http://republicans.oversight.house.gov/ … x?NewsID=4
http://republicans.oversight.house.gov/ … 010907.pdf
Interesting to say the least.
http://republicans.oversight.house.gov/ … 010907.pdf
Interesting to say the least.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
Pages: 1
Last edited by jonsimon (2007-01-09 19:05:03)
Tom Davis (R-VA) wrote:
“My staff’s investigation reveals that President Clinton’s former National Security Advisor Sandy Berger compromised national security much more than originally disclosed,” Davis said. “It is now also clear that Mr. Berger was willing to go to extraordinary lengths to compromise national security, apparently for his own convenience.
“The 9/11 Commission relied on incomplete and misleading information regarding its access to documents Mr. Berger reviewed. No one ever told the Commission that Mr. Berger had access to original documents that he could have taken without detection.
“We now know that Mr. Berger left stolen highly classified documents at a construction site to avoid detection. We know that Mr. Berger insisted on privacy at times to allow him to conceal documents that he stole. One witness with a very high security clearance believed he saw Berger concealing documents in his socks.
“Mr. Berger’s review of documents did not conform to the usual requirements for reviewing classified documents in a secure facility and under strict supervision. The Archives staff’s failure to contact law enforcement immediately and their contacts with Mr. Berger about the missing documents compromised the law enforcement effort.
“The compromised law enforcement effort contributes to reduced confidence that the 9/11 Commission received all the documents it requested. The execution of a search warrant before Mr. Berger knew there was an investigation would have either located additional documents or enhanced confidence that he stole no others than those he admitted to taking.
“The public statements of the former chief of the public integrity section, Noel Hillman, were incomplete and misleading. Because Mr. Berger had access to original documents that he could have taken without detection, we do not know if anything ‘was lost to the public or the process.’
“The Justice Department’s assertion that Mr. Berger’s statements are credible after being caught is misplaced. One wouldn’t rely on the fox to be truthful after being nabbed in the hen house. But the Justice Department apparently did.”
It's not about mudslinging, it's about holding people accountable.(So we don't repeat our mistakes)jonsimon wrote:
Right, and the commision's report would have changed to what? "It's the dem's faults!" C'mon, don't buy into this dumbass party mudslinging. Infighting makes America weaker and worse than it already is.
To add, anyone who says "its clintons fault" is an unpatriotic freedom-hater.
Last edited by Kmarion (2007-01-09 19:14:06)
Proof?BN wrote:
Condi was warned in advance by Tenet and Co.
She brushed him off.
Says volumes doesn't it.
George Tenet said it himself. Look it updeeznutz1245 wrote:
Proof?BN wrote:
Condi was warned in advance by Tenet and Co.
She brushed him off.
Says volumes doesn't it.
Look up the relationship between Tenet and Cheney also.BN wrote:
George Tenet said it himself. Look it updeeznutz1245 wrote:
Proof?BN wrote:
Condi was warned in advance by Tenet and Co.
She brushed him off.
Says volumes doesn't it.
they were dating?usmarine2007 wrote:
Look up the relationship between Tenet and Cheney also.BN wrote:
George Tenet said it himself. Look it updeeznutz1245 wrote:
Proof?
u jealous?BN wrote:
they were dating?usmarine2007 wrote:
Look up the relationship between Tenet and Cheney also.BN wrote:
George Tenet said it himself. Look it up
At the risk of sounding like a "mudslinger", why hasn't he? There is absolutely no doubt he compromised national security. I'm not one for conspiracy theories but there is something really funky going on there. I don't know if it's a loop whole or if someone is receiving special protection.Turquoise wrote:
Granted, this Sandy guy should be thrown in jail.
Pages: 1