long as the girl is in the range of decent to hot.

ugly or fat is plznokthxbi
Holy shit I agree with DesertEagal!
"If you want a vision of the future, imagine SecuROM slapping your face with its dick -- forever." -George Orwell
Agent_Dung_Bomb
Member
+302|7173|Salt Lake City

Stingray24 wrote:

For me, looks were the initial attraction and personality kept me interested.  So personality ended up mattering more.  She is hot, though.
Agreed.  Long term relationships tend to be based more on personality that looks.
GunSlinger OIF II
Banned.
+1,860|7080
price?
Commie Killer
Member
+192|6824

Afrika_18 wrote:

I don't know about this poll, but I know that for women, pecker-size is the most important thing to them.  I'll summarize the results of the study I read: if you have less than 14 inches, you aren't even classified as a man to the average woman.  They consider you a half-man/half-woman hybrid.  Anything less than 14 inches won't satisfy a woman, and if she's still with you and you have less than 14 inches, then she's a lesbian. 

Most of you will find this hard to believe, but the data is based on a study conducted by a famous Harvard Psychiatrist.  It was found that 14 inches produces the critical amount of pleasure/pain for the woman to 'submit'.  Anything below 14 inches produced only fake orgasms and thus, fake submission. 

It should also be noted that 95% of the women polled mentioned that the ideal pecker-size was 27 inches, and that the 14 inch critieria was just a minimum.
Wow, they must of used cheap whores as the test subjects.
Lai
Member
+186|6588
Voted personality but if you hadn't added "I like to be intrigued", I would have made a Null Vote:

Somehow I always find myself more attracted to one with not the "best" personality. So while personality is what matters (well to me at least) it doesn't necessarily has to be a 100% good one. Guess life would be a lot simpler if it did

Last edited by Lai (2007-12-12 12:46:11)

mikkel
Member
+383|7038
Personality is a bigger factor, but I need physical attraction for a relationship to work. I want to be able to both talk to and sleep with my significant other. I don't want to have to turn to someone else for either of the two.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard