E6400 or E6600?

2006-12-29 17:10:19

#1

Daysniper: Member; +42|7092

Which has a better benefit per cost?

If I get the 6400 I can get a third GB of RAM plus a 600W PSU (preparing for an 8800GTS W00t!)

But If I get an e6600, will the performance be noticably different than a 6400?

Thanks in advance.... I hope.

2006-12-29 17:12:11

#2

LockerFish: Member; +47|7163

6400. BUt then again, I don't personally have either. But I hear the only difference is the 4mb cache.

2006-12-29 17:12:34

#3

CommieChipmunk: Member; +488|7027|Portland, OR, USA

i just got an E6600 and I don't really see the difference between it and my old AMD 4600 + x2... but idk..

http://www23.tomshardware.com/cpu.html? … ;chart=166

this is what i used to justify getting an e6600...

2006-12-29 17:44:35

#4

Des.Kmal: Member; +917|7075|Atlanta, Georgia, USA

the 6400 and 6600, when clocked to the SAME SPEED, the 6600 ONLY has a 7% increase in performance...

Add me on Origin for Battlefield 4 fun: DesKmal

2006-12-29 17:46:37

#5

Yaocelotl: :D; +221|7107|Keyboard

OK, you'll never notice a difference when you simply do simple things as play games, use word or browse the net. The power shows when you do things like simulation, rendering, compression of images/video,

2006-12-29 18:12:51

#6

claor: Member; +39|6871|Australia

go with the E6400

2006-12-29 18:15:36

#7

']['error: Banned; +630|7101|The Netherlands

get the E6400

2006-12-29 21:54:24

#8

adv3rsary: Member; +28|7173

i got the 6300 extreme edition.. works perfect and runs between 30-40 degrees while in-game, you won't need anything more

2006-12-29 21:56:03

#9

some_random_panda: Flamesuit essential; +454|6847

Get 6400. I've got one, and I've got no complaints.

(and the 3GB)

Last edited by some_random_panda (2006-12-29 21:56:57)

2006-12-29 21:58:31

#10

CommieChipmunk: Member; +488|7027|Portland, OR, USA

oh but get the zalman 9500 http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.a … 6835118003

2006-12-29 22:00:25

#11

A-Unit64: King Medic......; +23|7298

6400 if you are on a really low budget and the 6600 if you have a larger budget. The 6400 is plenty good for a year or 2 and can bet overclocked pretty well like all core2 if you have proper cooling.

2006-12-29 22:01:00

#12

jsnipy: ...; +3,277|6979|...

Des.Kmal wrote:
the 6400 and 6600, when clocked to the SAME SPEED, the 6600 ONLY has a 7% increase in performance...

Would you like to have 7% less teeth or 7% less penis size?

2006-12-29 22:01:52

#13

A-Unit64: King Medic......; +23|7298

adv3rsary wrote:
i got the 6300 extreme edition.. works perfect and runs between 30-40 degrees while in-game, you won't need anything more

sdafasdf

Last edited by A-Unit64 (2006-12-29 22:09:49)

2006-12-29 22:04:23

#14

jsnipy: ...; +3,277|6979|...

A-Unit64 wrote:
adv3rsary wrote:
i got the 6300 extreme edition.. works perfect and runs between 30-40 degrees while in-game, you won't need anything more
there is a 6300??? I think you are high or drunk cause I never heard of one its the 6400 6600 the 6700 and the 6800 ee, and the qx6700

looks like it: http://indigo.intel.com/compare_cpu/def … ture=en-US

2006-12-29 22:06:46

#15

some_random_panda: Flamesuit essential; +454|6847

A-Unit64 wrote:
adv3rsary wrote:
i got the 6300 extreme edition.. works perfect and runs between 30-40 degrees while in-game, you won't need anything more
there is a 6300??? I think you are high or drunk cause I never heard of one its the 6400 6600 the 6700 and the 6800 ee, and the qx6700

I had the option of buying an 6300...I just didn't bother because it's speed was less than 2 GHz

2006-12-29 22:06:49

#16

A-Unit64: King Medic......; +23|7298

I must be on some sort of dope...where is my brain or something??

Last edited by A-Unit64 (2006-12-29 22:07:11)

2006-12-29 22:12:51

#17

jsnipy: ...; +3,277|6979|...

I just put another system together with a 6700 ... would not know how it runs since my wife insists we go out of town .\ /.

Last edited by jsnipy (2006-12-29 22:13:05)

2006-12-30 03:13:06

#18

Stormscythe: Aiming for the head; +88|7006|EUtopia | Austria

CommieChipmunk wrote:
oh but get the zalman 9500 http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.a … 6835118003

Why? Zalman isn't that sort of a big deal anymore. You're rather paying the brand than cooling efficiency (oh, quality may also be better than somewhere else, but really, it's not such a difference anymore...)

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.a … 6835106061 -> silent, tested to be better than a 9500

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.a … 6835186134 -> best value for money

http://www.noctua.at/main.php?show=prod … amp;lng=de -> simply sweet

And yeah, go with the E6400 - the third GB of RAM will most probably be very sweet
(Or go for 4GB, since 1GB extra costs more than one GB of the 2GB - and Vista will recon that 4th GB of RAM )

2006-12-30 08:29:23

#19

majorassult: I <3 ak101; +307|7120|under there hayousaidunderwear

E6400 but I would get 4 gb and run in dual channel

2006-12-30 09:17:48

#20

Cybargs: Moderated; +2,285|7173

E6400.

https://cache.www.gametracker.com/server_info/203.46.105.23:21300/b_350_20_692108_381007_FFFFFF_000000.png

2006-12-30 09:22:53

#21

jsnipy: ...; +3,277|6979|...

cyborg_ninja-117 wrote:
E6400.

wow im supprised to hear that from you. Is that fact the 4mb is shared cache rather 2 per core a liability?

2006-12-30 17:05:38

#22

unnamednewbie13: Moderator; +2,075|7229|PNW

Des.Kmal wrote:
the 6400 and 6600, when clocked to the SAME SPEED, the 6600 ONLY has a 7% increase in performance...

7% is a lot in Diablo II.

2007-01-01 17:49:13

#23

Des.Kmal: Member; +917|7075|Atlanta, Georgia, USA

jsnipy wrote:
Des.Kmal wrote:
the 6400 and 6600, when clocked to the SAME SPEED, the 6600 ONLY has a 7% increase in performance...
Would you like to have 7% less teeth or 7% less penis size?

i'd like 100$ more to pay for dental bills and hookers.

Add me on Origin for Battlefield 4 fun: DesKmal

2007-01-01 18:13:25

#24

Bertster7: Confused Pothead; +1,101|7038|SE London

Go for the 6400. Higher FSB tolerances.

I run my 6300 at 2.8GHz, I have run it at 3.2GHz, but it got a bit hot and timings got a bit loose (keeping it stable anyway).

It's all about getting a low end C2D and overclocking the hell out of it. You can squeeze almost 200% performance out of the lower end C2Ds (on air - get a nice fan).

You don't need a 600W PSU for an 8800GTS. You'd be ok with a 400W, 500W to be on the safe side. 600W is overkill. It's not enough to run 2 8800GTSs in SLI though, so why bother. Get a 500 or 550W PSU, few more dollars for hookers and dentists.

Last edited by Bertster7 (2007-01-01 18:14:11)

2007-01-01 18:26:36

#25

Des.Kmal: Member; +917|7075|Atlanta, Georgia, USA

Bertster7 wrote:
. Get a 500 or 550W PSU, few more dollars for hookers and dentists.

win.

my point.

Add me on Origin for Battlefield 4 fun: DesKmal

BF2S Forums E6400 or E6600?

Des.Kmal wrote:

adv3rsary wrote:

A-Unit64 wrote:

adv3rsary wrote:

A-Unit64 wrote:

adv3rsary wrote:

CommieChipmunk wrote:

cyborg_ninja-117 wrote:

Des.Kmal wrote:

jsnipy wrote:

Des.Kmal wrote:

Bertster7 wrote:

Board footer