Pages: 1

 

2006-12-08 12:55:37
B.Schuss
I'm back, baby... ( sort of )
+664|7087|Cologne, Germany

appeals or admin complaints go here. managed by Alpha. no spamming please.

EDIT: Stryyker, what is it about "No spamming please" that you don't understand ?
2006-12-20 08:32:27
Echo
WOoKie
+383|6965|The Netherlands

Superior Mind wrote:

un ban me >.<!!
I got this from the meeting point and it goes here cause its an appeal. http://forums.bf2s.com/viewtopic.php?pi … 7#p1071877

I read in the banlist yesterday that he was perm banned for attacking an uncap. What do the other server admins think, should we give him a second chance?

My idea is, we could maybe unban him if he promises to follow our rules in the future.
2006-12-20 08:35:43
Negerkungen
I could not care less
+541|6988|Topside

Echo wrote:

Superior Mind wrote:

un ban me >.<!!
I got this from the meeting point and it goes here cause its an appeal. http://forums.bf2s.com/viewtopic.php?pi … 7#p1071877

I read in the banlist yesterday that he was perm banned for attacking an uncap. What do the other server admins think, should we give him a second chance?

My idea is, we could maybe unban him if he promises to follow our rules in the future.
Slayer has allready unbanned him by mistake(atleast that's what he said)
2006-12-20 08:41:51
Echo
WOoKie
+383|6965|The Netherlands
Okay case closed then.
2006-12-20 08:45:45
Bernadictus
Moderator
+1,055|6982

The ban for base raping is excessive. A kick is fine, but banning is too much.

And grasping back to base raping, that needs to be redefined as:

Being in the enemy uncap with:

* no intent of either stealing vehicles
* no intent of blowing up commander assets
* no intent of using ground & air defense in your self protection in the case of 'active' threats, which not allow you to safely leave the enemy uncap.
2006-12-20 08:51:43
Negerkungen
I could not care less
+541|6988|Topside

The rule is fine as it is,it doesn't have to be redefined.
2006-12-20 08:56:15
Jenspm
penis
+1,716|6978|St. Andrews / Oslo

If I can pitch in here - it should be:

Warning => Kick => 3-day Ban => Perm Ban

Does not aply for Hacks (auto perm ban) or glitches/exploits (3-day/perm)

I know I'm not an admin, but that's just my thoughts
https://static.bf2s.com/files/user/26774/flickricon.png https://twitter.com/phoenix/favicon.ico
2006-12-20 12:25:04
l41e
Member
+677|6894

Bernadictus wrote:

The ban for base raping is excessive. A kick is fine, but banning is too much.

And grasping back to base raping, that needs to be redefined as:

Being in the enemy uncap with:

* no intent of either stealing vehicles
* no intent of blowing up commander assets
* no intent of using ground & air defense in your self protection in the case of 'active' threats, which not allow you to safely leave the enemy uncap.
Unless there's a "telepathy" option in BF2142CC that I'm not aware of, these will be impossible to enforce. Anyone can say "but i didnt meen 2!!1!one" after the fact.
2006-12-20 12:32:35
theDude5B
Cool member
+804|6996

Negerkungen wrote:

The rule is fine as it is,it doesn't have to be redefined.
@Jenspm, yeah we generally follow that path. We all have enough experience now to use our judgement on different cases. We are all in safe hands.
2006-12-22 06:39:42
Echo
WOoKie
+383|6965|The Netherlands

Bernadictus wrote:

The ban for base raping is excessive. A kick is fine, but banning is too much.

And grasping back to base raping, that needs to be redefined as:

Being in the enemy uncap with:

* no intent of either stealing vehicles
* no intent of blowing up commander assets
* no intent of using ground & air defense in your self protection in the case of 'active' threats, which not allow you to safely leave the enemy uncap.
We ll decide ourselves what excessive or not, also this is not the topic to talk about rules, as a mod you should know better.

 

Pages: 1

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2024 Jeff Minard