Pages: 1 2

 

2006-11-27 20:47:03
Archer
rapes face
+161|6869|Canuckistan
Bet On Soldier must be like... FarCry multiplayer. It looks very awesome from looks, but sucks in gameplay.

And guys, you all forget. If Valve would have the Battlefield franchise, they would never fuck up it's core elements such as vehicles. Remember, they also know how EA became so successful in sales, atleast. And to those who think that it'll be just IO military and like CS 1.00 like someone said, it's called experience.
2006-11-28 01:24:31
Nikola Bathory
Karkand T-90 0wnage
+163|7231|Bulgaria
I don't think Blizzard is a good choice! I hate th3m
Guess why - people buy Wow, then pay EVERY SINGLE month again and again to play the game they BOUGHT!
So, imagine having to pay per month to play BF2!!!!  no, thanks!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>>>BF3 Central<<<
2006-11-30 07:32:28
bad_mongoloid
Member
+3|7220|New York City

Nikola Bathory wrote:

I don't think Blizzard is a good choice! I hate th3m
Guess why - people buy Wow, then pay EVERY SINGLE month again and again to play the game they BOUGHT!
So, imagine having to pay per month to play BF2!!!!  no, thanks!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
There's a huge difference in the type of games.  In MMORPGs you have to update and maintain lots more content than an online FPS.  If EA and BF2 would have the same quality control as Blizzard with World of Warcraft, then I would pay a monthly fee.
2006-12-03 19:55:56
Heavy_Guns_91
I hand out purple hearts like candy
+72|6848|Alberta, Canada

Archer wrote:

If Valve had it, it would've been more played than CSS.

Possibly WarCraft, provided that they do good shit with the franchise.

Blizzard would probably turn it into a military MMORPG, which would be gay unless it was MMOFPS.

EDIT: Ubisoft? I think they're only insanely good at single player games, tbh.
Bethesda is the king of the single player games game.
You all know what I mean.

But Ubisoft would be my choice for BF2. I mean, look at how they did Brothers In Arms... NO-ONE can say that's a bad game!
2006-12-03 20:02:18
Flaming_Maniac
prince of insufficient light
+2,490|7152|67.222.138.85
A lot of companies have made really good games, but what do you think is more important, the concept, execution, or customer support?
2006-12-04 01:12:27
Nikola Bathory
Karkand T-90 0wnage
+163|7231|Bulgaria

Flaming_Maniac wrote:

but what do you think is more important, the concept, execution, or customer support?
all 3 are important... But if I had to choose 2 of those 3, it would be the concept and execution.
>>>BF3 Central<<<
2006-12-04 01:19:36
plastic_budgie
Member
+114|7196|England : East Yorkshire
It still could be fixed by EA.. make 2 diffrent versions of patches one with jump and shoot c4 thorwing prone belly jumping i miss those day's thegame was fun to play not just to use thoese tactics but too see 7 spec ops spamming about in the air on there belly's throwing c4.. ide defently play if the game went back to that.. also black hawk bring it back
2006-12-04 16:51:49
Heavy_Guns_91
I hand out purple hearts like candy
+72|6848|Alberta, Canada

DonFck wrote:

Mr.Casual wrote:

I would say it would be a more overall stable and balanced game. If ubisoft did it, it wouild be better no questions asked. imo
Stability รก la Ubisoft = Patches come already with the game package:

http://img221.imageshack.us/img221/9175/patchqm0.jpg

Moral of the story: No matter who makes it, bugs and glitches exist.
Except Ubisoft's patches fix more than they ruin

 

Pages: 1 2

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard