I'll see your plant and raise you:Des.Kmal wrote:
plus, its such a preeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeetty plant <333333
http://img205.imageshack.us/img205/4743 … iteus7.jpg
Looks good enough to eat.
I'll see your plant and raise you:Des.Kmal wrote:
plus, its such a preeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeetty plant <333333
http://img205.imageshack.us/img205/4743 … iteus7.jpg
lol, one of my friends always licks his fingers after he breaks his bud up. roflOllie wrote:
I'll see your plant and raise you:Des.Kmal wrote:
plus, its such a preeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeetty plant <333333
http://img205.imageshack.us/img205/4743 … iteus7.jpg
http://www.uk420.com/boards/index.php?a … ;id=157514
Looks good enough to eat.
om nom nomOllie wrote:
I'll see your plant and raise you:Des.Kmal wrote:
plus, its such a preeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeetty plant <333333
http://img205.imageshack.us/img205/4743 … iteus7.jpg
http://www.uk420.com/boards/index.php?a … ;id=157514
Looks good enough to eat.
I can't even respond to how stupid this post is.Poseidon wrote:
I agree.Des.Kmal wrote:
wutWow, you think I was serious?
ROLFROLFOLFROFLROFLROFLROFLROFLROFLROFLROFL
Yay, now we got the post maturity level down to something you can understand.
I think this whole "maturity" thing is just his last ditch effort when he knows he's losing the argument. It's pretty easy to call someone "immature" when you're losing the argument. Watch, next he'll call me a poopiehead doodoo face.
Last edited by nukchebi0 (2008-02-13 19:32:16)
Thanks for proving my point.nukchebi0 wrote:
I can't even respond to how stupid this post is.Poseidon wrote:
I agree.Des.Kmal wrote:
wut
I think this whole "maturity" thing is just his last ditch effort when he knows he's losing the argument. It's pretty easy to call someone "immature" when you're losing the argument. Watch, next he'll call me a poopiehead doodoo face.
Last edited by Poseidon (2008-02-13 19:33:04)
Calling a post stupid and calling someone a "poopiehead doodoo face" are slightly different.Poseidon wrote:
Thanks for proving my point.nukchebi0 wrote:
I can't even respond to how stupid this post is.Poseidon wrote:
I agree.
I think this whole "maturity" thing is just his last ditch effort when he knows he's losing the argument. It's pretty easy to call someone "immature" when you're losing the argument. Watch, next he'll call me a poopiehead doodoo face.
Last edited by nukchebi0 (2008-02-13 19:35:10)
Obviously you don't understand a word I just said.nukchebi0 wrote:
Calling a post stupid and calling someone a "poopiehead doodoo face" are slightly different.Poseidon wrote:
Thanks for proving my point.nukchebi0 wrote:
I can't even respond to how stupid this post is.
http://img357.imageshack.us/img357/2787/fail2it9.jpg
http://img357.imageshack.us/img357/2787/fail2it9.jpg
Last edited by nukchebi0 (2008-02-13 19:38:28)
You should be.nukchebi0 wrote:
I understand what you said. But if I thought you were referring to a different point than you intended to, that is entirely your fault for being unclear.
Sorry.
Lolwut.nukchebi0 wrote:
I can't even respond to how stupid this post is.Poseidon wrote:
I agree.Des.Kmal wrote:
wut
I think this whole "maturity" thing is just his last ditch effort when he knows he's losing the argument. It's pretty easy to call someone "immature" when you're losing the argument. Watch, next he'll call me a poopiehead doodoo face.
So I won't.
?Poseidon wrote:
You should be.nukchebi0 wrote:
I understand what you said. But if I thought you were referring to a different point than you intended to, that is entirely your fault for being unclear.
Sorry.
Now bend over.
Sssh. He thinks he makes sense and is really mature in his own little world. Hell, if anyone in this thread is high as a kite, it's probably him...Ollie wrote:
Lolwut.nukchebi0 wrote:
I can't even respond to how stupid this post is.Poseidon wrote:
I agree.
I think this whole "maturity" thing is just his last ditch effort when he knows he's losing the argument. It's pretty easy to call someone "immature" when you're losing the argument. Watch, next he'll call me a poopiehead doodoo face.
So I won't.
nukchebi0 wrote:
?Poseidon wrote:
You should be.nukchebi0 wrote:
I understand what you said. But if I thought you were referring to a different point than you intended to, that is entirely your fault for being unclear.
Sorry.
Now bend over.
Are you admitting defeat or something?
Pot heads get defensive when questioned (I believe paranoia is a side effect), and the morality police have never backed away from a fight.krAzi wrote:
wow this is still going...
Smoking a cigarette is probably better than cutting off your arm, but it's still not good for you.Poseidon wrote:
Eating a Big Mac is probably worse than one joint or one bowl.CommieChipmunk wrote:
Forget the side effects to your essential body organs or the fact that you're fucking with brain chemistry that neither you, scientists, nor doctors really know anything about.Des.Kmal wrote:
lol way off topic.
anyway, the only anti drug argument is that u shouldnt do it cuz its illegal, and its illegal cuz u shouldnt do it, and u shouldnt do it cuz its illegal.
People still die from lung related diseases. Just because statistically more people may die from heart related diseases (as you say), doesn't mean that your lungs are magically immune from harm.Des.Kmal wrote:
lol nukchebi0 are u serious? more people die from heart disease than lung cancer or any lung related diseases. -.-
gj.
I hate ignorance. And people who inhale smoke are full of it.ig wrote:
why do you keep trying?CommieChipmunk wrote:
Forget the side effects to your essential body organs or the fact that you're fucking with brain chemistry that neither you, scientists, nor doctors really know anything about.Des.Kmal wrote:
lol way off topic.
anyway, the only anti drug argument is that u shouldnt do it cuz its illegal, and its illegal cuz u shouldnt do it, and u shouldnt do it cuz its illegal.
He's a brick wall? You're the one purposefully breathing in carcinogens.Poseidon wrote:
I swear, it's just like talking to a brick wall. Although, I have a bit more respect for the brick wall and could probably have a more intelligent conversation with it.
You should probably just go under your sink and chug the Drano and get it over with.
Last edited by CommieChipmunk (2008-02-13 19:51:14)
He's probably an acid freak just in it for teh lulz.Poseidon wrote:
Sssh. He thinks he makes sense and is really mature in his own little world. Hell, if anyone in this thread is high as a kite, it's probably him...Ollie wrote:
Lolwut.nukchebi0 wrote:
I can't even respond to how stupid this post is.
So I won't.
Probably. He likes the reactions.Ollie wrote:
He's probably an acid freak just in it for teh lulz.Poseidon wrote:
Sssh. He thinks he makes sense and is really mature in his own little world. Hell, if anyone in this thread is high as a kite, it's probably him...Ollie wrote:
Lolwut.
Yeah, and you're doing the same every day you walk out of the door. The air's full of 'em.CommieChipmunk wrote:
He's a brick wall? You're the one purposefully breathing in carcinogens.Poseidon wrote:
I swear, it's just like talking to a brick wall. Although, I have a bit more respect for the brick wall and could probably have a more intelligent conversation with it.
You should probably just go under your sink and chug the Drano and get it over with.
Ollie wrote:
I'll see your plant and raise you:Des.Kmal wrote:
plus, its such a preeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeetty plant <333333
http://img205.imageshack.us/img205/4743 … iteus7.jpg
http://www.uk420.com/boards/index.php?a … ;id=157514
Looks good enough to eat.
Hardly, it's really down to risk vs gain. Most logical people can see that being high for 1-2 hours is worth shaving 7 or so minutes of your life. And as has been said, marijuana can be vapourised and eaten. No carcinogenic effects from these methods of ingestion.CommieChipmunk wrote:
I hate ignorance. And people who inhale smoke are full of it.
Special brownies!Ollie wrote:
Hardly, it's really down to risk vs gain. Most logical people can see that being high for 1-2 hours is worth shaving 7 or so minutes of your life. And as has been said, marijuana can be vapourised and eaten. No carcinogenic effects from these methods of ingestion.CommieChipmunk wrote:
I hate ignorance. And people who inhale smoke are full of it.
Being high for 1-2 hours isn't worth my 1-2 hours, honestly.Ollie wrote:
Hardly, it's really down to risk vs gain. Most logical people can see that being high for 1-2 hours is worth shaving 7 or so minutes of your life. And as has been said, marijuana can be vapourised and eaten. No carcinogenic effects from these methods of ingestion.CommieChipmunk wrote:
I hate ignorance. And people who inhale smoke are full of it.
Now that's something I wanna try.krAzi wrote:
Special brownies!Ollie wrote:
Hardly, it's really down to risk vs gain. Most logical people can see that being high for 1-2 hours is worth shaving 7 or so minutes of your life. And as has been said, marijuana can be vapourised and eaten. No carcinogenic effects from these methods of ingestion.CommieChipmunk wrote:
I hate ignorance. And people who inhale smoke are full of it.
I'm confused...how exactly is us debating it wasting your life? Do you need to be reading this thread or something?S.Lythberg wrote:
Being high for 1-2 hours isn't worth my 1-2 hours, honestly.Ollie wrote:
Hardly, it's really down to risk vs gain. Most logical people can see that being high for 1-2 hours is worth shaving 7 or so minutes of your life. And as has been said, marijuana can be vapourised and eaten. No carcinogenic effects from these methods of ingestion.CommieChipmunk wrote:
I hate ignorance. And people who inhale smoke are full of it.
I don't care if you want to waste your lives, but don't waste mine debating it...
Last edited by Poseidon (2008-02-13 19:59:43)
I guess there's just a gap between you and me that I'll never be able to understand. Knowingly shortening your life doesn't make much sense any way you look at it in my book...Ollie wrote:
Hardly, it's really down to risk vs gain. Most logical people can see that being high for 1-2 hours is worth shaving 7 or so minutes of your life. And as has been said, marijuana can be vapourised and eaten. No carcinogenic effects from these methods of ingestion.CommieChipmunk wrote:
I hate ignorance. And people who inhale smoke are full of it.