Well, he certainly is the best, its just a shock, i thought he had another few years in him.........
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/st … 05,00.html
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/st … 05,00.html
Well you can thank the England team from last year for "persuading" him to keep going for another year.JET_G raidensen wrote:
Well, he certainly is the best, its just a shock, i thought he had another few years in him.........
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/st … 05,00.html
Last edited by B00MH3ADSH0T (2006-12-21 06:56:35)
Shame about that . Clarke is the new McGrath though.TeamZephyr wrote:
Oh and also, Glenn McGrath is also retiring and he is just as good as Warney cept in the pace department.
Yeah, Clarke is fucking great, i just the other Clarke-the batter guy gets his game back on, he has the potential to be pretty powerhouse.-[Silver.Inc* wrote:
Shame about that . Clarke is the new McGrath though.TeamZephyr wrote:
Oh and also, Glenn McGrath is also retiring and he is just as good as Warney cept in the pace department.
Sad to see em both go
Lol? just because he retires doesnt mean he record goes away... btw do you even watch criket?TeamZephyr wrote:
Damn, this means that chucker murali will take over the wicket record.
A sad day for Australian cricket.
Oh and also, Glenn McGrath is also retiring and he is just as good as Warney cept in the pace department.
Well on the feilding team theres 11 players 1 is a bowler and 1 is a wicket keeper the rest are in the feild waiting for a catch, on the batting team there is 2 men and they are at ethier side of the pitch and they hit the ball and run back and forth scoring "runs" the batting team has 10 wickets so they have to get as many runs before they get out 10 times. so on the radio they will say somthing for example like 5 for 219 as the score that means the batting team has lost 5 wickets and they have scored 219 runs, hope this helped. You may be the next warnie so start texting lolDersmikner wrote:
When my family had a condo in Grand Cayman we watched quite a bit of cricket but I still have no F-ing idea how you score that shit.
Can someone give me a rundown of the players, what their jobs are, and how they score it?
I listen to the scores all the time on the BBC World Service radio and have no damned idea what I'm hearing...
Do YOU ever watch the cricket?B00MH3ADSH0T wrote:
Lol? just because he retires doesnt mean he record goes away... btw do you even watch criket?TeamZephyr wrote:
Damn, this means that chucker murali will take over the wicket record.
A sad day for Australian cricket.
Oh and also, Glenn McGrath is also retiring and he is just as good as Warney cept in the pace department.
This coming from a guy who thinks the record goes away when someone retires.... murali may be in 2nd place but he is no where near overtaking warnes recordTeamZephyr wrote:
Do YOU ever watch the cricket?B00MH3ADSH0T wrote:
Lol? just because he retires doesnt mean he record goes away... btw do you even watch criket?TeamZephyr wrote:
Damn, this means that chucker murali will take over the wicket record.
A sad day for Australian cricket.
Oh and also, Glenn McGrath is also retiring and he is just as good as Warney cept in the pace department.
Murali is right behind him in the wicket taking record department and is 5 years younger than Warne and McGrath meaning that he will probably overtake Warney's record.
And guys, it's Clark who bowls. Clarke is a batter
He could be in 4-5 years...B00MH3ADSH0T wrote:
This coming from a guy who thinks the record goes away when someone retires.... murali may be in 2nd place but he is no where near overtaking warnes recordTeamZephyr wrote:
Do YOU ever watch the cricket?B00MH3ADSH0T wrote:
Lol? just because he retires doesnt mean he record goes away... btw do you even watch criket?
Murali is right behind him in the wicket taking record department and is 5 years younger than Warne and McGrath meaning that he will probably overtake Warney's record.
And guys, it's Clark who bowls. Clarke is a batter