Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|7057|132 and Bush

Bernadictus wrote:

AMD had the the chance to kill Intel with better processors, only Intel woke up, and produced their CD and C2D.
They pawned AMD because AMD did not innovate.
Intel already classifies it 32nm "in good shape". The future doesn't look much better for AMD.
http://forums.bf2s.com/viewtopic.php?id=56066
Xbone Stormsurgezz
<[onex]>Headstone
Member
+102|7158|New York

Kmarion wrote:

Bernadictus wrote:

AMD had the the chance to kill Intel with better processors, only Intel woke up, and produced their CD and C2D.
They pawned AMD because AMD did not innovate.
Intel already classifies it 32nm "in good shape". The future doesn't look much better for AMD.
http://forums.bf2s.com/viewtopic.php?id=56066
The biggest reason AMD won last time and had awesome processors was because IBM bailed them out with the A64 with Better silicon and processor design. But now that AMD has noone to lean on, and the fact they are putting ALOT into there ATI part of the company, They will be more of an OEM supplier now than an entheuisists company that turns out great gameing chips for cheap.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard