Bull3t
stephen brule
+83|6783

liquidat0r wrote:

I just wish they'd called it something different. Such a rubbish name for such a good film.
He gives his own life.

He is a Legend.
Poseidon
Fudgepack DeQueef
+3,253|7019|Long Island, New York

SamTheMan:D wrote:

Spoiler (highlight to read):
Did you cry when he had to kill his dog?
I almost did. I just had a german shepherd die last month, so it was pretty hard seeing his dog limping like that and then having to strangle it. God. I don't think any movie besides United 93's ever evoked that much emotion from me.
Brasso
member
+1,549|7112

Volatile_Squirrel wrote:

Good not great. Will Smith actually acted in this film, and his daily routines and interaction with his dog were entertaining. But.....the horrible CGI nearly ruined it all, and the abilities the infected had were ridiculous.

Oh, and that C4 grenade he used in the end was interesting.
Yeah, along with that 20 second fuse.
"people in ny have a general idea of how to drive. one of the pedals goes forward the other one prevents you from dying"
CosmoKramer
CC you in October
+131|7100|Medford, WI
yeah it was a sweet movie, now my first house is going to be built for a post apocalyptic world, with steel curtains and thick concrete floors and a basement bomb shelter/lab
r2zoo
Knowledge is power, guard it well
+126|7078|Michigan, USA

haffeysucks wrote:

Volatile_Squirrel wrote:

Good not great. Will Smith actually acted in this film, and his daily routines and interaction with his dog were entertaining. But.....the horrible CGI nearly ruined it all, and the abilities the infected had were ridiculous.

Oh, and that C4 grenade he used in the end was interesting.
Yeah, along with that 20 second fuse.
No 20 second fuse, when you pull the pin, it doesnt start counting down.  Only when you release the "spoon" does it then trigger it.  Depends on model of course.  Then again the explosion it produced was quite amazing for a hand grenade.
Brasso
member
+1,549|7112

r2zoo wrote:

haffeysucks wrote:

Volatile_Squirrel wrote:

Good not great. Will Smith actually acted in this film, and his daily routines and interaction with his dog were entertaining. But.....the horrible CGI nearly ruined it all, and the abilities the infected had were ridiculous.

Oh, and that C4 grenade he used in the end was interesting.
Yeah, along with that 20 second fuse.
No 20 second fuse, when you pull the pin, it doesnt start counting down.  Only when you release the "spoon" does it then trigger it.  Depends on model of course.  Then again the explosion it produced was quite amazing for a hand grenade.
Oh, really?  Whew, never knew that.  Haha explains a lot.

But yeah that was a huge explosion anyway.  And why didn't those demon dogs just run across the sunlight line when it was like a foot wide?
"people in ny have a general idea of how to drive. one of the pedals goes forward the other one prevents you from dying"
Mugen
Member
+19|6481

haffeysucks wrote:

But yeah that was a huge explosion anyway.  And why didn't those demon dogs just run across the sunlight line when it was like a foot wide?
Because they're stupid ass infected dogs.

That or the director just wanted to add more suspense.

Or it's all the companion cube's fault.

Nobody knows.
Reciprocity
Member
+721|7062|the dank(super) side of Oregon
the scene with smith dicking around on the road while the rabid doggies pretty much ruined the whole movie.  pretty bad when they have to create unnecessary tension to advance the plot.  the whole crawling thing, without his m4 was just fucking stupid.

and when they tipped over his giant SUV, I dont care if the zombies are super-fucking-human, you cant just bounce off the side of a 3 ton truck and toss it on it's side.

lazy film makers with too much money.
Uzique
dasein.
+2,865|6952
I watched a stream of the movie off the Internet (high quality leak, was only up for a few hours... saved to hard-drive anyway) and was impressed with it as a Hollywood movie. As far as blockbusters go, this is pretty much spot on. Grandiose storyline, epic setting, massive production costs, a fantastic lead actor, the odd interspersed moments of action and big bangs to keep the action-genre lovers happy, and a deeper more thoughtful theme.

But, the only reason I was interested in watching the film in the first place was because I had previously read the novel. The novel kicked ass. In comparison, the movie really didn't. The movie deviated from the plot of the novel (which was ingenious to be fair), and instead started to just clone movies such as the non-Hollywood British '28 Days Later'. The original 'I Am Legend' novel is much more similar to Blade, if I had to make any Hollywood allusions- and the entire Goddamned point of the 'legend' part is that the protagonist reaches the climactic conclusion that he himself has become an even bigger legend than the vampires (note: VAMPIRES, not mindless Resident Evil zombies)- through his actions, and then realizes the entire primal fear-based morality of mankind. This film went way off the mark when it came to plot, and I'm not really sure why. If you're going to make a novel adaptation, why remove so many key elements and make it into a complete deviation of the original? The book was widely acclaimed and was a classic in its own right... so why the hell did they decide to make another (slightly) generic man vs. city of zombies movie? Boooo!

Because I already knew beforehand the reason why the main-character becomes AN HERO / AN LEGEND, I thought that the way in which they tried to wrap it up in the mountain colony-- with the cheesy "He saved us... we are his legacy, he is our legend" -- was utter tripe. It was cheesy, rushed, and a full on cock slap to the original author of the novel,- who actually had a point to calling him a legend.

At the end of the day, I think it boils down to the subliminal theme of the novel being too high-brow for the mainstream audience. I don't mean that in a patronizing or pejorative manner. I just mean that your average movie-going fan doesn't necessarily want engaging, complicated and complex plots/themes; they just want big explosions, a lead actor that can make witty humorous comments, and perhaps the odd titty flash here and there.

Last edited by Uzique (2007-12-28 02:29:38)

libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual. http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/
AWSMFOX
Banned
+405|6945|A W S M F O X
He should have done a barrel roll.
Airwolf
Latter Alcoholic
+287|7201|Scotland

Uzique wrote:

I watched a stream of the movie off the Internet (high quality leak, was only up for a few hours... saved to hard-drive anyway) and was impressed with it as a Hollywood movie. As far as blockbusters go, this is pretty much spot on. Grandiose storyline, epic setting, massive production costs, a fantastic lead actor, the odd interspersed moments of action and big bangs to keep the action-genre lovers happy, and a deeper more thoughtful theme.

But, the only reason I was interested in watching the film in the first place was because I had previously read the novel. The novel kicked ass. In comparison, the movie really didn't. The movie deviated from the plot of the novel (which was ingenious to be fair), and instead started to just clone movies such as the non-Hollywood British '28 Days Later'. The original 'I Am Legend' novel is much more similar to Blade, if I had to make any Hollywood allusions- and the entire Goddamned point of the 'legend' part is that the protagonist reaches the climactic conclusion that he himself has become an even bigger legend than the vampires (note: VAMPIRES, not mindless Resident Evil zombies)- through his actions, and then realizes the entire primal fear-based morality of mankind. This film went way off the mark when it came to plot, and I'm not really sure why. If you're going to make a novel adaptation, why remove so many key elements and make it into a complete deviation of the original? The book was widely acclaimed and was a classic in its own right... so why the hell did they decide to make another (slightly) generic man vs. city of zombies movie? Boooo!

Because I already knew beforehand the reason why the main-character becomes AN HERO / AN LEGEND, I thought that the way in which they tried to wrap it up in the mountain colony-- with the cheesy "He saved us... we are his legacy, he is our legend" -- was utter tripe. It was cheesy, rushed, and a full on cock slap to the original author of the novel,- who actually had a point to calling him a legend.

At the end of the day, I think it boils down to the subliminal theme of the novel being too high-brow for the mainstream audience. I don't mean that in a patronizing or pejorative manner. I just mean that your average movie-going fan doesn't necessarily want engaging, complicated and complex plots/themes; they just want big explosions, a lead actor that can make witty humorous comments, and perhaps the odd titty flash here and there.
that's insight right there, nice. Might go and read novel now...


Also I was shitting myself when he had to go into the dark to get his dog.





Also, what was the zombie guy's face all about at the end? It was like he was smiling or summat, fucking zombie.
Eldu
Member
+62|6589|Belgium

Zimmer wrote:

The film was awful. It was a terrible copy of 28 Days Later; along with the worst ending I have ever seen.

It was hollywood spewl. Only Will Smith saved it from being utter fail. His mesmerising performance saved teh day for me. But never again will I watch that crap. The infected actually made me feel sorry for them, the reverse of what I was meant to feel : fear.
100% correct. I was just laughing at the end because it was so bad. The infected looked like crap. Should've used life ones like in 28 days later. The thing with the light ruined it. Movie could've been good. You just can't top 28 days later ^^.
Chou
Member
+737|7272

Zilla wrote:

great movie. reminded me of Castaway. (the part where he was losing his mind from being alone, not the infected, or the beingstuckonaisland part.)
If you liked that part then you will appreciate this top notch acting.

The Hurricane (Denzel Washington)

Last edited by Chou (2007-12-28 04:40:16)

SamFisher199
Airwhore
+40|6795|Netherlands
Yes, great movie (downloaded it)
RDMC
Enemy Wheelbarrow Spotted..!!
+736|7046|Area 51
Yep, saw in the cinema yesterday, by accident though.

I clearly said I wanted a ticket for American Gangster, turns out she gave me I Am Legend, didn't see that one before anyway so no big deal. I really did enjoy the movie, loved the dog To bad it died, though there are some flaws in the movie, IF YOU HAVEN'T SEEN THE MOVIE, PLEASE LOOK AWAY That he cut himself loose, he lands on his knive and he has to crawl, but suddenly he gets up and runs, kinda weird. Rest of the movie was just great
stef10
Member
+173|6964|Denmark

RDMC wrote:

Yep, saw in the cinema yesterday, by accident though.

I clearly said I wanted a ticket for American Gangster, turns out she gave me I Am Legend, didn't see that one before anyway so no big deal. I really did enjoy the movie, loved the dog To bad it died, though there are some flaws in the movie, IF YOU HAVEN'T SEEN THE MOVIE, PLEASE LOOK AWAY That he cut himself loose, he lands on his knive and he has to crawl, but suddenly he gets up and runs, kinda weird. Rest of the movie was just great
Know Adrenalin or fear?
jsnipy
...
+3,277|7004|...

Zimmer wrote:

It was a terrible copy of 28 Days Later;
28 Days later was win
r'Eeee
That's how I roll, BITCH!
+311|6930

Bull3t wrote:

liquidat0r wrote:

I just wish they'd called it something different. Such a rubbish name for such a good film.
He gives his own life.

He is a Legend.
Fuck - you just spoiled it. I was about to go and watch it. Not saying your fault. I guess, I should have known there would be spoilers here. Oh well.
stef10
Member
+173|6964|Denmark
Not any of you guys knew that this movie was on youtube for 2 days, 2 weeks ago?
Sone
i piss excellence
+22|7005|Houston (Spring), TX
I was a good bitch and paid my $10 to see it. ($20 actually, +the girlfriend that yelped through the whole movie)
Sydney
2λчиэλ
+783|7325|Reykjavík, Iceland.
I thought it was pretty good, had a few good scares there and there, I was practically shitting myself when he went inside the dark house to get his dog. (WTF were they doing inside there anyway, you know, they were all in one big group, sleeping standing up or watching something?)

Seeing the comments above I want to read the novel and compare it with the movie.
Mekstizzle
WALKER
+3,611|7102|London, England

PBAsydney wrote:

I thought it was pretty good, had a few good scares there and there, I was practically shitting myself when he went inside the dark house to get his dog. (WTF were they doing inside there anyway, you know, they were all in one big group, sleeping standing up or watching something?)

Seeing the comments above I want to read the novel and compare it with the movie.
Probably like some sort of fucked up Hibernation seeing as they can't do much when it's day time. It was a pretty cool way to show just how fucked up they are imo.

What I don't get is why he kept putting his hand on the light, was it some sort of Military tactic so they don't see your flashlight too much or was it something else.

Last edited by Mek-Izzle (2007-12-28 05:09:54)

Eldu
Member
+62|6589|Belgium

stef10 wrote:

RDMC wrote:

Yep, saw in the cinema yesterday, by accident though.

I clearly said I wanted a ticket for American Gangster, turns out she gave me I Am Legend, didn't see that one before anyway so no big deal. I really did enjoy the movie, loved the dog To bad it died, though there are some flaws in the movie, IF YOU HAVEN'T SEEN THE MOVIE, PLEASE LOOK AWAY That he cut himself loose, he lands on his knive and he has to crawl, but suddenly he gets up and runs, kinda weird. Rest of the movie was just great
Know Adrenalin or fear?
You're funny .
Rubix-Cubes
Member
+123|7137|UK
WoW!!!! this film had a lot of everything, apart from TITS, unless of course you count Bill Smith as one.  Not the kind of film i would sit down and watch again  like 28 days later. But i think that was partly to do with the higher budget, 28 days had a lesser budget, and it gave it that grainy feel, plus i think that the I AM A LEG END had the CGI guys from playskol, the only thing that really kept this film going was Will Smoooths acting, especially the part with the dog, that was really touching, there could have been a lot more to this film but i guess they rushed to get it out for boxing day here in the UK, rate this film 5/10
Mekstizzle
WALKER
+3,611|7102|London, England

Rubix-Cubes wrote:

WoW!!!! this film had a lot of everything, apart from TITS
*cough* captured zombie girl

eyyy

https://web.tiscali.it/albaworld/Foto%20Telefilm/Fonzie.jpg

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard